Simulation of conservative congruence transformation: conservative properties in the joint and Cartesian spaces

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Volumn 2, Issue , 2000, Pages 1283-1288

  Chen, Shih Feng ^a   Kao, Imin ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARTESIAN SPACE; CONSERVATIVE CONGRUENCE TRANSFORMATION; JOINT SPACE; TWO LINK PLANAR MANIPULATOR;

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; END EFFECTORS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MOTION PLANNING; STIFFNESS MATRIX; TORQUE;

MANIPULATORS;

EID: 0033706361     PISSN: 10504729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. S.-F. Chen and I. Kao. Simulation of conservative properties of stiffness matrices in congruence transformation. In Proc. of IEEE/RSJ IROS'98, pages 311-316, Canada, Oct. 1998.
2. S.-F. Chen and I. Kao. The conservative congruence transformation of stiffness control in robotic grasping and manipulation. In the 9th Int. Symp. on Robotics Res., pages 7-14, Utah, USA, Oct. 9-12 1999.
3. S.-F. Chen and I. Kao. Conservative congruence transformation for joint and Cartesian stiffness matrices of robotic hands and fingers. to appear in the Int. J of Robotics Res., 2000.
4. N. Ciblak and H. Lipkin. Asymmetric Cartesian stiffness for the modeling of compliant robotic systems. In.DE Vol. 72: Robotics: Kinematics, Dynamics and Control, pages 197-204. ASME, 1994.
5. M. R. Cutkosky and I. Kao. Computing and controlling the compliance of a robotic hand. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 5(2):151-165, April 1989.
6. M Griffis and J. Duffy. Global stiffness modeling of a class of simple compliant couplings. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 28(2):207-224, 1993.
7. N. Hogan. Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part i, ii, and iii. J of Dyn Sys, Measurement, and Control, 107:l-24, March 1985.
8. N. Hogan. Mechanical impedance of single- and multi-articular systems. In J. M. Winters and S. L.-Y. Woo, editors, Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement Organization, pages 149-164, New, York, 1990. Springer-Verlag.
9. S. Howard, M. Zefran, and V. Kumar. On the 6x6 stiffness matrix for three dimensional motions. J. of Mech. & Machine Theory, 33(4):389-408, May 1998.
10. I. Kao. Stiffness control and calibration of robotic and human hands and fingers. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, May 1994.
11. I. Kao, M. R. Cutkosky, and R. S. Johansson. Robotic stiffness control and calibration as applied to human grasping tasks. IEEE Trans. on Robotics 'and Automation, 13(4):557-566, August 1997.
12. I. Kao and C. Ngo. Properties of grasp stiffness matrix and conservative control strategy. Int. J of Robotics Res., 18(2):159-167, Febrary 1999.
13. F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi, N. Hogan, and E. Bizzi. Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans. J of Neuroscience, 5(10):2732-2743, October 1985.
14. V. Nguyen. Constructing stable grasps. Int. J of Robotics Res., 8(1):26-37, Feburary 1989.
15. J. K. Salisbury. Active stiffness control of a manipulator in Cartesian coordinates. In Proc. 19th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, pages 87-97, Albuquerque, NM, December 1980.
16. M. Zefran and V. Kumar. Affine connections for the Cartesian stiffness matrix. In PTOC of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 1376-1381, 1997.