FDR-controlling stepwise procedures and their false negatives rates

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 125, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 119-137

  Sarkar, Sanat K ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Benjamini Hochberg step up procedure; Benjamini Liu step down procedure; Generalized step up step down procedure; Power of an FDR controlling procedure; Unbiasedness of an FDR controlling procedure

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043080005     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2003.06.019     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abramovich F. Benjamini Y. Adaptive thresholding of wavelets coefficients Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 225 1996 351-361
2. Abramovich, F., Benjamni, Y., Donoho, D.L., Johnstone, I.M., 2000. Adapting to unknown sparsity by controlling the false discovery rate. Technical Report, Department of Statistics, Stanford University
3. Basford K.E. Tukey J.W. Graphical profiles as an aid to understanding plant breeding experiments J. Statist. Plann. Inference 57 1997 93-107
4. Benjamini Y. Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Series B 57 1995 289-300
5. Benjamini Y. Liu W. A step-down multiple hypothesis testing procedure that controls the false discovery rate under independence J. Statist. Plann. Inference 82 1999 163-170
6. Benjamini Y. Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependence Ann. Statist. 29 2001 1165-1188
7. 2 and log-concavity. Inequalities in Statistics and Probability, IMS Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, Vol. 5, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, California, pp. 54-58
8. Drigalenko E.I. Elston R.C. False discoveries in genome scanning Genetic Epidemiol. 14 1997 779-784
9. Efron B. Tibshirani R. Storey J.D. Tusher V. Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96 2001 1151-1160
10. Finner H. Roters M. On the false discovery rate and expected type I errors Biomterical J. 43 2001 985-1005
11. Finner H. Roters M. Multiple hypotheses testing and expected number of type I errors Ann. Statist. 30 2002 220-238
12. Genovese C. Wasserman L. Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 64 2002 499-517
13. Karlin S. Total Positivity 1968 Stanford Press CA
14. Karlin S. Rinott Y. Classes of orderings of measures and related correlation inequalities I: Multivariate totally positive distributions J. Multivariate Anal. 10 1980 467-498
15. Lehmann E. Testing Statistical Hypotheses 2nd Edition 1986 Wiley New York
16. Liu W. Multiple tests of a non-hierarchical finite family of hypotheses J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 58 1996 455-461
17. 2 random variables: A proof of the Simes conjecture Ann. Statist. 26 1998 494-504
18. Sarkar S.K. Some results on false discovery rate in stepwise multiple testing procedures Ann. Statist. 30 2002 239-257
19. Sarkar, S.K., 2003. False discovery and false non-discovery rates in single-step multiple testing procedures. Technical Report, Temple University
20. Sarkar S.K. Chang C.K. Simes method for multiple hypothesis testing with positively dependent test statistics J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 92 1997 1601-1608
21. Simes R.J. An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance Biometrika 73 1986 751-754
22. Storey, J.D., Tibshirani, R., 2001. Estimating false discovery rates under dependence with applications to DNA microarrays. Technical Report 2001-28, Department of Statistics, Stanford University
23. Tamhane A.C. Liu W. Dunnett C.W. A generalized step-up-down multiple test procedure Canad. J. Statist. 26 1998 353-363
24. Williams V.S.L. Jones L.V. Tukey J.W. Controlling error in multiple comparisons with examples from state-to-state differences in educational achievement J. Educ. Behav. Statist. 24 1999 42-69