Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 407-433

  van Wynsberghe, Aimee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Care ethics; Care robots; Ethics and technology; Value sensitive design

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; NURSING; PERSONHOOD; ROBOTICS; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARD;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSING; PERSONHOOD; ROBOTICS; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 84878288051     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 16605454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Asaro, P. (2006). What should we want from a robot ethic? In R. Capurro & M. Nagenborg (Eds.), Ethics and robotics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
3. Barras, C. (2009). Useful, loveable and unbelievably annoying. The New Scientist, 22-23.
4. Brey, P. (2009). Values in technology and disclosive computer ethics. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cummings, M. (2006). Integrating ethics through value sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(4), 701-715.
6. Engelberger, J. (1989). Robotics in service. London: MIT Press.
7. Freidman, B., Kahn, P., et al. (2006). Value sensitive design and information systems. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations (pp. 348-372). NY: M. E. Sharpe.
8. Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2003). Human values, ethics, and design. In The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (pp. 1177-1201). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Gadow, S. A. (1985). Nurse and patient: The caring relationship. In A. H. Bishop & J. R. Scudder Jr. (Eds.), Caring, curing, coping: Nurse, physician, patient relationships (pp. 31-43). University Alabama: The University of Alabama Press.
10. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Hayashi, T., Kawamoto, H., & Sankai, Y. (2005). Control method of robot suit HAL working as operator's muscle using biological and dynamical information. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 3063-3068.
12. Howcroft, D., Mitev, N., & Wilson, M. (2004). What we may learn from the social shaping of technology approach. In J. Mingers & L. P. Willcocks (Eds.), Social theory and philosophy for information systems (pp. 329-371). Chichester: Wiley.
13. ISO. (2011). http://www. iso. org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail. htm?csnumber=53820.
14. Jecker, N. S., Carrese, J. A., & Pearlman, R. A. (2002). Separating care and cure: An analysis of historical and contemporary images of nursing and medicine. In E. Boetzkes & W. J. Waluchow (Eds.), Readings in healthcare ethics (pp. 57-68). Canada: Broadview Press.
15. Kawamoto, H., & Sankai, Y. (2002). Power assist system HAL-3 for gait disorder person. Computers Helping People with Special Needs; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2398, 19-29.
16. Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Le Dantec, C., Poole, E., & Wyche, S. (2009). Values as lived experience; evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. In Proceedings of the 27th International conference on human factors in computing systems. ISBN: 978-1-60558-246-7.
18. Li, J., Wolf, L., & Evanoff, B. (2004). Use of mechanical patient lifts decreased musculoskeletal symptoms and injuries among health care workers. Injury Prevention, 10(4), 212-216.
19. Little, M. (1998). Care: From theory to orientation and back. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 23(2), 190-209.
20. Mander-Huits, N. (2011). What values in design? The challenge of incorporating moral values in design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, 271-287.
21. Metzler, T., & Lewis, L. (2008). Ethical view, religious views, and acceptance of robotic applications: A pilot study. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. http://www. aaai. org.
22. Nathan, L., Friedman, B., Klasnja, P., Kane, S., & Miller, J. (2008). Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design. In Proceedings of DIS (pp. 1-10).
23. Nissenbaum, H. (1998). Values in the design of computer systems. Computers and Society, 38-39.
24. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkely: University of California Press.
25. Onishi, M., ZhiWei, L., Odashima, T., Hirano, S., Tahara, K., Mukai, T. (2007). Generation of human care behaviours by human-interactive robot RI-MAN. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3128-3129.
26. Reich, W. T. (1995). History of the notion of care. In W. T. Reich (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics, vol. 5 (pp. 319-331), Revised edition. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
27. Rosati, C. (2009). Relational good and the multiplicity problem. Philosophical Issues, 19(1), 205-234.
28. Ruddick, S. (1995). Maternal thinking. New York: Ballantine Books.
29. Sharkey, N., & Sharkey, A. (2010). Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology. doi: 10. 1007/s10676-010-9234-6.
30. Simpson, J. A., & Weiner, E. S. C. (1989). The Oxford english dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
31. Sparrow, R., & Sparrow, L. (2006). In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Mind and Machine, 16, 141-161.
32. Super, D. E. (1973). The work values inventory. In D. G. Zytowski (Ed.), Contemporary approaches to interest measurement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33. Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
34. Tronto, J. C. (2010). Creating caring institutions: Politics, plurality, and purpose. Ethics and Social Welfare, 4(2), 158-171.
35. Vallor, S. (2011). Carebots and caregivers: Sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the 21st century. Journal of Philosophy and Technology, 24, 251-268.
36. van den Hoven, J. (2007). ICT and value sensitive design. International Federation for Information Processing, 233, 67-72.
37. van Wynsberghe, A., & Gastmans, C. (2008). Telesurgery: An ethical appraisal. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, e22.
38. Vanlaere, L., & Gastmans, C. (2011). A personalist approach to care ethics. Nursing Ethics, 18(2), 161-173.
39. Verbeek, P. (2006). Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 31(3), 361-380.
40. Verbeek, P. (2008). Morality in design; design ethics and the morality of technological artifacts. In P. Vermaas, P. Kroes, A. Light, & S. Moore (Eds.), Philosophy and design: From engineering to architecture (pp. 91-102). Berlin: Springer.
41. Veruggio, G., & Operto, F. (2006). Roboethics: A bottom-up interdisciplinary discourse in the field of applied ethics in robotics. In International Review of Information Ethics. Ed. Ethics in Robotics, pp. 2-8.
42. WHO. (2010). Health topics: Ageing. Available from: http://www. who. int/topics/ageing/en/.
43. Wilson, M. (2002). Making nursing visible? Gender, technology and the care plan as script. Information Technology and People, 15(2), 139-158.
44. World Health Organization. (2007). People centered health; a framework for policy. http://www. wpro. who. int/NR/rdonlyres/55CBA47E-9B93-4EFB-A64E-21667D95D30E/0/PEOPLECENTREDHEATLHCAREPolicyFramework. pdf.