Definition in the Criminal Law

Definition in the Criminal Law

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-219

  Halpin, Andrew ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85203978022     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (347)

1. AESCHYLUS, Eumenides in the Loeb edition, Aeschylus II, with translation by Herbert Weir Smyth (London, William Heinemann, 1926)
2. LARRY ALEXANDER, ‘Insufficient Concern: A Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability’ (2000) 88 California Law Review 931
3. LARRY ALEXANDER and EMILY SHERWIN, The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 2001)
4. PETER ALLDRIDGE, Relocating Criminal Law (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2000)
5. American Law Institute, Model Penal Code (Official Draft and Explanatory Notes: Complete Text of Model Penal Code as Adopted at the 1962 Annual Meeting of the American Law Institute, 24 May 1962) (Philadelphia, PA, American Law Institute, 1985), also in Dubber (2002)
6. Archbold 2003, PJ Richardson (ed) (London, Sweet & Maxwell); Archbold 1992
7. MRS JUSTICE ARDEN, ‘Criminal Law at the Crossroads: The Impact of Human Rights from The Law Commission’s Perspective and the Need for a Code’ [1999] Criminal Law Review 439
8. ANDREW ASHWORTH, ‘The elasticity of mens rea’ in Tapper (ed) (1981)
9. ANDREW ASHWORTH, Editorial [1986] Criminal Law Review 1
10. ANDREW ASHWORTH, ‘Belief, Intent, and Criminal Liability’ in Eekelaar and Bell (eds) (1987)
11. ANDREW ASHWORTH, ‘Interpreting Criminal Statutes: A Crisis of Legality?’ (1991) 107 Law Quarterly Review 419
12. ANDREW ASHWORTH, Principles of Criminal Law (4th edn, Oxford, OUP, 2003); (3rd edn, 1999)
13. ANDREW ASHWORTH and KENNETH CAMPBELL, ‘Recklessness in Assault—and in General?’ (1991) 107 Law Quarterly Review 187
14. ANDREW ASHWORTH and BARRY MITCHELL (eds), Rethinking English Homicide Law (Oxford, OUP, 2000)
15. FERNANDO ATRIA, On Law and Legal Reasoning (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2001)
16. JOHN AUSTIN, Lectures on Jurisprudence I (5th edn, London, John Murray, 1885; reprinted 1929)
17. JM BALKIN, ‘Deconstruction’ in Patterson (ed) (1996)
18. REZA BANAKAR and MAX TRAVERS (eds), An Introduction to Law and Social Theory (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2002)
19. KIT BARKER, ‘Understanding the Unjust Enrichment Principle in Private Law: A Study of the Concept and its Reasons’ in Neyers, McInnes and Pitel (eds) (2004)
20. M CHERIF BASSIOUNI and GAMAL M BADR, ‘The Shari’ah: Sources, Interpretation, and Rule-Making’ (2002) 1 UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law 135
21. JOHN BELL and GEORGE ENGEL, Cross’s Statutory Interpretation (3rd edn, London, Butterworths, 1995)
22. SEYLA BENHABIB, Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory (New York, NY, Columbia University Press, 1986)
23. MITCHELL BERMAN, ‘Justification and Excuse, Law and Morality’ (2003) 53 Duke Law Journal 1
24. DERYCK BEYLEVELD, RICHARD KIRKHAM and DAVID TOWNEND, ‘Which presumption? A critique of the House of Lords’ reasoning on retrospectivity and the Human Rights Act’ (2002) 22 Legal Studies 185
25. DI BIRCH, ‘The Foresight Saga: The Biggest Mistake of All?’ [1988] Criminal Law Review 4
26. DI BIRCH, ‘Rethinking Sexual History Evidence: Proposals for Fairer Trials’ [2002] Criminal Law Review 531
27. DI BIRCH, ‘Untangling Sexual History Evidence: A Rejoinder to Professor Temkin’ [2003] Criminal Law Review 370
28. PETER BIRKS, ‘The Early History of Iniuria’ (1969) 37 Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 163
29. PETER BIRKS, Harassment and Hubris: The Right to an Equality of Respect, the Second John Maurice Kelly Memorial Lecture (Dublin, Faculty of Law, University College Dublin, 1996)
30. ALAN BOGG and JOHN STANTON-IFE, ‘Protecting the vulnerable: legality, harm and theft’ (2003) 23 Legal Studies 402
31. CHRISTINE BOYLE, MARIE-ANDRÉE BERTRAND, CÉLINE LACERTE-LAMONTAGNE and REBECCA SHAMAI, A Feminist Review of Criminal Law (Ottawa, Ministry of Supply and Services, 1985)
32. JAMES BRADY, ‘Recklessness’ (1996) 15 Law and Philosophy 183
33. JOHN BRAITHWAITE, ‘Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty’ (2002) 27 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 47
34. SCOTT BREWER, ‘Exemplary Reasoning: Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Rational Force of Legal Argument by Analogy’ (1996) 109 Harvard Law Review 923
35. ADRIAN BRIGGS, ‘Judges, juries and the meaning of words’ (1985) 5 Legal Studies 314
36. WENDY BROWN and JANET HALLEY, ‘Introduction’ in Brown and Halley (eds) (2002)
37. WENDY BROWN and JANET HALLEY (eds), Left Legalism /Left Critique (Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 2002)
38. ROGER BROWNSWORD, Contract Law: Themes for the Twenty-First Century (London, Butterworths, 2000)
39. WW BUCKLAND, A Text-book of Roman Law, Peter Stein (ed) (rev 3rd edn, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1975)
40. BJORN BURKHARDT, ‘Some Questions and Comments on What is Called “The Mental Element of the Offence”’ (1996) 30 Israel Law Review 82
