The burdens and the excitement of the "new" curriculum research: A response to hlebowitsh's "the burdens of the new gurricularist"

Curriculum Inquiry

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 363-364

  Westbury, Ian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750148833     PISSN: 03626784     EISSN: 1467873X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Au, Kathryn H. and Valencia, Sheila W. 1997. The complexities of portfolio assessment. In Teaching and its predicaments, ed. Nicholas C. Burbules and David T. Hansen, 123-144. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2. Darling-Hammond, Linda. 1994. Standards of practice for learner-centered schools. In Outcome equity in education: Fifteenth annual yearbook of the American Educational Finance Association, 1994, ed. Robert Berne and Lawrence O. Picus, 191-223. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
3. Floden, Robert, E. 1997. Reforms that call for more than you understand. In Teaching and its predicaments, ed. Nicholas C. Burbules and David T. Hansen, 11-28. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
4. Hansén, Sven-Erik. 1991. Tradition och reform. Urval och konstruktion au modersmålsämnets läroplanstexter frdn 20-tal till 80-tal. Åbo: Åbo Academy Press.
5. Haft, Henning, and Hopmann, Stefan. 1990. Curriculum administration as symbolic action. In Case studies of curriculum administration history, ed. Henning Haft and Stefan Hopmann, 159-173. London: Falmer Press.
6. Hlebowitsh, Peter. 1999. The burdens of the new curricularist. Curriculum Inquiry 29(3): 343-354.
7. Meyer, John W., and Rowan, Brian. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340-363.
8. Meyer, John W., Scott, W. R., and Deal, T. E. 1983. Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure. In Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality, ed. John W. Meyer and W. R. Scott, 45-67. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Reid, William A. 1994. Curriculum planning as deliberation. Rapport Nr. 11, Pedagogisk Forskningsinstitutt, University of Oslo.
10. Schwab, Joseph J. 1970. The practical: A language for curriculum. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.
11. Schwab, Joseph J. 1978. The practical: A language for curriculum. In Joseph J. Schwab, Science, curriculum, and liberal education, ed. Ian Westbury and Neil J. Wilkof, 287-321, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Spillane, James, in press. External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31: 143-175.
13. Vedung, Evert. 1997. Public policy and program evaluation. Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
14. Weniger, Erich, in press. Didaktik as a theory of education. In Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition, ed. Ian Westbury, Stefan Hopmann, and Kurt Riquarts. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Westbury, Ian. 1994. Deliberation and the improvement of schooling. In Deliberation in education and society, ed. James T. Dillon, 37-65. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.