CARING RELATIONS IN THE EDUCATION OF PRACTISING MATHEMATICS TEACHERS

The Mathematics Teacher Educator as a Developing Professional: Individuals, Teams, Communities and Networks: Volume 4

Volumn 4, Issue , 2008, Pages 299-314

  Sztajn, Paola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85147054192     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (2007/ Preparing STEM teachers: The key to global competitiveness. Selected profiles of teacher preparation programs. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Ball, D. L., & Wilson, S. M. (1996). Integrity in teaching: Recognizing the fusion of moral and intellectual. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 155-192.
3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
4. Business Higher Education Forum (2007). An American imperative: Transforming the recruitment, retention, and renewal of our nation's mathematics and science teaching workforce. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). The unforgiving complexity of teaching: Avoiding simplicity in the age of accountability. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 3-5.
6. Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Taking stock in 2004: Teacher education in dangerous times. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 3-7.
7. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal Study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81-112.
8. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Guskey, T. R. (2005). Taking a second look at accountability. Journal of Staff Development, 26(1) 1018.
10. Hackenberg, A. (2005). A model of mathematical learning and caring relation. For the learning of Mathematics., 25(1), 45-51.
11. Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s Mathematics Professional Development Institutes. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 330-351.
12. Jaworski, B., & Wood, T. (1999). Themes and issues in inservice programmes. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood, & A. J. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 125-147). London: Falmer Press.
13. Kennedy, M. (1998). Form and substance in inservice teacher education. Research Monograph, 13. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education.
14. Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Richard A., Swanson, R. A. (1998). The adult learner. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
15. National Academy of Sciences (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: Author.
16. Nieto, S. (2003). What keeps teachers going? New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
18. Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Noddings, N. (2001). The caring teacher. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 99-105). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
20. Noddings, N (2002). Caring and social policy: Starting at home. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21. Noddings, N. (2006). Educational leaders as caring teachers. School Leadership and Management, 26(4), 339-345.
22. Richardson, V. (1992). The agenda-setting dilemma in a constructivist staff development process. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 287-300.
23. Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (pp. 157-223) Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
24. Sztajn, P., Ortigão, M. I., Carvalho, J. B. P. (2000). E agora? O que fazer sem os conjuntos? [What to do without set theory?]. Revista Presença Pedagógica, 6(3), 37-47.
25. Tong, R., & Williams, N. (2006). Feminist ethics. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved on January 2008 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/#2.
26. U.S. Department of Education (2007). Report of the Academic Competitiveness Council. Washington, DC: Author.
27. Van de Walle, J. (2003). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (5th Edition). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
28. Watson, M. (2003). Learning to trust. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.