41. KENNETH CAMPBELL, ‘The Test of Dishonesty in R v Ghosh’ (1984) 43 Cambridge Law Journal 349
42. TOM CAMPBELL, ‘Rationales for Freedom of Communication’ in Campbell and Sadurski (eds) (1994)
43. TOM CAMPBELL and WOJCIECH SADURSKI (eds), Freedom of Communication (Aldershot, Dartmouth, 1994)
44. PETER CANE, Responsibility in Law and Morality (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2002)
45. PETER CANE and MARK TUSHNET (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies (Oxford, OUP, 2003)
46. ALBERT CARDARELLI and STEPHEN HICKS, ‘Radicalism in Law and Criminology: a Retrospective View of Critical Legal Studies and Radical Criminology’ (1993) 84 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 502
47. PAUL CARRINGTON, ‘Of Law and the River’ (1984) 34 Journal of Legal Education 222
48. ANTONIO CASSESE, International Criminal Law (Oxford, OUP, 2003)
49. EMILIOS CHRISTODOULIDIS, Law and Reflexive Politics (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998)
50. EC CLARK, An Analysis of Criminal Liability (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1880; reprinted, Littleton, CO, Fred B Rothman & Co, 1983)
51. CMV CLARKSON, ‘Violence and the Law Commission’ [1994] Criminal Law Review 324
52. CMV CLARKSON and HM KEATING, Criminal Law, Text and Materials (5th edn, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2003)
53. ERIC CLIVE, PAMELA FERGUSON, CHRISTOPHER GANE and ALEXANDER MCCALL SMITH, A Draft Criminal Code for Scotland with Commentary (Edinburgh, Scottish Law Commission, 2003)
54. JULES COLEMAN and SCOTT SHAPIRO (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford, OUP, 2002)
55. HUGH COLLINS, The Law of Contract (4th edn, London, Butterworths, 2003)
56. JOANNE CONAGHAN, ‘Wishful Thinking or Bad Faith: A Feminist Encounter with Duncan Kennedy’s Critique of Adjudication’ (2001) 22 Cardozo Law Review 721
57. DRUCILLA CORNELL, The Imaginary Domain: Abortion, Pornography & Sexual Harassment (New York, NY, Routledge, 1995)
58. DRUCILLA CORNELL, MICHEL ROSENFELD and DAVID CARLSON (eds), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice (London, Routledge, 1992)
59. KIMBERLÉ CRENSHAW, ‘Race, Reform, and Retrenchment: Transformation and Legitimation in Antidiscrimination Law’ (1988) 101 Harvard Law Review 1331
60. Criminal Code Bill Commission (C 2345, 1879), Report of the Royal Commission appointed to consider The Law Relating to Indictable Offences: With an Appendix containing a Draft Code embodying the Suggestions of the Commissioners
61. Criminal Law Revision Committee (Cmnd 2977, 1966), Eighth Report, Theft and Related Offences
62. RUPERT CROSS, ‘The Mental Element in Crime’ (1967) 83 Law Quarterly Review 215
63. RUPERT CROSS, ‘The Reports of the Criminal Law Commissioners (1833–1849) and the Abortive Bills of 1853’ in Glazebrook (ed) (1978)
64. FREDERICK DANFORTH (ed), The Argentine Penal Code, Emilio Gonzalez-Lopez (transl) (South Hackensack, NJ, Fred B Rothman & Co, 1963)
65. CHARLES DEBATTISTA, ‘Is the end in sight for chartering demise clauses?’, Lloyd’s List, 21 February 2001, 5
66. LORD DENNING, The Discipline of Law (London, Butterworths, 1979)
67. IAN DENNIS, ‘The Critical Condition of Criminal Law’ (1997) Current Legal Problems 213
68. JACQUES DERRIDA, ‘Letter to a Japanese Friend’ in Wood and Bernasconi (eds) (1985)
69. JACQUES DERRIDA, ‘Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundation of Authority”’ in Cornell, Rosenfeld and Carlson (eds) (1992)
70. JACQUES DERRIDA, Points …: Interviews, 1974–1994 (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 1995)
71. JACQUES DERRIDA, On the Name (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 1995)
72. MARTIN DOCKRAY (ed), City University Centenary Lectures in Law (London, Blackstone Press, 1996)
73. JOSHUA DRESSLER, ‘Justifications and Excuses: A Brief Review of the Concepts and the Literature’ (1987) 33 Wayne Law Review 1155
74. JOSHUA DRESSLER, ‘Does One Mens Rea Fit All?: Thoughts on Alexander’s Unified Conception of CRIMINAL CULPABILITY’ (2000) 88 California Law Review 955
75. MARKUS DUBBER, Criminal Law: Model Penal Code (New York, NY, Foundation Press, 2002)
76. ANTONY DUFF, Intention, Agency and Criminal Liability: Philosophy of Action and the Criminal Law (Oxford, Blackwell, 1990)
77. ANTONY DUFF, Introduction to Duff (ed) (1998)
78. ANTONY DUFF, ‘Principle and Contradiction in the Criminal Law: Motives and Criminal Liability’ in Duff (ed) (1998)
79. ANTONY DUFF (ed), Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998)
80. NEIL DUXBURY, Patterns of American Jurisprudence (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995)
81. NEIL DUXBURY, Jurists and Judges: An Essay on Influence (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2001)
82. NEIL DUXBURY, Frederick Pollock and the English Juristic Tradition, forthcoming (Oxford, OUP, 2005)
83. RONALD DWORKIN, Taking Rights Seriously (London, Duckworth, 1977)
84. RONALD DWORKIN, ‘In Praise of Theory’ (1997) 29 Arizona State Law Journal 353
