Reflections, perceptions, and future directions

Journal for the Education of the Gifted

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 125-146

  Renzulli, Joseph S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033236348     PISSN: 01623532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016235329902300109     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baldwin, A. Y. (1978) The Baldwin identification matrix. In A. Y. Baldwin, G. H. Gear, & L. J. Lucito (Eds.), Educational planning for the gifted: Overcoming cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
2. Baldwin, A. Y. (1999). The Baldwin identification matrix. In A. Y. Baldwin & W. Vialle (Eds.), The many faces of giftedness: Lifting the masks (pp. 8-13). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3. Chall, J. S., & Conrad, S. C. (1991). Should textbooks challenge students? The case for easier or harder textbooks. New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Delcourt, M. (1994). Characteristics of high-level creative productivity: A longitudinal study of students identified by Renzulli's three-ring conception of giftedness. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 401-426). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
5. Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Ford, D. Y. (1999). Renzulli's philosophy and program: Opening doors and nurturing potential. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 117-124.
7. Ford, D. Y. & Harris, Y. Y. (1999). Multicultural gifted education. New York: Teacher's College Press.
8. Frasier, M. M., & Passow, A. H. (1994). Toward a new paradigm for identifying talent potential [Research Monograph 94112]. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
9. George, P. (1997). Middle schools, ability grouping, and gifted students: The continuum. In T. O. Erb (Ed.), Dilemmas in talent development in the middle grades: Two views (pp. 9-43). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
10. Giuffrida, T. (1998, May 11). End parade to Dr. 130. The Palm Beach Post, p. 16A.
11. Hébert, T. (1993) Reflections at graduation: The long-term impact of elementary school experiences in creative productivity. Roeper Review 16, 22-28.
12. Johnsen, S. K. (1999). Renzulli's model: Needed research. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 102-116.
13. Kaplan, S. (1986). The Grid: A model to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted. In J. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 180-193). Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
14. Kaufmann, F. A. (1995). On gifted education: What do we really know? Roeper Review, 18, 134-135.
15. Kitano, M. K. (1999). Bringing clarity to "this thing called giftedness": A response to Dr. Renzulli. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 87-101.
16. Kozol, J. (1992). Savage inequalities: Children in American schools. New York: HarperPerennial.
17. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1999). A critique of Renzulli's theory into practice models for gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 55-66.
19. Pendarvis, E., Howley, C., & Howley, A. (1999). Renzulli's triad: School to work for gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 75-86.
20. Purcell, J. H., & Renzulli, J. S. (1998). The total talent portfolio: A systematic plan to identify and nurture gifts and talents. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
21. Reis, S. M. (1996). Older women's reflections on eminence: Obstacles and oppurtunities. In K. D. Arnold, K. D. Nobel, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development. (pp. 146-168) Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
22. Reis, S. M., et al. (1993). Why not let high ability students start school in January? The curriculum compacting study (Research Monograph No. 93106). Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
23. Reis, S. M., & Purcell, J. H. (1993). An analysis of content elimination and strategies used by elementary classroom teachers in the curriculum compacting process. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 147-171.
24. Reis, S. M., Gentry, M., & Maxfield, L. R. (1998). The application of enrichment clusters to teachers' classroom practices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 310-334.
25. Renzulli, J. S. (1990). A practical system for identifying gifted and talented students. Early Child Development and Care, 63, 9-18.
26. Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical for total school development. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
27. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In J. Davidson & S. Sternberg (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-93). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Renzulli, J. S. (1999). What is this thing called giftedness, and how do we develop it? A twenty-five year perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 3-54.
29. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1991). The reform movement and the quiet crisis in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 26-35.
30. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
31. Renzulli, J. S. (1999). What is this thing called giftedness, and how do we develop it? A twenty-five year perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 3-54.
32. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Rising tides and racing torpedoes: Triumphs and tribulations of the adult gifted as illustrated by the career of Joseph Renzulli. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 67-74.
33. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
34. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.
35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1924)