Sequence comparison in historical linguistics

Sequence Comparison in Historical Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-307

  List, Johann Mattis ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Alignment analyses; Automatic cognate detection; Automatic cognates detection; Basic algorithm; Cognition and science; Collaborative research center; Continuous entities; Definition of sequences; Differences between sequences; Discrete entities; Gerhard schurz; Hana filip; Heinrich heine universit t; Historical linguistics; Laura kallmeyer; Lexical change; Lexstat; Modelling sequence differences; Multilingual cognate detection; Multiple alignment analyses; Pairwise alignment analyses; Peter indefrey; Phonetic alignment; Progressive alignment; Relations between languages; Relations between words; Resemblances in form; Resemblances in meaning; Robert d. van valin; Sca; Sebastian l bner; Semantic change; Sequence comparison; Sequence modelling; Sfb 991; Sound change; Sound class based phonetic alignment; Structural extensions; Substantial extensions; The structure of representations in language

Indexed keywords

EID: 85109241961     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110720082     Document Type: Book

References (218)

1. Allen, W. S. (1953). “Relationship in comparative linguistics”. T. Philol. Soc. 52-108.
2. Allwood, J. (2003). “Meaning potentials and context: Some consequences for the analysis of variation in meaning”. In: Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics. Ed. by H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven, and J. R. Taylor. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 29-65.
3. Alonso, L., I. Castellon, J. Escribano, M. Xavier, and L. Padro (2004). “Multiple sequence alignment for characterizing the linear structure of revision”. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. “LREC 2004" (Lisbon, 05/26-05/28/2004), 403-406.
4. Alpher, B. and D. Nash (1999). “Lexical replacement and cognate equilibrium in Australia”. Australian Journal of Linguistics 19.1, 5-56.
5. Alter, S. G. (2001). “The linguistic legacy of William Dwight Whitney”. In: History of the language sciences. An international handbook on the evolution of the study of language from the beginnings to the present. Ed. by S. Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, H.-J. Niederehe, and K. Versteegh. Vol. 2. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1923-1931.
6. Amigó, E., J. Gonzalo, J. Artiles, and F. Verdejo (2009). “A comparison of extrinsic clustering evaluation metrics based on formal constraints”. Information Retrieval 12.4, 461-486.
7. Anttila, R. (1972). An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. New York: Macmillan.
8. Arapov, M. V. and M. M. Xerc (1974). Matematičeskie metody v istoričeskoj lingvistike [Mathematical methods in historical linguistics]. Moscow: Nauka; German translation: Arapov, M. V. and M. M. Cherc (1983). Mathematische Methoden in der historischen Linguistik. Trans. by R. Köhler and P. Schmidt. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
9. Arens, H. (1955). Sprachwissenschaft. Der Gang ihrer Entwicklung von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Freiburg: Alber.
10. Arlotto, A. (1972). Introduction to historical linguistics. Boston: Mifflin.
11. Atkinson, Q. D. and R. D. Gray (2006). “How old is the Indo-European language family? Illumination or more moths to the flame?" In: Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages. Ed. by P. Forster and C. Renfrew. Cambridge, Oxford, and Oakville: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 91-109.
12. Bagga, A. and B. Baldwin (1998). “Entity-based cross-document coreferencing using the vector space model”. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Asso ciation for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. “COLING-ACL '98" (Montréal, Quebec, Canada, 08/10-08/14/1998), 79-85.
13. Barbour, S. and P. Stevenson (1998). Variation im Deutschen. Soziolinguistische Perspektiven. Berlin: de Gruyter.
14. Barton, G. J. and M. J. E. Sternberg (1987). “A strategy for the rapid multiple alignment of protein sequences. Confidence levels from tertiary structure comparisons”. J. Mol. Biol. 198.2, 327-337.
15. Baxter, W. H. (1992). A handbook of Old Chinese phonology. Berlin: de Gruyter.
16. Baxter, W. H. and A. Manaster Ramer (2000). “Beyond lumping and splitting: Probabilistic issues in historical linguistics”. In: Time depth in historical linguistics. Ed. by C. Renfrew, A. McMahon, and L. Trask. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 167-188.
17. Bennet, P. R. (1976). “Some problems of Bantu lexicostatistics”. Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 3.5-6, 147-173.
