No child left behind and the public schools

No Child Left Behind and The Public Schools

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-206

  Abernathy, Scott ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898154433     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (175)

1. Abernathy, Scott Franklin. 2005. School Choice and the Future of American Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2. Abernathy, Scott Franklin 2006. "Evaluating the Impact of No Child Left Behind in Minnesota." Center for Urban and Regional Affairs Reporter 36 (1): 17-23. Available at www.cura.umn.edu.
3. Alchian, Armen A., and Harold Demsetz. 1972. "Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization." American Economic Review 62 (5): 777-95.
4. Antle, W. James III. 2005. "The Bull That Never Ends." American Conservative, August 1.
5. Archibald, George. 2005. "Utah Set to Reject No Child Left Behind." Washington Times, February 23.
6. Averch, Harvey, Stephen J. Carroll, Theodore S. Donaldson, Herbert J. Kiesling, and John Pincus. 1972. How Effective Is Schooling? Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
7. Barton, Paul E. 2003. Parsing the Achievement Gap. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Policy Information Center.
8. Betts, Julian R., and Anne Danenberg. 2003. "The Effects of Accountability in California." In No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, edited by Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
9. Betts, Julian R., Andrew C. Zau, and Lorien A. Rice. 2003. Determinants of Student Achievement: New Evidence from San Diego. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
10. Bowles, Samuel, and Henry M. Levin. 1968. "The Determinants of Scholastic Achievement-An Appraisal of Some Recent Evidence." Journal of Human Resources 3 (1): 3-24.
11. Brandt, Steve. 2004. "Homework for the Holidays." Minneapolis Star Tribune, December 18.
12. Brehm, John, and Scott Gates. 1997. Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
13. Brehm, John, and Wendy Rahn. 1997. "Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital." American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 999-1023.
14. Brewer, Dominic J. 1993. "Principals and Student Outcomes: Evidence from U.S. High Schools." Economics of Education Review 12 (4): 281-92.
15. Brookover, Wilbur B., Charles Beady, Patricia Flood, John Schweitzer, and Joe Wisenbaker. 1979. School Social Systems and Student Achievement. New York: Praeger.
16. Brookover, Wilbur B., Richard J. Gigliotti, Ronald D. Henderson, and Jeffrey M. Schneider. 1973. Elementary School Social Environment and School Achievement. East Lansing: Michigan State University, College of Urban Development.
17. Brookover, Wilbur B., and L. W. Lezotte. 1977. Changes in School Characteristics Coincident with Changes in Student Achievement. East Lansing: Michigan State University, College of Urban Development.
18. Bryk, Anthony S., and Barbara Schneider. 2002. Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Development. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19. Card, David, and Alan B. Krueger. 1996. "School Resources and Student Outcomes: An Overview of the Literature and New Evidence from North and South Carolina." Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (4): 31-50.
20. Casserly, Michael. 2004. "Choice and Supplemental Services in America's Great City Schools." In Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools, edited by Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
21. Center on Education Policy. 2004. Rule Changes Could Help More Schools Meet Test Score Targets for the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
22. Center on Education Policy 2005. From the Capital to the Classroom: Year 3 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
23. Chase, Bob. 2000. "Making a Difference." In Will Standards Save Public Education? edited by Joshua Cohen and Joel Rogers. Boston: Beacon.
24. Chubb, John E., and Terry M. Moe. 1990. Politics, Markets, and America's Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
25. Coleman, James S. 1988. "Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital." American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement): 95-120.
26. Coleman, James S., E. Q. Campbell, C. J. Hobson, J. McPortland, A. M. Mood, F. D. Weinfield, and R. L. York. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
27. Council of the Great City Schools. 2004. Foundations for Success in the Minneapolis Public Schools. Washington, DC: Council of the Great City Schools.
28. Cronin, John, G. Gage Kingsbury, Martha S. McCall, and Branin Bowe. 2005. "The Impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on Student Achievement and Growth: 2005 Edition." Lake Oswego, OR: Northwest Evaluation Association.
29. Darling-Hammond, Linda. 1993. "Reframing the School Reform Agenda." Phi Delta Kappan 74 (10): 752-61.
30. Darling-Hammond, Linda.2004. "From 'Separate but Equal' to 'No Child Left Behind': The Collision of New Standards and Old Inequalities." In Many Children Left Behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act Is Damaging Our Children and Our Schools, edited by Deborah Meier and George Wood. Boston: Beacon.