85. RONALD DWORKIN, ‘Thirty Years On’ (2002) 115 Harvard Law Review 1655
86. HARRY EDWARDS, ‘Collegiality and Decision Making on the D.C. Circuit’ (1998) 84 Virginia Law Review 1335
87. JOHN EEKELAAR and JOHN BELL (eds), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, Third Series (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987)
88. DW ELLIOTT, ‘Dishonesty in Theft: A Dispensable Concept’ [1982] Criminal Law Review 395
89. DW ELLIOTT, ‘Directors’ Thefts and Dishonesty’ [1991] Criminal Law Review 732
90. DW ELLIOTT, ‘Endangering Life by Destroying or Damaging Property’ [1997] Criminal Law Review 382
91. EVELYN ELLIS (ed), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1999)
92. BEN EMMERSON and ANDREW ASHWORTH, Human Rights and Criminal Justice (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2001)
93. TIMOTHY ENDICOTT, Vagueness in Law (Oxford, OUP, 2000)
94. SUSAN ESTRICH, ‘Rape’ (1986) 95 Yale Law Journal 1087
95. JIM EVANS, ‘Controlling the Use of Parliamentary History’ (1998) 18 New Zealand Universities Law Review 1
96. JIM EVANS, ‘Questioning the Dogmas of Realism’ [2001] New Zealand Law Review 145
97. LINDSAY FARMER, ‘The Obsession with Definition: The Nature of Crime and Critical Legal Theory’ (1996) 5 Social and Legal Studies 57
98. LINDSAY FARMER, Criminal law, tradition and legal order: Crime and the genius of Scots law, 1747 to the present (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997)
99. DAVID FELDMAN (ed), English Public Law (Oxford, OUP, 2004)
100. PAMELA FERGUSON, ‘Codifying Criminal Law (1): A Critique of Scots Common Law’ [2004] Criminal Law Review 49
101. JOHN FINNIS, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1980)
102. JOHN FINNIS, ‘On “The Critical Legal Studies Movement”’ (1985) 30 American Journal of Jurisprudence 21, also in Eekelaar and Bell (eds) (1987)
103. STANLEY FISH, The Trouble with Principle (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1999)
104. OWEN FISS, ‘The Death of the Law’ (1986) 72 Cornell Law Review 1
105. PETER FITZPATRICK and ALAN HUNT (eds), Critical Legal Studies (Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1987), a reprint of (1987) 14(1) Journal of Law and Society
106. GEORGE FLETCHER, ‘The Theory of Criminal Negligence: A Comparative Analysis’ (1971) 119 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 401
107. GEORGE FLETCHER, Rethinking Criminal Law (Boston, MA, Little, Brown & Co, 1978; republished, Oxford, OUP, 2000)
108. GEORGE FLETCHER, ‘The Fall and Rise of Criminal Theory’ (1998) 1 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 275
109. GEORGE FLETCHER, ‘Dogmas of the Model Penal Code’ (1998) 2 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 3
110. CAROLINE FORELL and DONNA MATTHEWS, A Law of Her Own: The Reasonable Woman as a Measure of Man (New York, NY, New York University Press, 2000)
111. CHRISTOPHER FORSYTH (ed), Judicial Review and the Constitution (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2000)
112. ML FRIEDLAND, ‘R.S. Wright’s Model Criminal Code: A Forgotten Chapter in the History of the Criminal Law’ (1981) 1 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 307
113. LON FULLER, Legal Fictions (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 1967)
114. DONALD GALLOWAY, ‘Nothing If Not Critical’ (1997) 36 Alberta Law Review 273
115. JOHN GARDNER, ‘Criminal Law and the Uses of Theory: A Reply to Laing’ (1994) 14 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 217
116. JOHN GARDNER, ‘On the General Part of the Criminal Law’ in Duff (ed) (1998)
117. MARTIN GARDNER, ‘The Mens Rea Enigma: Observations on the Role of Motive in the Criminal Law Past and Present’ (1993) Utah Law Review 635
118. SIMON GARDNER, ‘Is Theft a Rip-Off?’ (1990) 10 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 441
119. SIMON GARDNER, ‘Recklessness Refined’ (1993) 109 Law Quarterly Review 21
120. SIMON GARDNER, ‘Manslaughter by Gross Negligence’ (1995) 111 Law Quarterly Review 22
121. RUTH GAVISON (ed), Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of H.L.A. Hart (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987)
122. RAYMOND GEUSS, The Idea of a Critical Theory, Habermas and the Frankfurt School (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1981)
123. MARIANNE GILES, ‘Judicial Law-Making in the Criminal Courts: the case of marital rape’ [1992] Criminal Law Review 407
124. PETER GLAZEBROOK (ed), Reshaping the Criminal Law: Essays in honour of Glanville Williams (London, Stevens & Sons, 1978)
125. PETER GLAZEBROOK, ‘Revising the Theft Acts’ (1993) 52 Cambridge Law Journal 191
126. PETER GLAZEBROOK, ‘Still No Code! English Criminal Law 1894–1994’ in Dockray (ed) (1996)
127. ROBERT GOFF, ‘The Search for Principle’ (1983) 69 Proceedings of the British Academy 169
128. LORD GOFF, ‘Judge, Jurist and Legislature’ (1987) 2 Denning Law Journal 79
129. ROBERT GOFF, ‘The Mental Element in the Crime of Murder’ (1988) 104 Law Quarterly Review 30
130. MICHAEL GORR, ‘Should the Law Distinguish between Intention and (Mere) Foresight?’ (1996) 2 Legal Theory 359
