STS education: A rose by any other name

A Vision for Science Education: Responding to the Work of Peter Fensham

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 59-75

  Aikenhead, Glen ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139330024     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203006436-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (123)

1. AAAS (1989) Project 2061: Science for all Americans, Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
2. Aikenhead, G.S. (1973) ‘The measurement of high school students’ knowledge about science and scientists’, Science Education 57: 539-49.
3. Aikenhead, G.S. (1979) ‘Using qualitative data in formative evaluation’, The Alberta Journal of Educational Research 25: 117-29.
4. Aikenhead, G.S. (1980) Science in Social Issues: Implications for teaching, Ottawa: Science Council of Canada.
5. Aikenhead, G.S. (1988) ‘An analysis of four ways of assessing student beliefs about STS topics’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 25: 607-29.
6. Aikenhead, G.S. (1994a) ‘What is STS teaching?’, in J. Solomon and G. Aikenhead (eds) STS Education: International perspectives on reform, New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 47-59.
7. Aikenhead, G.S. (1994b) ‘Consequences to learning science through STS: A research perspective’, in J. Solomon and G. Aikenhead (eds) STS Education: International perspectives on reform, New York, Teachers College Press, pp. 169-86.
8. Aikenhead, G.S. (2000) ‘STS in Canada: From policy to student evaluation’, in D.D. Kumar and D.E. Chubin (eds) Science, Technology, and Society: A sourcebook on research and practice, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 49-89.
9. Aikenhead, G.S. (2002) ‘The educo-politics of curriculum development’, Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 2(1): In press.
10. Aikenhead, G.S. and Fleming, R.W. (1975) Science: a way of knowing, Saskatoon: Curriculum Studies, University of Saskatchewan.
11. Aikenhead, G.S. and Ryan, A.G. (1992) ‘The development of a new instrument: Views on science-technology-society (VOSTS), Science Education 76: 477-91.
12. ASE (Association for Science Education) (1979) Alternatives for Science Education, Hatfield: Association for Science Education.
13. Bingle, W.H. and Gaskell, P.J. (1994) ‘Scientific literacy for decision making and the social construction of scientific knowledge’, Science Education 72: 185-201.
14. Blunck, S.M. and Yager, R.E. (1996) ‘The Iowa Chautauqua program: A proven in¬service model for introducing STS in K-12 classrooms’, in R.E. Yager (ed.) Science/technology/society as Reform in Science Education, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 298-305.
15. Bond, H. (1985) ‘Society’s view of science’, in G.B. Harrison (ed.) World Trends in Science and Technology Education, Nottingham: Trent Polytechnic, pp. 10-13.
16. Bybee, R.W. (ed.) (1985) Science-Technology-Society. 1985NSTA Yearbook, Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
17. Cheek, D.W. (1992) Thinking Constructively About Science, Technology, and Society Education, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
18. Cheek, D.W. (2000) ‘Marginalization of technology within the STS movement in American K-12 education’, in D.D. Kumar and D.E. Chubin (eds) Science, Technology, and Society: A sourcebook on research and practice, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 167-92.
19. Cross, R.T. (1997) ‘Ideology and science teaching: Teachers’ discourse’, International Journal of Science Education 19: 607-16.
20. Cross, R.T. and Fensham, P.J. (eds) (2000) Science and the Citizen: For educators and the public (special issue of the Melbourne Studies in Education), Melbourne: Arena Publications.
21. Cross, R.T. and Price, R.F. (1992) Teaching Science for Social Responsibility, Sydney: St Louis Press.
22. Cross, R.T. and Price, R.F. (1999) ‘The social responsibility of science and public understanding’, International Journal of Science Education 21: 775-85.
23. Cross, R.T., Zatsepin, V., and Gavrilenko, I. (2000) ‘Preparing future citizens for post Chernobyl Ukraine: A national calamity brings about reform of science education’, in R.T. Cross and P.J. Fensham (eds) Science and the citizen: For educators and the public, Melbourne: Arena Publications, pp. 179-87.
