New Approaches to Understanding Federal Involvement in Education

Handbook of Education Policy Research

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 735-748

  Cohen Vogel, Lora ^a   McLendon, Michael K ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145855834     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203880968-64     Document Type: Chapter

References (104)

1. Abernathy, S. (2007). No Child Left Behind and the public schools. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
2. Bailey, M. A., & Rom, M. C. (2004). A wider race? Interstate competition across health and welfare programs. Journal of Politics, 66, 326-347.
3. Baird, K. L. (1998, April). The NIH and FDA new medical research policies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
4. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. Journal of Politics, 53, 1044-1074.
5. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. (1998). Taking time seriously: Timeseries-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1260-1288.
7. Berry, F. S., & Baybeck, B. (2005). Using geographic information systems to study interstate competition. American Political Science Review, 99, 505-519.
8. Berry, J. (1989). The interest group society (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
9. Blaukenau, J. (2001). The fate of national health insurance in Canada and the United States: A multiple streams explanation. Policy Studies Journal, 29, 38-55.
10. Breunig, C., & Koske, C. (2005). Punctuated equilibria and budgets in the American states. Seattle, WA: Center for American Politics and Public Policy.
11. Burnham, W. D. (1970). Revitalization and decay: Looking toward the third century of American electoral politics. Journal of Politics, 38(3), 146-172.
12. Center on Education Policy. (1999). A brief history of the federal role in education: Why it began and why it’s still needed. Washington, DC: Author.
13. Center on Education Policy. (2006, March). From the capital to the classroom:Year four of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC:Author. Retrieved November 20, 2008, from http://commongood.org/assets/attachments/CEP-NCLB-Report-4.pdf
14. Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1983). Participation in American politics:The dynamics of agenda building (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
16. Cohen-Vogel, L. (2005). Federal role in teacher quality: “Redefinition” or policy alignment? Educational Policy, 19, 18-43.
17. Cohen-Vogel, L., & Ingle, K. (2007). When neighbours matter most:Innovation, diffusion and state policy adoption in tertiary education. Journal of Education Policy, 22(3), 241-262.
18. Cohen-Vogel, L., Ingle, K., Albee, A., & Spence, M. (2008). The “spread” of merit-based college aid: Politics, policy consortia and interstate competition. Educational Policy, 22, 339-362.
19. Cross, C. T. (2004). Political education: National policy comes of age. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3-13.
21. DeBray, E. (2006). Politics, ideology, and education: Federal policy during the Clinton and Bush Administrations. New York: Teachers College Press.
22. DeBray-Pelot, E. (2007). School choice and educational privatization initiatives in the 106th and 107th Congresses: An analysis of policy formation and political ideologies. Teachers College Record, 109, 927-972.
23. Dodd, L., & Jillson, C. (Eds.). (1994). New perspectives on American politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
24. Dougherty, J., & Pfaltzgraff, R. (1997). Contending theories of international relations: A comprehensive survey (4th ed.). New York:Longman.
25. Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
26. Durant, R. F., & Diehl, P. F. (1989). Agendas, alternatives, and public policy: Lessons from the U.S. foreign policy arena. Journal of Public Policy, 9, 179-205.
27. Dye, T. R. (1990). American federalism: Competition among governments. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
28. Eldredge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. Schopf (Ed.), Models in Paleobiology (pp.82-115). San Francisco: Freeman.
29. Gittel, M., & McKenna, L. (1999). Redefining education regimes and reform: The political role of governors. Urban Education, 34, 268-291.
30. Harris, R. A., & Milkis, S. M. (1996). The politics of regulatory change: A tale of two agencies (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Hayes, M. (2001). The limits of policy change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
32. Hearn, J. C. (1993). The paradox of growth in federal aid for college students:1965-1990. In J.C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research? Vol 9 (pp.94-153). New York: Agathon.
33. Hearn, J. C. (2001). Epilogue to ‘The paradox of growth in federal aid for college students: 1965-1990.' In M. B. Paulsen & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice (pp.316-320). New York: Agathon.
34. Henig, R., Hula, R. C., Orr, M., & Pedescleaux, D. S. (1999). The color of school reform: Race, politics, and the challenge of urban education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Hochschild, J. (2004). Three puzzles in search of an answer from political scientists (with apologies to Pirandello). Political Science and Politics, 37, 225-229.
