Design for Agency, Adaptivity and Reciprocity: Reimagining AAL and Telecare Agendas

Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal

Volumn 2015, Issue , 2015, Pages 305-338

  Fitzpatrick, Geraldine ^a   Huldtgren, Alina ^b   Malmborg, Lone ^c   Harley, Dave ^d   Ijsselsteijn, Wijnand ^e  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c IT UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

^e CMG Eindhoven   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ambient Assist Live; Everyday Object; Formal Care; Senior Citizen; Whole System Demonstrator

Indexed keywords

HOME HEALTH CARE;

ADAPTIVITY; AGING POPULATION; AMBIENT ASSIST LIVE; AMBIENT ASSISTED LIVING; AMBIENTS; EVERYDAY OBJECT; FORMAL CARE; SENIOR CITIZENS; TELECARE; WHOLE SYSTEM DEMONSTRATOR;

ASSISTED LIVING;

EID: 85143784370     PISSN: 09259724     EISSN: 15737551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_13     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Aarhus, R., & Ballegaard, S. (2010). Negotiating boundaries: Managing disease at home. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’10) (pp. 1223–1232). New York: ACM.
2. Aoki, P. M., & Woodruff, A. (2005). Making space for stories: Ambiguity in the design of personal communication systems. In Proceedings of CHI’05 (pp. 181–190). New York: ACM.
3. Axelrod, L., Fitzpatrick, G., Burridge, J., Mawson, S., Probert Smith, P., Rodden, T., & Ricketts, I. (2009). The reality of homes fit for heroes: Design challenges for rehabilitation technology at home. Journal of Assistive Technology, 3(2), 35–43.
4. Baltes, P. B. (1993). The aging mind: Potential and limits. Gerontologist, 33, 580–594.
5. Baltes, P., & Baltes, M. (1990). Successful aging. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Baltes, M. M., & Carstensen, L. L. (1999). Social-psychological theories and their applications to aging: From individual to collective. In V. L. Bengtson, J.-E. Ruth, & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 209–226). New York: Springer.
7. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
8. Barlow, J., Singh, D., Bayer, S., & Curry, R. (2007, June 1). A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 13, 172–179.
9. Bessière, K., Newhagen, J., Robinson, J. P., & Shneiderman, B. (2006). A model for computer frustration: The role of instrumental and dispositional factors on incident, session, and post-session frustration and mood. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 941–961.
10. Blythe, M. A., Monk, A. F., & Doughty, K. (2005). Socially dependable design: The challenge of ageing populations for HCI. Interacting with Computers, 17(6), 672–689. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.09.005.
11. Boehner, K. (2009, November). Reflections on representation as response. Interactions, 16(6), 28–32.
12. Boehner, K., Chen, M., & Liu, Z. (2003). The vibe reflector: An emergent impression of collective experience. In Proceedings of CHI 2003 workshop on providing elegant peripheral awareness. New York: ACM.
13. Borning, A., & Muller, M. (2012). Next steps for value sensitive design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’12) (pp. 1125–1134). New York: ACM.
14. Brandt, E., Binder, T., Malmborg, L., & Sokoler, T. (2010). Communities of everyday practice and situated elderliness as an approach to co-design for senior interaction. In OZCHI 2010 proceedings (pp. 400–403). Brisbane, Australia.
15. Brandt, E., Mortensen, P. F., Malmborg, L., Binder, T., & Sokoler, T. (Eds.). (2012). SeniorIn-teraktion – Innovation gennem dialog [Eng: SeniorInteraction – Innovation through dialogue]. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, School of Design.
16. Brownsell, S., Bradley, D., Blackburn, S., Cardinaux F., & Hawley, M. (2011) A systematic review of lifestyle monitoring technologies. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 17(4), 185–189. Publisher: Royal Society of Medicine.
17. Carstensen, L. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 331–338.
18. Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915.
19. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.
20. Choi, N. G., & McDougall, G. J. (2007). Comparison of depressive symptoms between homebound older adults and ambulatory older adults. Aging and Mental Health, 11, 310–322.