31. Davison, Mark L., and Leslie J. Davison. 2004. "Growth and Value-Added Issues in Minnesota." Paper presented at the conference of the Council of Chief State School Officers on the Use of Growth Models Based on Student-Level Data in School Accountability, Washington, DC, November 15-16.
32. Dewey, John. 1938. Experience and Education. New York: Collier.
33. DiIulio, John J. Jr. 1993a. "Measuring Performance When There Is No Bottom Line." In Performance Measures for the Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
34. DiIulio, John J. Jr. 1993b. "Rethinking the Criminal Justice System: Toward a New Paradigm." In Performance Measures for the Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
35. Draper, Norman. 2002. "Lofty Goals May Leave Schools Far Behind." Minneapolis Star Tribune, December 15.
36. Drury, Darrel, and Harold Duran. 2003. "The Value of Value-Added Analysis." National School Boards Association Policy Brief 3 (1): 1-4.
37. Eberts, Randall W., and Joe A. Stone. 1988. "Student Achievement in Public Schools: Do Principals Make a Difference?" Economics of Education Review 7 (3): 291-99.
38. Edmonds, Ronald. 1979. "Effective Schools for the Urban Poor." Educational Leadership 37 (1): 15-24.
39. Education Commission of the States. 2004a. "ECS Report to the Nation: State Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act." Available at www.ecs.org.
40. Education Commission of the States 2004b. "NCLB Standards and Assessments: Minnesota." 2004. Available at www.ecs.org.
41. Education Minnesota. 2003. "Most Schools Get Three Stars" (press release). September 2.
42. Epple, Dennis, and Richard E. Romano. 1998. "Competition between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer Group Effects." American Economic Review 88 (1): 33-62.
43. Ericson, David P., and Frederick S. Ellett Jr. 2002. "The Question of the Student in Educational Reform." Education Policy Analysis Archives. Available at http://epaa.asu.edu/v10n31/.
44. Farkas, Steve, Jean Johnson, and Ann Duffett. 2003. "Rolling Up Their Sleeves: Superintendents and Principals Talk about What's Needed to Fix Public Schools." Public Agenda. Available at www.publicagenda.org.
45. Finn, Chester E. Jr. 2002. "Making School Reform Work." Public Interest 148 (summer): 85-95.
46. Finn, Chester E. Jr., Bruno V. Manno, and Greg Vanourek. 2000. Charter Schools in Action: Renewing Public Education. Princeton: Princeton University Press. "First National Suit over Education Law." 2005. AP Newswire. April 20.
47. Hannaway, Jane. 1991. "The Organization and Management of Public and Catholic Schools: Looking inside the 'Black Box.'" International Journal of Educational Research 15 (5): 463-81.
48. Hannaway, Jane, and Kendra Bishoff. 2004. "Florida: Confusions, Constraints, and Cascading Scenarios." In Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools, edited by Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
49. Hanushek, Eric. A. 1972. Education and Race. Lexington, MA: Heath.
50. Hanushek, Eric. A. 1979. "Conceptual and Empirical Issues in the Estimation of Educational Production Functions." Journal of Human Resources 14 (3): 351-88.
51. Hanushek, Eric. A.1986. "Throwing Money at Schools." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1 (19): 19-41.
52. Hanushek, Eric. A. 1996. "Measuring Investment in Education." Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (4): 9-30.
53. Hanushek, Eric. A. 2003. "The Failure of Input-Based Schooling Policies." Economic Journal 113 (485): 64-98.
54. Hanushek, Eric A., and Margaret E. Raymond. 2003. "Lessons about the Designs of State Accountability Systems." In No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, edited by Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
55. Harris, Douglas N., and Carolyn D. Herington. 2006. "Accountability, Standards, and the Growing Achievement Gap: Lessons from the Past Half-Century." American Journal of Education 111 (2): 209-38.
56. Henig, Jeffrey. 1994. Rethinking School Choice: Limits of the Market Metaphor. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
57. Herdman, Paul A., Nelson Smith, and Harold Doran. 2002. "Value-Added Analysis: A Critical Component of Determining Adequate Yearly Progress." Charter School Friends Network Policy Brief. Available at http://www. charterfriends.org/NCLB-ValueAdded.doc.