131. KENT GREENAWALT, ‘The Perplexing Borders of Justification and Excuse’ (1984) 84 Columbia Law Review 1897
132. EDWARD GRIEW, ‘Consistency, Communication and Codification: Reflections on Two Mens Rea Words’ in Glazebrook (ed) (1978)
133. EDWARD GRIEW, ‘Dishonesty: The Objections to Feely and Ghosh’ [1985] Criminal Law Review 341
134. EDWARD GRIEW, The Theft Acts (7th edn, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1995); (6th edn, 1990)
135. HYMAN GROSS, A Theory of Criminal Justice (New York, NY, OUP, 1979)
136. HYMAN GROSS and ROSS HARRISON (eds), Jurisprudence: Cambridge Essays (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1992)
137. TADEUSZ GRYGIER, Social Protection Code: A New Model of Criminal Justice (South Hackensack, NJ, Fred B Rothman & Co, 1977)
138. AG GUEST (ed), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1961)
139. JEROME HALL, ‘Negligent Behaviour Should Be Excluded from Penal Liability’ (1963) 63 Columbia Law Review 632
140. ANDREW HALPIN, ‘Intended Consequences and Unintentional Fallacies’ (1987) 7 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 104
141. ANDREW HALPIN, ‘More Comments on Rights and Claims’ (1991) 10 Law and Philosophy 271
142. ANDREW HALPIN, ‘The Appropriate Appropriation’ [1991] Criminal Law Review 426
143. ANDREW HALPIN, ‘The Test for Dishonesty’ [1996] Criminal Law Review 283
144. ANDREW HALPIN, Rights and Law – Analysis and Theory (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1997)
145. ANDREW HALPIN, ‘Definitions and directions: recklessness unheeded’ (1998) 18 Legal Studies 294
146. ANDREW HALPIN, Review of Christodoulidis’ Law and Reflexive Politics (2000) 4 Edinburgh Law Review 107
147. ANDREW HALPIN, Reasoning with Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2001)
148. ANDREW HALPIN, ‘Or, even, What the Law Can Teach the Philosophy of Language: A Response to Green’, forthcoming Virginia Law Review
149. BV HARRIS, ‘Final Appellate Courts Overruling Their Own “Wrong” Precedents: The Ongoing Search for Principle’ (2002) 118 Law Quarterly Review 408
150. JIM HARRIS, ‘Towards Principles of Overruling—When Should a Final Court of Appeal Second Guess?’ (1990) 10 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 135
151. HLA HART, ‘Negligence, Mens Rea and Criminal Responsibility’ in Hart (1968), also in Guest (ed) (1961)
152. HLA HART, Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1968)
153. Her Majesty’s Commissioners for Revising and Consolidating the Criminal Law (appointed 1845), Fourth Report (1848), Parliamentary Papers (1847–8)XXVII, 1
154. PADDY HILLYARD, ‘Invoking Indignation: Reflections on Future Directions of Socio-legal Studies’ (2002) 29 Journal of Law and Society 645
155. LORD HOFFMAN, ‘The Influence of the European Principle of Proportionality upon UK Law’ in Ellis (ed) (1999)
156. Home Office, Stalking—The Solutions: A Consultation Paper (London, Home Office, 1996)
157. JEREMY HORDER, ‘Cognition, Emotion, and Criminal Culpability’ (1990) 106 Law Quarterly Review 469
158. JEREMY HORDER, ‘Criminal Culpability: The Possibility of a General Theory’ (1993) 12 Law and Philosophy 193
159. JEREMY HORDER, ‘Intention in the Criminal Law—A Rejoinder’ (1995) 58 Modern Law Review 678
160. JEREMY HORDER, ‘Criminal Law: Between Determinism, Liberalism, and Criminal Justice’ (1996) Current Legal Problems 159
161. JEREMY HORDER, ‘Crimes of Ulterior Intent’ in Simester and Smith (eds) (1996)
162. JEREMY HORDER, ‘Two Histories and Four Hidden Principles of Mens Rea’ (1997) 113 Law Quarterly Review 95
163. JEREMY HORDER, ‘Gross Negligence and Criminal Culpability’ (1997) 47 University of Toronto Law Journal 495
164. JEREMY HORDER (ed), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, Fourth Series (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2000)
165. JEREMY HORDER, ‘Criminal Law and Legal Positivism’ (2002) 8 Legal Theory 221
166. DOUGLAS HUSAK, ‘The Sequential Principle of Relative Culpability’ (1995) 1 Legal Theory 493
167. GRANT HUSCROFT and PAUL RISHWORTH (eds), Litigating Rights: Perspectives from Domestic and International Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2002)
168. ELIZABETH IGLESIAS, ‘Latcrit Theory: Some Preliminary Notes towards a Transatlantic Dialogue’ (2000) 9 University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review 1 International Chamber of Commerce, Uniform Customs and Practices for Documentary Credits (UCP 500) (Paris, International Chamber of Commerce, 1993)
169. LORD IRVINE, ‘Judges and Decision-makers: The Theory and Practice of Wednesbury Review’ [1996] Public Law 59
170. DAVID JABBARI, ‘Reason, Cause and Principle in Law: The Normativity of Context’ (1999) 19 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 203
171. DAVID JABBARI, ‘Radical Particularism: A Natural Law of Context’ (1999) 50 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 454
172. SUSAN JAMES and STEPHANIE PALMER (eds), Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2002)
173. CATHERINE JONES FINER and MIKE NELLIS (eds), Crime and Social Exclusion (Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 1998)