21. Cockton, G. (2006). Designing worth is worth designing. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: Changing roles (NordiCHI’06) (pp. 165–174). New York: ACM.
22. Consolvo, S., Roessler, P., & Shelton, B. E., (2004, September) The CareNet display: Lessons learned from an In home evaluation of an ambient display. In Proceedings of UbiComp’04 (pp. 1–17). Nottingham, UK.
23. Cook, D. (2012). Bringing smart home data to caregivers. Posted December 18 2012. http://www. igert.org/highlights/593
24. Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricerche di Psichologia, 27, 17–34.
25. DelliFrance, J., & Dansky, K. (2008, March). Home-based telehealth: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Telemed Telecare, 14(2), 62–66.
26. DePaulo, B. M. (1982). Social-psychological processes in informal help-seeking. In T. A. Wills (Ed.), Basic processes in helping relationship (pp. 255–279). New York: Academic.
27. Detweiler, C. A., Dechesne, F., Hindriks, K. V., & Jonker, C. M. (2012). Ambient intelligence implies responsibility. In T. Bosse (Ed.), Agents and ambient intelligence – Achievements and challenges in the intersection of agent technology and ambient intelligence (pp. 33–61). Amsterdam/Washington, DC: Ios Press.
28. Draper, H., & Sorell, T. (2012). Telecare, remote monitoring and care. Bioethics, 9702, 195–200. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01961.x.
29. Ertner, M., & Malmborg, L. (2012, May 5–10). Lost in translation: Inscriptions of the elderly in concept-driven design of welfare technology. Position paper, CHI2012, Austin, TX, USA.
30. Ertner, M., Kragelund, A. M., & Malmborg, L. (2010, November). Five enunciations of empowerment in participatory design. In Proceedings of PDC’10, Sydney, Australia (pp. 191–194). New York: ACM Press.
31. Fitrianie, S., Huldtgren, A., Alers, H., & Guldemond, N. A. (2013). A smartTV platform for wellbeing, care and social support for elderly at home. In Inclusive society: Health and wellbeing in the community, and care at home (Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 7910, pp. 94–101). Berlin/New York: Springer.
32. Fitzpatrick, G. (2012) New challenges for health IT – Design fit for life. In A. Yoxall (Ed.), Proceedings of the design 4 health 2011 (pp. 121–135). Sheffield Hallam University, 13–15 July 2011. Available from http://research.shu.ac.uk/lab4living/design-4-health-2011-proceedings
33. Fitzsimmons, D. A., Thompson, J., Hawley, M., & Mountain, G. A. (2011, January 7). Preventative tele-health supported services for early stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial pilot. Trials, 12, 6. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-12-6.
34. Flanagan, M., Howe, D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2008). Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. In J. van den Hoven and J. Weckert (Eds.), Information technology and moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Foverskov, M., & Binder, T. (2011). Super dots: Making social media tangible for senior citizens. In Proceedings of the 2011 conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces (DPPI’11). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2347504.2347575.
36. Frederiksberg Municipality. (2013). Handleforslag 48: Plejebolig som kvalitetsforbedrende alternativ til omfattende hjemmehjælp [in English: Activity proposal 48: Nursing home as quality improving alternative to extensive home care], 2013–04–21. Copenhagen, Denmark.
37. Friedman, B., Kahn, P., & Borning, A. (2006). Chapter 16: Value sensitive design and information systems. In Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations. London: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
38. Friedman, B., Nathan, L. P., Kane, S., & Lin, J. (2011). Envisioning cards. Seattle: University of Washington.
39. Fyrand, L. (2010). Reciprocity: A predictor of mental health and continuity in elderly people’s relationships? A review. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, Article ID 340161.
40. Gabriel, Z., & Bowling, A. (2004). Quality of life in old age from the perspectives of older people. In A. Walker & C. H. Hennessy (Eds.), Growing older: Quality of life in old age (pp. 14–34). Maidenhead/New York: Open University Press.