18. Bergsland, K. and H. Vogt (1962). “On the validity of glottochronology”. Curr. Anthropol.3.2, 115-153.
19. Bergsma, S. and G. Kondrak (2007). “Multilingual cognate identification using integer linear programming”. In: Proceedings of the RANLP Workshop on Acquisition and Management of Multilingual Lexicons. (Borovets, Bulgaria, 09/03/2007).
20. Bilu, Y., P. K. Agarwal, and R. Kolodny (2006). “Faster algorithms for optimal multiple sequence alignment based on pairwise comparisons”. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 3.4, 408-422.
21. Branner, D. P. (2006). “Some composite phonological systems in Chinese”. In: The Chinese rime tables. Linguistic philosopy and historical-comparative phonology. Ed. by D. P. Branner. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 209-232.
22. Brown, C. H., E. W. Holman, S. Wichmann, V. Velupillai, and M. Cysouw (2008). “Automated classification of the world’s languages. A description of the method and preliminary results”. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61.4, 285-308.
23. Brown, C. H., E. W. Holman, and S. Wichmann (2013). “Sound correspondences in the world’s languages”. Language 89.1, 4-29.
24. Bussmann, H., ed. (1996). Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. Trans. from the German by G. Trauth and K. Kazzazi. London and New York: Routledge.
25. Böckenbauer, H.-J. and D. Bongartz (2003). Algorithmische Grundlagen der Bioinformatik. Stuttgart, Leipzig, and Wiesbaden: Teubner.
26. Campbell, L. (1999). Historical linguistics. An introduction. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
27. Campbell, L. and M. Mixco (2007). A glossary of historical linguistics. Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.
28. Chao, K.-M. and L. Zhang (2009). Sequence comparison. Theory and methods. London:Springer.
29. Chao, Y. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London:University of California Press.
30. Chao, Y. (1930 [2006]). “A system of ‘tone letters’". In: Linguistic Essays by Yuenren Chao. Ed. by Z.-j. Wu and X.-n. Zhao. Bĕijīng: Shāngwù, 98-102.
31. Chén Băoyà (1996). Lùn yŭyán jiēchù yŭ yŭyán liánméng [Language contact and language unions]. Bĕijīng: Yŭwén.
32. Chen, M. (1972). “The time dimension. Contribution toward a theory of sound change”. Foundations of Language 8.4, 457-498.
33. Chomsky, N. (1959). “On certain formal properties of grammars”. Information and Control 2, 137-167.
34. Chomsky, N. and M. Halle (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York, Evanston, and London: Harper and Row.
35. Coseriu, E. (1973). Probleme der strukturellen Semantik. Vorlesung gehalten im Wintersemester 1965/66 an der Universität Tübingen. Tübingen: Narr.
36. Covington, M. A. (1996). “An algorithm to align words for historical comparison”. Computational Linguistics 22.4, 481-496.
37. Covington, M. A. (1998). “Alignment of multiple languages for historical comparison”. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. “COLING-ACL 1998" (Montreal, 08/10-08/14/1998), 275-279.
38. Croft, W. (2008). “Evolutionary linguistics”. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 37, 219-234.
39. Cronbach, L. J. and P. E. Meehl (1955). “Construct validity in psychological tests”. Psychol. Bull. 52, 281-302.
40. Damerau, F. J. (1964). “A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors”. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 7.3, 171-176.
41. Delmestri, A. and N. Cristianini (2010). “Robustness and statistical significance of PAM-like matrices for cognate identification”. J Commun. Comput. 7.73, 21-31.
42. DIALIGN. DIALIGN. Multiple sequence alignment. URL: http://bibiserv.techfak. uni-bielefeld.de/dialign/. (Visited on 10/06/2011).
43. Do, C. B., M. S. P. Mahabhashyam, M. Brudno, and S. Batzoglou (2005). “Prob-Cons. Probabilistic consistency-based multiple sequence alignment”. Genome Res.15, 330-340.
44. Dolgopolsky, A. B. (1964). “Gipoteza drevnejšego rodstva jazykovych semej Severnoj Evrazii s verojatnostej točky zrenija [A probabilistic hypothesis concering the oldest relationships among the language families of Northern Eurasia]”. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 2, 53-63; English translation:- (1986). “A probabilistic hypothesis concerning the oldest relationships among the language families of northern Eurasia”. In: Typology, relationship and time. A collection of papers on language change and relationship by Soviet linguists. Ed. by V. V. Shevoroshkin. Trans. from the Russian by V. V. Shevoroshkin. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publisher, 27-50.