58. Hess, Frederick M. 2003. "Refining or Retreating? High-Stakes Accountability in the States." In No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, edited by Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
59. Hess, Frederick M., and Chester E. Finn Jr., eds. 2004. Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
60. Hochschild, Jennifer. 2003. "Rethinking Accountability Politics." In No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, edited by Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
61. Hochschild, Jennifer L., and Nathan Scovronick. 2003. The American Dream and the Public Schools. New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Howell, William. 2004. "Fumbling for an Exit Key: Parents, Choice, and the Future of NCLB." In Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools, edited by Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
63. Hoxby, Caroline Minter. 1996. "How Teachers' Unions Affect Educational Production." Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (3): 671-718.
64. Hoxby, Caroline Minter.2000. Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation. Working Paper 7867. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
65. Jansen, Jonathan D. 1995. "Effective Schools?" Comparative Education 31 (2): 181-200.
66. Jencks, Christopher, et al. 1972. Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.
67. Jennings, Jack. 2002. "Stricter Federal Demands, Bigger State Role: What to Expect from the No Child Left Behind Act." State Education Standard (spring). National Association of State Boards of Education. Available at www.nasbe.org.
68. Kafer, Krista. 2004. "No Child Left Behind: Where Do We Go from Here?" Heritage Foundation Backgrounder 1775 (July): 1-8.
69. Kane, Thomas J., and Douglas O. Staiger. 2003. "Unintended Consequences of Racial Subgroup Rules." In No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, edited by Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
70. Kelley, Stanley. 1961. "The Presidential Campaign." In The Presidential Election and Transition 1960-61, edited by Paul T. David. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
71. Kelling, George L. 1999. "Broken Windows" and Police Discretion. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
72. Key, V. O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Vintage Books.
73. King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. "Making the Most of Statistical Analysis: Improving Interpretation and Presentation." American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 341-55.
74. Kohn, Alfie. 2000. The Case against Standardized Testing: Raising the Scores, Ruining the Schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
75. Kohn, Alfie 2004. "NCLB and the Effort to Privatize Public Education." In Many Children Left Behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act Is Damaging Our Children and Our Schools, edited by Deborah Meier and George Wood. Boston: Beacon.
76. Koretz, Daniel M. 2002. "Limitations in the Use of Achievement Tests as Measures of Educators' Productivity." Journal of Human Resources 37 (4): 752-77.
77. Lachat, Mary Ann. 2001. Data-Driven High School Reform: The Breaking Ranks Model. Providence, RI: Brown University.
78. Ladd, Helen, and Randall P. Walsh. 2002. "Implementing Value-Added Measures of School Effectiveness: Getting the Incentives Right." Economics of Education Review 21 (1): 1-17.
79. Lazear, Edward P. 2001. "Educational Production." Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (3): 777-803.
80. Levitt, Steven D. 2005. Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. New York: Morrow.
81. Linn, Robert L. 2004. "Rethinking the No Child Left Behind Accountability System." Paper presented at the Center on Education Policy Forum on Ideas to Improve the Accountability Provisions under the No Child Left Behind Act, Washington, DC, July 28.
82. Linn, Robert L., Eva L. Baker, and Damian W. Betebenner. 2002. "Accountability Systems: Implications of Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001." Educational Researcher 31 (6): 3-6.
83. Linn, Robert L., Eva L. Baker, and Stephen B. Dunbar. 1991. "Complex, Performance- Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation Criteria." Educational Researcher 20 (8): 15-21.
84. Locy, Toni. 2005. "Judge Tosses Out NCLB Lawsuit." Minneapolis Star Tribune, November 23.
85. Logan, Charles H. 1993. "Criminal Justice Performance: Measures for Prisons." In Performance Measures for the Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
86. Loveless, Tom. 2003a. "Charter School Achievement and Accountability." In No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, edited by Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
87. Loveless, Tom 2003b. "How Well Are American Students Learning?" In Brown Center Report on American Education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
88. Lynn, Ronnie. 2005. "Utah Bucks Feds on Schools." Salt Lake Tribune, April 20.
89. Malloy, Kate. 1998. Building a Learning Community: The Story of New York City Community School District #2. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.
