Setting the Governmental Agenda for State Decentralization of Higher Education

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2003, Pages

  McLendon, Michael K ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141976301     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2003.11778887     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Allison, G. (1971). Essence of decision. Boston: Little, Brown.
2. Bailey, S. K. (1975). Education interest groups in the nation's capital. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
3. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Berdahl, R. O. (1971). Statewide coordination of higher education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
5. Berdahl, R. O. (1975). (Ed.). Evaluating statewide boards. New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 5. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Berdahl, R. O. (1998). Balancing self-interest and accountability: St. Mary's College of Maryland. In T. MacTaggart (Ed.), Seeking excellence through independence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Berdahl, R. O., & MacTaggart, T. (2000). Charter colleges: Balancing freedom and accountability. Boston: Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research.
8. Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
9. Birnbaum, R. (2000). Policy scholars are from Venus; policy makers are from Mars. Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 119-132.
10. Carnegie Commission. (1973). Governance of higher education. New York: McGraw- Hill.
11. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1976). The states and higher education: A proud past and a vital future. New York: The Carnegie Foundation.
12. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1982), The control of the campus: A report on the governance of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Clune, W. H. (1987). Institutional choice as a theoretical framework for research on educational policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 117-132.
14. Cobb, R., & Elder, C. (1983). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
16. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Department of Budget, Economic Development, and Tourism. (1997). Towards a productivity driven growth strategy. Honolulu: Author.
18. Dilulio, J. (1994). Deregulating the public service. Washington, DC: Brookings.
19. Dodd, C., & Jillson, C. (1994). New perspectives on American politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
20. Durant, R. F., & Diehl, P. F. (1989). Agendas, alternatives, and public policy: Lessons from the U.S. foreign policy arena. Journal of Public Policy, 9, 179-205.
21. Dye, T. R. (1995). Who's running America? (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
22. Elder, C., & Cobb, R.(1984). Agenda-building and the politics of aging. Policy Studies Journal, 13, 115-129.
23. Fowler, F. C. (1994). Education reform comes to Ohio: An application of Mazzoni's arena models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(3), 335-350.
24. Glenny, L. (1959). Autonomy of public colleges. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Glenny, L. A., & Bowen, F. M. (1977). State intervention in higher education. A Report Prepared for the Sloan Commission on Government and Higher Education. Cambridge, MA: ED 184-427.
26. Governors Task Force on Higher Education. (1992). Springfield, IL: Author
27. Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1174-1185
28. Greer, D. (1998). Defining the scope and limits of autonomy: New Jersey. In T. MacTaggart (Ed.), Seeking excellence through independence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Gruber, W. (1991, January 7). Recession finally reaching Midwest. Chicago Tribune, p. Al.
30. Haddigan, M. (1996, July 16). Governor of Arkansas quits, finally. The Washington Post, p.A1 .
31. Hearn, J. C., & Griswold, C. P. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 16(2), 161-190.
32. Hyatt, J., & Santiago, P. (1984). Incentives and disincentives for effective management. Washington, DC: National Association of College and University Business Officers.
33. King, D. C. (1994). John Kingdon as an agenda item. Policy Currents, 4(3), 17-20.
34. King, G., Keohane, R., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry. Princeton University Press.
35. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Harper Collins.
36. Kingdon, J. W. (1994). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. (2nd ed.). New York: Harper.
37. Lane, J. E. (1983). Higher education public policymaking. Higher Education, 12, 519-565.
38. Layzell, D. (1990, 24 October). Most research on higher education is stale, irrelevant, and of little use to policy makers. Chronicle of Higher Education, 37(8), pp. B1, B3.
39. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40. Lindblom, C. (1959) The science of 'muddling through'. Public Administration Review, 19, 79-88.
