Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 6-12

  Janhom, A ^a,b   Van der Stelt, P F ^a   Van Ginkel, F C ^a   Geraets, W G M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Department of Oral Radiology ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Diagnostic imaging; Digital radiography, dental; Imaging processing, computer assisted; ROC curve

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DENTAL CARIES; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTIFACTS; DENTAL CARIES; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0032612940     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600397     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Moyen F, Benz C, Sonnabend E, Lodter JP. Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 68: 238-242.
2. Wenzel A, Borg E, Hintz H, Grondahl H-G. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor system: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 250-254.
3. Araki K, Seki K, Kimura Y, Okano T. Diagnostic ability of the film-based digitized and compressed images in diagnosing the mandibular bone destruction by the malignancy. In: Farman AG, Ruprecht A, Gibbs SJ, Scarfe WC, (eds). Advances in Maxillofacial Imaging. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997; pp 349-356.
4. Nelson M, Gailly J-L. The data compression Book. 2nd Edition. New York: M&T Books, 1996.
5. Lo S-C, Huang HK. Compression of radiological images with 512, 1024 and 2048 matrices. Radiology 1986; 161: 519-525.
6. MacMahon H, Doi K, Sanada S, et al. Data compression: Effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. Radiology 1991; 178: 175-179.
7. Good WF, Maitz GS, Gur D. JPEG Compatible data compression of mammograms. J Digit Imaging 1994; 7: 123-132.
8. Sneiderman C, Schosser R, Pearson T. A comparison of JPEG and FIF compression of color medical images for dermatology. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1994; 18: 339-342.
9. Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG): JPEG technical specification, Revision 5 (Document No JPEG-8-R5 or JTC 1/ SC2/WG8 N 933) ISO Central secretariat, 1990.
10. Pennebaker W. JPEG technical specification, Revision 8 Working document No JTC1/SC2/WG10/JPEG-8-R8 , 1990.
11. van der Stelt PF, Oosterbaan J-J, Sanderink GCH, Huiskens R, Van Papenrecht F. Diagnostically acceptable compression rate of digital image files. In: You DS, Park TW, Lee SR, (eds). Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiology. Seoul: Korea, 1994; pp 387-389.
12. van der Stelt PF, Sanderink GCH, Dula K, Huiskens R. Lossy file compression and diagnostic image quality of digital intra oral radiographic images. J Dent Res 1997; 76(special issue): 140 (Abstract 1010).
13. Sanderink GCH, Dula K, Huiskens R, van der Stelt PF. The loss of image quality in digital panoramic radiography using image compression. In: Farman AG, Ruprecht A, Gibbs SJ, Scarfe WC, (eds). Advances in Maxillofacial Imaging. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997; pp 299-305.
14. Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Borg E, Grondahl H-G. Impact of lossy image compression on accuracy of caries detection in digital images taken with a storage phosphor system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radial Endo 1996; 81: 351-355.
15. Rabbani M, Jones PW. Digital image compression techniques. SPIE Tutorial texts series. Vol TT7. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Optical Engineering Press. 1991.
16. Matsuda Y, Okano T, Igeta A, Seki K. Effects of exposure reduction on the accuracy of an intraoral photostimulable phosphor imaging system in detecting incipient proximal caries. Oral Radiol 1995; 11: 11-16.
17. Wenzel A. Sensor noise in direct digital imaging (the RadioVisioGraphy, Sens-A-Ray, and Visualix/Vixa systems) evaluated by subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77: 70-74.
18. Stheeman SE, Van't Hof MA, Mileman PA, van der Stelt PF. Use of the Delphi technique to develop standards for quality assessment in diagnostic radiology. Community Dent Health 1995; 12: 194-199.
19. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research(review). Br Med J 1995; 311: 376-380.
20. Persons K, Palisson P, Manduca A, Erickson BJ, Savcenko V. An analytical look at the effects of compression on medical images. J Digit Imaging 1997; 10: 60-66.
21. Erickson BJ, Manduca A, Persons K, et al. Evaluation of irreversible compression of digitized posterior-anterior chest radiographs. J Digit Imaging 1997; 10: 97-102.