Similarities and differences in the types of algebraic activities in two classes taught by the same teacher

Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 152-170

  Eisenmann, Tammy ^a   Even, Ruhama ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909347231     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203884645     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Bednarz, N., Kieran, C., & Lee, L. (Eds.). (1996). Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363-401). New York, NY: Macmillan.
3. Clarke, B., Clarke, D., & Sullivan, P. (1996). The mathematics teacher and curriculum development. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1,207-1,234). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (2001). Making change: Instruction and its improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(1), 73-77.
5. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 813-834.
6. Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 153-187.
7. Even, R. (1990). Subject matter knowledge for teaching and the case of functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 521-544.
8. Even, R. & Kvatinsky, T. (2007, August). Teaching mathematics to low-achieving students: enhancement of personal or traditional teaching approach? Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Budapest, Hungary.
9. Even, R., Robinson, N., & Carmeli, M. (2003). The work of providers of professional development for teachers of mathematics: Two case studies of experienced practitioners. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 227-249.
10. Freeman, D. J., & Porter, A. C. (1989). Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools? American Educational Research Journal, 26, 403-421.
11. Gallego, M. A., Cole, M., & The Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (2001). Classroom cultures and cultures in the classroom. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th Edition, pp. 951-997). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
12. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Lubienski, S. T., & Id-Deen, L. (2006). Reconsidering the study of mathematics instructional practices: the importance of curricular context in understanding local and global teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(4), 313-345.
13. Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (1999). The emergent perspective in rich learning environments:Some roles of tools and activities in the construction of sociomathematical norms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 149-166.
14. Kieran, C. (2004). The core of algebra: Reflections on its main activities. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra; The12th ICME study (pp. 21-33). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
15. Kieran, C. (2007). Learning and teaching algebra at the middle school through college levels. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 707-762). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
16. Lloyd, G. M. (1999). Two teachers' conceptions of a reform curriculum: Implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 227-252.
17. Lloyd, G. M. (2008). Teaching mathematics with a new curriculum: Changes to classroom organization and interactions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 163-195.
18. Manouchehri, A., & Goodman, T. (1998). Mathematics curriculum reform and teacher: Understanding the connections. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 27-41.
19. Manouchehri, A., & Goodman, T. (2000). Implementing mathematics reform: The challenge within. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 1-34.
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
22. Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers' curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29, 315-342.
23. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75, 211-246.
24. Robinson, N., & Taizi, N. (1995-2002). Everybody learns mathematics: Mathematics for heterogeneous classes (A series of textbooks for grades 7-8). Rehovot: The Weizmann Institute of Science (in Hebrew).
25. Robinson, N., & Taizi, N. (1997). Everybody learns mathematics: Mathematics for heterogeneous classes, on the algebraic expressions 1. Rehovot: The Weizmann Institute of Science [in Hebrew].
26. Robinson, N., Inbar, Y., & Koren, M. (2001). On the algebraic expressions: Teacher's guide. Rehovot:The Weizmann Institute of Science [in Hebrew].
27. Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 883-907.
28. Sabar, N. (Ed.). (2001). Qualitative research: Genres and traditions in qualitative research. Tel Aviv:Zmora Bitan [in Hebrew].
29. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Valverde, G. A., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (1997). Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intention in school mathematics (Vol. 1). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
30. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. A. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 455-488.
31. Tirosh, D., Even, R., & Robinson, N. (1998). Simplifying algebraic expressions: Teacher awareness and teaching approaches. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 51-64.
32. Usiskin, Z. (1998). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In A. F. Coxford (Ed.), The ideas of algebra, K-12 (pp. 8-19). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.