A new adaptive method to control the false discovery rate

Recent Advances In Biostatistics: False Discovery Rates, Survival Analysis, And Related Topics

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-26

  Liu, Fang ^a   Sarkar, Sanat K ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85116539866     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 57, 289-300.
2. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (2000). On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics, Journal of educational and Behavioral Statistics 25, 60-83.
3. Benjamini, Y., Krieger, A. and Yekutieli, D. (2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate, Biometrica 93, 491-507.
4. Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Stat. 29, 1165-1188.
5. Broberg, P. (2005). A comparative review of estimates of the proportion unchanged genes and the false discovery rate. BMC Bioinformatics 6, 199.
6. Finner, H., Dickhaus, T. and Roters, M. (2009). On the false discovery rate and an asymptotically optimal rejection curve. Ann. Statist. 37(2), 596-618.
7. Finner, H. and Roters, M. (2001). On the false discovery rate and expected type I errors. Biometrical Journal 43, 985-1005.
8. Gavrilov, Y., Benjamini, Y. and Sakar, S. K. (2009). An adaptive step-down procedure with proven FDR control. Ann. Statist. 37, 2, 619-629.
9. Hommel, G. (1988). A stepwise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika 75, 383-386.
10. Langaas, M. and Lindqvist, B. H. (2005). Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses, with application to DNA microarray data. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B (Methodological) 67, 555-572.
11. Liu, F. and Sarkar, S. K. (2009). A note on estimating the false discovery rate under mixture model. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 140, 1601-1609.
12. Lu, X, and Perkins, D. L. (2007). Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 157.
13. Pounds, S. and Morris, S. W. (2003). Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values. Bioinformatics 19, 10, 1236-1242.
14. Pounds, S. and Cheng, C. (2004). Improving false discovery rate estimation. Bioinformatics 20, 11, 1737-1745.
15. Romano, J. P., Shaikh, A. M. and Wolf, M. (2008). Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling. TEST 17, 417-442.
16. 2 random variables: a proof of the simes conjecture. Ann. Stat. 26, 2, 494-504.
17. Sarkar, S. K. (2002). Some results on false discovery rate in stepwise multiple testing procedures. Ann. Stat. 30, 239-257.
18. Sarkar, S. K. (2004). FDR-controlling procedures and their false negatives rates. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 125, 119-139.
19. Sarkar, S. K. (2006). False discovery and false non-discovery rates in single-step multiple testing procedures. Ann. Stat. 34, 394-415.
20. Sarkar, S. K. (2007). Stepup procedures controlling generalized FWER and generalized FDR. Ann. Stat. 35, 2405-2420.
21. Sarkar, S. K. (2008a). On the Simes inequality and its generalization. IMS Collections Beyond Parametrics in Interdisciplinary Research: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Pranab K. Sen 1, 231-242.
22. Sarkar, S. K. (2008b). On methods controlling the False Discovery Rate (with discussions). Sankhya 70, 135-168.
23. Sarkar, S. K. and Chang, C. K. (1997). The simes method for multiple hypothesis testing with positively dependent test statistics. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 92, 1601-1608.
24. Schweder, R. and Spjotvoll, E. (1982). Plots of p-values to evaluate many tests simultaneously. Biometrika 69, 493-502.
25. Simes, R. J. (1986) An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 73, 751-754.
26. Storey, J. D. (2002). A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 64, 479-498.
27. Storey, J. D. (2003). The positive false discovery rate: a bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Ann. Stat. 31, 2013-2035.
28. Storey, J. D., Taylor, J. E. and Siegmund, D. (2004). Strong control, conservative point estimation, and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: A unified approach. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 66, 187-205.
29. Storey, J. D. and Tibshirani, R. (2003). Statistical Significance for genome-wide studies. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440-9445