Performance of threading scoring functions designed using new optimization method

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 3-4, 1999, Pages 299-311

  Bieńkowska, Jadwiga R ^a   Rogers Jr , Robert G ^a   Smith, Temple F ^a  

^a Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

Score optimization; Threading

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACIDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOLVENTS;

EID: 0032749852     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/106652799318283     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., and Lipman, D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410.
2. Bernstein, F.C., Koetzle, T.F., Williams, G.J.B., Meyer, E.F., Brice, M.D., Rodgers, J.R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T., and Tasumi, M. 1977. The Protein Data Bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112, 535-542. Brookhaven Protein Data Bank release 80.
3. Bieńkowska, J.R., Rogers, R.G., Jr., and Smith, T.F. 1999. Filtered neighbors threading. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. In press.
4. Bowie, J.U., Luthy, R., and Eisenberg, D. 1991. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 253, 164-170.
5. Brenner, S.E., Chothia, C., and Hubbard, T. 1997. Population statistics of protein structures: Lessons from structural classifications. Curr. Opinion Struct. Biol. 7, 369-376. The best quality fold representatives were obtained thanks to the courtesy of S. Brenner.
6. Bryant, S.H., and Lawrence, C.E. 1993. An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 16, 92-112.
7. Eisenberg, D., and MacLachlan, A.D. 1986. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature (London) 319, 199-203.
8. Fisher, D., and Eisenberg, D. 1996. Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Protein Sci. 5, 947-955.
9. Godzik, A., Skolnick, J., and Kolinski, A. 1992. A topology fingerprint approach to the inverse folding problem. J. Mol. Biol. 227, 227-238.
10. Holm, L., and Sander, C. 1997. Dali/FSSP classification of three-dimensional protein folds. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 231-234.
11. Holm, L., and Sander, C. 1998. Touring protein fold space with Dali/FSSP. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 316-319.
12. Jaroszewski, L., Rychlewski, L., Zhang, B., and Godzik, A. 1997. Fold prediction by a hierarchy of sequence, threading and modeling methods. Protein Sci. 6, 676-688.
13. Jernigan, R.L., and Bahar, I. 1996. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr. Opinion Struct. Biol. 6, 195-209.
14. Jones, D.T., and Thornton, J.M. 1996. Potential energy functions for threading. Curr. Opinion Struct. Biol. 6, 210-216.
15. Jones, D., Taylor, W., and Thornton, J. 1992. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature (London) 358, 86-89.
16. Kabsch, W., and Sander, C. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22, 2577-2637.
17. Lathrop, R.H., and Smith, T.F. 1996. Global optimum protein threading with gapped alignment and empirical pair score functions. J. Mol. Biol. 255, 641-665.
18. Lathrop, R.H., Rogers, R.G., Jr., Bieńkowska, J.R., Bryant, B.K.M., Buturović, L.J., Gaitatzes, R., Nambudripad, C., White, J.V., and Smith, T.F. 1998a. In Salzberg, S., Searls, D., and Kasif, S., eds., Analysis and Algorithms for Protein Sequence-Structure Alignment, 227-283. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
19. Lathrop, R.H., Rogers, R.G., Jr., Smith, T.F., and White, J.V. 1998b. A bayes-optimal sequence-structure theory that unifies protein sequence-structure recognition and alignment. Bull. Math. Biol. 60, 1-33.
20. Levitt, M. 1997. Competitive assessment of protein fold recognition and alignment accuracy. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. Suppl. 1, 92-104.
21. Lo Conte, L., and Smith, T.F. 1997. Visible volume: A robust measure for protein structure characterization. J. Mol. Biol. 273(1), 338-348.
22. Maiorov, V.N., and Crippen, G.M. 1992. Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 227, 876-888.
23. Marchler-Bauer, A., and Bryant, S.H. 1997. Measures of threading specificity and accuracy. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. Suppl. 1, 74-82.
24. Marchler-Bauer, A., Levitt, M., and Bryant, S.H. 1997. A retrospective analysis of casp2 threading. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. Suppl. 1, 83-91.
25. Mirny, L.A., and Shakhnovich, E.I. 1996. How to derive a protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem. J. Mol. Biol. 264, 1164-1179.
26. Miyazawa, S., and Jernigan, R.L. 1985. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18, 534-552.
27. Miyazawa, S., and Jernigan, R.L. 1996. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J. Mol. Biol. 256, 623-644.
28. Murzin, A., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T., and Chothia, C. 1995. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of the sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247, 536-540.
29. Orengo, C.A., Michie, A.D., Jones, S., Jones, D.T., Swindells, M.B., and Thornton, J.M. 1997. CATH - a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5, 1093-1108.
30. Richardson, J. 1981. The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structures. Adv. Protein Chem. 34, 167-339.
31. Rost, B., Schneider, R., and Sander, C. 1997. Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. J. Mol. Biol. 270, 471-480.
32. Russell, R.B., Copley, R.R., and Barton, G.J. 1996. Protein fold recognition by mapping predicted secondary structures. J. Mol. Biol. 259, 349-365.
33. Sippl, M.J. 1995. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr. Opinion Struct. Biol. 5, 229-235.
34. Skolnick, J., Jaroszewski, L., Kolinski, A., and Godzik, A. 1997. Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct? Protein Sci. 6, 676-688.
35. Smith, T.F., Lo Conte, L., Bienkowska, J.R., Rogers, R.G., Jr., Gaitatzes, C., and Lathrop, R.H. 1997. The threading approach to the inverse protein folding problem. In RECOMB97 Proceedings of the First Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology. ACM Press, New York.
36. Sowdhamini, R., Burke, D.F., Huang, J., Mizuguchi, K., Nagarajaram, H.A., Srinivasan, N., Steward, R.E., and Blundell, T.L. 1998. Campass: A database of structurally aligned protein superfamilies. Structure 6, 1079-1085.
37. Stultz, C.M., Nambudripad, R., Lathrop, R.H., and White, J.V. 1995. Predicting protein structure with probabilistic models. In Allewell, N., and Woodward, C., eds., Protein Folding and Stability. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
38. Taylor, W.R. 1997. Multiple sequence threading: An analysis of alignment quality and stability. J. Mol. Biol. 269, 902-943.
39. White, J.V., Muchnik, I., and Smith, T.F. 1994. Modeling protein cores with Markov random fields. Math. Biosci. 124, 149-179.
40. Zhang, L., and Skolnick, J. 1998. How do potentials derived from structural databases relate to "true" potentials? Protein Sci. 7, 112-122.