174. JUSTINIAN, Institutes, JB Moyle (ed) (5th edn, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1912)
175. MARK KELMAN, ‘Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law’ (1981) 33 Stanford Law Review 591
176. MARK KELMAN, A Guide to Critical Legal Studies (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1987)
177. DUNCAN KENNEDY, A Critique of Adjudication (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1997)
178. DUNCAN KENNEDY, ‘The Critique of Rights in Critical Legal Studies’ in Brown and Halley (eds) (2002) Kenny’s Outlines of Criminal Law—see Turner
179. GEORGE KLIPPERT, ‘The Juridical Nature of Unjust Enrichment’ (1980) 30 University of Toronto Law Journal 356
180. MORDECHAI KREMNITZER, Preface (1996) 30 Israel Law Review 1
181. ITZHAK KUGLER, Direct and Oblique Intention in the Criminal Law: An inquiry into degrees of blameworthiness (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2002)
182. NICOLA LACEY, ‘A Clear Concept of Intention: Elusive or Illusory?’ (1993) 56 Modern Law Review 621
183. NICOLA LACEY, ‘In(de)terminable Intentions’ (1995) 58 Modern Law Review 692
184. NICOLA LACEY, ‘Contingency, Coherence, and Conceptualism: Reflections on the Encounter between “Critique” and “the Philosophy of the Criminal Law”’ in Duff (ed) (1998)
185. NICOLA LACEY, ‘General Principles of Criminal Law? A Feminist View’ in Nicolson and Bibbings (eds) (2000)
186. NICOLA LACEY, ‘Violence, Ethics and Law: Feminist Reflections on a Familiar Dilemma’ in James and Palmer (eds) (2002)
187. NICOLA LACEY and CELIA WELLS, Reconstructing Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on Crime and the Criminal Process (2nd edn, London, Butterworths, 1998); (3rd edn with Oliver Quick, 2003)
188. Law Commission No 143 (HC 270, 1985), Codification of the Criminal Law
189. Law Commission No 177 (HC 299, 1989), A Criminal Code for England and Wales
190. Law Commission No 237 (HC 171, 1996), Legislating the Criminal Code: Involuntary Manslaughter
191. Law Commission, LCCP No 155 (1999), Legislating the Criminal Code: Fraud and Deception
192. Law Commission No 274 (HC 227, 2001), Eighth Programme of Law Reform
193. Law Commission No 276 (Cm 5560, 2002), Fraud
194. SIR JOHN LAWS, ‘Law and Democracy’ [1995] Public Law 72
195. SIR JOHN LAWS, ‘The Limitations of Human Rights’ [1998] Public Law 254
196. SIR JOHN LAWS, ‘Judicial Review and the Meaning of Law’ in Forsyth (ed) (2000)
197. LH LEIGH, ‘Some Remarks on Appropriation in the Law of Theft after Morris’ (1985) 48 Modern Law Review 167
198. LH LEIGH, ‘Recklessness after Reid’ (1993) 56 Modern Law Review 208
199. LH LEIGH, ‘Liability for Inadvertence: A Lordly Legacy?’ (1995) 58 Modern Law Review 457
200. IAN LOVELAND, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction (3rd edn, London, Butterworths, 2003)
201. NEIL MACCORMICK, ‘Reconstruction after Deconstruction: A Response to CLS’ (1990) 10 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 539
202. NEIL MACCORMICK, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (rev edn, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994)
203. CATHERINE MACKINNON, ‘Towards Feminist Jurisprudence’ (1982) 34 Stanford Law Review 703
204. SIR HENRY MAINE, Ancient Law (10th edn with Introduction and Notes by Sir Frederick Pollock, London, John Murray, 1920)
205. BASIL MARKESINIS, Comparative Law in the Courtroom and in the Classroom: The Story of the Last Thirty-Five Years (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2003)
206. FINBARR MCAULEY and J PAUL MCCUTCHEON, Criminal Liability: A Grammar (Dublin, Round Hall Sweet & Maxwell, 2000)
207. SHAUN MCVEIGH and PETER RUSH, ‘Cutting our Losses: Criminal Legal Doctrine’ in McVeigh, Rush and Young (eds) (1997)
208. SHAUN MCVEIGH, PETER RUSH and ALISON YOUNG (eds), Criminal Legal Doctrine (Aldershot, Ashgate, 1997)
209. BARRY MITCHELL, ‘Culpably Indifferent Murder’ (1996) 25 Anglo-American Law Review 64
210. MICHAEL MOORE, Placing Blame: A General Theory of the Criminal Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1997)
211. MAYO MORAN, Rethinking the Reasonable Person: An Egalitarian Reconstruction of the Objective Standard (Oxford, OUP, 2003)
212. COLIN MUNRO, Studies in Constitutional Law (2nd edn, London, Butterworths, 1999)
213. DANA NEASCU, ‘CLS Stands for Critical Legal Studies, If Anyone Remembers’ (2000) 8 Journal of Law and Policy 415
214. DAVID NELKEN, ‘Critical Criminal Law’ (1987) 14 Journal of Law and Society 105, also in Fitzpatrick and Hunt (eds) (1987)
215. JASON NEYERS, MITCHELL MCINNES and STEPHEN PITEL (eds), Understanding Unjust Enrichment (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2004)
216. DONALD NICOLSON and LOIS BIBBINGS (eds), Feminist Perspectives on Criminal Law (London, Cavendish Publishing, 2000)
217. ALAN NORRIE, Law, Ideology and Punishment: Retrieval and Critique of the Liberal Idea of Criminal Justice (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991)
218. ALAN NORRIE, ‘Subjectivism, Objectivism and the Limits of Criminal Recklessness’ (1992) 12 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 45
