PROTOTYPES IN COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS

Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 39-65

  Taylor, John R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145844487     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203938560-11     Document Type: Chapter

References (110)

1. Aarts, B. (2004). Modelling linguistic gradience. Studies in Language, 28, 1-49.
2. Allwood, J. (2003). Meaning potentials and context: Some consequences for the analysis of variation in meaning. In Cuyckens, H., Dirven, R., & Taylor, J. (Eds.) (2003). Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics pp. 29-65. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Armstrong, S. L., Gleitman, L. R., & Gleitman, H. (1983). What some concepts might not be. Cognition, 13, 163-308.
4. Avrahami, J., Kareev, Y., Bogot, Y., Caspi, R., Dunaevsky, S., & Lerner, S. (1997). Teaching by examples: Implications for the process of category acquisition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 586-606.
5. Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S. (Eds.) (2000). Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
6. Barsalou, L. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11, 211-227.
7. Barsalou, L. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.) Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101-140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Barsalou, L. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 27 (pp. 1-64). New York, Academic Press.
9. Blank, A. & Koch, P. (Eds.) (1999). Historical semantics and cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.
11. Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (Eds.) (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Coleman L., & Kay, P. (1981). Prototype semantics: The English word “lie”. Language, 57, 26-44.
14. Coseriu, E. (2002). Structural semantics and “cognitive” semantics. Logos and Language, 1, 19-42.
15. Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Deane, P. (1991). Limits to attention: A cognitive theory of island phenomena. Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 1-63.
17. Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2001). The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 97-141.
18. Dirven, R., & Taylor, J. R. (1988). The conceptualization of vertical space in English: The case of tall. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 379-402). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
20. Ellis, R., & Anderson, J. R. (1984). The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction. Memory and Cognition, 12, 20-30.
21. Fehr, B., & Russel, J. A. (1984). Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 464-486.
22. Fillmore, C. & Atkins, B. (2000). Describing polysemy: The case of “crawl”. In Y. Ravin & C. Leacock (Eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches (pp. 91-110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Fodor, J. (1980). The present status of the innateness controversy. In Representations: Philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science (pp. 257-316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Fodor, J. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Fodor, J., & Lepore, E. (1996). The red herring and the pet fish: Why concepts still can’t be prototypes. Cognition, 58, 253-270.
26. Geeraerts, D. (1989). Prospects and problems of prototype theory. Linguistics, 27, 587-612.
27. Geeraerts, D. (1993). Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 223-272.
28. Geeraerts, D. (1997). Diachronic prototype semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Geeraerts, D., Grondelaers, S., & Bakema, P. (1994). The structure of lexical variation: Meaning, naming, and context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
30. Gleason, H. A. (1955). An introduction to descriptive linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
31. Goldberg, A. (1992). The inherent semantics of argument structure: The case of the English ditransitive construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 37-74.
32. Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289-316.
34. Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N. (2005). The role of prediction in construction-learning. Journal of Child Language, 32, 407-426.
35. Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1,166-1,183.
36. Gries, S. Th. (2003). Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 1-18.
37. Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on “alternations”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 97-129.
38. Grieser, D., & Kuhl, P. (1989). Categorization of speech by infants: Support for speech-perception prototypes. Developmental Psychology, 25, pp. 577-588.
39. Hallan, N. (2001). Paths to prepositions? A corpus-based study of the acquisition of a lexico-grammatical category. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 91-120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
40. Hampton, J. (1987). Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions. Memory and Cognition, 15, 55-71.
41. Hampton, J. (1991). The combination of prototype concepts. In P. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings (pp. 91-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Heider, E. R. (1971). “Focal” color areas and the development of color names. Developmental Psychology, 4, 447-455.
43. Heider, E. R. (1972). Universals in color naming and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 10-20.
44. Hintzman, D. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 328-338.
45. Hummel, M. (1994). Regard critique sur la sémantique du prototype. Cahiers de lexicologie, 65, 159-182.
46. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Johnson, K. (1997) Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145-165). San Diego: Academic Press.
48. Jones, D. (1964). An outline of English phonetics. Cambridge: Heffer. First published 1918.
49. Jusczyk, P. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Kay, P., & McDaniel, C. K. (1978). The linguistic significance of the meanings of basic color terms. Language, 54, 610-646.
51. Kleiber, G. (1990). La sémantique du prototype: Catégories et sens lexical. Paris: PUF.
52. Kristiansen, G. (2003). How to do things with allophones: Linguistic stereotypes as cognitive reference points in social cognition. In R. Dirven, R. Frank, & M. Pütz (Eds.), Cognitive models in language and thought: Ideology, metaphors and meanings (pp. 69-120). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
53. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
54. Kuhl, P. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 93-107.
55. Kuhl, P. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97 (no. 22), 11,850-11,857.
56. Kuhl, P., & Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic experience and the “perceptual magnet effect”. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 121-154). Timonium, MD: York Press.
57. Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. In C.-J. Bailey & R. W. Shuy (Eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English (pp. 340-372). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Reprinted in Aarts et al. (2004), 67-89.
58. Lachs, L., McMichael, K., & Pisoni, D. B. (2000). Speech perception and implicit memory: Evidence for detailed episodic encoding of phonetic events. Research on Spoken Language Processing, Progress Report, No. 24 (pp. 149-167). Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University, Bloomington.
59. Lakoff, G. (1982). Categories: An essay in cognitive linguistics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981 (pp. 139-193). Seoul: Hanshin.
60. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
62. MacLaury, R. (1995). Vantage theory. In J. Taylor & R. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 231-276). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
63. McClelland, J., Fiez, J., & McCandliss, B. (2002). Teaching the /r/-/l/discrimination to Japanese adults: Behavioral and neural aspects. Physiology and Behavior, 77, 657-662.
64. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, E. J. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
65. Moon, R. (1998). Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Murphy, G. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
67. Murphy, G., & Medin, D. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.
68. Nathan, G. (1986). Phonemes as mental categories. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 12, 212-223.
69. Nosofsky, R.M. (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 14, 700-708.
70. Ortony, A., Vondruska, R., Voss, M., & Jones. L. (1985). Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 569-594.
71. Osherson, D., & Smith, E. (1981). On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition, 9, 35-58.
72. Pierrehumbert, J. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee & Hopper (2001), pp. 137-157.
73. Pierrehumbert, J. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 7 (pp. 101-139). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
74. Posner, M. L. & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
75. Pulman, S. G. (1983). Word meaning and belief. London: Croom Helm.
76. Renouf, A. & Sinclair, J. (1991). Collocational frameworks in English. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics (pp. 128-143). London: Longman.
77. Rice, S. (2003). Growth of a lexical network: Nine English prepositions in acquisition. In Cuyckens, H., Dirven, R., & Taylor, J. (Eds.) (2003). Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics pp. 243-280. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
78. Rips, L. J. (1975). Inductive judgments about natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 665-681.
79. Rosch. E. (1975a). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 532-547.
80. Rosch, E. (1975b). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192-233.
81. Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in crosscultural psychology. Vol. 1 (pp. 3-49). London: Academic Press.
82. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Reprinted in Aarts et al. (2004), pp. 91-108.
83. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
84. Ross, B. H., & Makin, V. S. (1999). Prototype versus exemplar models. In R. J. Steinberg (Ed.), The nature of cognition (pp. 205-241). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Rothkopf, E. Z. (1971). Incidental memory for location of information page. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 608-613.
86. Sandra, D., & Rice, S. (1995). Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind-the linguist’s or the language user’s? Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 89-130.
87. Schacter, D. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
88. Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89. Stefanowitch, A., & Gries, S. Th. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8, 209-243.
90. Stevens, K. (1972). The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatoryacoustic data. In E. E. David & P. D. Denes (Eds.), Human communication: A unified view (pp. 51-66). New York: McGraw-Hill.
91. Sweetser, E. (1987). The definition of lie: An examination of the folk models underlying a semantic prototype. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 43-66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92. Taylor, J. R. (1996). Possessives in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93. Taylor, J. R. (1998). Syntactic constructions as prototype categories. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 177-202). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
94. Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
95. Taylor, J. R. (2003a). Linguistic categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. First edition: 1989.
96. Taylor, J. R. (2003b). Near synonyms as co-extensive categories: “High” and “tall” revisited. Language Sciences, 25, 263-284.
97. Taylor, J. R. (2004). Why construction grammar is radical. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 321-348.
98. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
99. Tsohatzidis, S. (Ed.) (1990). Meanings and prototypes: Studies on linguistic categorization. London: Routledge.
100. Tuggy, D. (1993). Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 273-290.
101. Tversky, A. 1977. Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
102. Uehara, S. (2003). A diachronic perspective on prototypicality: The case of nominal adjectives in Japanese. In Cuyckens, H., Dirven, R., & Taylor, J. (Eds.) (2003). Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics pp. 363-391. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
103. Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H.-J. (1996). An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London: Longman.
104. Verhagen, A. (2005). Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
105. Violi, P. (1997). Significato ed esperienza. Milan: Bompiani. [Meaning and experience, Trans. Jeremy Carden, 2001, Bloomington: Indiana University Press]
106. Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
107. Wierzbicka, A. 1990. “Prototypes save”: On the uses and abuses of the notion of “prototype” in linguistics and related fields. In Tsohatzidis (1990), pp. 347-367. Reprinted in Aarts, B., Denison, D., Keizer, E., & Popova, G. (Eds.) (2004). Fuzzy grammar: A reader pp. 461-478. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
108. Wittgenstein, L. (1978). Philosophical investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
109. Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
110. Zlatev, J. (2003). Polysemy or generality? Mu. In Cuyckens, H., Dirven, R., & Taylor, J. (Eds.) (2003). Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics pp. 447-494. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.