90. Manna, Paul. 2004. "Leaving No Child Behind." In Political Education: National Policy Comes of Age, edited by Christopher T. Cross. New York: Teachers College Press.
91. Maranto, Robert, and April Gresham Maranto. 2004. "Options for Low-Income Students: Evidence from the States." In Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools, edited by Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
92. McAdams, Donald, Michelle Wisdom, Sarah Glover, and Anne McClellan. 2003. Urban School District Accountability Systems. Denver: Education Commission of the States and the Center for Reform of School Systems.
93. McDonnell, Lorraine. 2004. Politics, Persuasion, and Educational Testing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
94. Meier, Deborah. 2000. "Educating a Democracy." In Will Standards Save Public Education? edited by Joshua Cohen and Joel Rogers. Boston: Beacon.
95. Meier, Deborah 2004. "NCLB and Democracy." In Many Children Left Behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act Is Damaging Our Children and Our Schools, edited by Deborah Meier and George Wood. Boston: Beacon.
96. Meier, Deborah, and George Wood, eds. 2004. Many Children Left Behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act Is Damaging Our Children and Our Schools. Boston: Beacon.
97. Meyer, Robert H. 1997. "Value-Added Indicators of School Performance: A Primer." Economics of Education Review 16 (3): 283-301.
98. Meyer, Robert H. 2002. "Value-Added Indicators: Do They Make a Difference? Evidencefrom the Milwaukee Public Schools." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 2. Minneapolis Public Schools. 2004. "School Information Report." Available at http://www.incschools.com/mpls/.
99. Minnesota Department of Education. 2003a. "2003 NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) System Requirements/Business Rules." Available at http://clf.state.mn.us/mde/static/003261.pdf.
100. Minnesota Department of Education 2003b. "Adequate Yearly Progress Status by Consequence." Available at http://education.state.mn.us/mde/ index.html.
101. Minnesota Department of Education 2003c. "Fall Populations by School: 2002-03." Available at http://clf.state.mn.us/mde/static/GEG0203. xls.
102. Minnesota Department of Education 2003d. "Gender by Ethnicity by School: 2002-03." Available at http://clf.state.mn.us/mde/static/GEG0203. xls.
103. Minnesota Department of Education 2003e. "Governor Pawlenty Unveils 'Accountability on a Stick'" (press release). August 21.
104. Minnesota Department of Education 2003f. "MCA 2003 Grades 3 & 5 Public Schools 5/18/04 Corrected." Available at http://clf.state.mn.us/mde/ static/x19-class2003mcapublic.xls.
105. Minnesota Department of Education 2004a. "2004 AYP by Consequence." Available at http://clf.state.mn.us/mde/static/ AYP%20Results%202004%20-%20All%20Schools%20and%20Districts.XLS.
106. Minnesota Department of Education 2004b. "2004 Star Ratings." Available at http://clf.state.mn.us/mde/static/Star%20Results%202004%20- %20All%20Schools.XLS.
107. Minnesota Department of Education 2004c. "Governor Pawlenty Announces 'Value-Added' Growth Model to Measure Individual Student Progress" (press release). October 13.
108. Minnesota Department of Education 2004d. "MCA 2004 Grades 3, 5, & 7 Public Schools." Available at http://clf.state.mn.us/mde/static/ 2004%20MCA%203-5-7%20Public%20Schools.xls.
109. Minnesota Department of Education 2004e. "No Questions Left Behind: A Comprehensive Guide to Minnesota's Accountability Plan under the No Child Left Behind Act." Available at http://clf.state.mn.us/mde/static/003326.pdf.
110. Minnesota Department of Education 2005. "Governor Pawlenty: Minnesota's Schools Get Even Better" (press release). August 29.
111. Minnesota Office of Educational Accountability and University of Minnesota College of Education and Human Development. 2002a. "The 'No Child Left Behind Act' and Minnesota's Standards, Assessments, and Accountability." Available at http://education.umn.edu/oea/PDF/ 02PolicyBrief.pdf.
