More on "the burdens of the new curricularist"

Curriculum Inquiry

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 369-373

  Hlebowitsh, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750197841     PISSN: 03626784     EISSN: 1467873X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0362-6784.00134     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Barrow, R. 1988. Over the top: A misuse of philosophical techniques? Interchange 19(2): 41-67.
2. Jackson, P. W. 1992. Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialists. In Philip W. Jackson, Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 3-40). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
3. Jickling, B. 1988. Critical comments on the work of Tanner and Tanner and A tough nut: A Rejoinder to Robin Barrow and to Daniel and Laurel Tanner. Interchange 19 (2): 41-67.
4. Reid, W. A. 1993. Does Schwab improve on Tyler? A response to Jackson. Journal of Curriculum Studies 25(6): 499-510.
5. Tanner, D., and Tanner, L. 1995. Curriculum development: Theory into practice. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
6. Tanner, D., and Tanner, L. 1988. Emergence of a paradigm in the curriculum field: A reply to Jickling. Interchange 19(2): 41-67.
7. Tyler, R. W. 1984. Personal reflections on The Practical 4. Curriculum Inquiry 14(1): 97-102.
8. Wraga, W. G. 1999. Extracting sunbeams out of cucumbers: The retreat from practice in reconceptualized curriculum studies. Educational Researcher 28(1): 4-13.