On methods controlling the false discovery rate

Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics

Volumn 70, Issue 2 SERIES A, 2008, Pages 135-168

  Sarkar, Sanat K ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adpative BH methods; BH method; BY method; False non discovery rate; Multivariate totally positive of order two; Pair wise FDR; Positive dependence; Stepwise multiple testing methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 75249095775     PISSN: 09727671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Benjamini, Y. and Heller, R. (2007). False discovery rates for spatial signals. J. Amer. Satist. Assoc. 102, 1272-1281.
2. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 57,289-300.
3. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1997). Multiple hypotheses testing with weights. Scand. J. Statist. 24, 407-418.
4. Benjamini, Y., Krieger, A.M. and Yekutieli, D. (2006). Adaptive linear step-up false discovery rate controlling procedures. Biometrika 93, 491-507.
5. Benjamini, Y. and Liu, W. (1990). A step-down multiple hypotheses testing procedures that controls the false discovery rate under independence. J. Statist. Plann. Inf. 82,163-170.
6. Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Statist. 29, 1165-1188.
7. Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D. (2005). False discovery rate-adjusted multiple confidence intervals for selected parameters. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100, 71-93.
8. Blanchard, G and Roquain, E. (2008). Adaptive FDR control under independence and dependence. J. Mach. Learn. Res. To appear.
9. Block, H. W., Savits, T. H. and Shaked, M. (1985). A concept of negative dependence using stochastic ordering. Statist. Probab. Lett. 3, 81-86.
10. Dudoit, S. and van der Laan, M. (2008). Multiple Testing Procedures with Applications to Genomics, Springer.
11. Farcomeni, A. (2007). Some results on the control of the false discovery rate under dependence. Scand. J. Statist. 34, 275-297.
12. Ferreira, J. A. and Zwinderman, A. H. (2006). On the Benjamini-Hochberg method. Ann. Statist 34, 1827-1849.
13. Finner, H., Dickhaus, T. and Roters, M. (2008). Dependency and false discovery rate: Asymptotics Ann. Statist. 35, 1432-1455.
14. Finner, H., Dickhaus, T. and Roters, M. (2009). On the false discovery rate and an asymptotically optimal rejection curve. Ann. Statist. 37, 596-618.
15. Finner, H. and Roters, M. (2001). On the false discovery rate and expected Type I errors. Biom. J. 43, 985-1005.
16. Gavrilov, Y., Benjamini, Y. and Sarkar, S. K. (2009). An adaptive step-down procedure with proven FDR control. Ann. Statist. 37, 619-629.
17. Genovese, C., Roeder, K. and Wasserman, L. (2008). False discovery control with p-value weighting. Biometrika 93, 509-524.
18. Genovese, C. and Wasserman, G. (2002). Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 64, 499-517.
19. Genovese, C. and Wasserman, G. (2004). A stochastic process approach to false discovery control. Ann. Statist. 32, 1035-1061.
20. Guo, W. and Rao, M. B (2008). On control of the false discovery rate under no assumption of dependency. J. Statist. Plann. & Inf. 138, 1072-1084.
21. Guo, W. and Romano, J. P. (2007). A generalized Sidak-Holm procedure and control of generalized error rates under independence. Statist. App. Gen. Mol. Bio. 6 (1): Article 3.
22. Guo, W. and Sarkar, S. K. (2008). Stepdown procedures controlling a generalized false discovery rate. Unpublished manuscript, available at http://astro.temple.edu/sanat/reports.html.
23. Hochberg, Y. and Tamhane, A. (1987). Multiple comparison procedures. Wiley, New York.
24. Karlin, S. and Rinott, Y. (1980). Classes of orderings of measures and related correlation inequalities I: Multivariate totally positive distributions. J. Mult. Anal. 10, 467-498.
25. Korn, E., Troendle, T., McShane, L. and Simon, R. (2004). Controlling the number of false discoveries: Application to high-dimensional genomic data. J. Statist. Plann. Inf. 124, 279-398.
26. Lehmann, E. L. and Romano, J. P. (2005). Generalizations of the familywise error rate. Ann. Statist. 33, 1138-1154
27. Romano, J. P. and Shaikh, A. M. (2006). On stepdown control of the false discovery proportion. IMS Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, 2nd Lehmann Symposium - Optimality, 49 33-50.
28. Romano, J. P. and Shaikh, A. M. (2006). Stepup procedures for control of generalizations of the familywise error rate. Ann. Statist. 34, 1850-1873.
29. Romano, J. P., Shaikh, A. M. and Wolf, M. (2008). Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling. TEST 17, 417-442.
30. Romano, J. P. and Wolf, M. (2007). Control of generalized error rates in multiple testing. Ann. Statist. 35 1378-1408.
31. Sarkar, S. K. (1998). Some probability inequalities for ordered MTP2 random variables: a proof of the Simes conjecture. Ann. Statist. 26, 494-504.
32. Sarkar, S. K. (2002). Some results on false discovery rate in stepwise multiple testing procedures. Ann. Statist. 30, 239-257.
33. Sarkar, S. K. (2004). FDR-controlling stepwise procedures and their false negatives rates. J. Statist. Plann. & Inf. 125 119-137.
34. Sarkar, S. K. (2006). False discovery and false nondiscovery rates in single-step multiple testing procedures. Ann. Statist. 34, 394-415.
35. Sarkar, S. K. (2007). Stepup procedures controlling generalized FWER and generalized FDR. Ann. Statist. 35, 2405-2420.
36. Sarkar, S. K. (2008a). Generalizing Simes' test and Hochberg's stepup procedure. Ann. Statist. 36, 337-363.
37. Sarkar, S. K. (2008b). Two-stage stepup procedures controlling FDR. J. Statist. Plann. Inf. 138, 1072-1084.
38. Sarkar, S. K. (2008c). On the Simes inequality and its generalization. IMS Collections Beyond Parametrics in Interdisciplinary Research: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Pranab K. Sen 1, 231-242.
39. Sarkar, S. K. and Chang, C-K. (1997). The Simes method for multiple hypothesis testing with positively dependent test statistics. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 92, 1601-1608.
40. Sarkar, S. K. and Guo, W. (2009a). On a generalized false discovery rate. Ann. Statist. 37, 1545-1565.
41. Sarkar, S. K. and Guo, W. (2009b). Procedures controlling the k-FDR using bivariate distributions of the null p-values. Statist. Sinica. To appear.
42. Sarkar, S. K. and Heller, R. (2008). Comments on: Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling. TEST, 17, 450-455.
43. Sarkar, S. K. and Liu, F. (2008a). A note on estimating the false discovery rate. Unpublished manuscript, available at http://astro.temple.edu/sanat/reports.html
44. Simes, R. J. (1986). An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 73, 751-754.
45. Storey, J. D. (2002). A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 64,479-498.
46. Storey, J. D., Taylor, J. E. and Siegmund, D. (2004). Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultanaeous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: A unified approach. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 66,187-205.
47. Tamhane, A. C., Liu, W. and Dunnett, C. W. (1998). A generalized step-up-down multiple test procedure. Can. J. Stat. 26, 353-363
48. Troendle, J. F. (2000). Stepwise normal theory test procedures controlling the false discovery rate. J. Statist. Plann. & Inf. 84, 139158.
49. Yekutieli, D. (2008). Hierarchical false discovery rate-controlling methodology. J. Ameri. Statist. Assoc. 103, 309-316.
50. Yekutieli, D. and Benjamini, Y. (1999). Resampling based false discovery rate controlling multiple testing procedure for correlated test statistics. J. Statist. Plann. Inf. 82, 171-196.