Neither even nor odd: Sixth grade students' dilemmas regarding the parity of zero

Journal of Mathematical Behavior

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 83-95

  Levenson, Esther ^a   Tsamir, Pessia ^a   Tirosh, Dina ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Elementary school; Explanations; Mathematically based and practically based explanations; Parity; Zero

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547800096     PISSN: 07323123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Anthony G., and Walshaw M. Zero: A "none" number?. Teaching Children Mathematics 11 1 (2004) 38-41
2. Ball D. Prospective elementary and secondary teachers' understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 21 2 (1990) 132-144
3. Ball D. With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal 93 4 (1993) 373-397
4. Ball D., and Bass H. Making believe: The collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom. In: Phillips D. (Ed). Yearbook of the national society for the study of education, constructivism in education (2000), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
5. Blake R., and Verhille C. The story of 0. For the Learning of Mathematics 5 3 (1985) 35-47
6. Board of Studies NSW (2006). K-6 mathematics syllabus-Sample units of work. Syndney, Australia: Board of Studies NSW.
7. Bonotto C. How informal out-of-school mathematics can help students make sense of formal in-school mathematics: The case of multiplying by decimal numbers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 7 4 (2005) 313-344
8. Borasi R. Learning mathematics through inquiry (1992), Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH
9. Bowers J., and Doerr H. An analysis of prospective teachers' dual roles in understanding the mathematics of change: Eliciting growth with technology. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 4 (2001) 115-137
10. Bruner J. Towards a theory of instruction (1966), Norton, New York
11. Cobb P., McLain K., and Gravemeijer K. Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction 21 1 (2003) 1-78
12. Cramer K., and Henry A. Using manipulative models to build number sense for addition of fractions. In: Litwiller B., and Bright G. (Eds). Making sense of fractions, rations, and proportions (2002), NCTM, Reston, Virginia
13. De Souza, A., Mometti, A., Scavazza, H., & Baldino, R. (1995). Games for integers: Conceptual or semantic fields? In L. Meira & D. Carraher (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 232-239). Recife, Brazil.
14. Even R., and Tirosh D. Subject matter knowledge and knowledge about students as sources of teacher presentations of the subject matter. Educational Studies in Mathematics 29 1 (1995) 1-20
15. Fischbein E., Deri M., Nello M., and Marino M. The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for research in Mathematics Education 16 1 (1985) 3-17
16. Fischbein E. Intuition in science and mathematics (1987), Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
17. Freudenthal H. Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures (1983), Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
18. Fuchs L., Fuchs D., Hamlett C., Phillips N., Karns K., and Dutka S. Enhancing students' helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. The Elementary School Journal 97 3 (1997) 223-249
19. Ginsburg H., and Seo K. Mathematics in children's thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 1 2 (1999) 113-129
20. Henry B. Zero, the troublemaker. Arithmetic Teacher 16 5 (1969) 365-367
21. Hiebert J., and Carpenter T. Learning and teaching with understanding. In: Grouws D.A. (Ed). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (1992), Macmillan Publishing Company, New York 65-97
22. Israel national mathematics curriculum (2005). Retrieved April 16, 2006, from http://cms.education.gov.il.
23. Koirala, H. (1999). Teaching mathematics using everyday contexts: What if academic mathematics is lost? In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 161-168). Haifa, Israel.
24. Lampert M. When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer. American Educational Research Journal 27 1 (1990) 29-63
25. Levenson, E., Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (2004). Elementary school students' use of mathematically-based and practically-based explanations: The case of multiplication. In M. Hoines & A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 241-248). Bergen, Norway.
26. Levenson E., Tirosh D., and Tsamir P. Mathematically-based and practically-based explanations: Individual preferences and sociomathematical norms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 4 2 (2006) 319-344
27. Levenson E., Tsamir P., and Tirosh D. First and second graders' use of mathematically-based and practically-based explanations for multiplication with zero. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 29 2 (2007) 21-40
28. Linchevsky L., and Williams J. Using intuition from everyday life in 'filling' the gap in children's extension of their number concept to include the negative numbers. Educational Studies in Mathematics 39 (1999) 131-147