219. ALAN NORRIE, ‘Legal and Moral Judgment in the “General Part”’ in McVeigh, Rush and Young (eds) (1997)
220. ALAN NORRIE, ‘“Simulacra of Morality”? Beyond the Ideal/Actual Antinomies of Criminal Justice’ in Duff (ed) (1998)
221. ALAN NORRIE, Punishment, Responsibility, and Justice: A Relational Critique (Oxford, OUP, 2000)
222. ALAN NORRIE, Crime, Reason and History: A Critical Introduction to Criminal Law (2nd edn, London, Butterworths, 2001)
223. ALAN NORRIE, ‘From Criminal Law to Legal Theory: The Mysterious Case of the Reasonable Glue Sniffer’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 538
224. CHRISTOPHER NORRIS, Deconstruction and the Interests of Theory (London, Pinter Publishers, 1988)
225. VF NOURSE, ‘Hearts and Minds: Understanding the New Culpability’ (2002) 6 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 361
226. MARTHA NUSSBAUM, ‘Skepticism about Practical Reason in Literature and the Law’ (1994) 107 Harvard Law Review 714
227. FRANCES OLSEN, ‘Statutory Rape: A Feminist Critique of Rights Analysis’ (1984) 63 Texas Law Review 387
228. DAVID ORMEROD, ‘A Bit of a Con? The Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on Fraud’ [1999] Criminal Law Review 789
229. Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edn prepared by JA Simpson and ECS Weiner, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1989)
230. DENNIS PATTERSON, ‘Introduction’ in Patterson (ed) (1994)
231. DENNIS PATTERSON (ed), Postmodernism and Law (Aldershot, Dartmouth, 1994)
232. DENNIS PATTERSON (ed), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Oxford, Blackwell Publishers, 1996)
233. DENNIS PATTERSON, 2002 Quinlan Lecture, ‘What is at Stake in Jurisprudence?’ (2003) 28 Oklahoma City University Law Review 173
234. DENNIS PATTERSON, ‘From Postmodernism to Law and Truth’ (2003) 26 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 49
235. GEORGE PAVLICH, ‘The Art of Critique or How Not to be Governed Thus’ in Wickham and Pavlich (eds) (2001)
236. A PHILLIPS GRIFFITHS (ed), Philosophy and Practice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985)
237. SAMUEL PILLSBURY, Judging Evil: Rethinking the Law of Murder and Manslaughter (New York, NY, New York University Press, 1998)
238. PLATO, Republic, Loeb edition with translation by Paul Shorey (London, William Heinemann, 1935)
239. Gerald Postema, ‘Philosophy of the Common Law’ in Coleman and Shapiro (eds) (2002)
240. JIRI PRIBAN, ‘Sharing the Paradigms? Critical Legal Studies and the Sociology of Law’ in Banakar and Travers (eds) (2002)
241. PETER PUGH, Is Guinness Good for You? (London, Financial Training Publications, 1987)
242. LEON RADZINOWICZ, ‘The Waltham Black Act: A Study of the Legislative Attitude towards Crime in the Eighteenth Century’ (1945) 9 Cambridge Law Journal 56
243. LEON RADZINOWICZ, A History of English Criminal Law and its Administration from 1750, 1: The Movement for Reform (London, Stevens & Sons, 1948)
244. RICHARD REVESZ, ‘Ideology, Collegiality, and the D.C. Circuit: A Reply to Chief Judge Harry T. Edwards’ (1999) 85 Virginia Law Review 805
245. PAUL ROBERTS, ‘Philosophy, Feinberg, Codification, and Consent: A Progress Report on English Experiences of Criminal Law Reform’ (2001) 5 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 173
246. PAUL ROBINSON, ‘A Brief History of Distinctions in Criminal Culpability’ (1980) Hastings Law Journal 815
247. PAUL ROBINSON, ‘Should the Criminal Law Abandon the Actus Reus-Mens Rea Distinction?’ in Shute, Gardner and Horder (eds) (1993)
248. PAUL ROBINSON, Structure and Function in Criminal Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1997)
249. PAUL ROBINSON, ‘In Defense of the Model Penal Code: A Reply to Professor Fletcher’ (1998) 2 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 25
250. PAUL ROBINSON, MICHAEL CAHILL and USMAN MOHAMMAD, ‘The Five Worst (and Five Best) American Criminal Codes’ (2000) 95 Northwestern University Law Review 1
251. RICHARD ROBINSON, Definition (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1954)
252. MICHEL ROSENFELD, ‘Deconstruction and Legal Interpretation, Conflict, Indeterminacy and the Temptations of the New Legal Formalism’ in Cornell, Rosenfeld and Carlson (eds) (1992)
253. KATHERYN RUSSELL, ‘A Critical View from the Inside: An Application of Critical Legal Studies to Criminal Law’ (1994) 85 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 222
254. ANDREW RUTHERFORD, ‘Criminal Policy and the Eliminative Ideal’ (1997) 31 Social Policy and Administration 116, also in Jones Finer and Nellis (eds) (1998)
255. ANDREW SANDERS, Review of Alldridge’s Relocating Criminal Law (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 151
256. FREDERICK SCHAUER, Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision Making in Law and in Life (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1991)
257. ELIZABETH SCHNEIDER, ‘Equal Rights to Trial for Women: Sex Bias in the Law of Self-Defense’ (1980) 15 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 623