41. Lindblom, C. (1968). The policymaking process. Englewood-Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
42. MacRae, D., & Wilde, J. (1979). Policy analysis for public decisions. Boston, MA: Duxbury.
43. MacTaggart, T. (Ed.) (1996). Restructuring higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44. MacTaggart, T. (Ed.). (1998). Seeking excellence through independence: Liberating colleges and universities from excessive regulation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45. Marcus, L. R. (1997). Restructuring state higher education governance patterns. Review of Higher Education, 20(4), 399-418.
46. Marcus, L. R., Pratt, B. A., & Stevens, J. L. (1997). Deregulating colleges: The autonomy experiment. Educational Policy, 11(1), 92-110.
47. Mawhinney, H. B. (1993). An Advocacy-Coalition approach to change in Canadian education. In P. Sabatier & H. C. Jenkins-Smith (Ed.), Policy change and learning; An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
48. Mazzoni, T. (1991). Analyzing state school policy making: An arena model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 115-138.
49. McGuinness, A. C. (1995). A case study of the 1994 New Jersey Higher Education Restructuring Act. Denver: Education Commission of the States.
50. McGuinness, A. C. (1998). State postsecondary education structures handbook. Denver: ECS.
51. McLendon, M. K. (2000), Setting the agenda for state decentralization of higher education: Analyzing the explanatory boundaries of alternative agenda models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan.
52. McLendon, M. K., & Hearn, J. C. (Guest Eds.). (2003). The politics of education yearbook special issue: The politics of higher education. Educational Policy, 17(1).
53. McLendon, M. K. (forthcoming). State governance reform of higher education: Patterns, trends, and theories of the public policy process. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (vol. 18). New York: Agathon.
54. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Analyzing qualitative data. (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage.
55. Millett, J. D. (1982). Conflict in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56. Mingle, J. (1983). (Ed.). Management flexibility and state regulation in higher education. Atlanta: Southern Regional Education Board.
57. Mucciaroni, G. (1992). The garbage can model and the study of policy making: A critique. Polity, 24(3), 460-482.
58. Mumper, M. (1987). Understanding policy agendas. The Social Science Journal, 24(1), 83-86.
59. Novak, R. J. (1996). Methods, objectives, and consequences of restructuring. In T. MacTaggart (Ed.), Restructuring higher education, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
60. Olivas, M. (1984). State law and postsecondary coordination: The birth of the Ohio board of regents. Review of Higher Education, 7(4), 357-395.
61. Omandam, P. (1998, January 20). Economy legislature's 500-1b. Gorilla. Honolulu Star Bulletin. [WWW document]. URL http://starbulletin.com/98/01/20/news/storyl.html.
62. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
63. Perez, R. (1997, October 28). Critics say panel ignored many suggestions for downsizing. Honolulu Star Bulletin. URL www.//starbulletin.com/97/10/28/news/story4.html.
64. Polsby, N. (1984). Political innovation in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
65. Potter, R. (1984). Autonomy and accountability at the University of Hawaii. Higher Education Policy Study, No. 2. Honolulu, HI: College of Education, University of Hawaii.
66. Rosenthal, A. (1981). Legislative life. New York: Harper and Row.
67. Sabatier, P. A. (1999). Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
68. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wilson.
69. Simon, H. (1957). Administrative behavior. (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
70. Streamline boards of state universities. (1992, April 9). Chicago Sun Times, p. A41.
71. Terenzini, P. T. (1997). Rediscovering roots: Public policy and higher education research. Review of Higher Education, 20(1), 5-13.
72. Vitale, R. (1992, April 8). Edgar fails to mollify educators. Chicago Tribune, p. A16.
73. Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880-899.
74. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75. Yuen, M. (1997, August 5). Top level economic task force formed. Honolulu Star Bulletin, p. A1.
76. Zahariadis, N. (1998). Comparing three lenses of policy choice. Policy Studies Journal, 26(3); 434-448.
77. Zahariadis, N. (1999). Ambiguity, time, and multiple streams. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
78. Zumeta, W. (2001). Public university accountability to the state in the late twentieth century. Policy Studies Review, 15(4), 5-22.