Holomeric vs. meromeric segmentation: A tale of centipedes, leeches, and rhombomeres

Evolution and Development

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 35-48

  Minelli, Alessandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTHROPOD; ARTICLE; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; LARVA; LEECH; RHOMBENCEPHALON;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; LARVA; LEECHES; RHOMBENCEPHALON;

ANIMALIA; ANNELIDA; ARTHROPODA; CHILOPODA; HIRUDINIDA; INSECTA; INVERTEBRATA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0033947969     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-142X.2000.00030.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aguesse, P. 1965. La division des antennes chez les larves d'Odonates. Bull. Soc. Eut. France 70: 8-12.
2. Ahlberg, P. 1992. Coelacanth fins and evolution. Nature 358: 459.
3. Arthur, W. 1999. Variable segment number in centipedes: population genetics meets evolutionary developmental biology. Evolution & Development 1: 62-69.
4. Balavoine, G. 1997. The early emergence of platyhelminths is contradicted by the agreement between 18 S rRNA and Hox genes data. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sci. Vie 320: 83-94.
5. Brölemann, H. W. 1894. Difformité constatée chez un Himantarium Gabrielis L. Feuilles Jeunes Nat. 24(3): 124-125.
6. Castle, W. L. 1900. The metamerism of the Hirudinea. Proc. Am. Acad. Sci. 35: 285-303.
7. Clark, R. B. 1964. Dynamics in Metazoan Evolution. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
8. Dahmann, C., and Basler, K. 1999. Compartment boundaries at the edge of development. Trends Genet. 15: 320-326.
9. Damen, W. G. M., and Tautz, D. 1999. Abdominal-B expression in a spider suggests a general role for Abdominal-B in specifying the genital structures. J. Exp. Zool. 285: 85-91.
10. Enghoff, H. 1990. The ground-plan of the chilognathan millipedes. In A. Minelli (ed.). Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Myriapodology. Brill, Leiden, pp. 1-21.
11. Foddai, D., and Minelli, A. 1999. A troglomorphic geophilomorph centipede from Southern France (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Geophilidae). J. Nat. Hist. 33: 267-287.
12. Garcia-Bellido, A., Ripoll P., and Morata, G. 1973. Developmental compartmentalisation of the wing disk of Drosophila. Nature 245: 251-252.
13. Gratiolet, P. 1862. Recherches sur l'organisation du système vasculaire dans la sangsue médicinale et l'aulastome vorace. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. 17: 174-225.
14. Guthrie, S., and Lumsden, A. 1991. Formation and regeneration of rhombomere boundaries in the developing chick hindbrain. Development 112: 221-229.
15. Guthrie, S., Prince, V., and Lumsden, A. 1993. Selective dispersal of avian rhombomere cells in orthotopic and heterotopic grafts. Development 118: 527-538.
16. Handlirsch, A. 1925. Geschichte, Literatur, Technik, Paläontologie, Phylogenie, Systematik. In C. Schröder (ed.). Handbuch der Entomologie, Vol. 3. Fischer, Jena, pp. 1-1202.
17. Hansen, H. J. 1893. Zur Morphologie der Gliedmaßen und Mundtheilen bei Crustaceen und Insekten. Zool Anz. 16: 193-198, 201-213.
18. Heyman, I., Faissner, A., and Lumsden, A. 1995. Cell and matrix specialisations of rhombomere boundaries. Dev. Dynamics 204: 301-315.
19. Whitman, C. O. 1892. The metamerism of Clepsinc. In Festschr. 70. Geburtstage R. Leuckart's. Engelmann, Leipzig, pp. 385-395.
20. Williams, J. A., Paddock, S. W., and Carroll, S. B. 1993. Pattern formation in a secondary field: a hierarchy of regulatory' genes subdivides the developing Drosophila wing disc into discrete subregions. Development 117: 571-584.
21. Xu, Q., Mellitzer, G., Robinson, V., and Wilkinson, D. G. 1999. In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins. Nature 399: 267-271.