That is your evidence?: Classifying stance in online political debate

Decision Support Systems

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 719-729

  Walker, Marilyn A ^a   Anand, Pranav ^a   Abbott, Rob ^a   Tree, Jean E Fox ^a   Martell, Craig ^b   King, Joseph ^a  

^a University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

^b NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Argumentation strategies; Automatic classification; Dialogue; Online debate; Stance

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION STRATEGIES; AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION; DIALOGUE; ONLINE DEBATE; STANCE;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84865502733     PISSN: 01679236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.032     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. R. Abbott, M. Walker, P. Anand, J. Tree, R. Bowmani, and J. King How can you say such things?!?: recognizing disagreement in informal political argument ACL HLT 2011 2011 2
2. R. Agrawal, S. Rajagopalan, R. Srikant, and Y. Xu Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web 2003 ACM 529 535
3. X. Bai Predicting consumer sentiments from online text Decision Support Systems 50 4 2011 732 742
4. A. Balahur, Z. Kozareva, and A. Montoyo Determining the polarity and source of opinions expressed in political debates Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing 2009 468 480
5. M. Bansal, C. Cardie, and L. Lee The power of negative thinking: exploiting label disagreement in the min-cut classification framework Proceedings of COLING: Companion Volume: Posters 2008 13 16
6. D. Biber Variation Across Speech and Writing 1991 Cambridge Univ Pr
7. S. Blair-Goldensohn, K. McKeown, and O. Rambow Building and refining rhetorical-semantic relation models Proceedings of NAACL HLT 2007 428 435
8. Y. Choi, and C. Cardie Learning with compositional semantics as structural inference for subsentential sentiment analysis Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2008 Association for Computational Linguistics 793 801
9. D. Crystal Language and the Internet 2001 Cambridge Univ Pr
10. M. De Marneffe, B. MacCartney, and C. Manning Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses LREC 2006 2006 Citeseer
11. J. Fox Tree Discourse markers across speakers and settings Language and Linguistics Compass 4 2010 269 281
12. J. Fox Tree, and J. Schrock Discourse markers in spontaneous speech: oh what a difference an oh makes Journal of Memory and Language 40 1999 280 295
13. J. Fox Tree, and J. Schrock Basic meanings of you know and I mean Journal of Pragmatics 34 2002 727 747
14. S. Greene, and P. Resnik More than words: syntactic packaging and implicit sentiment Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2009 Association for Computational Linguistics 503 511
15. M. Groen, J. Noyes, and F. Verstraten The effect of substituting discourse markers on their role in dialogue Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal 47 2010 33
16. K. Jones Automatic summarizing: factors and directions Advances in Automatic Text Summarization 1999 1 12
17. M. Joshi, and C. Penstein-Rosé Generalizing dependency features for opinion mining Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers 2009 Association for Computational Linguistics 313 316
18. C. Kiss, and M. Bichler Identification of influencers-measuring influence in customer networks Decision Support Systems 46 2008 233 253
19. D. Klein, and C. Manning Accurate unlexicalized parsing Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics vol. 1 2003 Association for Computational Linguistics 423 430
20. W. Lin, T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and A. Hauptmann Which side are you on?: identifying perspectives at the document and sentence levels Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning 2006 Association for Computational Linguistics 109 116
21. R. Malouf, and T. Mullen Taking sides: user classification for informal online political discourse Internet Research 18 2008 177 190
22. D. Marcu Perlocutions: the Achilles' heel of speech act theory Journal of pragmatics 32 2000 1719 1741
23. G. Marwell, and D. Schmitt Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: an empirical analysis Sociometry 1967 350 364
24. G. Mishne, and N. Glance Leave a reply: an analysis of weblog comments Third Annual Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem 2006 Citeseer
25. A. Murakami, and R. Raymond Support or oppose?: classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters 2010 Association for Computational Linguistics 869 875
26. B. Pang, and L. Lee Opinion mining and sentiment analysis Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2 2008 1 135
27. J. Pennebaker, M. Francis, and R. Booth Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: Liwc2001 2001
28. E. Pitler, A. Louis, and A. Nenkova Automatic sense prediction for implicit discourse relations in text Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP vol. 2 2009 Association for Computational Linguistics 683 691
29. R. Prasad, A. Joshi, and B. Webber Realization of discourse relations by other means: alternative lexicalizations Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters 2010 Association for Computational Linguistics 1023 1031
30. S. Purpura, C. Cardie, and J. Simons Active learning for e-rulemaking: public comment categorization Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Digital Government Research 2008 Digital Government Society of North America 234 243
31. S. Somasundaran, and J. Wiebe Recognizing stances in online debates Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP vol. 1 2009 Association for Computational Linguistics 226 234
32. S. Somasundaran, and J. Wiebe Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text 2010 Association for Computational Linguistics 116 124
33. S. Somasundaran, J. Wiebe, and J. Ruppenhofer Discourse level opinion interpretation Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics vol. 1 2008 Association for Computational Linguistics 801 808
34. M. Thomas, B. Pang, and L. Lee Get out the vote: determining support or opposition from congressional floor-debate transcripts Proceedings of the 2006 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing 2006 Association for Computational Linguistics 327 335
35. M. Walker Rejection by implicature Proceedings of the 20th Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 1994 Citeseer
36. M. Walker Inferring acceptance and rejection in dialog by default rules of inference Language and Speech 39 1996 265
37. Y. Wang, and C. Rosé Making conversational structure explicit: identification of initiation-response pairs within online discussions Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2010 Association for Computational Linguistics 673 676
38. J. Yearwood, and A. Stranieri The generic/actual argument model of practical reasoning Decision Support Systems 41 2006 358 379
39. A. Yessenalina, Y. Yue, and C. Cardie Multi-level structured models for document-level sentiment classification Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2010 Association for Computational Linguistics 1046 1056