41. Gale, N., & Sultan, H. (2013). Telehealth as ‘peace of mind’: Embodiment, emotions and the home as the primary health space for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. Health and Place, 21, 140–147.
42. Gaver, W., Beaver, J., & Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proceedings of CHI’03 (pp. 233–240). New York: ACM.
43. Greenhalgh, T., Procter, R., Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., & Shaw, S. (2012). The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: Discourse analysis. BMJ Open, 2(4), e001574. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001574.
44. Gregory, C. (1994). Exchange and reciprocity. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Companion encyclopedia of anthropology (pp. 911–939). London/New York: Routledge.
45. Grönvall, E., & Kyng, M. (2012). On participatory design of home-based healthcare. Cognition, Technology & Work, 15(4), 389–401. doi:10.1007/s10111-012-0226-7.
46. Halloran, J., Hornecker, E., Stringer, M., Harris, E., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2009). The value of values: Resourcing co-design of ubiquitous computing. CoDesign: International Journal of Co-Creation in Design and the Arts, 5(4), 245–273.
47. Hardisty, A., Peirce, S., Preece, A., Bolton, C., Conley, E., Gray, W., Rana, O., Yousef, Z., & Elwyn, G. (2011). Bridging two translation gaps: A new informatics research agenda for telemonitoring of chronic disease. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(10), 734– 744. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.07.002.
48. Harley, D. (2011) Older people’s appropriation of computers and the internet. Doctoral thesis, University of Sussex.
49. Harley, D., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2009). YouTube and intergenerational communication: The case of geriatric 1927. Universal Access in the Information Society, 8(1), 5–20.
50. Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). Stress and the aging immune system. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 18, 114–119.
51. Hawthorn, D. (2000). Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interacting with Computers, 12, 507–528.
52. Henderson, C., Knapp, M., Fernández, J.-L., Beecham, J., Hirani, S. P., Cartwright, M., Rixon, L., Beynon, M., Rogers, A., Bower, P., Doll, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Steventon, A., Bardsley, M., Hendy, J., & Newman, S. P. (2013). Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole systems demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): Nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Online), 346(7902).
53. Hirsch, T., Forlizzi, J., Hyder, E., Goetz, J., Kurtz, C., & Stroback, J. (2000). The elder project: Social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies. In Proceedings conference on Universal Usability, CUU’00 (pp. 72–79). New York: ACM.
54. House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241(4865), 540.
55. Huang, J.-C. (2011). Exploring the acceptance of telecare among senior citizens: An application of back propagation network. Telemedicine and e-Health, 17(2), 111–117.
56. James, A., James, W. L., & Smith, H. L. (1984). Reciprocity as a coping strategy of the elderly: A rural Irish perspective. Gerontologist, 24(5), 483–489.
57. Joyce, K., & Loe, M. (2010). A sociological approach to ageing, technology and health. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(2), 171–180. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01219.x.
58. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. Lindley, S. E. (2011). Shades of lightweight: Supporting cross-generational communication through home messaging. Universal Access in the Information Society, 11(1), 31–43.
60. Lindley, S., et al. (2008). Designing for elders: Exploring the complexity of relationships in later life. In Proceedings of BCS-HCI ’08 (vol. 1, pp. 77–86). Liverpool, UK.
61. Lotfi, A., Langensiepen, C., Mahmoud, S., & Akhlaghinia, M. (2012). Smart homes for the elderly dementia sufferers: Identification and prediction of abnormal behaviour. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 3(3), 205–218.
