Structure of the integral membrane domain of the GLP1 receptor

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 375-386

  Frimurer, Thomas M ^a   Bywater, Robert P ^a  

^a NOVO NORDISK A S   (Denmark)

Author keywords

G protein coupled receptor; GLP1 receptor model; Secretin family; Structure prediction; Transmembrane helices

Indexed keywords

GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; RHODOPSIN; SECRETIN;

ARTICLE; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; FOURIER ANALYSIS; FROG; GLYCOSYLATION; LIGAND BINDING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

EID: 0033152909     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990601)35:4<375::AID-PROT1>3.0.CO;2-2     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ballesteros J, Weinstein H. Integrated methods for modeling G-protein coupled receptors. Meth Neurosci 1995;25:366-428.
2. Sander C, Schneider R. Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 1991;9:56-68.
3. Vriend G. WHAT IF: a molecular modelling and drug design program. J Mol Graph 1990;8:52-56.
4. Horn F, Weare J, Beukers MW et al. GPCRDB: an information system for G protein-coupled receptors. Nucleic Acid. Res 1998;26: 275-279.
5. Donnelly D. The arrangement of the transmembrane helices in the secretin receptor family of G protein-coupled receptors. FEBS Lett 1997;409:431-436.
6. Henderson R, Baldwin JM, Ceska TA, Zemlin F, Beckman E, Downing KH. Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy. J Mol Biol 1990;213: 899-929.
7. Unger MV, Hargrave AP, Baldwin MJ, Schertler GFX. Arrangement of the rhodopsin transmembrane α-helices. Nature 1997;389: 203-206.
8. Tams JW, Knudsen SM, Fahrenkrug J. Proposed arrangement of the seven transmembrane helices in the secretin receptor family. Receptors and Channels 1997;5:79-90.
9. Baldwin JM, Schertler GFX, Unger VZ. An alpha-carbon template for the transmembrane helices in the rhodopsin family of G-protein coupled receptors. J Mol Biol 1997;272:144-164.
10. Jones TA, Thirup S. Using known structures in protein model building and crystallography. EMBO J 1986;5:819-822.
11. Baldwin JM. The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein-coupled receptors. EMBO J 1993;12:1693-1703.
12. Li SC, Deber CM. A measure of helical propensity for amino acids in membrane environments Nat Struct Biol 1994;1:368-558.
13. Deber CM, Li SC. Peptides in membranes: helicity and hydrophobicity. Bioploymers 1995;37:295-318.
14. Donnelly D, Overington JP, Stuart VR, Nugent HAJ, Blundell LT. Modeling α-helix transmembrane domains: the calculation and use of substitution tables for lipid-facing residues. Protein Sci 1993;2:55-70.
15. Bowie UJ. Helix packing in membrane proteins. J Mol Biol 1997;272:780-789.
16. Bywater RP, Thomas D, Vriend G. Residue preferences, side chain rotamer angles and helix-helix packing in membrane proteins. 1999. In press.
17. Weiss MS, Abele U, Weckesser J, Welte W, Schiltz E, Schulz GE. Molecular architecture and electrostatic properties of a bacterial porin. Science 1991;254:1626-1630.
18. Cowan SW, Schirmer T, Rummel G, et al. Crystal structures explain functional properties of two E. coli porins. Nature 1992;358: 727-733.
19. Rippmann F. Molecular modelling of G protein-coupled receptors: the ligand gives the clue. 7TM 1994;4:1-17.
20. Overington JP, Johnson MS, Sali A, Blundell TL. Tertiary structural constraints on protein evolutionary diversity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1990;241:132-145.
21. Overington JP, Donnelly D, Johnson MS, Sali A, Blundell TL. Environment-specific amino acid substitution tables: tertiary templates and prediction of protein folds. Protein Sci 1992;1:216-226.
22. Dayhoff MO, editor. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure Vol. 5 Suppl. 3. Washington DC: National Biomedical Research Foundation; 1978.
23. Scharf M, PhD Thesis, Heidelberg: University of Heidelberg; 1989.
24. Bowie JB, Lüthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991;253:164-170.
25. Donnelly D, Cogdell JR. Predicting the point at which transmembrane helices protrude from the bilayer: a model of the antenna complexes from photosynthetic bacteria. Protein Eng 1993;6:629-635.
26. Rost B, Sander C. Transmembrane helices predicted at 95% accuracy. Protein Sci 1995;4:521-533.
27. Shiffer M, Edmundson AB. Use of a helical wheel to represent the structures of protein and to identify segments with helical potential. Biophys J 1967;7:121-135.
28. Eisenberg D, Weiss RM, Terwilliger TC. The hydrophobic moment: a measure of the amphiphilicity of a helix. Nature 1982;299: 371-374.
29. Finer-Moore J, Stroud RM. Amphipathic analysis and possible formation of the ion channel in an acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984;81:155-159.
30. Eisenberg D, Weiss RM, Terwilliger TC. The hydrophobic moment detects periodicity in protein hydrophobicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984;81:140-144.
