Bateman's Principles: Original Experiment and Modern Data For and Against

Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, Volume-Three Set

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages V1-166-V1-176

  Tang Martinez Z ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Anisogamy; Bateman; Bateman gradients; Cost of male reproduction; Cost of Sperm; Extra pair copulations; Male female differences in sexual behavior; Polyandry; Selection gradients; Sexual selection; Sperm allocation; Sperm depletion; Variance in mating success; Variance in reproductive success

Indexed keywords

EID: 85181388171     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-045337-8.00182-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. M.C.B. Andrade and M.M. Kasumovic (2005) Terminal investment strategies and male mate choice: Extreme tests of Bateman. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45 838-847.
2. S.J. Arnold (1994) Bateman’s principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. American Naturalist 144 S126-S149.
3. S.J. Arnold and D. Duvall (1994) Animal mating systems: A synthesis based on selection theory. American Naturalist 143 317-348.
4. A.J. Bateman (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2 349-368.
5. A. Bjork and S. Pitnick (2006) Intensity of selection along the anisogamy-isogamy continuum. Nature 441 742-745.
6. C. Darwin (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray
7. D.A. Dewsbury (2005) The Darwin-Bateman paradigm in historical context. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45 831-837.
8. D. Gopurenko, R.N. Williams and J.A. DeWoody (2007) Reproductive and mating success in the small-mouthed salamander (Ambystoma texanum) estimated via microsatellite parentage analysis. Evolutionary Biology 34 130-139.
9. P.A. Gowaty (2004) Sex roles, contests for the control of reproduction, and sexual selection. P. Kappeler, C. van Schaik (Eds) Sexual Selection in Primates Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 37-54.
10. P.A. Gowaty and S.P. Hubbell (2005) Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45 931-944.
11. M.E. Hauber and E.A. Lacey (2005) Bateman’s principle in cooperatively breeding vertebrates: The effects of non-breeding alloparents on variability in female and male reproductive success. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45 903-914.
12. J.L. Hoogland (1998) Why do female Gunnison’s prairie dogs copulate with more than one male? Animal Behaviour 55 351-359.
13. S.P. Hubbell and L.K. Johnson (1987) Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. American Naturalist 130 91-112.
14. A.G. Jones, J.R. Arguello and S.J. Arnold (2002) Validation of Bateman’s principles: A genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269 2533-2539.
15. A.G. Jones, G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, S.J. Arnold and J.C. Avise (2000) The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267 677-680.
16. E.D. Ketterson, P.G. Parker, S.A. Raouf, V. Nolan, C. Ziegenfus and C.R. Chandler (1998) The relative impact of extra-pair fertilizations on variation in male and female reproductive success in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). P.G. Parker, N.T. Burley (Eds) Avian Reproductive Tactics: Female and Male Perspectives Ornithological Monographs vol.49 81-101.
17. R.B. Lanctot, K.T. Schribner, B. Kempenaers and P.J. Weatherhead (1997) Lekking without a paradox in the buff-breasted sandpiper. American Naturalist 149 1051-1070.
18. D.R. Levitan (2005) The distribution of male and female reproductive success in a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45 848-855.
19. P.D. Lorch, L. Bussière and D.T. Gwynne (2008) Quantifying the potential for sexual dimorphism using upper limits on Bateman gradients. Behaviour 125 1-24.
20. G.A. Parker, R.R. Baker and V.G.F. Smith (1972) The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male–female phenomenon. Journal of Theoretical Biology 36 529-553.
21. A.I. Schulte-Hostedde, J.S. Millar and H.L. Gibbs (2004) Sexual selection and mating patterns in a mammal with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Behavioral Ecology 15 351-356.
22. B.F. Snyder and P.A. Gowaty (2007) A re-appraisal of Bateman’s classic study of intrasexual selection. Evolution 61 2457-2468.
23. W.J. Sutherland (1985) Chance can produce sex differences in mating success and explain Bateman’s data. Animal Behaviour 33 1349-1352.
24. Z. Tang-Martínez and T.B. Ryder (2005) The problem with paradigms: Bateman’s worldview as a case study. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45 821-830.
25. R.L. Trivers (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. B. Campbell (Eds) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing 136-179.
26. N. Wedell, M.J.G. Gage and G.A. Parker (2002) Sperm competition, male precedence, and sperm-limited females. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17 313-320.
27. R.N. Williams and J.A. DeWoody (2009) Reproductive success and sexual selection in eastern wild tiger salamanders (Ambystoma t. tigrinum). Evolutionary Biology 36 201-213.
28. B.E. Woolfenden, H.L. Gibbs and S.G. Sealy (2002) High opportunity for sexual selection in both sexes of an obligate brood parasitic bird, the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 52 417-425.
29. B.D. Worden and P.G. Parker (2001) Polyandry in grain beetles leads to greater reproductive success: Material and genetic benefits? Behavioral Ecology 12 761-767.