The evolution of segmentation of centipede trunk anti appendages

Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 103-117

  Minelli, Alessandro ^a   Foddai, Donatella ^a   Pereira, Luis Alberto ^b   Lewis, John G E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES Y MUSEO   (Argentina)

^c Somerset County Museum   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Centipedes; Chilopoda; Geophilomorpha; Holomeric segmentation; Meromeric segmentation; Paramorphic axes; Regeneration; Serial homology

Indexed keywords

SCHENDYLOPS OLIGOPUS;

EID: 0034210483     PISSN: 09475745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0469.2000.382137.x     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Anderson, D. T., 1973: Embryology and Phylogeny in Annelids and Arthropods. Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Braunschweig: Pergamon Press.
2. Andersson, G., 1976: Post-embryonic development of Lithobius forficatus (L.) (Chilopoda: Lithobiidae). Ent. Scand. 7, 161-168.
3. Andersson, G., 1978: Post-embryonic development of Lithobius erythrocephalus C.L. Koch (Chilopoda: Lithobiidae). Ent. Scand. 9, 241-246.
4. Andersson, G., 1979: On the use of larval characters in the classification of lithobiomorph centipedes (Chilopoda Lithobiomorpha). In: Camatini, M. (ed.), Myriapod Biology. London, New York, Toronto, Sydney, San Francisco: Academic Press. pp. 73-81.
5. Andersson, G., 1980: Post-embryonic development of Lithobius melanops Newport (Chilopoda: Lithobiidae). Ent. Scand. 11, 225-230.
6. Andersson, G., 1982a: Post-embryonic development of Lithobius microps Meinert (Chilopoda: Lithobiidae). Ent. Scand. 13, 89-95.
7. Andersson, G., 1982b: Post-embryonic development of Lithobius calcaratus C.L. Koch (Chilopoda: Lithobiidae). Ent. Scand. 13, 435-440.
8. Andersson, G., 1983: Post-embryonic development of Lithobius curtipes C.L. Koch (Chilopoda: Lithobiidae). Ent. Scand. 14, 387-394.
9. Andersson, G., 1984a: Post-embryonic development of Lithobius tenebrosus fennoscandius Lohmander (Chilopoda: Lithobiidae). Ent. Scand. 15, 1-7.
10. Andersson, G., 1984b: Post-embryonic development of Lamyctes fulvicornis Meinert (Chilopoda: Henicopidae). Ent. Scand. 15, 9-14.
11. Arthur, W., 1999: Variable segment number in centipedes. Evol Dev 1, 62-69.
12. Berto, D.; Fusco, G.; Minelli, A., 1997: Segmental units and shape control in Chilopoda. Ent. Scand. Suppl. 51, 61-70.
13. Boore, J. L.; Collins, T. M.; Stanton, D.; Daehler, L. L.; Brown, W. M., 1995: Deducing the pattern of arthropod phylogeny from mitochondrial DNA rearrangements. Nature 376, 163-165.
14. Boore, J. L.; Lavrov, D. V.; Brown, W. M., 1998: Gene translocation links insects and crustaceans. Nature 392, 667-668.
15. Brölemann, H. W., 1921: Principe de contraction contre principe d'élongation. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse 49, 340-359.
16. Brölemann, H. W., 1932: La contraction tachygenétique des Polydesmiens (Myriapodes) et leurs affinités naturelles. Bull. Soc. Zool. France 57, 387-396.
17. Cameron, J. A., 1926: Regeneration in Scutigera forceps. J. Exp. Zool. 46, 169-179.
18. Chalande, J., 1905: Recherches biologiques et anatomiques sur le Myriopodes du Sud-Ouest de la France. Bull. Soc. Sci. Nat. Toulouse 38-39, 46-154.
19. Damen, W. G. M.; Tautz, D., 1999: Abdominal-B expression in a spider suggests a general role for Abdominal-B in specifying the genital structures. J. Exp. Zool. 285, 85-91.