45. Downey, S. S., B. Hallmark, M. P. Cox, P. Norquest, and S. Lansing (2008). “Computational feature-sensitive reconstruction of language relationships: developing the ALINE distance for comparative historical linguistic reconstruction”. J. Quant. Linguist. 15.4, 340-369.
46. Durbin, R., S. R. Eddy, A. Krogh, and G. Mitchinson (1998 [2002]). Biological sequence analysis. Probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids. 7th ed. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
47. Durie, M., ed. (1996). The comparative method reviewed. Regularity and irregularity in language change. With an intro. by M. D. Ross and M. Durie. New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Dybo, A. and G. Starostin (2008). “In defense of the comparative method, or the end of the Vovin controversy”. In: Aspekty komparativistiki [Aspects of comparative linguistics]. Vol. 3. Ed. by I. S. Smirnov. Moscow: RGGU, 119-258.
49. Dyen, I., J. B. Kruskal, and P. Black (1992). “An Indoeuropean classification. A lexicostatistical experiment”. T. Am. Philos. Soc. 82.5, 111-132.
50. Eco, U. and T. A. Sebeok, eds. (1983). The sign of three. Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
51. Eddy, S. R. (2004). “Where did the BLOSUM62 alignment score matrix come from?" Nat. Biotechnol. 22.8, 1035-1036.
52. Edgar, R. C. (2004). “MUSCLE. Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput”. Nucleic Acids Res. 32.5, 1792-1797.
53. Engstrand, O. (1999). “Swedish”. In: Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. A guide to the use of the international phonetic alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 140-142.
54. Feng, D. F. and R. F. Doolittle (1987). “Progressive sequence alignment as a prerequisite to correct phylogenetic trees”. J. Mol. Evol. 25.4, 351-360.
55. Fitch, W. M. (2000). “Homology. A personal view on some of the problems”. TRENDS Genet. 16.5, 227-231.
56. Fox, A. (1995). Linguistic reconstruction. An introduction to theory and method. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
57. Frege, G. (1892). "Über Sinn und Bedeutung”. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100, 25-50.
58. Gabelentz, H. G. C. (1891). Die Sprachwissenschaft. Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.
59. Geisler, H. (1992). Akzent und Lautwandel in der Romania. Tübingen: Narr.
60. Geisler, H. and J.-M. List (2013). “Do languages grow on trees? The tree metaphor in the history of linguistics”. In: Classification and evolution in biology, linguistics and the history of science. Concepts- methods- visualization. Ed. by H. Fangerau, H. Geisler, T. Halling, and W. Martin. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 111-124.
61. Geisler, H. and J.-M. List (forthcoming). “Beautiful trees on unstable ground. Notes on the data problem in lexicostatistics”. In: Die Ausbreitung des Indogermanischen. Thesen aus Sprachwissenschaft, Archäologie und Genetik. Ed. by H. Hettrich. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
62. Geoffrey, N., G. N. O’Grady, and T. Klokeid (1969). “Australian linguistic classification:A plea for coordination of effort”. Oceania 39.4, 298-311.
63. Goossens, J. (1973). “Sprache”. In: Niederdeutsch. Sprache und Literatur. Eine Einführung. Vol. 1. Ed. by J. Goossens. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz.
64. Gotoh, O. (1982). “An improved algorithm for matching biological sequences”. J. Mol. Biol. 162.3, 705-708.
65. Gotoh, O. (1996). “Significant improvement in accuracy of multiple protein sequence alignments by iterative refinement as assessed by reference to structural alignments”. J. Mol. Biol. Direct 264, 823-838.
66. Gray, G. S. and W. M. Fitch (1983). “Evolution of antibiotic resistance genes. The DNA sequence of a kanamycin resistance gene from Staphylococcus aureus”. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1.1, 57-66.
67. Gray, R. D. and Q. D. Atkinson (2003). “Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin”. Nature 426.6965, 435-439.
68. Greenhill, S. J., R. Blust, and R. D. Gray (2008). “The Austronesian Basic Vocabulary Database: From bioinformatics to lexomics”. Evol. Bioinformatics 4, 271-283.
69. Grimm, J. (1822). Deutsche Grammatik. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Göttingen: Dieterichsche Buchhandlung.