24. Cutcliffe, S.H. (1989) ‘The emergence of STS as an academic field’, in P. Durbin (ed.) Research in Philosophy and Technology, Vol. 9, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 287- 301.
25. Cutcliffe, S.H. (1996) ‘National association for science, technology, and society’, in R.E. Yager (ed.) Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 291-305.
26. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., and Scott, P. (1996) Young People’s Images of Science, Buckingham: Open University Press.
27. Durbin, P.T. (1991) ‘Defining STS: Can we reach consensus?’, Bulletin of Science, Tech¬nology and Society 11: 187-90.
28. Egan, K. (1996) ‘Competing voices for the curriculum’, in M. Wideen and M.C. Courtland (eds) The Struggle For Curriculum: Education, the state, and the corporate sector, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Institute for Studies in Teacher Educa¬tion, Simon Fraser University, pp. 7-26.
29. Eijkelhof, H.M.C. and Kapteijn, M. (2000) ‘A new course on public understanding of science for senior general secondary education in The Netherlands’, in R.T. Cross and P.J. Fensham (eds) Science and the Citizen: For educators and the public, Melbourne: Arena Publications, pp. 189-99.
30. Eijkelhof, H.M.C. and Kortland, K. (1982) ‘The context of physics education’, Paper presented to the 2nd IOSTE Symposium, Nottingham, UK, July 1982.
31. Eijkelhof, H.M.C. and Kortland, K. (1988) ‘Broadening the aims of physics educa¬tion’, in P.J. Fensham (ed.) Development and Dilemmas in Science Education, New York: Falmer Press, pp. 282-305.
32. Eijkelhof, H.M.C., Kortland, K., and Lijnse, P.L. (1996) ‘STS through physics and environmental education in the Netherlands’, in R.E. Yager (ed.) Science/Tech¬nology/Society as Reform in Science Education, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 249-60.
33. Fensham, P.J. (1983) ‘A research base for new objectives of science teaching’, Science Education 67: 3-12.
34. Fensham, P.J. (1985) ‘Science for all’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 17: 415-35.
35. Fensham, P.J. (ed.) (1988a) Developments and Dilemmas in Science Education, New York: Falmer Press.
36. Fensham, P.J. (1988b) ‘Familiar but different: Some dilemmas and new directions in science education’, in P.J. Fensham (ed.) Developments and Dilemmas in Science Education, New York: Falmer Press, pp. 1-26.
37. Fensham, P.J. (1988c) ‘Approaches to the teaching of STS in science education’, Inter¬national Journal of Science Education 10: 346-56.
38. Fensham, P.J. (1988d) ‘Physical science, society and technology’, Australian Journal of Education 32: 375-86.
39. Fensham, P.J. (1992) ‘Science and technology’, in P.W. Jackson (ed.) Handbook of Research on Curriculum, New York: Macmillan, pp. 789-829.
40. Fensham, P.J. (1996a) ‘Post-compulsory education and science dilemmas and oppor¬tunities’, in P.J. Fensham (ed.) Science and Technology Education in the Post-compulsory Years, Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research, pp. 9-30.
41. Fensham, P.J. (ed.) (1996b) Science and Technology Education in the Post-compulsory Years, Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
42. Fensham, P.J. (1996c) ‘Conclusion’, in P.J. Fensham (ed.) Science and Technology Education in the Post-compulsory Years, Melbourne: Australian Council for Educa¬tional Research, pp. 317-21.
43. Fensham, P.J. (1998a) ‘Student response to the TIMSS Test’, Research in Science Education 28: 481-506.
44. Fensham, P.J. (1998b) ‘The politics of legitimating and marginalizing companion meanings: Three Australian case stories’, in D.A. Roberts and L. Ostman (eds) Problems of Meaning in Science Curriculum, New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 178-92.
45. Fensham, P.J. and Corrigan, D. (1994) ‘The implementation of an STS chemistry course in Australia: A research perspective’, in J. Solomon and G. Aikenhead (eds) STS Education: International perspectives on reform, New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 194-204.