29. Lubinsky C., and Fox T. Learning to make sense of division of fractions: One K-8 preservice teacher's perspective. School Science and Mathematics 98 5 (1998) 247-259
30. Lytle, P. A. (1994). Investigation of a model based on the newutralization of opposites to teach integer addition and subtraction. In J. P. Ponte & J. J. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 192-199). Lisbon, Portugal.
31. Mack K. Learning fractions with understanding: Building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 21 1 (1990) 16-32
32. Mack K. Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 26 5 (1995) 422-441
33. Mick H., and Sinicrope R. Two meanings of fraction multiplication. School Science and Mathematics 89 8 (1989) 632-639
34. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
35. Newstead, K., & Murry, H. (1998). Young students' construction of fractions. In A. Olivier & K. Olivier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 295-302).
36. Ni Y., and Zhou Y. Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist 40 1 (2005) 27-52
37. Nyabanyaba T. Whither relevance? Mathematics teachers' discussion of the use of 'real-life' contexts in school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics 19 3 (1999) 10-14
38. Piaget J. The child's conception of number (1952), Humanities Press, New York
39. Piaget J., and Inhelder B. The psychology of the child (1969), Basic Books, Inc., New York
40. Pogliani L., Randic M., and Trinajstic N. Much ado about nothing-an introductive inquiry about zero. International Journal of Mathematics Education Science and Technology 29 5 (1998) 729-744
41. Raman M. Coordinating informal and formal aspects of mathematics: Student behavior and textbook messages. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 21 (2002) 135-150
42. Reys R., and Grouws D. Division involving zero: Some revealing thoughts from interviewing children. School Science and Mathematics 78 (1975) 593-605
43. Schwarz B., Kohn A., and Resnick L. Positives about negatives: A case study of an intermediate model for signed numbers. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3 1 (1993) 37-92
44. Seife C. Zero: The biography of a dangerous idea (2000), Viking Penguin, New York
45. Sfard A. Learning mathematics as developing a discourse. In: Speiser R., Maher C., and Walter C. (Eds). Proceedings of 21st Conference of PME-NA (2001), Clearing House for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education, Columbus, Ohio 23-44
46. Sharp J., and Adams B. Children's conctructions of knowledge for fraction division after solving realistic problems. The Journal of Educational Research 95 6 (2002) 333-347
47. Siegler R. Children's thinking (1998), Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey
48. Skemp R. The psychology of learning mathematics (1987), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
49. Streefland L. Fractions in realistic mathematics education: A paradigm of developmental research (1991), Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
50. Streefland L. Fractions: A realistic approach. In: Carpenter T.P., fennema E., and Romberg T.A. (Eds). Rational numbers (1993), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
51. Thompson A., Philipp R., Thompson P., and Boyd B. Calculational and conceptual orientation in teaching mathematics. In: Coxford A. (Ed). 1994 yearbook of the national council of teachers of mathematics (1994), The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc., Reston, VA 79-92
52. Tsamir P., and Sheffer R. Concrete and formal arguments: The case of division by zero. Mathematics Education Research Journal 12 2 (2000) 92-106
53. Tsamir P., Sheffer R., and Tirosh D. Intuitions and undefined operations: The case of division by zero. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 22 1 (2000) 1-16
54. Van der Heuvel M. The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics 54 (2003) 9-35
55. Vinner S. The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In: Tall D. (Ed). Advanced mathematical thinking (1991), Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
56. Watanabe T. Teaching multiplication: An analysis of elementary school mathematics teachers' manuals from Japan and the United States. The Elementary School Journal 104 2 (2003) 111-126
57. Wheeler M., and Feghali I. Much ado about nothing: Preservice elementary school teachers' concept of zero. Journal of Research in mathematics Education 14 3 (1983) 147-155
58. Wilson P. Zero: A special case. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 6 5 (2001) 300-303 308-309
59. Wu H. Basic skills versus conceptual understanding: A bogus dichotomy. American Educator 23 3 (1999) 14-19 50-52
60. Zazkis R. Odds and ends of odds and evens: An inquiry into students; understanding of even and odd numbers. Educational Studies in mathematics 36 1 (1998) 73-89
61. Zazkis R., and Campbell S. Divisibility and multiplicative structure of natural numbers: Preservice teachers' understanding. Journal for Mathematics Education 27 5 (1996) 540-563