20. Demange, J.-M., 1963: La segmentation dorsale des Myriapodes Chilopodes au niveau de la zone des 7e et 8e segments. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 257, 514-517.
21. Demange, J.-M., 1967: Recherches sur la segmentation du tronc des Chilopodes et des Diplopodes Chilognathes (Myriapodes). Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Paris A44, 1-188.
22. Demange, J.-M., 1969: La réduction métamérique chez les chilopodes et les diplopodes chilognathes (Myriapodes). Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Paris 40, 532-538.
23. Demange, J.-M.; Richard, J., 1969: Morphologie de l'appareil génital mâle des scolopendromorphes et son importance en systématique (Myriapodes Chilopodes). Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Paris 40 (1968), 968-983.
24. Dohle, W., 1985: Phylogenetic pathways in the Chilopoda. Bjidr. Dierk. 55, 55-66.
25. Dohle, W., 1988: Myriapoda and the Ancestry of Insects. The Charles H. Brookes Memorial Lecture. Manchester: The Manchester Polytechnic, pp. 1-28.
26. Dohle, W., 1990: Some observations on morphology and affinities of Craterostigmus tasmanianus (Chilopoda). In: Minelli, A. (ed.), Proc. 7th Int. Congr. Myriapodology. Leiden: Brill, pp. 69-79.
27. Dohle, W., 1997: Are the insects more closely related to the crustaceans than to the myriapods? Ent. Scand. Suppl. 51, 7-16.
28. Eason, E. H., 1964: Centipedes of the British Isles. London. New York: Warne.
29. Eason, E. H., 1992: On the taxonomy and geographical distribution of the Lithobiomorpha. In: Meyer, E.; Thaler, K.; Schedl, W. (eds), Advances in Myriapodology. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of Myriapodology. Ber. nat.-med. Verein Innsbruck (Suppl. 10), 1-9.
30. Edgecombe, G. D.; Giribet, G.; Wheeler, W., 1999: Filogenia de Chilopoda: combinando sequencias de los genes ribosómicos 18S y 28S y morfología. Boll. Soc. Ent. Aragon. 26, 1-39.
31. Farris, J. S., 1988: HENNIG 86, Version 1.5. Computer program published by the author.
32. Foddai, D., 1998: Phylogenetic relationships within geophilomorph centipedes based on morphological characters: a preliminary report. Mem. Mus. Civ. St. Nat. Verona, (2), Sci. Vita 13, 67-68.
33. Foddai, D.; Minelli, A., 2000: Phylogeny of geophilomorph centipedes: old wisdom and new insights from morphology. Ann. Zool. (Warszawa) 43, in press.
34. Friedrich, M.; Tautz, D., 1995: Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods. Nature 376, 165-167.
35. Fusco, G., 1999: Modularità e metameria nell'evoluzione dei Chilopodi. In: 7o Incontro italiano di Biologia evoluzionistica. Firenze, 11-13 Febbraio 1999. Firenze: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Area delta Ricerca di Firenze, pp. 21-22.
36. Fusco, G.; Minelli, A., 2000: Measuring morphological complexity of segmented animals: a tale of short vs. long centipedes. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 38-46.
37. Garcia-Bellido, A.; Ripoll, P.; Morata, G., 1973: Developmental compartmentalisation of the wing disk of Drosophila. Nature 245, 251-252.
38. Giribet, G.; Carranza, S.; Riutort, M.; Baguñà, J.; Ribera, C., 1999: Internal phylogeny of the Chilopoda (Myriapoda, Arthropoda) using complete 18S rDNA and partial 28S rDNA sequences. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 352, 215-222.
39. Grenier, J. K.; Galbert, T. L.; Warren, R.; Whitington, P. M., 1997: Evolution of the entire arthropod Hox gene set predated the origin and radiation of the onychophoran-arthropod clade. Current Biol. 7, 547-553.
