Preschool Geometry: Theory, Research, and Practical Perspectives

Preschool Geometry: Theory, Research, and Practical Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-134

  Levenson, Esther ^a   Tirosh, Dina ^a   Tsamir, Pessia ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85142589971     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (94)

1. Attneave, F. (1957). Transfer of experience with a class schema to identification of patterns and shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 81-88.
2. Aubrey, C. (1993). An investigation of the mathematical knowledge and competencies which young children bring to school. British Educational Research Journal, 19, 27-41.
3. Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers and Early Childhood Australia (AAMT/ECA) (2006). Position paper on early childhood mathematics. Retrieved January 20, 2009, from http://www.aamt.edu.au/documentation/statements.
4. Ball, D., Bass, H., and Hill, H. (2004). Knowing and using mathematical knowledge in teaching: Learning what matters. In Buffgler, A. and Lausch, R. (Eds.), Proceedings for the 12th Annual Conference of the South African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Durban. SAARMSTE.
5. Ball, D., Hill, H., and Bass, H. (2005, Fall). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29, 14-22.
6. Ball, D., Thames, M., and Phelps, G., (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
7. Baroody, A. and Wilkins, J. (1999). The development of informal counting, number, and arithmetic skills and concepts. In J. V. Copley (Ed.), Mathematics in the early years (pp. 48-65). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
8. Bereiter, C. and Engelmann, S. (1966). Teaching disadvantaged children in preschool. New York: John Wiley.
9. Bieda, K. (2009). Enacting proof in middle school mathematics. ICMI Study 19: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education, 1, 65-70.
10. Board of Studies New South Wales (2006). Mathematics K-6 Syllabus. Retrieved November 25, 2010 from http://k6.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/files/maths/k6_maths_syl.pdf.
11. Burger, W. and Shaughnessy, J. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31-48.
12. Clements, D. and Battista, M. T. (2001). Logo and Geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
13. Clements, D. H. and Sarama, J. (2007). Early childhood mathematics learning. In F.K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 461-555). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
14. Clements, D., Swaminathan, S., Hannibal, M., and Sarama, J. (1999). Young children’s concepts of shape. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 192-212.
15. De Villiers, M. (1994). The role and function of a hierarchical classification of quadrialters. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 11-18.
16. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53(2), 159-199.
17. Doyle, W. (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students’ thinking during instruction, Educational Psychologist, 23, 167-180.
18. Eisenmann, T. and Even, R. (2009). Similarities and differences in the types of algebraic activities in two classes taught by the same teacher. In J. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenmann and G. Lloyd (Eds.), Teachers’ use of mathematics curriculum materials: Research perspectives on relationships between teachers and curriculum (pp. 152-170). New-York, NY: Routledge.
19. Even, R. and Tirosh, D. (1995). Subject-matter knowledge and knowledge about students as sources of teacher presentations of the subject-matter. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 1-20.
20. Figueiredo, N., van Galen, F., and Gravemeijer, K. (2009). The actor’s and observer’s point of view: A geometry applet as an example. Educational Designer, 1(3), 1-20. Retrieved April 5, 2010, from: http://www.educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume2011/issue2013/article2010.
21. Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel Publishing Company.
22. Fischbein, E. (1993a). The interaction between the formal, the algorithmic and the intuitive components in a mathematical activity. In R. Biehler, R. Scholz, R. Straber, B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline (pp. 231-245). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
23. Fischbein, E. (1993b). The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(2), 139-162.
24. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
25. Ginsburg, H. P., Lee, J. S., and Boyd, J. S. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report, XXII(I), 1-22.
26. Graven, M. (2004). Investigating mathematics teacher learning within an in-service community of practice: The centrality of confidence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 177-211.
27. Gutiérrez, A. (1996). Visualization in 3-dimensional geometry: In search of a framework. In L. Puig and A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th PME International Conference, 1, 3-19.
28. Gutiérrez, A., Jaime, A., and Fortuny, J. M. (1991). An alternative paradigm to evaluate the acquisition of the van Hiele levels. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(3), 237-251.
29. Hannibal, M. (1999). Young children’s developing understanding of geometric shapes. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 353-357.