70. Grønnum, N. (1998). “Danish”. J. Int. Phonet. Assoc. 28: Illustrations of the IPA, 99-105.
71. Gusfield, D. (1997). Algorithms on strings, trees and sequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. Guy, J. B. M. (1994). “An algorithm for identifying cognates in bilingual wordlists and its applicability to machine translation”. J. Quant. Linguist. 1.1, 35-42.
73. Haas, M. R. (1969). The prehistory of languages. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.
74. Hall, D. and D. Klein (2010). “Finding cognate groups using phylogenies”. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. “ACL 2010" (Uppsala, 07/11-07/16/2010). Stroudsburg, 1030-1039.
75. Hall, T. A. (2000). Phonologie. Eine Einführung. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
76. Hamming, R. W. (1950). “Error detection and error detection codes”. AT&T TECH J 29.2, 147-160.
77. Hauer, B. and G. Kondrak (2011). “Clustering semantically equivalent words into cognate sets in multilingual lists”. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. (Chiang Mai, Thailand, 11/08-11/13/2011), 865-873.
78. Heeringa, W. J., P. Kleiweg, C. Gooskens, and J. Nerbonne (2006). “Evaluation of string distance algorithms for dialectology”. In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Distances Workshop at the joint conference of International Committee on Computational Linguistics and the Association for Computational Linguistics. “Linguistic Distances” (Sydney, 07/23/2006), 51-62.
79. Henikoff, S. and J. G. Henikoff (1991). “Automated assembly of protein blocks for database searching”. Nucleic Acids Res. 19.23, 6565-6572.
80. Henikoff, S. and J. G. Henikoff (1992). “Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89.22, 10915-10919.
81. Higgins, D. G. and P. M. Sharp (1988). “CLUSTAL. A package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer”. Gene 73, 237-244.
82. Hirosawa, M., Y. Totoki, M. Hoshida, and M. Ishikawa (1995). “Comprehensive study on iterative algorithms of multiple sequence alignment”. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 11, 13-18.
83. Hock, H. H. (1991). Principles of historical linguistics. 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
84. Hock, H. H. and B. D. Joseph (1995 [2009]). Language history, language change and language relationship. An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. 2nd ed. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
85. Hoenigswald, H. M. (1959). “Some uses of nothing”. Language 35.3, 409-420.
86. Hoenigswald, H. M. (1960). “Phonetic similarity in internal reconstruction”. Language 36.2, 191-192.
87. Hogeweg, P. and B. Hesper (1984). “The alignment of sets of sequences and the construction of phyletic trees. An integrated method”. J. Mol. Evol. 20.2, 175-186.
88. Hoijer, H. (1956). “Lexicostatistics. A critique”. Language 32.1, 49-60.
89. Holm, H. J. (2000). “Genealogy of the main Indo-European branches applying the separation base method”. J. Quant. Linguist. 7.2, 73-95.
90. Holman, E. W., S. Wichmann, C. H. Brown, V. Velupillai, A. Müller, and D. Bakker (2008). “Explorations in automated lexicostatistics”. Folia Linguistica 20.3, 116-121.
91. Holman, E. W. et al. (2011). “Automated dating of the world’s language families based on lexical similarity”. Curr. Anthropol. 52.6, 841-875.
92. Holzer, G. (1996). Das Erschließen unbelegter Sprachen. Zu den theoretischen Grundlagen der genetischen Linguistik. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
93. Hrozný, B. (1915). “Die Lösung des hethitischen Problems”. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 56, 17-50.
94. Hübschmann, H. (1877). “Ueber die stellung des armenischen im kreise der indogermanischen sprachen”. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung der indogermanischen Sprachen 23, 5-49.
95. IPA Handbook (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. A guide to the use of the international phonetic alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Jakobson, R. (1976 [1978]). Six lectures on sound and meaning. Trans. from the French by J. Mepham. With an intro. by C. Lévi-Strauss. Cambridge and London:MIT Press.
97. Jones, W. (1798). “The third anniversary discourse, delivered 2 February, 1786, by the president. On the Hindus”. Asiatick Researches 1, 415-431.
98. Karlgren, B. (1950). The book of odes. Chinese text, transcription and translation. Stockholm: Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities.
99. Katičić, R. (1966). “Modellbegriffe in der vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft”. Kratylos 11, 49-67.
100. Keller, R. (1990). Sprachwandel. Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. Tübingen:Francke.
101. Kessler, B. (1995). “Computational dialectology in Irish Gaelic”. In: Proceedings of the seventh conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. “EACL 1995" (Dublin), 60-66.
