Conservative congruence transformation for joint and Cartesian stiffness matrices of robotic hands and fingers

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 835-847

  Chen, Shih Feng ^a   Kao, Imin ^a  

^a Stony Brook University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; MANIPULATORS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; STIFFNESS MATRIX;

CONSERVATIVE CONGRUENCE TRANSFORMATION;

END EFFECTORS;

EID: 0034263038     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/02783640022067201     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ball, R. S. 1900. A Treaties on the Theory of Screws. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Chen, S.-F., and Kao, I. 1998. Simulation of conservative properties of stiffness matrices in congruence transformation. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Victoria, BC, Canada, pp. 311-316.
3. Chen, S.-F., and Kao, I. 1999. The conservative congruence transformation of stiffness control in robotic grasping and manipulation. The 9th International Symposium on Robotics Research, Snowbird, UT, pp. 7-14.
4. Ciblak, N., and Lipkin, H. 1994. Asymmetric Cartesian stiffness for the modeling of compliant robotic systems. Robotics: Kinematics, Dynamics and Control, ASME DE Vol. 72, pp. 197-204.
5. Cutkosky, M. R., and Kao, I. 1989. Computing and controlling the compliance of a robotic hand. IEEE Transaction of Robotics and Automation 5(2):151-165.
6. Dimentberg, F. M. 1965. The screw calculus and its applications in mechanics. Technical Report FTD-HT-23-1632-67, U.S. Department of Commerce Translation.
7. Griffis, M., and Duffy, J. 1993. Global stiffness modeling of a class of simple compliant couplings. Mechanism and Machine Theory 28(2):207-224.
8. Hogan, N. 1990. Mechanical impedance of single-and multi-articular systems. In Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement Organization, ed. J. M. Winters and S. L.-Y. Woo, 149-164. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. Howard, S., Žefran, M., and Kumar, V. 1998. On the 6 × 6 stiffness matrix for three dimensional motions. J. of Mechanism and Machine Theory 33(4):389-408.
10. Huang, S., and Schimmels, J. M. 1998. The bounds and realization of spatial stiffnesses achieved with simple springs connected in parallel. IEEE Transaction on Robotics and Automation 14(3):466-475.
11. Kao, I., Cutkosky, M. R., and Johansson, R. S. 1997. Robotic stiffness control and calibration as applied to human grasping tasks. IEEE Transaction on Robotics and Automation 13(4):557-566.
12. Kao, I., and Ngo, C. 1999. Properties of grasp stiffness matrix and conservative control strategy. The International Journal of Robotics Research 18(2):159-167.
13. Lončarić, J. 1985. Geometrical Analysis of Compliant Mechanisms in Robotics. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
14. Malvern, L. E. 1969. Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Mason, M. T., and Salisbury, J. K. 1985. Robot Hands and the Mechanics of Manipulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., Hogan, N., and Bizzi, E. 1985. Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 5(10):2732-2743.
17. Ngo, C. 1998. Conservative Properties of Grasp Stiffness Matrix. Master's thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
18. Pigoski, T., Griffis, M., and Duffy, J. 1992. Stiffness mapping employing different frames of reference. Proceedings of the 22nd Biennial ASME Mechanisms Conference, ASME, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 445-452.
19. Salisbury, J. K. 1980. Active stiffness control of a manipulator in Cartesian coordinates. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 87-97.
20. Žefran, M., and Kumar, V. 1997. Affine connections for the Cartesian stiffness matrix. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 1376-1381.