30. Hasegawa, J. (1997). Concept formation of triangles and quadrilaterals in the second grade. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 157-179.
31. Herbst, P. (2003). Using novel tasks to teach mathematics: Three tensions affecting the work of the teacher. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 197-238.
32. Hershkowitz, R. (1989). Visualization in geometry -Two sides of the coin. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1), 61-76.
33. Hershkowitz, R. (1990). Psychological aspects of learning geeometry. In P. Nesher and J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition (pp. 70-95). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Hershkowitz, R. and Vinner, S. (1983). The role of ciritical and non-critical attributes in the concept image of geometrical concepts. In R. Hershkowitz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th PME International Conference (pp. 223-228). Shoresh, Israel: The Weizmann Institute of Science.
35. Israel National Mathematics Preschool Curriculum (INMPC) (2008). Retrieved April 7, 2009, from http://meyda.education.gov.il/files/Tochniyot_Limudim/KdamYesodi/Math1.pdf.
36. Jimerson, S., Egelnad, B., and Teo, A. (1999). A longitudinal study of achievement trajectories: Factors associated with change. Journal for Educational Psychology, 91, 116-126.
37. Kahneman, D. (2002). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. In T. Frangsmyr (Ed.), Les Prix Nobel (pp. 416-499). Also accessible at http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2002/kahnemann-lecture.pdf.
38. Kellogg, R. (1980). Feature frequency and hypothesis testing in the acquisition of rule-governed concepts. Memory and Cognition, 8, 297-303.
39. Klausmeier, H. and Sipple, T. (1980). Learning and teaching concepts. New York: Academic Press.
40. Krainer, K. (1993). Powerful tasks: A contribution to a high level of acting and reflecting in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(1), 65-93.
41. Lehrer, R., Jenkins, M., and Osana, H. (1998). Longitudinal study of children’s reasoning about space and geometry. In R. Lehrer and D. Chazan (Eds.), Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space (pp. 137-167). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Leron, U. and Hazzan, O. (2006). The rationality debate: Application of cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 105-126.
43. Levenson, Tsamir, and Tirosh, D. (2007). Neither even nor odd: Sixth grade students’ dilemmas regarding the parity of zero. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 83-95.
44. Markman, E. (1989). Categorization and naming in children. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
45. Markman, E. and Watchtel, G. (1988). Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meaning of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 121-157.
46. Martin, T., Lukong, A., and Reaves, R. (2007). The role of manipulatives in arithmetic and geometry tasks. Journal of Education and Human Development, 1(1), 1-14.
47. National Association for the Education of Young Children and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NAEYC and NCTM) (2002). Position statement. Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings. Available: www.naeyc.org/resources/position_statements/psmath.htm.
48. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2006). Curriculum focal points for kindergarten through grade 8 mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
49. Nieuwoudt, H. D. and van Niekerk, R. (1997, March). The spatial competence of young children through the development of solids. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
50. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1956). The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge and K. Paul/Basic Books, Inc.
51. Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., and Szeminska, A. (1960). The child’s conception of geometry. London: Routledge and K. Paul.
52. Posner, M. I. and Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
53. Practice Guidance for the Early Years Foundation Stage (2008). Retrieved April 9, 2009 from www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/eyfs/resources/downloads/practice-guidance.pdf.
54. Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382-407.
55. Rosch, E. (1973). Natural Categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350.
56. Rosch, E. and Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 773-605.
57. Roth, W. and Thom, J. (2009). The emergence of 3D geometry from children’s (teacher-guided) classification tasks. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 45-99.
58. Sarama, J. and Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. New York: Routledge.
59. Satlow, E. and NewCombe, N. (1998). When is a triangle not a triangle? Young children’s developing concepts of geometric shape. Cognitive development, 13(4), 547-559.
60. Schwarz, B. and Hershkowitz, R. (1999). Prototypes: Brakes or levers in learning the function concept? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 362-389.
61. Shaughnessy, J. and Burger, W. (1985). Spadework prior to deduction in geometry. Mathematics Teacher, 78, 419-428.
62. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
63. Silver, E. A., Mesa, V. M., Morris, K. A., Star, J. R., and Benken, B. M. (2009). Teaching mathematics for understanding: An analysis of lessons submitted by teachers seeking NBPTS certification. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 501-531.