46. Fensham, P.J. and Gardner, P.L. (1994) ‘Technology education and science education: A new relationship?’, in D. Layton (ed.) Innovations in Science and Technology Education, Vol. 4, Paris: UNESCO, pp. 159-70.
47. Fensham, P.J. and Harlen, W. (1999) ‘School science and public understanding of science’, International Journal of Science Education 12: 755-63.
48. Gallagher, J.J. (1971) ‘A broader base for science education’, Science Education 55: 329-38.
49. Gaskell, J.P. (1982) ‘Science, technology and society: Issues for science teachers’, Studies in Science Education 9: 33-46.
50. Gaskell, P.J. (1994) ‘Assessing STS literacy: What is rational?’, in K. Boersma, K. Kort- land, and J. van Trommel (eds) 7th IOSTE Symposium Proceedings, Endrecht: IOSTE Conference Committee, pp. 309-20.
51. Giddings, G. (1996) ‘STS initiatives in Australia’, in R.E. Yager (ed.) Science/Tech¬nology/Society as Reform in Science Education, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 271-9.
52. Gilliom, M.E., Helgeson, S.L., and Zuga, K.F. (eds) (1991) Theory into Practice (special issue on STS) 30: No. 4.
53. Gilliom, M.E., Helgeson, S.L., and Zuga, K.F. (eds) (1992) Theory into Practice (special issue on STS) 31: No. 1.
54. Hackett, E.J. (2000) ‘Trends and opportunities in science and technology studies: A view from the National Science Foundation’, in D.D. Kumar and D.E. Chubin (eds) Science, Technology, and Society: A sourcebook on research and practice, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 277-91.
55. Hall, W.C. (1973) ‘Patterns: Teachers’ handbook’, London: Longman/Penguin Press.
56. Hall, W.C. (1982) ‘Science/Technology/Society education: Reasons for current inter¬est and problems to overcome’, Paper presented to the 2nd IOSTE Symposium, Nottingham, UK, July 1982.
57. Harding, P. and Hare, W. (2000) ‘Portraying science accurately in classrooms: Empha¬sizing open-mindedness rather than relativism’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37: 225-36.
58. Harms, N.C. and Yager, R.E. (eds) (1981) What Research Says to the Science Teacher, Vol. 3, Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
59. Harrison, G. (1979) ‘The role of technology in science education’, Paper presented to the 1st IOSTE Symposium, Halifax, Canada, August 1979.
60. Holford, D. (1982) ‘Training science teachers for science-technology-society roles’, Paper presented to the 2nd IOSTE Symposium, Nottingham, UK, July 1982.
61. Holman, J. (ed.) (1988) International Journal of Science Education (special issue on STS) 10: No. 4.
62. Hunt, J.A. (1988) ‘SATIS approaches to STS’, International Journal of Science Education 10: 409-20.
63. Hurd, P.D. (1970) ‘Scientific enlightenment for an age of science’, The Science Teacher 37: 13-15.
64. Hurd, P.D. (1975) ‘Science, technology and society: New goals for interdisciplinary science teaching’, The Science Teacher 42: 27-30.
65. Hurd, P.D. (1986) ‘Perspectives for the reform of science education’, Phi Delta Kappan 67: 353-8.
66. Irwin, A. (1995) Citizen Science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development, New York: Routledge.
67. James, R.K. (ed.) (1985) Science Technology and Society: Resources for science educators (1985 AETS Yearbook), Columbus, OH: Association for the Education of Teachers in Science.
68. Jeans, S.L. (1998) ‘Teacher images of the intent of science curriculum policy: Experi¬enced and novice teachers at work’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Ottawa, Canada, May 1998.
69. Jenkins, E. (1994) ‘Public understanding of science and science education for action’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 26: 601-11.
70. Jenkins, E. (1999) ‘School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science’, International Journal of Science Education 21: 703-10.
71. Jenkins, E. (2000) ‘Science for all: Time for a paradigm shift?’, in R. Millar, J. Leach, and J. Osborne (eds) Improving Science Education: The contribution of research, Bucking¬ham: Open University Press, pp. 207-26.
