A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 113-118

  Tyndall, Donald A ^a   Ludlow, John B ^a   Platin, Enrique ^a   Nair, Madhu ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROC CURVE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL CARIES; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0031613130     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90408-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Beideman RW, Johnson ON, Alcoy RW. A study to develop a rating system and evaluate dental radiography submitted to a third party carrier. J Am Dent Assoc 1976;93:1010-13.
2. Borg E, Grondahl HG. Dynamic range of film and digital systems for image acquisition in intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:104-5.
3. Matteson SR, Phillips C, Kantor ML, Leinedecker T. The effect of lesion size, restorative material, and film speed on the detection of recurrent caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;68:22-7.
4. Kantor ML, Zeichner SJ, Valachovic RW, Reiskin AB. Efficacy of dental radiographic practices: options for image receptors, examination selection, and patient selection. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;119:259-68.
5. Platin E. An investigation of selected factors associated with knowledge, adoption, and attitudes of North Carolina general dentists toward dental radiology quality assurance. (PhD thesis) Raleigh, North Carolina State University, 1992.
6. Nakfoor CA, Brooks SL. Compliance of Michigan dentists with radiographic safety recommendations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:510-3.
7. Lundeen RC, McDavid WD, Barnwell GM. Proximal surface caries detection with direct-exposure and rare earth screen/film imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;66:734-45.
8. White SC, Yoon DC. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:32-8.
9. Kang BC, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Goldsmith JL. Mechanical defects in enamel vs. natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Extaspeed Plus film. Caries Res 1996;30:156-62.
10. Grondahl H-G. Radiologic diagnosis in caries management. In: Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O, editors. Textbook of clinical cariology, 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgard; 1994. p. 367-82.
11. King NM, Shaw L. Value of bitewing radiographs in detection of occlusal caries. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1979;7:218-21
12. Wenzel A. Current trends in radiographic caries imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80:527-39.
13. Wenzel A, Fejerskov O. Validity of diagnosis of questionable carious lesions in occlusal surfaces of extracted third molars. Caries Res 1992;26:188-94.
14. Wenzel A, Fejerskov O, Kidd E, Joyston-Bechal S, Geroneveld A. Depth of occlusal caries assessed clinically by conventional film radiographs and by digitized, processed radiographs. Caries Res 1990:24:327-33.
15. Wenzel A, Larsen MJ, Fejerskov O. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs. Caries Res 1991;25: 365-71.
16. Wenzel A. Computer-aided image manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance diagnosis in dental practice: a review. Int Dent J 1993;43:99-108.
17. Moystad A, Svanaes S, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Grondahl H-G. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental x-ray film. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996;25:202-6.
18. Wenzel A, Hintze H, Mikkelsen L, Mouyen F. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries in noncavitated teeth: a comparison of conventional film radiographs, digitized film radiographs, and Radio VisioGraphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72: 621-6.
19. Russell M, Pitts NB. Occlusal caries diagnosis: radiovisiography vs bitewing radiography. Caries Res 1991;25:217.
20. Wenzel A, Borg E, Hintze H, Grondahl H-G. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in-vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:250-4.
21. Ludlow JB, Platin E. Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:105-13.
22. Thunthy KH, Weinberg R. Sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus, Ektaspeed and Ultra-speed dental films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:114-6.
23. White SC, Hollender L, Gratt BM. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of proximal surface caries. J Am Dent Assoc 1984;108:755-9.
24. Dove SB, McDavid WD. A comparison of conventional intraoral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992;21:127-34.
25. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Jones C. In vitro comparison of D and E speed film radiography, RVG, and Visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occulsal caries lesions. Caries Res 1994;28:363-7.
26. Sivasriyanond C, Manson-Hing LR. Microdensitometric and visual evaluation of the resolution of dental films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978;45:811-22.
27. Benn DK. Radiographic caries diagnosis and monitoring. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23:69-72.