258. LOUIS SCHWARTZ, ‘With Gun and Camera Through Darkest CLS-Land’ (1984) 36 Stanford Law Review 413
259. SIR STEPHEN SEDLEY, ‘Human Rights: a Twenty-First Century Agenda’ [1995] Public Law 386
260. SIR STEPHEN SEDLEY, Freedom, Law and Justice (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1999)
261. SEXTUS EMPIRICUS, Against the Logicians in the Loeb edition, Sextus Empiricus II, with translation by RG Bury (London, William Heinemann, 1935)
262. EMILY SHERWIN, ‘A Defense of Analogical Reasoning in Law’ (1999) 66 University of Chicago Law Review 1179
263. STEPHEN SHUTE, ‘Appropriation and the Law of Theft’ [2002] Criminal Law Review 445
264. STEPHEN SHUTE, JOHN GARDNER and JEREMY HORDER, ‘Introduction: The Logic of Criminal Law’ in Shute, Gardner and Horder (eds) (1993)
265. STEPHEN SHUTE, JOHN GARDNER and JEREMY HORDER (eds), Action and Value in Criminal Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1993)
266. STEPHEN SHUTE and AP SIMESTER (eds), Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Oxford, OUP, 2002)
267. STEPHEN SILBER, ‘The Law Commission, Conspiracy to Defraud and the Dishonesty Project’ [1995] Criminal Law Review 461
268. RAIMO SILTALA, A Theory of Precedent: From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2000)
269. AP SIMESTER, ‘Can Negligence be Culpable?’ in Horder (ed) (2000)
270. AP SIMESTER and ATH SMITH (eds), Harm and Culpability (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996)
271. NE SIMMONDS, ‘Bluntness and Bricolage’ in Gross and Harrison (eds) (1992)
272. KENNETH SIMONS, ‘Rethinking Mental States’ (1992) 72 Boston University Law Review 463
273. KENNETH SIMONS, ‘Dimensions Of Negligence in Criminal and Tort Law’ (2002) 3 Theoretical Inquiries in Law (Online Edition) No 2 Article 2
274. KENNETH SIMONS, ‘Does Punishment for “Culpable Indifference” Simply Punish for “Bad Character”? Examining the Requisite Connection Between Mens Rea and Actus Reus’ (2002) 6 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 219
275. ATH SMITH, ‘On Actus Reus and Mens Rea’ in Glazebrook (ed) (1978)
276. ATH SMITH, ‘Judicial Lawmaking in the Criminal Law’ (1984) 100 Law Quarterly Review 46
277. ATH SMITH, Property Offences (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1994)
278. ATH SMITH, ‘Offences Against Property’ in Feldman (ed) (2004)
279. JOHN SMITH, Comment on Caldwell [1981] Criminal Law Review 393
280. JOHN SMITH, Comment on Morris [1983] Criminal Law Review 815
281. JOHN SMITH, Comment on Dobson [1990] Criminal Law Review 273
282. JOHN SMITH, Comment on Buzalek and Schiffer [1991] Criminal Law Review 130
283. JOHN SMITH, Comment on O’Connell [1991] Criminal Law Review 771
284. JOHN SMITH, Comment on R v R [1992] Criminal Law Review 207
285. JOHN SMITH, Comment on Gallasso [1993] Criminal Law Review 459
286. JOHN SMITH, ‘Reforming the Theft Acts’ (1996) 28 Bracton Law Journal 27
287. SIR JOHN SMITH, The Law of Theft (8th edn, London, Butterworths, 1997); (6th edn, 1989)
288. SIR JOHN SMITH, ‘The Sad Fate of the Theft Act 1968’ in Swadling and Jones (eds) (1999)
289. SIR JOHN SMITH, Smith and Hogan’s Criminal Law (10th edn, London, Butterworths, 2002)
290. KEITH SMITH, Lawyers, Legislators and Theorists: Developments in English Criminal Jurisprudence 1800–1957 (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998)
291. LAWRENCE SOLUM, ‘On the Indeterminacy Thesis: Critiquing Critical Dogma’ (1987) 54 University of Chicago Law Review 54
292. JOHN STANNARD, ‘Subjectivism, Objectivism, and the Draft Criminal Code’ (1985) 101 Law Quarterly Review 540
293. SIR JAMES FITZJAMES STEPHEN, A History of the Criminal Law of England (London, Macmillan & Co, 1883; reprinted New York, NY, Burt Franklin, 1973)
294. SIR JAMES FITZJAMES STEPHEN, A Digest of the Criminal Law (Crimes and Punishments) (3rd edn, London, Macmillan & Co, 1883)
295. NADINE STROSSEN, ‘Liberty and Equality: Complementary, Not Competing, Constitutional Commitments’ in Huscroft and Rishworth (eds) (2002)
296. DON STUART, ‘Supporting General Principles for Criminal Responsibility in the Model Penal Code with Suggestions for Reconsideration: A Canadian Perspective’ (2000) 4 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 13
297. GR SULLIVAN, ‘Intent, Subjective Recklessness and Culpability’ (1992) 12 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 380
298. GR SULLIVAN, ‘Is Criminal Law Possible?’ (2002) 22 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 747
299. CASS SUNSTEIN, ‘On Analogical Reasoning’ (1993) 106 Harvard Law Review 741
300. CASS SUNSTEIN, Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (New York, NY, OUP, 1996)
301. WILLIAM SWADLING and GARETH JONES (eds), The Search for Principle: Essays in Honour of Lord Goff of Chieveley (Oxford, OUP, 1999)
302. VICTOR TADROS, ‘Recklessness and the Duty to Take Care’ in Shute and Simester (eds) (2002)
303. VICTOR TADROS, ‘The system of the criminal law’ (2002) 22 Legal Studies 448
304. COLIN TAPPER (ed), Crime, Proof and Punishment: Essays in Memory of Sir Rupert Cross (London, Butterworths, 1981)