112. Minnesota Office of Educational Accountability and University of Minnesota College of Education and Human Development 2002b. "The Minnesota Basic Skills Test: Performance Gaps on the Reading and Mathematics Tests from 1996 to 2001, by Gender, Ethnicity, Limited English Proficiency, Individual Education Plans, and Socio-Economic Status." Available at http://education.umn.edu/oea/PDF/BSTPerfGapsReport.pdf.
113. Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor. 2004. Evaluation Report: No Child Left Behind. Report 04-04. St. Paul: Program Evaluation Division.
114. Miron, Gary, and Christopher Nelson. 2001. Student Academic Achievement in Charter Schools: What We Know and Why We Know So Little. Occasional Paper 41. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
115. Moe, Terry M. 2003. "Politics, Control, and the Future of School Accountability." In No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, edited by Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
116. Monk, David H. 1989. "The Educational Production Function: Its Evolving Role in Policy Analysis." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11 (1): 31-45.
117. Mortimore, Peter, Pamela Sammons, Louise Stoll, David Lewis, and Russell Ecob. 1988. School Matters. Berkeley: University of California Press.
118. Murnane, Richard J. 1975. The Impact of School Resources on the Learning of Inner City Children. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
119. Murnane, Richard J. 2000. "The Case for Standards." In Will Standards Save Public Education? edited by Joshua Cohen and Joel Rogers. Boston: Beacon.
120. Murphy, Walter. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
121. National Association of Elementary School Principals and National Association of Secondary School Principals. 2003. K-12 Principals Guide to No Child Left Behind. Alexandria, VA: Education Research Service.
122. National Conference of State Legislatures. 2005. Task Force on No Child Left Behind: Final Report. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.
123. National Education Association. 2005. "U.S. Education Department Validates NEA's Concerns, Proposes More Flexibility under 'No Child Left Behind'" (press release). November 21.
124. National Education Association 2006. "More Schools Are Failing NCLB Law's Adequate Yearly Progress Requirements." Available at www.nea.org.
125. National School Boards Association. 2005. "NSBA's Bill to Improve No Child Left Behind." Priority Issue, January. Available at www.nsba.org.
126. National School Boards Association 2006. "Education Vital Signs." American School Board Journal, February. Available at www.nsba.org The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Public Law 107-110, January 8, 2002. 115 Stat. 1425.
127. Novak, John R., and Bruce Fuller. 2003. Penalizing Diverse Schools? Similar Test Scores, but Different Students, Bring Federal Sanctions. PACE Policy Brief 03-4. Stanford: Policy Analysis for California Education.
128. Oakes, Jeannie. 1989. "What Educational Indicators? The Case for Assessing the School Context." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11 (2): 181-99.
129. Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
130. Packer, Joel. 2004. "No Child Left Behind and Academic Yearly Progress-Fundamental Flaws: A Forecast for Failure." Paper presented at the Center on Education Policy Forum on Ideas to Improve the Accountability Provisions under the No Child Left Behind Act, Washington, DC, July 28.
131. Payne, Gavin. 2004. "The Implementation of the Accountability Provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act." Paper presented at the Center on EducationPolicy Forum on Ideas to Improve the Accountability Provisions under the No Child Left Behind Act, Washington, DC, July 28.
132. Peterson, Paul E., and Martin R. West, eds. 2003. No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
133. Pierce, Jason. 2003. "Minimum Size of Subgroups for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)." State Notes: Education Commission of the States, September. Available at www.ecs.org.
134. Pirsig, Robert M. 1981. Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry into Values. New York: Bantam.
135. Pontiac v. Spellings. 2005. 05-CV-71535-DT.
136. Popham, W. James. 2004. America's "Failing" Schools: How Parents and Teachers Can Cope with No Child Left Behind. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
137. Porter, Andrew C. 1991. "Creating a System of School Process Indicators." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 13 (1): 13-29.
138. Powers, Alfred, and Howard McKinley Corning, eds. 1937. History of Education in Portland. Portland, OR: WPA Adult Education Project.
139. Prendergast, Canice. 1999. "The Provision of Incentives in Firms." Journal of Economic Literature 37 (1): 7-63.
140. Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Aaron Wildavsky. 1984. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
141. Pugmire, Tim. 2003a. "List of Underachieving Schools Shrinks to 144." Minnesota Public Radio, August 14.
142. Pugmire, Tim 2003b. "School Report Cards Out: Available Online." Minnesota Public Radio, August 21.
143. Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
144. Putnam, Robert 1995. "Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital." Journal of Democracy 6 (1): 65-78.