64. Simon, M. and Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91-104.
65. Skemp, R. (1971). The psychology of learning mathematics. London: Penguin.
66. Smith, E., Shoben, E., and Rips, L. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological review, 81, 214-241.
67. Smith, E. and Medin, D. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68. Spector, M. (2010). Triangles and non-triangles in elementary school: Identification, justification, and reaction time. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
69. Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage (2008). Retrieved November 25, 2010 from http://nationalstrategies.standards.dcsf.gov.uk/node/157774.
70. Stavy, R. and Babai, R. (2010). Overcoming intuitive interference in mathematics: insights from behavioral, brain imaging and intervention studies. ZDM, 42(6), 621-633.
71. Stavy, R. and Tirosh, D. (1996). Intuitive rules in mathematics and science: The case of “the more of A the more of B”. International Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 653-667.
72. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., and Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 455-488.
73. Stylianides, A. and Stylianides, G. (2008). Studying the classroom implementation of tasks: High-level mathematical tasks embedded in ‘real-life’ contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 859-875.
74. Swan, M. (2007). The impact of task-based professional development on teachers’ practices and beliefs: A design research study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4/6), 217-237.
75. Swan, M. (2008). A designer speaks. Educational Designer, 1. Retrieved from: http://www.educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume1/issue1/article3.
76. Tall, D. and Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with special reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169.
77. Thorndike, E. (1922). The psychology of arithmetic. New York: MacMillan.
78. Tirosh, D., and Tsamir, P. (2008). Friendly and unfriendly examples of triangles and non-triangles: Working with kindergarten teachers. Mispar Hazak, 15, 38-43 [in Hebrew].
79. Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., and Levenson, E. (2010). Is it or is it not a triangle? Intuitions and triangles in preschool. Oryanut Vesapha, 3, 161-181 [in Hebrew].
80. Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., Levenson, E., and Tabach, M. (2011). From kindergarten teachers’ professional development to children’s knowledge: The case of equivalence. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 113-131.
81. Tsamir, P. (2008). Using theories as tools in mathematics teacher education. In D. Tirosh and T. Wood (Eds.), Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (pp. 211-234). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
82. Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., and Levenson, E. (2008). Intuitive nonexamples: The case of triangles. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 81-95.
83. Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Levenson, E., and Barkai. (2011). Investigating geometric knowledge and selfefficacy among abused and neglected kindergarten children. CERME 7 -Seventh Conference of European Research in Mathematics Education. Retrieved May 18, 2011 from http://www.cerme7.univ.rzeszow.pl/WG/13/CERME7_WG13_Tsamir.pdf.
84. Van Hiele, P. M. (1999). Developing geometric thinking through activities that begin with play. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 310-316.
85. van Hiele, P. M. and van Hiele, D. (1958). A method of initiation into geometry. In H. Freudenthal (Ed.), Report on methods of initiation into geometry (pp. 67-80). Groningen: Walters.
86. Vinner, S. (1991). The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 65-81). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
87. Vinner, S. and Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 356-66.
88. Vinner, S. and Hershkowitz, R. (1980). Concept images and common cognitive paths in the development of some simple geometric concepts. In R. Karplus (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th PME International Conference (pp. 177-184).
89. Watson, A. and Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
90. Watson, A. and Mason, J. (2007). Taken-as-shared: A review of common assumptions about mathematical tasks in teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4/6), 205-215.
91. Watson, A. and Sullivan, P. (2008). Teachers learning about tasks and lessons. In D. Tirosh and T. Wood (Eds.), Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (pp. 109-134). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
92. Waxman, S. (1999). The dubbing ceremony revisited: Object naming and categorization in infancy and early childhood. In D. Medin and S. Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
93. Waxman, S. and Braun, I. (2005). Consistent (but not variable) names as invitations to form object categories: New evidence from 12-month-old infants. Cognition, 95(3), B59-B68.
94. Wilson, S. (1986). Feature frequency and the use of negative instances in a geometric task. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 130-139.