The language learning potential of form-focused feedback on writing: Students' and teachers' perceptions

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 31, Issue , 2011, Pages 159-179

  Hyland, Fiona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85126875294     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/lllt.31.12hyl     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Bitchener, J. 2008. Evidence in support of corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 17: 102-118.
2. Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. 2008. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research 12: 409-431.
3. Bruton, A. 2009. Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing 18(2): 136-140.
4. Chandler, J. 2003. The efficacy of various kinds of error correction for improvement of the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12: 267-296.
5. Chandler, J. 2009. Response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing 18: 57-58.
6. DeKeyser, R. 1998. Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Focus on Form in Classroom Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & J. Williams (eds), 42-63. Cambridge: CUP.
7. Doughty, C. 2001. Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In Cognition and Second Language Instruction, P. Robinson (ed.), 206-257. Cambridge: CUP.
8. Ellis, R. 2002. Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 223-236.
9. Ellis, R. 2003. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: OUP.
10. Ellis, R. 2006. Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly 40: 83-106.
11. Ellis, R. & Fotos, S. 1999. Learning a Second Language Through Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M. & Takashima, T. 2008. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 36: 353-371.
13. Ferris, D. R. 1997. The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly 31: 315-339.
14. Ferris, D. R. 1999. The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 1-12.
15. Ferris, D. R. 2004. The 'grammar correction' debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?). Journal of Second Language Writing 13: 49-62.
16. Ferris, D. R. 2006. Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, K. Hyland & F. Hyland (eds), 81-104. Cambridge: CUP.
17. Ferris, D. R. & Roberts, B. 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 161-184.
18. Goldstein, L. 2001. For Kyla: What does the research say about responding to ESL writers. In On Second Language Writing, T. Silva & P. Matsuda (eds), 73-90. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Hyland, F. 1998. The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 7(3): 255-286.
20. Hyland, F. 2003. Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System 31(2): 217-230.
21. Izumi, S. & Bigelow, M. 2000. Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly 34: 239-278.
22. Krashen, S. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
23. Krashen, S. 1993. The effect of grammar teaching: Still peripheral. TESOL Quarterly 27: 717-725.
24. Lantolf, J. & Pavlenko, A. 2001. (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In Learner Contributions to Language Learning: New Directions in Research, M. P. Breen (ed.), 141-158. London: Longman.
25. Leki, I. 1991. The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals 24: 203-218.
26. Long, M. 1983. Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of the research. TESOL Quarterly 17: 359-382.
27. Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 37-66.
28. Manchón, M. In press. The language learning potential of writing in foreign language contexts: Lessons from research. In Foreign Language Writing. Research Insights, M. Reichelt & T. Chimasko (eds). West Lafayette IN: Parlor Press.
29. Radecki, P. M. & Swales, J. M. 1988. ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System 16: 355-365.
30. Schmidt, R. 2001. Attention. In Cognition and Second Language Instruction, P. Robinson (ed.), 3-32. Cambridge: CUP.
31. Truscott, J. 1996. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46: 327-369.
32. Truscott, J. 1999. The case for 'the case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes'. A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 111-122.
33. Truscott, J. 2004. Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing 13: 337-343.
34. Truscott, J. 2007. The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 16: 255-272.