36. John, P. (1998). Analyzing public policy. London: Pinter.
37. Jones, B. D., Baumgartner, F. R., & True, J. L. (1995). The shape of change:Punctuations and stability in U.S. budgeting, 1946-95. Journal of Politics, 66, 1-33.
38. Jordan, M. M. (2003). Punctuations and agendas: A new look at local government budget expenditures. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22, 345-360.
39. Kaestle, C. (2006). Foreword. In E. H. DeBray (Ed.), Politics, ideology, and education? Federal policy during the Clinton and Bush administrations (pp. xi-xiv). New York: Teachers College Press.
40. Kamieniecki, S. (2000). Testing alternative theories of agenda setting:Forest policy change in British Columbia, Canada. Policy Studies Journal, 28, 176-189.
41. Kawar, A. (1989). Issue definition, democratic participation, and genetic engineering. Policy Studies Journal, 17, 719-744.
42. Kelly, S. Q. (1994). Punctuated change and the era of divided government. In L. Dodd & C. Jillson (Eds.), New perspectives on American politics (pp.162-190). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
43. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston:Little, Brown.
44. Kingdon, J. W. (1994). Agendas, ideas, and policy change. In L. Dodd & C. Jillson (Eds.), New perspectives on American politics (pp.215-299). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
45. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
46. Kirst, M. (2006). A forty-year perspective on the politics of education and its association, PEA [Electronic version]. Politics of Education Bulletin, 31(1), 1, 4.
47. Kratochwil, F., & Ruggie, J. G. (1997). International organizations: The state of the art. In P. F. Diehl (Ed.), The politics of global governance:International organizations in an interdependent world (pp.29-40). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
48. Larson, T. E. (2004, November 3). Decentralization in U.S. public higher education: A comparative study of New Jersey, Illinois, and Arkansas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Kansas City, MO.
49. Leslie, D. W., & Berdahl, R. A. (2006, September 3). More freedoms, more controls simultaneously in U.S. state accountability patterns:The Virginia experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Association for Institutional Research, Rome, Italy.
50. Lindblom, C. E. (1965). The intelligence of democracy: Decision-making through mutual adjustment. New York: Free Press.
51. Manna, P. (2006). School’s in: Federalism and the national education agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
52. March, J., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
53. Mayhew, D. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54. Mayhew, D. (1991). Divided we govern: Party control, lawmaking, and investigations, 1946-1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55. McDermott, K. (2005). In MINT Condition? The politics of alternative certification and pay incentives for teachers in Massachusetts. Educational Policy, 19, 44-62.
56. McDonnell, L. (2005). No Child Left Behind and the federal role in education: Evolution or revolution? Peabody Journal of Education, 80(2), 19-38.
57. McDonnell, L. (2006). School’s in: Federalism and the national education agenda [Review of the book School’s in: Federalism and the national education agenda]. Teachers College Record. Retrieved March 22, 2007, from http://www.tcrecord.org
58. McGuinn, P. J. (2006). No Child Left Behind and the transformation of federal education policy, 1965-2005. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
59. McGuire, M. (2004, April). Are political scientists ignoring education policy at their own risk? Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago.
60. McLendon, M. K. (2003a). Setting the governmental agenda for state decentralization of higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 74, 479-516.
61. McLendon, M. K. (2003b). State governance reform of higher education:Patterns, trends, and theories of the public policy process. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research? Vol. 18 (pp.57-143). London: Kluwer.
62. McLendon, M., & Cohen-Vogel, L. (2008). Understanding educational policy-making in the American states: Lessons from political science. In B. S. Cooper, L. Fusarelli, & J. Cibulka (Eds.), Handbook of educational politics and policy (pp.30-51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Mills, M. (2007). Stories of politics and policy: Florida’s higher education governance reorganization. Journal of Higher Education, 78, 162-187.
64. Moe, T. (1990). The politics of structural choice: Toward a theory of public bureaucracy. In O. Williamson (Ed.), Organizational theory from Chester Bernard to the present (pp.116-153). Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
65. Neckerman, K. M. (2000). Good politics [Review of the book The color of school reform: Race, politics, and the challenge of urban education]. American Journal of Education, 108, 135-145.
66. Ness, E. C. (2005, November 15). Deciding who earns HOPE, PROMISE, and SUCCESS: Toward a comprehensive model of the merit aid eligibility policy process. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia.
