Effect of exposure time on in vitro caries diagnosis using the Digora® system

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 15-20

  Huysmans, Marie Charlotte D N J M ^a   Hintze, Hanne ^b   Wenzel, Ann ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Dental caries; Diagnosis; Digital radiography; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

BICUSPID; CUSPID; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; HUMANS; MOLAR; MOLAR, THIRD; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0031063217     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: 16000722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00175.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. SANDERINK GCH. New versus traditional technological aids. Int Dent J 1993; 43: 335-342.
2. WENZEL A, GRÖNDAHL H-G. Direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int Dent J 1995; 45: 27-34.
3. GRÖNDAHL H-G, WENZEL A, BORG E, TAMMISALO E. An image plate system for digital intra-oral radiography: The Digora®. Dental Update 1996: in press.
4. WELANDER U, SANDERINK GCH, MCDAVID WD, TRONJE G, MÖRNER A-C. Some essential characteristics of new systems for direct intra-oral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 89.
5. BORG E, GRÖNDAHL H-G. On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25: 82-88.
6. LUOSTARINEN T, TAMMISALO T, VÄHÄTALO K, TAMMISALO E. Comparison of intra-oral digital and film radiography for diagnosis of periapical bone lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 92-93.
7. WENZEL A, BORG E, HINTZE H, GRÖNDAHL H-G. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 250-254.
8. VELDERS XL, SANDERINK GCH, VAN DER STELT PF. The effect of different exposure times on the detectability of endodontic files in the new Digora indirect digital oral X-ray system. In: Abstracts of the 10th Congress of the International Association of Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiology, 25 June-July 1 1994, Seoul, p. 73.
9. BORG E, GRÖNDAHL H-G. Endodontic measurements in digital radiographs acquired by a photostimulable, storage phosphor system. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996; 12: 20-24.
10. METZ CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978; 8: 283-295.
11. CHANVANCE M. Le canif et les bretelles. Rev-Epidemiol-Santé-Publique 1992; 40: 209-18.
12. HANLEY JA, MCNEIL BJ. A method of comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839-843.
13. SVENSON B, WELANDER U, ANNEROTH G, SODERFELDT B. Exposure parameters and their effect on diagnostic accuracy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 78: 544-550.
14. IE YL, VERDONSCHOT EH. Performance of diagnostic systems in occlusal caries detection compared. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994; 22: 187-191.
15. RIJKOM HM VAN, VERDONSCHOT EH. Factors involved in validity measurements of diagnostic tests for approximal caries: a meta-analysis. Caries Res 1995; 29: 364-370.