Experimental approaches to action

Agency and Self-Awareness: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 165-187

  Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85187625558     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Ach, N. (1905), Über die Willenstätigkeit und das Denken. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1983), 'The architecture of cognition', Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
3. Brass, M. (1999), 'Imitation and ideomotor compatibility'. Dissertation, University of Munich.
4. Brass, M. Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., and Prinz, W. (2000), 'Compatibility between observed and executed: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues', Brain and Cognition, 44:124-43.
5. Brass, M. Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., and Prinz, W. (2001), 'Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task', Acta Psychologica, 106:3-22.
6. Descartes, R. (1664), Traitée de I'Homme. Paris: Girard.
7. Donders, F. C. (1862), 'Über die Schnelligkeit psychischer Processe', Archiv für Anatomie und Physiologie, 657-81.
8. Fitts, P. M., and Biederman, I. (1965), 'S-R compatibility and information reduction', Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69: 408-12.
9. Freese, M., and Sabini, J. (eds.) (1985), Goal-Directed Behavior: The Concept of Action in Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Gibson, J. J., and Gibson, E. J. (1955), 'What is learned in perceptual learning? A reply to Professor Postman', Psychological Review, 62: 447-50.
11. Gollwitzer, P. M., and Bargh, J. A. (eds.) (1996), The Psychology of Action. Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
12. Greenwald, A. (1970), 'Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideomotor mechanism', Psychological Review, 77: 73-99.
13. Helmholtz, H. (1852), 'Messungen über Fortpflanzungsgeschwindigkeit der Reizung in den Nerven, Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medizin, 199-216.
14. Hershberger, W. A. (ed.) (1989), Volitional Action: Conation and Control. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
15. Hommel, B. (1993), 'Inverting the Simon effect by intention: determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information', Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55: 270-9.
16. Hommel, B. (1997), 'Toward an action concept model of stimulus-response compatibility', in B. Hommel and W. Prinz (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Stimulus-Response Compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 281-320.
17. Hommel, B. Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., and Prinz, W. (2001), 'The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24: 849-937.
18. Hull, C. L. (1943), Principles of Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
19. James, W. (1890), The Principles of Psychology. New York: Macmillan.
20. Jeannerod, M. (1997), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
21. Knuf, L. (1998), Ideomotorische Phänomene: Neue Fakten für ein altes Problem. Aachen: Shaker.
22. Knuf, L. Aschersleben, G., and Prinz, W. (2001), 'An analysis of ideomotor action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130 (4): 779-98.
23. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., and Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967), 'Perception of the speech code', Psychological Review, 74: 431-61.
24. Lotze, R. H. (1852), Medicinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmann.
25. Massaro, D. W. (1990), 'An information-processing analysis of perception and action, in O. Neumann and W. Prinz (eds.), Relationships between Perception and Action: Current Approaches. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 133-66.
26. Meyer, D. E., and Kieras, D. E. (1999), 'Précis to a practical unified theory of cognition and action: some lessons from EPIC compu tational models of human multiple-task performance', in D. Gopher and A. Koriat (eds.), Attention and Performance, XVII. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 17-88.
27. Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., and Pribram, K. H. (1960), Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
28. Mosseler, J. (1999), 'How independent from action control is perception?', in G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, and J. Müsseler (eds.), Cognitive Contributions to the Perception of Spatial and Temporal Events. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 121-47.
29. Mosseler, J. and Hommel, B. (1997), 'Blindness to response-compatible stimuli', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23: 861-72.
30. Newell, R. (1990), Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
31. Postman, L. (1955), 'Association theory and perceptual learning', Psychological Review, 62: 438-46.
32. Pribram, K. H. (1971), Languages of the Brain: Experimental Paradoxes and Principles in Neuropsychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33. Prinz, W. (1984), 'Modes of linkage between perception and action, In W. Prinz and A. E Sanders (eds.), Cognition and Motor Processes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 185-93.
34. Prinz, W. (1987), 'Ideomotor action', in H. Heuer and A. E Sanders (eds.), Perspectives on Perception and Action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 47-76.
35. Prinz, W. (1990), 'A common coding approach to perception and action, in O. Neumann and W. Prinz (eds.), Relationships between Perception and Action: Current Approaches. Berlin, New York: Springer, 167-201.
36. Prinz, W. (1992), 'Why don't we perceive our brain states?', European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4: 1-20.
37. Prinz, W. (1997a), 'Perception and action planning', European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9 (2): 129-54.
38. Prinz, W. (1997b), 'Why Donders has led us astray', in B. Hommel and W. Prinz (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Stimulus-Response Compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 247-67.
39. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1991), Human Motor Control. San Diego: Academic Press.
40. Sanders, A. E (1980), 'Stage analysis of reaction processes', in G. E. Stelmach and J. Requin (eds.), Tutorials in Motor Behavior. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 331-54.
41. Schubö, A., Aschersleben, G., and Prinz, W. (2001), 'Interactions between perception and action in a reaction task with overlapping S-R assignments', Psychological Research, 65 (3): 145-57.
42. Simon, J. R. (1969), 'Reactions towards the source of stimulation', Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81: 174-6.
43. Simon, J. R. and Rudell, A. P. (1967), 'Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing', Journal of Applied Psychology, 51: 300-4.
44. Simon, J. R. and Rudell, A. P. Hinrichs, J. V., and Craft, J. L. (1970), 'Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence', Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86: 97-102.
45. Sternberg, S. (1969), 'The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donders' method', Acta Psychologien, 30: 276-315.
46. Stoet, G., and Hommel, B. (1999), 'Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25: 1625-40.
47. Viviani, P., Baud-Bovy, G., and Redolfi, M. (1997), 'Perceiving and tracking kinesthetic stimuli: further evidence of motor-perceptual interactions', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23: 1232-52.
48. Wallace, R. A. (1971), 'S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code', Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88: 354-60.
49. Watson, R. I. (1913), 'Psychology as the behaviorist views it', Psychological Review, 20: 158-78.
50. Welford, A. T. (1968), Fundamentals of Skill. London: Methuen.
51. Welford, A. T. (ed.) (1980), Reaction Times. London: Academic Press.