102. Kessler, B. (2001). The significance of word lists. Statistical tests for investigating historical connections between languages. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
103. Kiparsky, P. (1988). “Phonological change”. In: Linguistics. The Cambridge survey. Vol. 1: Linguistic theory. Foundations. Ed. by F. J. Newmeyer. Cambridge et al.:Cambridge University Press, 363-415.
104. Klein, W. P. (1999). “Die ursprüngliche Einheit der Sprachen in der philologischgrammatischen Sicht der frühen Neuzeit”. In: The Language of Adam. Proceedings of a conference held at the Herzog August Bibliothek (Wolfenbüttel, 05/30-05/31/1995). Ed. by A. P. Coudert. Wolfenbütteler Forschungen 84. Wiesbaden:Harrassowitz, 25-56.
105. Klein, W. P. (2004). “Was wurde aus den Wörtern der hebräischen Ursprache? Zur Entstehung der komparativen Linguistik aus dem Geist etymologischer Spekulation”. In: Gottes Sprache in der philologischen Werkstatt. Hebraistik vom 15. bis zum 19. Jahrhundert. Proceedings of the Symposium “Die Geburt der Philologie aus dem Geist der Hebraistik” (Wittenberg, 10/06-10/06/2002). Ed. by G. Veltri and G. Necker. Studies in European Judaism 11. Leiden: Bril, 3-23.
106. Kommission “Selbstkontrolle” (2011). Bericht an die Hochschulleitung der Universität Bayreuth aus Anlass der Untersuchung des Verdachts wissenschaftlichen Fehlverhaltens von Herrn Karl-Theodor Freiherr zu Guttenberg. Universität Bayreuth. PDF:http: / / www. uni- bayreuth. de / presse / Aktuelle- Infos / 2011 / Bericht _ der _Kommission_m__Anlagen_10_5_2011_.pdf.
107. Kondrak, G. (2000). “A new algorithm for the alignment of phonetic sequence”. In:Proceedings of the 1st North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics conference. (Seattle, 04/29-05/03/2000), 288-295.
108. Kondrak, G. (2002). “Algorithms for language reconstruction”. Dissertation. Toronto: University of Toronto. URL: http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/~kondrak/papers/thesis.pdf.
109. Kondrak, G. (2003). “Identifying complex sound correspondences in bilingual wordlists”. In:Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing. Ed. by A. Gelbukh. Berlin:Springer, 432-443.
110. Koonin, E. V. (2005). “Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics”. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 309-338.
111. Kormišin, I. V. (1988). “Prajazyk. Bližnjaja i dalʼnjaja rekonstrukcija [The protolanguage. Narrow and distant reconstruction]”. In: Sravnitelʼno-istoričeskoe izučenie jazykov raznych semej [Comparative-historical investigations of languages of different language families]. Vol. 3: Teorija lingvističeskoj rekonstrukcii [Theory of linguistic reconstruction]. Ed. by N. Z. Gadžieva. Moscow: Nauka, 90-105.
112. Kruskal, J. B. (1983). “An overview of sequence comparison. Time warps, string edits, and macromolecules”. SIAM Review 25.2, 201-237.
113. Kruskal, J. B. and M. Liberman (1983 [1999]). “The symmetric time-warping problem. From continuous to discrete”. In: Time warps, string edits, and macromolecules. The theory and practice of sequence comparison. Ed. by D. Sankoff and J. B. Kruskal. Repr. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 125-161. [Original edition: Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1983].
114. Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change. Internal factors. Malden, Oxford, and West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
115. Lass, R. (1997). Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
116. Lassmann, T. and E. L. Sonnhammer (2002). “Quality assessment of multiple alignment programs”. FEBS Lett. 529.1, 126-130.
117. Lee, W.-S. and E. Zee (2003). “Standard Chinese (Beijing)". J. Int. Phonet. Assoc.33.1: Illustrations of the IPA, 109-112.
118. Lee, W.-S. and E. Zee (2009). “Hakka Chinese”. J. Int. Phonet. Assoc. 39.1: Illustrations of the IPA, 107-111.
119. Lees, R. B. (1953). “The basis of glottochronology”. Language 29.2, 113-127.
120. Lehmann, W. P. (1962 [1992]). Historical linguistics. An Introduction. 3rd ed. London:Routledge.
121. Leskien, A. (1871 [2002]). Handbuch der altbulgarischen (altkirchenslavischen) Sprache. Grammatik, Texte, Glossar. Rev. by O. A. Rottmann. Repr. Heidelberg:Winter. [Original edition: Weimar: Böhlau, 1871].