31. Donnelly D, Overington JP, Blundell TL. The prediction and orientation of α-helices from the sequence alignments: the combined use of environment-dependent substitution tables, Fourier transform methods and helix capping rules. Protein Eng 1994;7: 645-653.
32. Donnelly D, Findlay JBC, Blundell TL. The evolution and structure of Aminergic G protein-coupled receptor. Receptors Channels 1994;2:61-78.
33. Komiya H, Yeates TO, Rees DC, Allen JP, Feher G. Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: symmetry relations and sequence comparison between different species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988;85:9012-9016.
34. Cornette JL, Cease KB, Margalit H, Spouge JL, Berzofsky JA, DeLisi C. Hydrophobicity scales and computational techniques for detecting amphipathic structures in proteins. J Mol Biol 1987;195: 659-685.
35. Andersson H, Von Heijne G. Membrane protein topology: effects of delta mu H+ on the translocation of charged residues explain the "positive inside" rule. EMBO J 1994;13:2267-2272.
36. Karnik S, Khorana HG. Assembly of functional rhodopsin requires a disulfide bond between cysteine residues 110 and 187. J Biol Chem 1990;265:17520-17524.
37. Kurtenbach E, Curtis CAM, Pedder EK, Aitken A, Harris ACM, Hulme EC. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Peptide sequencing identifies residues involved in antagonist binding and disulfide bond formation. J Biol Chem 1990;265:13702-13708.
38. Dohlman HG, Caron MG, DeBlasi A, Frielle T, Lefkowitz RJ. Role of extracellular disulfide-bonded cysteines in the ligand binding function of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor. Biochemistry 1990;29: 2335-2342.
39. Gardella TJ, Juppner H, Wilson AK et al. Determinants of [Arg2]PTH-(1-34) binding and signaling in the transmembrane region of the parathyroid hormone receptor. Endocrinology 1994; 135:1186-1194.
40. Schipani E, Kruse K, Juppner H. A constitutively active mutant PTH/PTHrP receptor in Jansen-type metphyseal chondrodysplasia. Science 1995;268:98-100.
41. Vilardaga JP, di Paolo E, de Neef P, Waelbroeck M, Bollen A, Robberecht P. Lysine 173 residue within the first exoloop of rat secretin receptor is involved in carboxylate moiety recognition of Asp 3 in secretin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996;218:842-846.
42. Turner PR, Bambino T, Nissenson RA. Mutations of neighboring polar residues on the second transmembrane helix disrupt signaling by the parathyroid hormone receptor. Mol Endocrinol 1996;10: 132-139.
43. Hjorth SA, Ørskov C, Schwartz TW. Constitutive activity of glucagon receptor mutants. Mol Endocrinol 1998;12:78-86.
44. Horn F, Bywater RP, Krause G et al. The interaction of class B G-protein-coupled receptors with their hormones. Receptors Channels 1998;5:305-314.
45. Herberg JT, Codina J, Rich KA, Rojas FJ, Iyengar R. The hepatic glucagon receptor. Solubilization, characterization, and development of an affinity adsorption assay for the soluble receptor. J Biol Chem 1984;259:9285-9294.
46. 2-adrenergic receptor transmembrane domain inhibits both receptor dimerization and activation. J Biol Chem 1996;271:16384-16392.
47. Gouldson PR, Snell CR, Bywater RP, Higgs C, Reynolds CA. Domain swapping: a mechanism for functional rescue in G-protein coupled receptors. Protein Eng 1998;11:1181-1193.
48. Scheer A, Fanelli F, Costa T, De Benedetti PG, Cotecchia S. Constitutively active mutants of the alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor: role of highly conserved polar amino acids in receptor activation. EMBO J 1996;15:3566-3578.
49. Oliveira L, Paiva AC, Sander C, Vriend G. A common step for signal transduction in G protein-coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1994;15:170-172.
50. Taylor WR, Jones DT. Deriving an amino acid distance matrix. J Theor Biol 1993;164:65-83.
51. Taylor WR. Motif based protein sequence alignment. J Comp Biol 1994;1:297-311.
52. Pazos F, Helmer-Citterich M, Ausiello G, Valencia A. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 1997;271:511-523.
53. Lichtarge O, Bourne HR, Cohen FE. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 1996;257:342-358.
54. Ison JC, Parish JH, Daniel SC, Blades MJ, Findlay JBC. A key residues approach to protein fold detection. 1999. In press.
55. Cardle L, Dufton MJ. Identification of important functional environs in protein tertiary structures from the analysis of residue variation in 3D: application to cytochromes c and carboxypeptidases A and B. Protein Eng 1994;7:1423-1431.
56. Elling CE, Møller-Nielsen S, Schwartz TW. Conversion of antagonist-binding site to metal-ion site in a tachykinin NK-1 receptor. Nature 1995;374:74-77.
57. Farrens DL, Altenbach CA, Yang K, Hubbell WL, Khorana HG. Requirement of rigid-body motions of transmembrane helices for light activation of rhodopsin. Science 1996;274:768-770.
58. Munro REJ, Taylor WR, Bywater RP. Ab initio folding of the N-terminal domain of the secretin receptors. 1999. In press.