40. Held Jr, L. I., 1995: Axes, boundaries and cordinates: the ABCs of fly leg development. Bioessays 17, 721-732.
41. Heymons, R., 1901: Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Scolopender. Zoologica (Stuttgart) 13, 1-244.
42. Kagoshima, H.; Cassata, G.; Bürglin, T. R., 1999: A Caenorhabditis elegans homeobox gene expressed in the male tail, a link between pattern formation and sexual dimorphism? Dev. Genes Evol. 209, 59-62.
43. Kettle, C.; Arthur, W.; Jowett, T.; Minelli, A., 1999: Homeotic transformation in a centipede. Trends Genet. 15, 393.
44. Kettle, C.; Arthur, W.; Jowett, T.; Minelli, A., 2000: A homeotically-transformed specimen of Strigamia maritima, and its morphological, developmental and evolutionary implications. Ann. Zool. (Warszawa) 43, in press.
45. Kondo, T.; Zakany, J.; Innis, J. W.; Duboule, D., 1997: Of fingers, toes and penises. Science 390, 29.
46. Kos, I., 1997: Post-embryonic development of Lithobius validus Meinert (Chilopoda Lithobiidae). Acta zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 43, 313-322.
47. Lewis, J. G. E., 1968: Individual variations in a population of the centipede Scolopendra amazonica from Nigeria and its implications for methods of taxonomic discrimination in the Scolopendridae. J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 47, 315-326.
48. Lewis, J. G. E., 1981: The Biology of Centipedes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Lewis, J. G. E., 2000: Antennal characters in centipedes, with particular reference to scolopendromorphs (Myriapoda, Chilopoda). Ann. Zool. (Warszawa) 43, in press.
50. Minelli, A., 1992: Towards a new morphology of myriapods. Ber. Natur.-Med. Verein Innsbruck Supplement 10, 37-46.
51. Minelli, A., 1993: Chilopoda. In: Harrison, F. W. (ed.), Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 12. New York: Wiley-Liss. pp. 57-114.
52. Minelli, A., 1996: Segments, body regions and the control of development through time. In: Ghiselin, M. T.; Pinna, G. (eds), New Perspectives on the History of Life. Mem. California Acad. Sci. 20, 55-61.
53. Minelli, A., 1997: Segments, tagmata and appendages: how many ways to patterning? J. Morphol. 232, 296.
54. Minelli, A., 2000a: Holomeric vs. meromeric segmentation: a tale of centipedes, leeches, and rhombomeres. Evol Dev 2, 35-48.
55. Minelli, A., 2000b: Limbs and tail as evolutionarily divergent duplicates of the main body axis. Evol. Dev. 2, 157-165.
56. Minelli, A., Bortoletto, S., 1988: Myriapod metamerism and arthropod segmentation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 33, 323-343.
57. Minelli, A.; Fusco, G., 1995: Body segmentation and segment differentiation: The scope for heterochronic change. In: McNamara, K. J. (ed.), Evolutionary Change and Heterochrony. London: Wiley, pp. 49-63.
58. Minelli, A.; Fusco, G., 1997: Geophilomorph centipedes as a model for the study of segmentation. In: Sixth Congress of the European Society for Evolutionary Biology, Programme [&] Abstracts, 24-28 August 1997, Arnhem.
59. Minelli, A.; Schram, F. R., 1994: Owen revisited: a reappraisal of morphology in evolutionary biology. Bijdr. Dijrk. 64, 65-74.
60. Munn, K.; Steward, R., 1995: The anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral axes have a common origin in Drosophila melanogaster. Bioessays 17, 920-922.
61. Negrea, S.; Minelli, A., 1994: Chilopoda. In: Juberthie, C.; Decu, V. (eds), Encyclopedia Biospeologica, Vol. 1. Moulis-Bucarest: Société de Biospéologie, 249-254.