122. Levenshtein, V. I. (1965). “Dvoičnye kody s ispravleniem vypadenij, vstavok i zameščenij simvolov [Binary codes with correction of deletions, insertions and replacements]”. Doklady Akademij Nauk SSSR 163.4, 845-848; English translation:- (1966). “Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals”. Soviet Physics Doklady 10.8, 707-710.
123. Lewis, M. P. and C. D. Fennig, eds. (2013). Ethnologue. Languages of the world. URL: http://www.ethnologue.com.
124. List, J.-M. (2010). “Phonetic alignment based on sound classes. A new method for sequence comparison in historical linguistics”. In: Proceedings of the 15th Student Session of the European Summer School for Logic, Language and Information. (Copenhagen, 08/09-08/20/2010). Ed. by M. Slavkovik, 192-202. PDF: http://lingulist.de/documents/list_sound_classes.pdf.
125. List, J.-M. (2012a). “LexStat. Automatic detection of cognates in multilingual wordlists”. In:Proceedings of the EACL 2012 Joint Workshop of Visualization of Linguistic Patterns and Uncovering Language History from Multilingual Resources. “LINGVIS & UNCLH 2012" (Avignon, 04/23-04/24/2012), 117-125.
126. List, J.-M. (2012b). “Multiple sequence alignment in historical linguistics. A sound class based approach”. In: Proceedings of ConSOLE XIX. “The 19th Conference of the Student Organization of Linguistics in Europe” (Groningen, 01/05-01/08/2011). Ed. by E. Boone, K. Linke, and M. Schulpen, 241-260. PDF: http://media.leidenuniv.nl/ legacy/console19-proceedings-list.pdf.
127. List, J.-M (2012c). “SCA. Phonetic alignment based on sound classes”. In: New directions in logic, language, and computation. Ed. by M. Slavkovik and D. Lassiter. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 32-51.
128. List, J.-M., A. Terhalle, and M. Urban (2013). “Using network approaches to enhance the analysis of cross-linguistic polysemies”. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Semantics- Short Papers. “IWCS 2013" (Potsdam, 03/19-03/22/2013), 347-353. URL: http: / / aclweb. org / anthology- new /W/W13/W13-0208.pdf.
129. Lowrance, R. and R. A. Wagner (1975). “An extension of the string-to-string correction problem”. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 22.2, 177-183.
130. Löbner, S. (2003). Semantik. Eine Einführung. Berlin: de Gruyter.
131. Mackay, W. and G. Kondrak (2005). “Computing word similarity and identifying cognates with pair hidden markov models”. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. “CoNLL 2005" (Ann Arbor, 06/29-06/30/2005), 40-47.
132. Maddieson, I. (2011). “Consonant inventories”. In: The world atlas of language structures online. Ed. by M. Dryer and M. Haspelmath. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. URL: http://wals.info/chapter/1.
133. Makaev, E. A. (1977). Obščaja teorija sravnitelʼnogo jazykoznanija [Common theory of comparative linguistics]. Moscow: Nauka.
134. Marchal, J. H. (1975). “On the concept of a system”. Philosophy of Science 42.4, 448-468.
135. McGuffin, L. J. (2009). “Insertion and deletion events, their molecular mechanisms, and their impact on sequence alignment”. In: Sequence alignment. Methods, models, concepts, and strategies. Ed. by M. S. Rosenberg. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 23-38.
136. McMahon, A. and R. McMahon (2005). Language classification by numbers. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
137. Meier-Brügger, M. (2002). Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft. In collab. with M. Fritz and M. Mayrhofer. 8th ed. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
138. Mel’čuk, I. (2006). Aspects of the theory of morphology. Ed. by D. Beck. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
139. Merrell, F. (2001). “Charles Sanders Peirce’s concept of the sign”. In: The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics. Ed. by P. Cobley. London and New York:Routledge, 28-39.
140. Morgenstern, B., A. Dress, and W. T. David (1996). “Multiple DNA and protein sequence alignment based on segment-to-segment comparison”. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Science 93, 12098-12103.