67. Oliver, T. R. (1991). Health care market reform in Congress: The uncertain path from proposal to policy. Political Science Quarterly, 106, 453-477.
68. Olsen, J. P. (2001). Garbage cans, new institutionalism, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 95, 191-198.
69. Orr, M. (1999). Black social capital: The politics of school reform in Baltimore, 1986-1998. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
70. Orr-Bement, D. M. (2002, November 21). A theoretical perspective of the state policy process for higher education policy decisions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Sacramento, CA.
71. Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (2004). The search for American political development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
72. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251-267.
73. Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
74. Portz, J. (1996). Problem definitions and policy agendas: shaping the educational agenda in Boston. Policy Studies Journal, 24, 371-386.
75. Protopsaltis, S. (2004, November 3). Political and policy dynamics of higher education governance and finance reform: The Shaping of the first college voucher system. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Kansas City, MO.
76. Repetto, R. (Ed.).(2006). By fits and starts: Punctuated equilibrium and the dynamics of US environmental policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
77. Robinson, S. E. (2004). Punctuated equilibrium, bureaucratization, and budgetary changes in schools. Policy Studies Journal, 32, 25-39.
78. Robinson, S. E. (2007). Schools in: Federalism and the national education agenda [Review of the book School’s in: Federalism and the national education agenda]. Perspectives of Politics, 5(1), 166-167.
79. Sabatier, P. A. (1999a). The need for better theories. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (1st ed., pp. 3-18). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
80. Sabatier, P. A. (Ed.). (1999b). Theories of the policy process (1st ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
81. Sabatier, P. A. (Ed.). (2007). Theories of the policy process (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
82. Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp.97-116). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
83. Schattschneider, E. E. (1975). The semi-sovereign people. New York:Wadsworth.
84. Schlesinger, A. M. (1986). The cycles of American history. Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
85. Shattock, M. (2006). Policy drivers in UK higher education in historical perspective: ‘Inside out’, ‘outside in’ and the contribution of research. Higher Education Quarterly, 60, 130-140.
86. Simon, C. A. (2007). Schools in: Federalism and the national education agenda [Review of the book School’s in: Federalism and the national education agenda]. Political Science Quarterly, 122(1), 177-178.
87. Sims, C. H., & Miskel, C. G. (2001, March). The punctuated equilibrium of national reading policy: Literacy’s changing images and venues. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
88. Sims, C. H., & Miskel, C. G. (2003). The punctuated equilibrium of national reading policy: Literacy’s changing images and venues. In W. Hoy & C. Miskel (Eds.), Studies in leading and organizing schools (pp.1-26). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
89. Skowronek, S. (1993). The politics presidents make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
90. Sroufe, G. E. (1994). Politics of education at the federal level. In J. D. Scribner & D. H. Layton (Eds.), The study of educational politics (pp.75-88). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
91. Stimson, J., MacKuen, M., & Erikson, R. (1995). Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review, 89, 543-565.
92. Stone, C. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence:University Press of Kansas.
93. Stone, D. (1988). Policy paradox and political reason. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown.
94. Stone, D. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104, 281-300.
95. Stout, K., & Stevens, B. (2000). The case of the failed diversity rule: A multiple streams analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 341-355.
96. Sundquist, J. L. (1968). Politics and policy: The Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson years. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
97. Sundquist, J. L. (1983). Whither the American party system? Political Science Quarterly, 98(4), 573-593.
98. True, J. L. (2000). Avalanches and incrementalism. American Review of Public Administration, 30, 3-18.
99. True, J. L., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (1999). Punctuated-equilibrium theory. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp.97-115). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
100. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
101. Van Der Slik, J. (1999, April). Beyond incrementalism: Changing higher education governance in Illinois. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
102. Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 67, 1174-1185.
103. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
104. Wilson, C. (2000). Policy regimes and policy change. Journal of Public Policy, 20, 247-274.