72. Klopfer, L.E. and Cooley, W.W. (1963) ‘The history of science cases for high school in the development of student understanding of science and scientists’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1: 33-47.
73. Knain, E. (1999) ‘Sense and sensibility in science education: Developing rational beliefs through cultural approaches’, Studies in Science Education 33: 1-29.
74. Koch, J. (1996) ‘National science education standards: A turkey, a valentine, or a lemon?’, in R.E. Yager (ed.) Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 306-15.
75. Kolsto, S.D. (2000) ‘Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship’, International Journal of Science Education 22: 645-64.
76. Kumar, D.D. and Chubin, D.E. (eds) (2000) Science, Technology, and Society: A source¬book on research and practice, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
77. Layton, D. (1994) ‘STS in the school curriculum: A movement overtaken by history?’, in J. Solomon and G. Aikenhead (eds) STS Education: International perspectives on reform, New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 32-44.
78. Lewis, J. (Proj. Dir.) (1981) Science in Society, London: Heinemann Educational Books.
79. Majumdar, S.K., Rosenfeld, L.M., Rubba, P.A., Miller, E.W., and Schmalz, R.F. (eds) (1991) Science Education in the United States: Issues, crises and priorities, Easton, PA: The Pennsylvania Academy of Science.
80. Manassero-Mas, M., Vazquez-Alonso, A. and Acevedo-Diaz, J. (2001) Avaluacio dels Temes de Ciencia, Tecnologia i Societat. Les Illes Balears, Spain: Conselleria d’Educacio i Cultura del Govern de les Illes Balears.
81. McClelland, L.W. (1998) ‘Curriculum change: What experienced science teachers say about it’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study ofEducation, Ottawa, Canada, May 1998.
82. McConnell, M.C. (1982) ‘Teaching about science, technology and society at the secondary school level in the United States: An education dilemma for the 1980s’, Studies in Science Education 9: 1-32.
83. Millar, R. (1996) ‘Towards a science curriculum for public understanding’, School Science Review 77: 7-18.
84. Millar, R. (2000) ‘Science for public understanding: Developing a new course for 16¬18 year old students’, in R.T. Cross and P.J. Fensham (eds) Science and the Citizen: For educators and the public, Melbourne: Arena Publications, pp. 201-14.
85. Nagasu, N. and Kumano, Y. (1996) ‘STS initiatives in Japan: Poised for a forward leap’, in R.E. Yager (ed.) Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 261-70.
86. NRC (National Research Council) (1996) National Science Education Standards, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
87. NSTA (National Science Teachers Association) (1982) ‘Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980s’, Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
88. Odegaard, M. (2001) ‘The drama of science education: How public understanding of biotechnology and drama as a learning activity may enhance a critical and inclusive science education’, Unpublished dissertation, University of Oslo.
89. Orpwood, G.W.F. and Roberts, D.A. (1980) ‘Science and society: Dimensions for science education for the ’80s’, Orbit 51: 21-5.
90. Oxford University (1989) Enquiry into the Attitudes of Sixth-formers Towards Choice of Science and Technology Courses in Higher Education, Oxford: Department of Educa¬tional Studies.
91. Piel, E.J. (1981) ‘Interaction of science, technology, and society in secondary school’, in N.C. Harms and R.E. Yager (eds) What Research Says to the Science Teacher, Vol. 3, Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association, pp. 94-112.
92. Prat, A.B. (ed.) (1990) Scuola Scienza e Societa, special issue of La Fisica nella Scuola 23: No. 3.
93. Rip, A. (1979) ‘The social context of science, technology and society courses’, Studies in Higher Education 4: 15-26.
94. Roberts, D.A. (1983) Scientific Literacy, Ottawa: Science Council of Canada.
95. Roberts, D.A. (1998) ‘Toward understanding how science teachers think about a new science curriculum policy’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Ottawa, Canada, May 1998.
96. Roberts, D.A. and Orpwood, G.W.F. (1979) Properties of Matter: A teacher’s guide to alternative versions, Toronto: OISE.