141. Morgenstern, B., W. R. Atchley, K. Hahn, and A. Dress (1998). “Segment-based scores for pairwise and multiple sequence alignments”. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. (Montréal, 06/28-07/01/1998). Ed. by J. Glasgow, T. Littlejohn, F. M. R. Lathrop, D. Sankoff, and C. Sensen. AAAI Press, 115-121.
142. Morrison, D. A. (2010). “Review of Sequence Alignment: Methods, Models, Concepts, and Strategies ed. by M. S. Rosenberg (2009)". Syst. Biol. 359.3, 363-365.
143. Needleman, S. B. and C. D. Wunsch (1970). “A gene method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins”. J. Mol. Biol. 48, 443-453.
144. Nelson-Sathi, S., J.-M. List, H. Geisler, H. Fangerau, R. D. Gray, W. Martin, and T. Dagan (2011). “Networks uncover hidden lexical borrowing in Indo-European language evolution”. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 278.1713, 1794-1803.
145. Nerbonne, J. and W. Heeringa (2010). “Measuring dialect differences”. In: Language and space. An international handbook of linguistic variation. Vol. 1. Theories and method. Ed. by P. Auer and J. E. Schmidt. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 550-567.
146. Nichols, J. (1996). “The comparative method as heuristic”. In: The comparative method reviewed. Regularity and irregularity in language change. Ed. by M. Durie. With an intro. by M. D. Ross and M. Durie. New York: Oxford University Press, 39-71.
147. Nietzsche, F. (1869 [1920]). Homer und die classische Philologie. Antrittsrede an der Universität Basel gehalten am 28. Mai 1869. In: Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 2: Kleinere Schriften. 1869-1874. München: Musarion, 1-32.
148. Notredame, C. (2007). “Recent evolutions of multiple sequence alignment algorithms”. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3.8, 1405-1408.
149. Notredame, C. (2009). “Computing multiple sequence alignment with template-based methods”. In: Sequence alignment. Methods, models, concepts, and strategies. Ed. by M. S. Rosenberg. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 55-69.
150. Notredame, C., L. Holm, and D. G. Higgins (1998). “COFFEE. An objective function for multiple sequence alignment”. Bioinformatics 14.5, 407-422.
151. Notredame, C., D. G. Higgins, and J. Heringa (2000). “T-Coffee. A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment”. J. Mol. Biol. 302, 205-217.
152. Oakes, M. P. (2000). “Computer estimation of vocabulary in a protolanguage from word lists in four daughter languages”. J. Quant. Linguist. 7.3, 233-243.
153. Oesterreicher, W. (2001). “Historizität, Sprachvariation, Sprachverschiedenheit, Sprachwandel”. In: Language typology and language universals. An international handbook. Ed. by M. Haspelmath. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1554-1595.
154. Ogden, C. K. and I. A. Richards (1923 [1989]). The meaning of meaning. A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. With an intro. by U. Eco. 8th ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World Inc.
155. Oommen, B. J. and R. K. S. Loke (1997). “Pattern recognition of strings with substitutions, insertions, deletions and generalized transpositions”. Pattern Recogn. 30.5, 789-800.
156. Osthoff, H. and K. Brugmann (1878). Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen. Vol. 1. Leipzig: Hirzel.
157. Pagel, M. (2009). “Human language as a culturally transmitted replicator”. Nature Reviews. Genetics 10, 405-415.
158. Peer, Y. Van de (2009). “Phylogenetic inference based on distance methods. Theory”. In: The phylogenetic handbook. A practical approach to phylogenetic analysis and hypothesis testing. Ed. by P. Lemey, M. Salemi, and A.-M. Vandamme. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 142-160.
159. Peirce, C. S. (1931/1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Ed. by C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss. Cont. by A. W. Burke. 8 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
160. Popper, K. R. (1978). “Three worlds”. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 143-167. URL: http: / / www. tannerlectures. utah. edu / lectures / documents / popper80.pdf.
161. Prokić, J., M. Wieling, and J. Nerbonne (2009). “Multiple sequence alignments in linguistics”. In: Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on Language Technology and Resources for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education. “LaTeCH-SHELT&R 2009" (Athens, 03/30/2009), 18-25.
162. Raghava, G. P. S. and G. J. Barton (2006). “Quantification of the variation in percentage identity for protein sequence alignments”. BMC Bioinformatics 7.415.
