Redefining education regimes and reform: The political role of governors

Urban Education

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 268-291

  Gittell, Marilyn ^a   McKenna, Laura ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22644449795     PISSN: 00420859     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042085999343002     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Beyle, T. L. (1989). From governor to governors. In C. E. Van Horn (Ed.), The state of the states (p. 33). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
2. Engler, J. (1996, January 17). Sixth State of the State Address. Michigan State Capitol, Lansing.
3. Finn, C. E. Jr., Manno, B. V., Bierlein, L. A., & Vanourek, G. (1997, July). The policy perils of charter schools. In Charter schools in action: A Hudson Institute Project (Final Report, Part III, pp. 1-12). Washington, DC: Hudson Institute.
4. Fuhrman, S. (1990, April 27-29). Legislators and education policy. Paper presented for the Symposium on the Legislature in the Twenty-First Century, Williamsburg, VA.
5. Gittell, M. (1994, September). School reform in New York and Chicago: Revisiting the ecology of local games. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 30(1), 136-151.
6. Governor responds to series (1996, February 26). Philadelphia Daily News.
7. Greenblatt, A. (1996, June 29). At state level, voters inclined to stay the course. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 54, 1806-1809.
8. Grimshaw, W. (1979). Union rule in the schools. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
9. Guthrie, J. W., & Koppich, J. (1988). Exploring the political economy of national education reform. In W. L. Boyd & C. T. Kerchner (Eds.), The politics of excellence and choice in education (pp. 25-47). New York: Falmer.
10. Hill, K. Q., & Mladenka, K. R. (1993). Texas politics and government: A concise survey. New York: Macmillan.
11. Kirschten, D. (1995, November 4). Changing places. National Journal, 27(44), 2773-2776.
12. Kirst, M. W. (1984). Who controls our schools? New York: Freeman.
13. Lake Research, Inc., and The Terrance Group. (1997). Great expectations: How American voters view children's issues. Washington, DC: Coalition for America's Children.
14. Mazzoni, T. L. (1994). State policy-making and school reform: Influences and influentials. In J. D. Scribner & D. H. Layton (Eds.), The study of educational politics (pp. 53-73). New York: Falmer.
15. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). The nation at risk. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
16. Patterson, S. C. (1990). State legislators and the legislatures. In V. Gray, H. Jacob, & R. B. Albritton (Eds.), Politics in the American states (pp. 161-195). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
17. Renshon, S. A., & Gittell, M. (1992). American governors: Political leadership and policy innovation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
18. Richardson, J. (1995, May 17). The declining fortune of Michigan's teacher's union. Education Week.
19. Rosenthal, A. (1990). Governors and legislatures: Contending powers. Washington, DC: CQ16 Press.
20. Rosenthal, A., & Fuhrman, S. (1981). Legislative education leadership in the states. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
21. Seib, G. F. (1997, June 4). Shed no tears for this Bush in tax tussle. Wall Street Journal, p. A20.
22. Stone, C. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
23. Usdan, M. D., Minar, D. W., & Hurwitz, E. Jr. (1969). Education and state politics. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Van Horn, C. E. (1989). The state of the states. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
25. Voters defeat initiative that would have weakened unions political clout. (1998, June 3). Los Angeles Times. Available on the World Wide Web at www.latimes.com/home/news/ politics/elect98/ap_prop226.htm.
26. Weir, M. (1996). Central cities' loss of power in state politics. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 2(2), 23-40.
27. Wells, A. S. (1998). Underlying policy assumptions of charter school reform: The multiple meanings of a movement. UCLA Charter School Study.