Curriculum development and sustainable development: Practices, institutions and literacies

Educational Philosophy and Theory

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 137-152

  Gough, Stephen ^a   Scott, William ^a  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000993354     PISSN: 00131857     EISSN: 14695812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2001.tb00259.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Beck, U., 1999. World Risk Society Polity Press.
2. Beck, U., Giddens, A., and Lash, S., 1994. Reflexive Modernisation Polity Press.
3. Bray, M., 1999. The Shadow Education System: private tutoring and its implications for planners UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning).
4. Carr, W., and Kemmis, S., 1986. Becoming Critical: education, knowledge and action research Falmer Press.
5. Geus, A., 1997. The Living Company Harvard Business School Press.
6. 1999. Sustainable Development Education Panel First Annual Report HMSO.
7. 1999. The National Curriculum HMSO.
8. 2000a. Environmental sustainability and eliminating poverty, Consultation document Department for International Development.
9. 2000b. Education for all—the challenge of universal primary education, Consultation document Department for International Development.
10. Elliott, J., 1998. The Curriculum Experiment: meeting the challenge of social change Open University Press.
11. Fien, J., 1991. Education for the Environment: critical curriculum theorising and environmental education Deakin University Press.
12. Foster, J., 2001. Education as sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 20: 00–00.
13. Grefnall, Gough A., 1993. Founders in Environmental Education Deakin University Press.
14. Greenall Gough, A., and Robottom, I., 1993. Towards a socially critical environmental education: water quality studies in a coastal school. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25: 301–316.
15. Hlebowitsh, P., 1999a. The burdens of the new curricularist. Curriculum Inquiry, 29: 343–354.
16. Hlebowitsh, P., 1999b. More on ‘the burdens of the new curricularist. Curriculum Inquiry, 29: 369–373.
17. Hopkins, C., Damlamian, J., and López Ospina, G., 1996. Evolving towards education for sustainable development: an international perspective. Nature and Resources, 32: 2–11.
18. Jickling, B., 1992. Why I don't want my children to be educated for sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Education, 23: 5–8.
19. Jickling, B., and Spork, H., 1998. Education for the environment: a critique. Environmental Education Research, 4: 309–329.
20. Kemmis, S., and Fitzclarence, L., 1986. Curriculum Theorising: beyond reproduction theory Deakin University Press.
21. Kerry Turner, R., Lorenzoni, I., Beaumont, N., Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., and McDonald, A.L., 1998. Coastal management for sustainable development: analysing environmental and socio economic changes on the UK coast. The Geographical Journal, 164: 269–281.
22. Kuhn, T.S., 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions University of Chicago Press.
23. Lundgren, U.P., 1991. Between Education and Schooling: outlines of a diachronic curriculum theory Deakin University Press.
24. MacIntyre, A., 1981. After Virtue: a study in moral theory Duckworth.
25. O'Riordan, T., 1989. “ The challenge for environmentalism ”. In New Models in Geography Edited by: Peet, R., 77–102. Unwin Hyman.
26. Posch, P., 1991. “ Environment and schools initiatives: background and basic premises of the project ”. In Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Environment, Schools and Active Learning 13–18. OECD.
27. Quicke, J., 2000. A new professionalism for a collaborative culture of organizational learning in contemporary society. Educational Management and Administration, 28: 299–316.
28. Reid, W.A., 1999. Curriculum as Institution and Practice: essays in the deliberative tradition Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Robottom, I., and Hart, P., 1993. Research in Environmental Education: engaging the debate Deakin University Press.
30. Schwab, J.J., 1969. The practical: a language for curriculum. School Review, 78: 1–24.
31. Schwab, J.J., 1978. “ The ‘impossible’ role of the teacher in progressive education ”. In Science, Curriculum and Liberal Education Edited by: Westbury, I., 170–171. University of Chicago Press.
32. Schwarz, M., and Thompson, M., 1990. Divided We Stand: redefining politics, technology and social choice University of Pennsylvania Press.
33. Scott, W.A.H., 1995. “ Diversity and opportunity—reflections on environmental education within initial teacher education programmes across the European Union ”. In ATEE Cahier No.8: Environmental Education into Initial Teacher Education: ‘The Slate of the Art Edited by: Brinkman, F.G., Association of Teacher Education in Europe.
34. Sears, J.T., and Marshall, J.D., 2000. Generational influences on contemporary curriculum thought. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32: 199–214.
35. Senge, P., 1990. The Fifth Discipline Century.
36. Stables, A., 1996. Paradox in educational policy slogans: evaluating equal opportunities in subject choice. British Journal of Educational Studies, 44: 159
37. Stables, A., and Bishop, K., 2001. Weak and strong conceptions of environmental literacy: implications for environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 7: 00–00.
38. Strain, M., 2000a. Editorial. Educational Management and Administration, 28: 243–246.
39. Strain, M., 2000b. Schools in a learning society: new purposes and modalities of learning in late modern society. Educational Management and Administration, 28: 281–298.
40. Tesh, S.N., 1988. Hidden Arguments: Political Ideology and Disease Prevention Policy Rutgers University Press.
41. Thompson, M., 1997. Security and solidarity: an anti‐reductionist framework for thinking about the relationship between us and the rest of nature. The Geographical Journal, 163: 141–140.
42. Turner, B.L., 1997. The sustainability principle in global agendas: implications for understanding land‐use/cover change. The Geographical Journal, 163: 133–140.
43. Westbury, I., 1999. The burdens and the excitement of the ‘new’ curriculum research: a response to Hlebowitsh's ‘The Burdens of the New Curricularist. Curriculum Inquiry, 29: 355–364.
44. Wilkins, R., 2000. Leading the learning society: the role of Local Education Authorities. Educational Management and Administration, 28: 339–352.
45. 1999. Education and Conservation: an evaluation of the contributions of educational programmes to conservation within the WWF network; Final Report WWF.
46. Young, M.F.D., 1998. The Curriculum of the Future: from the ‘new sociology of education’ to a critical theory of learning Falmer Press.