Creating and Characterizing a Diverse Corpus of Sarcasm in Dialogue

SIGDIAL 2016 - 17th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 31-41

  Oraby, Shereen ^a   Harrison, Vrindavan ^a   Reed, Lena ^a   Hernandez, Ernesto ^a   Riloff, Ellen ^b   Walker, Marilyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGH QUALITY; HIGH-ACCURACY; HIGH-PRECISION; LARGE-SCALES; LINGUISTIC DIFFERENCES; LINGUISTIC PATTERNS; NOVEL METHODS; PROPERTY; SIMPLE++; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 85122003148     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Robert Abbott, Brian Ecker, Pranav Anand, and Marilyn Walker. 2016. Internet argument corpus 2.0: An sql schema for dialogic social media and the corpora to go with it. In Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC2016.
2. Dario Bertero and Pascale Fung. 2016. A long short-term memory framework for detecting humor in dialogues. In North American Association of Computational Linguistics Conference, NAACL-16.
3. Shohini Bhattasali, Jeremy Cytryn, Elana Feldman, and Joonsuk Park. 2015. Automatic identification of rhetorical questions. In Proc. of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Short Papers).
4. Laura Cano Mora. 2009. All or nothing: a semantic analysis of hyperbole. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, pages 25–35.
5. Herbert L. Colston and Shauna B. Keller. 1998. You’ll never believe this: Irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 27(4):499–513.
6. Herbert L. Colston and Jennifer O’Brien. 2000. Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(11):1557 – 1583.
7. Elena Filatova. 2012. Irony and sarcasm: Corpus generation and analysis using crowdsourcing. In Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC2012.
8. Jane Frank. 1990. You call that a rhetorical question?: Forms and functions of rhetorical questions in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(5):723–738.
9. Raymond W. Gibbs. 2000. Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1):5–27.
10. Roberto González-Ibáñez, Smaranda Muresan, and Nina Wacholder. 2011. Identifying sarcasm in twitter: a closer look. In Proc. of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, volume 2, pages 581–586.
11. Chung-hye Han. 1997. Deriving the interpretation of rhetorical questions. In The Proc. of the Sixteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, WCCFL16.
12. Julia Hirschberg. 1985. A Theory of Scalar Implicature. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Computer and Information Science.
13. Cornelia Ilie. 1994. What else can I tell you?: a pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discursive and argumentative acts. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis: Stockholm studies in English. Almqvist & Wiksell International.
14. Aditya Joshi, Vinita Sharma, and Pushpak Bhattacharyya. 2015. Harnessing context incongruity for sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, volume 2, pages 757–762.
15. Raquel Justo, Thomas Corcoran, Stephanie M Lukin, Marilyn Walker, and M Inés Torres. 2014. Extracting relevant knowledge for the detection of sarcasm and nastiness in the social web. Knowledge-Based Systems.
16. Roger J. Kreuz and Richard M. Roberts. 1995. Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(1):21–31.
17. Jiwei Li, Xinlei Chen, Eduard Hovy, and Dan Jurafsky. 2016. Visualizing and understanding neural models in nlp. In North American Association of Computational Linguistics Conference, NAACL-16.
18. Stephanie Lukin and Marilyn Walker. 2013. Really? well. apparently bootstrapping improves the performance of sarcasm and nastiness classifiers for online dialogue. NAACL 2013, page 30.
19. Christopher D. Manning, Mihai Surdeanu, John Bauer, Jenny Rose Finkel, Steven Bethard, and David Mc-Closky. 2014. The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In ACL (System Demonstrations), pages 55–60.
20. Michael McCarthy and Ronald Carter. 2004.”there’s millions of them”: hyperbole in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2):149–184.
21. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 3111–3119.
22. Shereen Oraby, Lena Reed, Ryan Compton, Ellen Riloff, Marilyn Walker, and Steve Whittaker. 2015. And thats a fact: Distinguishing factual and emotional argumentation in online dialogue. 2nd Workshop on Argument Mining, NAACL HLT 2015, page 116.
23. Alan Partington. 2007. Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(9):1547–1569.
24. Fabian Pedregosa, Gael Varoquaux, Alexandre Gram-fort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, Jake Vanderplas, Alexandre Passos, David Cournapeau, Matthieu Brucher, Matthieu Perrot, Edouard Duchesnay. 2011. Scikitlearn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825–2830.
25. Radim Řehůřek and Petr Sojka. 2010. Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora. In Proc. of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks, pages 45–50.
26. Antonio Reyes, Paolo Rosso, and Tony Veale. 2013. A multidimensional approach for detecting irony in twitter. Data Knowl. Eng., 47(1):239–268, March.
27. Antonio Reyes, Paolo Rosso, and Davide Buscaldi. 2012. From humor recognition to irony detection: The figurative language of social media. Data Knowl. Eng., 74:1–12.
28. Ellen Riloff and Janyce Wiebe. 2003. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In Proc. of the 2003 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing-Volume 10, pages 105–112. Association for Computational Linguistics.
29. Ellen Riloff, Ashequl Qadir, Prafulla Surve, Lalindra De Silva, Nathan Gilbert, and Ruihong Huang. 2013. Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. In Proc. of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2013).
30. Ellen Riloff. 1996. Automatically generating extraction patterns from untagged text. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96), pages 1044–1049.
31. Deborah Schaffer. —2005—. Can rhetorical questions function as retorts?: Is the pope catholic? Journal of Pragmatics, 37:433–600.
32. Richard Socher, Alex Perelygin, Jean Wu, Jason Chuang, Christopher D. Manning, Andrew Ng, and Christopher Potts. 2013. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment tree-bank. In Proc. of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1631–1642.
33. Reid Swanson, Stephanie Lukin, Luke Eisenberg, Thomas Chase Corcoran, and Marilyn A Walker. 2014. Getting reliable annotations for sarcasm in online dialogues. In Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC 2014.
34. Michael Thelen and Ellen Riloff. 2002. A bootstrapping method for learning semantic lexicons using extraction pattern contexts. In Proc. of the ACL-02 Conference on Empirical Methods In Natural Language Processing, pages 214–221.
35. Marilyn Walker, Pranav Anand, Robert Abbott, and Jean E. Fox Tree. 2012a. A corpus for research on deliberation and debate. In Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC2012, pages 812–817.
36. Marilyn A. Walker, Pranav Anand, Rob Abbott, Jean E Fox Tree, Craig Martell, and Joseph King. 2012b. That’s your evidence?: Classifying stance in online political debate. Decision Support Systems, 53(4):719–729.
37. Byron C. Wallace, Do Kook Choe, Laura Kertz, and Eugene Charniak. 2014. Humans require context to infer ironic intent (so computers probably do, too). In Proc. of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 512–516.