145. Putnam, Robert 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
146. Resnick, Lauren B., and Megan Williams Hall. 1998. "Learning Organizations for Sustainable Education Reform." Daedalus 127 (4): 89-118.
147. Robson, Britt. 2004. "Built to Fail." City Pages, March 10.
148. Rowan, Brian, Steven T. Bossert, and David C. Dwyer. 1983. "Research on Effective Schools: A Cautionary Note." Educational Researcher 12 (4): 24-31.
149. Rudalevige, Andrew. 2003. "No Child Left Behind: Forging a Congressional Compromise." In No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, edited by Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
150. Ryan, James E. 2004. "The Perverse Incentives of the No Child Left Behind Act." NYU Law Review 79 (3): 932-89. San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriquez. 1973. 411 U.S. 1.
151. Sanders, William L., and Sandra P. Horn. 1998. "Research Findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) Database: Implicationsfor Educational Evaluation and Research." Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 12 (3): 247-56.
152. Schneider, Mark, Paul Teske, Christine Roch, and Melissa Marschall. 1997. "Networks to Nowhere: Segregation and Stratification in Networks of Information about Schools." American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 1201-23.
153. Simon, Herbert A. 1945. Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.
154. Stone, Clarence N., Jeffrey R. Henig, Bryan D. Jones, and Carol Pierannunzi. 2001. Building Civic Capacity: The Politics of Reforming Urban Schools. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
155. Summers, Anita A., and Barbara L. Wolfe. 1977. "Do Schools Make a Difference?" American Economic Review 67 (4): 639-52.
156. Sunderman, Gail L., and Jimmy Kim. 2004. Inspiring Vision, Disappointing Results: Four Studies on Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act. Cambridge: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
157. Tyack, David B. 1974. The One Best System: A History of American Urban Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
158. U.S. Department of Education. 2002. Fact Sheet on Title I, Part A. Washington, DC: Planning and Evaluation Service.
159. U.S. Department of Education 2005. "Secretary Spellings Announces Growth Model Pilot, Addresses Chief State School Officers' Annual Policy Forum in Richmond" (press release). November 18.
160. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1989. Effective Schools Programs: Their Extent and Characteristics. GAO-89-132BR. Washington, DC.
161. U.S. General Accounting Office 2004a. Unfunded Mandates: Analysis of Reform Act Coverage. GAO-04-637. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
162. U.S. General Accounting Office 2004b. No Child Left Behind Act: Improvements Needed in Education's Process for Tracking States' Implementation of Key Provisions. GAO-04-734. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
163. U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Undersecretary, Elementary and Secondary Education. 2002. No Child Left Behind: A Desktop Reference 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Undersecretary, Elementary and Secondary Education.
164. Vanourek, Gregg. 2005. State of the Charter Movement 2005. Washington, DC: Charter School Leadership Council.
165. Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
166. Wascoe, Dan. 2005. "Take Your Children to Work . . . Later." Minneapolis Star Tribune, 16 April.
167. Weber, G. 1971. Inner-City Children Can Be Taught to Read: Four Successful Schools. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
168. West, Martin R., and Paul E. Peterson. 2003. "The Politics and Practice of Accountability." In No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, edited by Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
169. Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.
170. Wilson, James Q 1993. "The Problem of Defining Agency Success." In Performance Measures for the Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
171. Witte, John F. 2000. The Market Approach to Education: An Analysis of America's First Voucher Program. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
172. Witte, John F., and Daniel J. Walsh. 1990. "A Systematic Test of the Effective Schools Model." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12 (2): 188-212.
173. Wood, George. 2004. "A View from the Field: NCLB's Effects on Classrooms and Schools." In Many Children Left Behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act Is Damaging Our Children and Our Schools, edited by Deborah Meier and George Wood. Boston: Beacon.
174. Wright, Peter W. D., Pamela Darr Wright, and Suzanne Whitney Heath, eds. 2003. Wrightslaw No Child Left Behind. Hartfield, VA: Harbor House Law Press.
175. Yeow Meng, Thum. 2003. No Child Left Behind: Methodological Challenges and Recommendations for Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress. CSE Tech Report 590. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.