Response bias correction in the process dissociation procedure: Approaches, assumptions, and evaluation

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 5, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 232-254

  Wainwright, Martin J ^a   Reingold, Eyal M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATISM; AWARENESS; COGNITION; EGO DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; MENTAL FUNCTION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; AUTOMATISM; AWARENESS; COGNITION; HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; UNCONSCIOUS (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0030091561     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0015     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Banks, W. P., & Prull, M. (1994). Process dissociation and list discrimination. Paper presented at the 35th Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.
2. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Vaterrodt-Plunnecke, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
3. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford Psychology Series, No. 26. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
4. Cowan, N., & Stadler, M. A. (in press). Estimating unconscious processes: Implications of a general class of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
5. Curran, T., & Hintzman, D. L. (1995). Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 531-547.
6. Debner, J. A., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Unconscious perception: Attention, awareness, and control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 304-317.
7. Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1993). Recognizing and remembering. In A. Collins, M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole, & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Theories of mind (pp. 163-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Graf, P., & Komatsu, S. (1994). Process dissociation procedure: Handle with caution! European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 113-129.
9. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-48.
10. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
11. Jacoby, L. L., Begg, I. M., & Toth, J. P. In defense of functional independence: Violations of assumptions underlying the process-dissociation procedure? In press.
12. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
13. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., Yonelinas, A. P., & Debner, J. A. (1994). The relationship between conscious and unconscious influences: Independence or redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 216-219.
14. Jacoby, L. L., Yonelinas, A. P., & Jennings, J. (in press). The relation between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.) Scientific approaches to the question of consciousness. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
15. Jones, G. V. (1987). Independence and exclusivity among psychological processes: Implications for the structure of recall. Psychological Review, 94, 229-235.
16. Joordens, S., & Merikle, P. M. (1993). Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 462-467.
17. Komatsu, S., Graf, P., & Uttl, B. (1995). Process dissociation procedure: Core assumptions fail, sometimes. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 19-40.
18. Lindsay, D. S., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 219-234.
19. Merikle, P. M., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 224-233.
20. Reingold, E. M. (1995). Facilitation and interference in indirect/implicit memory tests and in the process dissociation paradigm: The letter insertion and the letter deletion tasks. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 459-482.
21. Reingold, E. M., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y (in press). Automatic retrieval of new associations under shallow encoding conditions. Consciousness and Cognition.
22. Reingold, E. M., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (1996). Separating consciously controlled and automatic influences in memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 397-406.
23. Reingold, E. M., & Merikle, P. M. (1988). Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 563-575.
24. Reingold, E. M., & Merikle, P. M. (1990). On the inter-relatedness of theory and measurement in the study of unconscious processes. Mind and Language, 5, 9-28.
25. Reingold, E. M., & Toth, J. P. (1996). Process dissociations versus task dissociations: A controversy in progress. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 159-202). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
26. Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1994). Involuntary conscious memory and the method of opposition. Memory, 2, 1-29.
27. Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1996). Memory: Task dissociations, process dissociations, and dissociations of consciousness. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 85-158). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
28. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
29. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1994). The problem of differing false-alarm rates for the process dissociation procedure: Comment on Verfaellie and Treadwell (1993). Neuropsychology, 8, 284-288.
30. Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Toward a redefinition of implicit memory: Process dissociations following elaborative processing and self-generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 290-303.
31. Verfaellie, M. (1994). A reexamination of recognition memory in amnesia: Reply to Roediger and McDermott. Neuropsychology, 8, 289-292.
32. Verfaellie, M., & Treadwell, J. R. (1993). Status of recognition memory in amnesia. Neuropsychology, 7, 5-13.
33. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (in press). Response bias and the process dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
34. Yonelinas, A. P., Regehr, G., & Jacoby, L. L. (in press). Correcting for differences in response bias in a dual-process theory of memory. Journal of Memory and Language.