Can dentists recognize manipulated digital radiographs?

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 67-69

  Visser, Heiko ^a,b   Kruger W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b Mund Kieferheilkunde   (Germany)

Author keywords

Image enhancement; Image processing, computer assisted; Radiography, dental

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DENTIST; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROBABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DENTISTS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROBABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0012884522     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600204     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Anderson C. Easy-to-alter digital images raise fears of tampering. Science 1994; 263: 317-318.
2. Visser H. Ein einfaches Verfahren zur Digitalisierung von Zahnfilmen. Zahnärztl Welt 1994; 103: 282-287.
3. Richardson ML, Frank MS, Stern EJ. Digital image manipulation: what constitutes acceptable alteration of a radiologic image? AJR 1995; 164: 228-229.
4. Horner K, Brettle DS, Rushton VE. The potential medico-legal implications of computed radiography. Br Dent J 1996; 180: 271-273.
5. Berk RN. Policy regarding electronic manipulation of radiologic images. AJR 1995; 164: 230.
6. Jung T, Figgener L, Visser H. Digitale Röntgenaufnahme und Dokumentationspflicht. Zahnärztl Mitt 1996; 86: 760-763.
7. Taubes G. Technology for turning seeing into believing. Science 1994; 263 (5145): 318.