Robust interaction control of a mobile manipulator - dynamic model based coordination

Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 47-63

  Chung, Jae H ^a   Velinsky, Steven A ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; KINEMATICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOBILE ROBOTS; MOTION CONTROL; MOTION PLANNING; REDUNDANCY; ROBOTICS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

DYNAMIC MODEL BASED COORDINATIONS; MOBILE MANIPULATORS; NONHOLONOMIC MODELS; ROBUST INTERACTION CONTROLS;

MANIPULATORS;

EID: 0032595791     PISSN: 09210296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008130606534     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baumgartner, E. T., Yoder, J. D., and Skaar, S. B.: Stability of a nonholonomic path tracking vehide, in: 35th Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, 1997, pp. 1-11.
2. Boyden, F. D. and Velinsky, S. A.: Dynamic mode ing of wheeled mobile robots for high load applications, in: Proc. of IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1994, pp. 3071-3078.
3. Chong, N. Y., Yokoi, K., Oh, S. R., and Tanie, K.: Position control of collision-tolerant passive mobile manipulator with base suspension characteristics, in: Proc. of IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1997, pp. 594-599.
4. Chung, J. H., Velinsky, S. A., and Hess, R. A.: Interaction control of a redundant mobile manipulator, Internat. J. Robotics Res., 1998, to appear.
5. Dugoff, H., Fancher, P. and Segal, L.: An analysis of tiretraction properties and their influence on vehicle dynamic performance, SAE Transactions (1970), 1219-1243.
6. Ghamsepoor, A. and Sepehri, N.: A measure of machine stability for moving base manipulators, in: Proc. of IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1995, pp. 2249-2254.
7. Hong, D., Velinsky, S. A., and Feng, X.: Verification of a wheeled mobile robot dynamic mode and control ramifications, Trans. ASME J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 121 (1999), 58-63.
8. Hootsmanns, N. A. M. and Dubowsky, S.: The motion control of manipulators on mobile vehicles, in: Proc. of IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1991, pp. 2336-2341.
9. Jang, W. M. and Wiens, G. J.: Passive joint control of dynamic coupling in mobile robots, Internat. J. Robotics Res. 3 (1994), 209-220.
10. Joshi, J. and Desrochers, A. A.: Modeling and control of a mobile robot subject to disturbances, in: Proc. of IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1986, pp. 1508-1513.
11. Leitmann, G.: On the efficacy of nonlinear control in uncertain linear systems, Trans. ASME J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 102 (1981), 95-102.
12. Liu, K. and Lewis, F. L.: Decentralized continuous robust controller for mobile robots, in: Proc. of IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1990, pp. 1822-1827.
13. Pin, F. G., Culioli, J. C., and Reister, D. B.: Using minimax approaches to plan optimal task commutation configurations for combined mobile platform-manipulator systems, IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 10(1) (1994), 44-54.
14. Seraji, H.: A unified approach to motion control of mobile manipulators, Internat. J. Robotics Res. 17(2) (1998), 107-118.
15. Shibata, K., Murakami, T., and Ohnishi, K.: Control of a mobile manipulator based on equivalent mass matrix, in: Proc. of IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1995, pp. 1330-1335.
16. Spong, M. W. and Vidyasagar, M.: Robot Dynamics and Control, 1989, Wiley.
17. Yamamoto, Y. and Yun, X.: Modeling and compensation of the dynamic interaction of a mobile manipulator, in: Proc. of IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1994, pp. 2184-2192.