305. CHARLES TAYLOR, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989)
306. CHARLES TAYLOR, The Ethics of Authenticity (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1992)
307. JENNIFER TEMKIN, ‘Rape and Criminal Justice at the Millenium’ in Nicolson and Bibbings (eds) (2000)
308. JENNIFER TEMKIN, Rape and the Legal Process (2nd edn, Oxford, OUP, 2002)
309. JENNIFER TEMKIN, ‘Sexual History Evidence—Beware the Backlash’ [2003] Criminal Law Review 217
310. EP THOMPSON, Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act (London, Allen Lane, 1975)
311. ROSY THORNTON, ‘Dishonest Assistance: Guilty Conduct or a Guilty Mind?’ (2002) 61 Cambridge Law Journal 524
312. RICHARD TUR, ‘Dishonesty and the Jury: a Case Study in the Moral Content of Law’ in Phillips Griffiths (ed) (1985)
313. RICHARD TUR, ‘Subjectivism and Objectivism: Towards Synthesis’ in Shute, Gardner and Horder (eds) (1993)
314. JWC TURNER (ed), Kenny’s Outlines of Criminal Law (16th edn, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1952); (1st edn, 1902)
315. MARK TUSHNET, ‘Critical Legal Studies: A Political History’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 1515
316. MARK TUSHNET, Review of Schauer’s Playing with the Rules (1992) 90 Michigan Law Review 1560
317. MARK TUSHNET and JENNIFER JAFF, ‘Critical Legal Studies and Criminal Procedure’ (1986) 35 Catholic University Law Review 361
318. WILLIAM TWINING and DAVID MIERS, How To Do Things With Rules (4th edn, London, Butterworths, 1999)
319. WILLIAM TWINING, WARD FARNSWORTH, STEFAN VOGENAUER and FERNANDO TESÓN, ‘The Role of Academics in the Legal System’ in Cane and Tushnet (eds) (2003)
320. ROBERTO UNGER, ‘The Critical Legal Studies Movement’ (1983) 96 Harvard Law Review 561
321. ROBERTO UNGER, The Critical Legal Studies Movement (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1986)
322. RC VAN CAENEGEM, Judges, Legislators and Professors: Chapters in European Legal History (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987)
323. GRAHAM VIRGO, ‘Back to Basics—Reconstructing Manslaughter’ (1994) 53 Cambridge Law Journal 44.
324. ANDREW VON HIRSCH and ANDREW ASHWORTH (eds), Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy (2nd edn, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1998)
325. CELIA WELLS, ‘Swatting the Subjectivist Bug’ [1982] Criminal Law Review 209
326. CELIA WELLS, ‘Codification of the Criminal Law: Restatement or Reform?’ [1986] Criminal Law Review 314
327. CELIA WELLS, ‘Stalking: The Criminal Law Response’ [1997] Criminal Law Review 463
328. ROBIN WEST, ‘Re-Imagining Justice’ (2002) 14 Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 333
329. ROBIN WEST, Re-Imagining Justice: Progressive Interpretations of Formal Equality, Rights, and the Rule of Law (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2003)
330. PETER WESTEN and JAMES MANGIAFICO, ‘The Criminal Defense of Duress: A Justification, Not an Excuse—And Why it Matters’ (2003) 6 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 833
331. ALAN WHITE, Grounds of Liability: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1985)
332. ALAN WHITE, Misleading Cases (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1991)
333. GARY WICKHAM and GEORGE PAVLICH, Rethinking Law, Society and Governance: Foucault’s Bequest (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2001)
334. GLANVILLE WILLIAMS, Criminal Law: The General Part (2nd edn, London, Stevens & Sons, 1961)
335. GLANVILLE WILLIAMS, The Mental Element in Crime (Jerusalem, Magnes Press, 1965)
336. GLANVILLE WILLIAMS, ‘Recklessness Redefined’ (1981) 40 Cambridge Law Journal 252
337. GLANVILLE WILLIAMS, Textbook of Criminal Law (2nd edn, London, Stevens & Sons, 1983)
338. GLANVILLE WILLIAMS, ‘The Lords and Impossible Attempts, or Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?’ (1986) 45 Cambridge Law Journal 33
339. GLANVILLE WILLIAMS, ‘The Mens Rea for Murder: Leave It Alone’ (1989) 105 Law Quarterly Review 387
340. WILLIAM WILSON, ‘Murder and the Structure of Homicide’ in Ashworth and Mitchell (eds) (2000)
341. WILLIAM WILSON, Central Issues in Criminal Theory (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2002)
342. LUDWIG WITTGENSTEIN, Philosophical Investigations, GEM Anscombe (transl) (2nd edn, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1958)
343. DAVID WOOD and ROBERT BERNASCONI (eds), Derrida and Différance (Coventry, Parousia Press, 1985; republished, Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press, 1988)
344. LORD WOOLF, ‘Droit Public—English Style’ [1995] Public Law 57
345. RS WRIGHT (C 1893, 1877), Drafts of a Criminal Code and a Code of Criminal Procedure for the Island of Jamaica with an Explanatory Memorandum
346. STANLEY YEO, Fault in Homicide: Towards a Schematic Approach to the Fault Elements for Murder and Involuntary Manslaughter in England, Australia and India (Annandale, NSW, The Federation Press, 1997)
347. MICHAEL ZANDER, ‘What precedents and other source materials do the courts use?’ (2000) 150 New Law Journal 1790