97. Roy, R. (1984) S-S/T/S Project: Teach science via science, technology, and society material in the pre-college years, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
98. Roy, R. (2000) ‘Real science education: Replacing ‘PCB’ with S(cience) through-STS throughout all levels of K-12: ‘Materials’ as one approach’, in D.D. Kumar and D.E. Chubin (eds) Science, Technology, and Society: A sourcebook on research and practice, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 9-19.
99. Royal Ministry of Church, Education and Research (1995) Core Curriculum: For primary, secondary and adult education in Norway, Oslo: Akiademika a/s.
100. Rubba, P.A. and Wiesenmayer, R.L. (1985) ‘A goal structure for precollege STS edu¬cation: A proposal based upon recent literature in environmental education’, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 5: 573-80.
101. Ryder, J. (2001) ‘Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy’, Studies in Science Education 36: 1-42.
102. Schroeer, D. (1972) Physics and Its Fifth Dimension: Society, Don Mills, Ontario: Addison- Wesley.
103. Sjoberg, S. (1997) ‘Scientific literacy and school science: arguments and second thoughts’, in E. Kallerud and S. Sjoberg (eds) Science, Technology and Citizenship: The public understanding of science and technology in science education and research policy, Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education, pp. 9-28.
104. Solomon, J. (1983) Science in a Social Context (SISCON)-in-schools, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
105. Solomon, J. (1988) ‘The dilemma of science, technology and society education’, in P.J. Fensham (ed.) Development and Dilemmas in Science Education, New York: Falmer Press, pp. 266-81.
106. Solomon, J. (1992) ‘The classroom discussion of science-based social issues presented on television: Knowledge, attitudes and values’, International Journal of Science Education 14: 431-44.
107. Solomon, J. (1993) Teaching Science, Technology and Society, Buckingham: Open University Press.
108. Solomon, J. (1994) ‘Conflict between mainstream science and STS in science educa¬tion’, in J. Solomon and G. Aikenhead (eds) STS Education: International perspectives on reform, New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 3-10.
109. Solomon, J. (1996) ‘STS in Britain: Science in a social context’, in R.E. Yager (ed.) Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 241-48.
110. Solomon, J. and Aikenhead, G.S. (eds) (1994) STS Education: International perspectives on reform, New York: Teachers College Press.
111. Spiegel-Rosing, I. and Price, D. (eds) (1977) Science, Technology and Society: A cross- disciplinary perspective, London: Sage.
112. Thier, H. and Nagle, B. (1994) ‘Developing a model for issue-oriented science’, in J. Solomon and G. Aikenhead (eds) STS Education: International perspectives on reform, New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 75-83.
113. Tobias, S. (1990) They’re Not Dumb, They’re Different, Tuscon, AZ: Research Corporation.
114. st IOSTE Symposium, Halifax, Canada, August 1979.
115. Welzel, M. and Roth, W.-M. (1998) ‘Do interviews really assess students’ knowledge?’, International Journal of Science Education 20: 25-44.
116. Yager, R.E. (ed.) (1992) Status of STS: Reform efforts around the world, Knapp Hill, South Harting: ICASE.
117. Yager, R.E. (1996a) ‘History of science/technology/society as reform in the United States’, in R.E. Yager (ed.) Science/technology/society as Reform in Science Education, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 3-15.
118. Yager, R.E. (ed.) (1996b) Science/technology/society as Reform in Science Education, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
119. Yager, R.E. and Krajcik, J. (1989) ‘Success of students in a college physics course with and without experiencing a high school course’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 26: 599-608.
120. Ziman, J. (1980) Teaching and Learning about Science and Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
121. Ziman, J. (1984) An Introduction to Science Studies: The philosophical and social aspects of science and technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
122. Ziman, J. (1994) ‘The rationale for STS is in the approach’, in J. Solomon and G. Aikenhead (eds) STS Education: International perspectives on reform, New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 21-31.
123. Zoller, U. (1991) ‘Teaching/learning styles, performance, and students’ teaching evaluation in S/T/E/S-focused science teacher education’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28: 593-607.