62. Newman, S. A., 1996: Sticky fingers: Hox genes and cell adhesion in vertebrate limb development. Bioessays 18, 171-174.
63. Newport, G., 1844: On the reproduction of lost parts in Myriapoda and Insecta. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London 1844, 283-294.
64. Pereira, L. A., 1999: Un nouveau cas de dimorphisme sexuel chez les Schendylidae: Schendylops virgingordae (Crabill, 1960), espèce halophile nouvelle pour la Martinique (Myriapoda, Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha). Zoosystema 21, 525-533.
65. Pereira, L. A.; Coscarón, S., 1975-76: Estudios sobre Geophilomorfos neotropicales I. Sobre dos especies nuevas del genero Pectiniunguis Bollman (Schendylidae-Chilopoda). Rev. Soc. Ent. Arg. 35, 59-75.
66. Pereira, L. A.; Minelli, A.; Barbieri, F., 1995: Description of nine centipede species from Amazonia and related matters on Neotropical geophilomorphs (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha). Amazoniana 13, 325-418.
67. Rogers, B. T.; Kaufman, T. C., 1996: Structure of the insect head as revealed by the EN protein pattern in developing embryos. Development 122, 3419-3432.
68. Rogers, B. T.; Kaufman, T. C., 1997: Structure of the insect head in ontogeny and phylogeny: a view from Drosophila. Int. Rev. Cytol. 174, 1-84.
69. Saunders, P. T.; Ho, M.-W., 1984: The complexity of organisms. In: Pollard, J. W. (ed.), Evolutionary Theory: Path Into the Future. Chichester: Wiley. pp. 49-63.
70. Scheffel, H., 1969: Untersuchungen über die hormonale Regulation von Häutung und Anamorphose von Lithobius forficatus (L.) (Myriapoda Chilopoda). Zool. Jb. Physiol. 74, 436-505.
71. Scheffel, H., 1989: Zur wechselseitigen Beeinflussung von Regeneration und Häutung bei Larven des Chilopoden Lithobius forficatus (L.). Zool. Jb. Physiol. 93, 67-73.
72. Schileyko, A. A.; Pavlinov, I. Ja., 1997: A cladistic analysis of the order Scolopendromorpha (Chilopoda). Ent. Scand. Suppl. 51, 33-40.
73. Shinohara, K., 1970: On the phylogeny of Chilopoda. Proc. Jap. Soc. Syst. Zool. 6, 35-42.
74. Shultz, J. W.; Regier, J. C., 1997: Progress toward a molecular phylogeny of the centipede orders (Chilopoda). Ent. Scand. Suppl. 51, 25-32.
75. Smith, L. M., 1998: An analysis of Hox genes in myriapods. PhD Thesis, Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
76. Turcato, A.; Fusco, G.; Minelli, A., 1995: The sternal pore areas of geophilomorph centipedes (Chilopoda Geophilomorpha). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 115, 185-209.
77. Verhoeff, K. W., 1902-25: Chilopoda. In: Dr. H.G. Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tier-Reichs, 5 (2). Leipzig: C. F. Winter, pp. 1-725, pls. I-XXX.
78. Verhoeff, K. W., 1928: Durch Zucht erhaltene Formen des Polydesmus complanatus, illyricus Verh. und ihre Bedeutung, sowie Beurteilung der Elongation. (110. Diplopoden-Aufsatz). Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 12, 684-705.
79. Verhoeff, K. W., 1940: Chilopoden-Kieferfuss-Regenerate in freier Natur. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 36, 645-650.
80. Weise, R., 1991: Regeneration of antennae in the third larvae of Lithobius forficatus L. Zool. Anz. 227, 343-355.
81. Whitington, P. M.; Meier, T.; King, P., 1991: Segmentation, neuro-genesis and formation of early axonal pathways in the centipede Ethmostigmus rubripes (Brandt). Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 199, 349-363.