Self-reported planning behaviour and second language performance in narrative retelling

Task-Based Language Teaching

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages 95-128

  Pang, Francine ^a   Skehan, Peter ^b  

^a MACAO POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (Macao)

^b ST MARY'S UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85150171613     PISSN: 1877346X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/tblt.5.04pan     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Bei, X. (2010). The effects of topic familiarity and strategic planning in topic-based task performance at different proficiency levels. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Chinese University of Hong Kong.
2. Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383.
3. De Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s “Speaking” model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24.
4. Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 1–20.
5. Ellis, R. (Ed.). (2005a). Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. Ellis, R. (2005b). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7. Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509.
8. Foster P. & Skehan P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18(3), 299–324.
9. Hill L.A. (1961). Picture composition book. London: Longman.
10. Kormos J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12. Levelt, W.J. (1999). Language production: a blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language, (pp. 83–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. MacWhinney B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analysing talk, Volume 1: Transcription format and programs (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 52–83.
15. Michel, M.C., F.Kuiken, & Vedder, I. (2007). Effects of task complexity and task condition on Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 241–259.
16. O’Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.
17. Ortega L. (1995). The effect of planning on L2 Spanish narratives. Research Note 15. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
18. Ortega L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148.
19. Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20. Oxford R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
21. Pang F., & Skehan P. (2006). ‘What do learners do when they plan: a qualitative study’. Paper presented at St. Mary’s University College, Twickenham.
22. Revesz A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), 437–470.
23. Robinson P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57.
24. Robinson P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Skehan, P. (2009a). Modeling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.
26. Skehan, P. (2009b). Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language-learning tasks. In B. Richards, H. Daller, D. Malvern, & P. Meara (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: The interface between theory and application. (pp. 107–124). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
27. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211.
28. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58(2), 439–473.
30. Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language, (pp. 239–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31. Wang, Z. (2009). Modelling speech production and performance: Evidence from five types of planning and two task structures. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Chinese University of Hong Kong.
32. Wigglesworth, G. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14(1), 85–106.