62. Mahmood, A., Yamamoto, T., Lee, M., & Steggell, C. (2008). Perceptions and use of gerotechnology: Implications for aging in place. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 22(1–2), 104–126.
63. Malmborg, L., & Yndigegn, S. L. (2013, June 9–12). Sustainable infrastructure for ad hoc social interaction. In E. Brandt, P. Ehn, T. D. Johansson, M. H. Reimer, T. Markussen, A. Vallgårda (Eds.), Experiments in design research. Proceedings of nordic design research conference 2013, Copenhagen-Malmö.
64. McCartney, M. (2012). Notes on the whole system demonstrator. At http://www. margaretmccartney.com/blog/?p=1647
65. Miller, J. K., Friedman, B., Jancke, G., & Gill, B. (2007). Value tensions in design: The value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation’s groupware system. In Proceedings of GROUP 2007 (pp. 281–290). New York: ACM.
66. Milliken, M., O’Donnell, S., Gibson, K., & Daniels, B. (2012). Older adults and video communications: A case study. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(1).
67. Mort, M., Roberts, C., & Callén, B. (2012). Ageing with telecare: Care or coercion in austerity? Sociology of Health & Illness, XX(X), 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01530.x.
68. Müller, C., Wan, L., & Hrg, D. (2010). Dealing with wandering: A case study on caregivers’ attitudes towards privacy and autonomy when reflecting the use of LBS. In Proceedings of Group 2010 (pp. 75–84). New York: ACM Press.
69. Müller, C., Neufeldt, C., Randall, D., & Wulf, W. (2012). ICT-development in residential care settings: Sensitizing design to the life circumstances of the residents of a care home. In Proceedings of CHI2012 (pp. 2639–2648). New York: ACM Press.
70. Mynatt, E., Rowan, J., Craighill, S., & Jacobs, A. (2001). Digital family portraits: Supporting peace of mind for extended family members. In Proceedings of CHI’01 (pp. 333–340). New York: ACM Press.
71. Nathan, L. P., Friedman, B., Klasjna, P. V., Kane, S. K., & Miller, J. K. (2008). Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design. In Proceedings of ACM conference on designing interactive systems (DIS’08) (pp. 1–10). New York: ACM.
72. Nazzi, E., Bagalkot, N. L., Nagargoje, A., & Sokoler, T. (2012). Concept-driven interaction design research in the domain of attractive aging: The example of walky. In P. Rodgers (Ed.), Articulating design thinking (pp. 227–245). Oxfordshire: Libri Publishing Ltd.
73. Östlund, B. (2005). Design paradigms and misunderstood technology: The case of older users. In B. Jæger (Ed.), Young technologies in old hands (pp. 25–39). Copenhagen: DJØF.
74. Panek, P., & Hlauschek, W. (2011). Experiences from user centric engineering of ambient assisted living technologies in the living lab schwechat. In Proceedings of ICE, 2011 (pp. 1–8). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6041274
75. Pedell, S., Vetere, F., Kulik, L., Ozanne, E., & Gruner, A. (2010). Social isolation of older people: The role of domestic technologies. In Proceedings of OZCHI’10 (pp. 164–167). New York: ACM.
76. Reginatto, B. (2012). Addressing barriers to wider adoption of telehealth in the homes of older people: An exploratory study in the Irish context. In eTELEMED 2012: The fourth international conference on eHealth, telemedicine, and social medicine. Red Hook: Curran.
77. Riche, Y. (2008). Designing communication appliances to support aging in place. Ph.D. thesis. INRIA/Universite Paris Sud.
78. Riche, Y., & MacKay, W. (2010). PeerCare: Supporting awareness of rhythms and routines for better aging in place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 19(1), 73–104.
79. Roberts, C., & Mort, M. (2009). Reshaping what counts as care: Older people, work and new technologies. ALTER – European Journal of Disability Research [Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap], 3(2), 138–158. doi:10.1016/j.alter.2009.01.004.
80. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). To be happy or to be self-fulfilled: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. In S. Fiske (Ed.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 141–166). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews/Inc.
81. Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Grolnick, W. S., & La Guardia, J. G. (2006). The significance of autonomy and autonomy support in psychological development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method (2nd ed., pp. 795–849). Hoboken: Wiley.
82. Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 4(1), 5–18.
83. Sanders, E.B.-N., & Westerlund, B. (2011, May). Experience, exploring and experimenting in and with co-design spaces. In Proceedings of NORDES’11 (pp. 1–5), Helsinki, Finland.
84. Sanders, C., Rogers, A., Bowen, R., et al. (2012). Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the whole system demonstrator trial: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 220.
85. Sayago, S., Sloan, D., & Blat, J. (2011). Everyday use of computer-mediated communication tools and its evolution over time: An ethnographical study with older people. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 543–554.
86. Shankar, K., Camp, L., Connelly, K., & Huber, L. (2012). Aging, privacy, and home-based computing: Developing a design framework. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 11(4), 46–54.
87. Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2012). Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(1), 27–40.
88. Ståhl, A., Höök, K., Svensson, M., Taylor, A., & Combetto, M. (2009, June). Experiencing the affective diary. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13(5), 365–378.
89. Steventon, A., Bardsley, M., Billings, J., Dixon, J., Doll, H., Hirani, S., et al. (2012). Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: Findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ, 344, e3874.
90. Stolterman, E., & Wiberg, M. (2010). Concept-driven interaction design research. Human-Computer Interaction, 25(2) 95–118.
91. Thomas, B., & Crandall, A. (2011). A demonstration of PyViz, a flexible smart home visualization tool. In Proceedings of pervasive computing and communications workshops. Piscataway: IEEE.
92. Thompson, M. G., & Heller, K. (1990). Facets of support related to well-being: Quantitative social isolation and perceived family support in a sample of elderly women. Psychology and Aging, 5(4), 535–544.
93. Tornstam, L. (1989). Gero-transcendence: A meta-theoretical reformulation of the disengagement theory. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 1(1), 55–63.
94. Tornstam, L. (2005). Gerotranscendence. A developmental theory of positive aging. New York: Springer.
95. Tornstam, L., & Toernqvist, M. (2000). Nursing staff’s interpretations of “gerotanscendental behaviors” in the elderly. Journal of Aging and Identity, 5, 15–29.
96. van den Hoven, J. (2007). ICT and value sensitive design. In The information society: Innovation, legitimacy, ethics and democracy (pp. 67–72). Boston: Springer.
97. van Wynsberghe, A. (2013). Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 407–433.
98. Vines, J., Blythe, M., Dunphy, P., Vlachokyriakos, V., Teece, I., Monk, A., & Olivier, P. (2012). Cheque mates: Participatory design of digital payments with eighty somethings. In Proceedings of CHI’12 (pp. 1189–1198). New York: ACM Press.
99. Waycott, J., Vetere, F., Pedell, S., Kulik, L., Ozanne, E., Gruner, A., & Downs, J. (2013). Older adults as digital content producers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’13) (pp. 39–48). New York: ACM Press.
100. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101. Woelfer, J. P., Iverson, A., Hendry, D. G., Friedman, B., & Gill, B. (2011). Improving the safety of homeless young people with mobile phones: Values, form and function. In Proceedings of CHI 2011 (pp. 1707–1716). New York: ACM Press.
102. World Health Organisation (WHO). (2002). Active ageing: A policy framework. Geneva: WHO.
103. Yoo, D., Huldtgren, A., Palzkill Woelfer, J., Hendry, D., & Friedman, B. (2013). A value sensitive action-reflection model: Evolving a co-design space with stakeholder and designer prompts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’13) (pp. 419–428). New York: ACM Press.
104. Zunzunegui, M.-V., Alvarado, B. E., Del Ser, T., & Otero, A. (2003). Social networks, social integration, and social engagement determine cognitive decline in community-dwelling Spanish older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(2), 93–100.