Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 293-297

  Cederberg, R A ^a   Frederiksen, N L ^a   Benson, B W ^a   Shulman, J D ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental; Dental caries; Digital imaging, dental; Perception; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; ROC CURVE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL CARIES; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; LIGHTING; LOGISTIC MODELS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROC CURVE; X-RAY FILM; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 0032150493     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600377     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barr J, Stephens R. Dental Radiology WB Saunders: Philadelphia, 1980, p 109.
2. Goaz PW, White SC. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation 3rd ed. Mosby-Year Book: St. Louis, 1994, p 293.
3. Wenzel A, Grondahl HG. Direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int Dent J 1993; 43: 335-342.
4. Vandre RH, Webber RL. Future trends in dental radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80: 471-478.
5. Welander U, Nelvig P, Tronje G, et al. Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intra-oral radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 75: 506-516.
6. Sanderink GCH. Imaging: New versus traditional technological aids. Int Dent J 1993; 43: 335-342.
7. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Jones C. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and Visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Caries Res 1994; 28: 363-367.
8. Moystad A, Svanes DB, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Grondahl H-G. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25: 202-206.
9. Svanaes DB, Moystad A, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Grondahl H-G. Intra-oral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82: 94-100.
10. Versteeg KH, Sanderink GCH, Velders XL, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental X-ray film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 8-1: 210-213.
11. Cederberg RA. Temporomandibular joint space analysis. J Crainomandib Pract 1994; 12: 172-177.
12. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1989.
13. Wenzel A, Pitts W, Verdonschot EH, Kalsbeek H. Developments in radiographic caries diagnosis. J Dent 1993; 21: 131-140.
14. White SC, Yoon DC. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997; 26: 32-38.
15. Sanderink GCH, Sholte CM. A comparison between two dental films and two film-screen combinations in detecting low contrast defects and initial caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1985; 14: 113-122.
16. Arnold LV. The radiographic detection of initial carious lesions on the proximal surfaces of teeth: Part I. the influence of exposure conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 64: 221-231.
17. Arnold LV. The radiographic detection of initial carious lesions on the proximal surfaces of teeth: Part II. the influence of viewing conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 64: 232-240.
18. Dagenais ME, Clark BG. Receiver operating characteristics of RadioVisioGraphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 79: 238-245.
19. Kang B-C, Farman AG, Scarfe WL, Goldsmith LJ. Observed differentiation of proximal enamel mechanical defects versus natural proximal dental caries with Computed Dental Radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82: 459-465.
20. Worth HM. Principles and Practice of Oral Radiologic Interpretation. Year Book Medical Publishers Inc.: Chicago 1963, p 213.
21. Wenzel A, Fejerskov O. Validity of diagnosis of questionable caries lesions in occlusal surfaces of extracted third molars. Caries Res 1992; 26: 188-194.
22. Wenzel A, Hintze H. Perception of image quality in direct digital radiography after application of various image treatment filters for detectability of dental disease. Dentamaxillofac Radiol 1993; 22: 131-134.
23. Wenzel A. Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27: 3-11.
24. Espelid I. The influence of viewing conditions on observer performance in dental radiology. ACTA Odontol Scand 1987; 45: 153-161.