163. Rask, R. K. (1818). Undersögelse om det gamle Nordiske eller Islandske sprogs oprindelse [Investigation of the origin of the Old Norse or Icelandic language]. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandlings Forlag; English translation:- (1993). Investigation of the origin of the Old Norse or Icelandic language. Trans. by N. Ege. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 26. Copenhagen: The Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen.
164. Renfrew, C., A. McMahon, and L. Trask, eds. (2000). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
165. Ringe, D., T. Warnow, and A. Taylor (2002). “Indo-European and computational cladistics”. T. Philol. Soc. 100.1, 59-129.
166. Rosenberg, M. S., ed. (2009a). Sequence alignment. Methods, models, concepts, and strategies. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.
167. Rosenberg, M. S., ed(2009b). “Sequence alignment. Concepts and history”. In: Sequence alignment. Methods, models, concepts, and strategies. Ed. by M. S. Rosenberg. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 1-22.
168. Rosenberg, M. S. and T. H. Ogden (2009). “Simulation approaches to evaluating alignment error and methods for comparing alternate alignments”. In: Sequence alignment. Methods, models, concepts, and strategies. Ed. by M. S. Rosenberg. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 179-207.
169. Ross, A. S. C. (1950). “Philological probability problems”. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B (Methodological) 12.1, 19-59.
170. Saitou, N. and M. Nei (1987). “The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees”. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4.4, 406-425.
171. Sankoff, D. (1969). “Historical linguistics as stochastic process”. Dissertation. Montreal:McGill University.
172. Saussure, F. de (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. by C. Bally. Lausanne:Payot; German translation:- (1967). Grundfragen der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. Trans. from the French by H. Lommel. 2nd ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
173. Schleicher, A. (1848). Zur vergleichenden Sprachengeschichte. Bonn: König.
174. Schleicher, A. (1861). Compendium der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprache. Vol. 1: Kurzer Abriss einer Lautlehre der indogermanischen Ursprache. Weimar: Böhlau.
175. Schleicher, A. (1863). Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft. Offenes Sendschreiben an Herrn Dr. Ernst Haeckel. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.
176. Schleicher, A. (1861 [1866]). Compendium der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprache. Vol. 1: Kurzer Abriss einer Lautlehre der indogermanischen Ursprache. 2nd ed. Weimar: Böhlau.
177. Schmidt, J. (1872). Die Verwantschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.
178. Schmitter, P. (1982). Untersuchungen zur Historiographie der Linguistik. Struktur-Methodik- theoretische Fundierung. Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 181. Tübingen:Gunter Narr.
179. Schurz, G. (2008). “Patterns of abduction”. Synthese 164, 201-234.
180. Schwarz, M. (1996). Einführung in die kognitive Linguistik. Basel and Tübingen:Francke.
181. Schwink, F. (1994). Linguistic typology, universality and the realism of reconstruction. Washington: Institute for the Study of Man.
182. Searls, D. B. (2002). “The language of genes”. Nature 420, 211-217.
183. Sechehaye, A. (1908). Programme et méthodes de la linguistique théorique. Psychologie du langage. Paris: Honoré Champion.
184. Shirō, H. (1973). “Japanese dialects”. In: Diachronic, areal and typological linguistics. Ed. by H. M. Hoenigswald and R. H. Langacre. Current Trends in Linguistics 11. The Hague and Paris: Mouton, 368-400.
185. Smith, T. F. and M. S. Waterman (1981). “Identification of common molecular subsequences”. J. Mol. Biol. 1, 195-197.
186. Sokal, R. R. and C. D. Michener (1958). “A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships”. University of Kansas Scientific Bulletin 28, 1409-1438.
187. Somers, H. L. (1999). “Aligning phonetic segments for children’s articulation assessment”. Computational Linguistics 25.2, 267-275.
188. Starostin, G. (2008a). Making a comparative linguist out of your computer. Problems and achievements. Talk, given at the Santa Fe Institute (Santa Fe, 08/12/2008).
189. Starostin, G. (2010). “Preliminary lexicostatistics as a basis for language classification: A new approach”. J. Lang. Relationship 3, 79-116.
190. Starostin, S. A. (1989). “Sravnitelʼno-istoričeskoe jazykoznanie i leksikostatistika [Comparative-historical linguistics and lexicostatistics]”. In: Lingvističeskaja rekonstrukcija i drevnejšaja istorija Vostoka [Linguistic reconstruction and the oldest history of the East]. Vol. 1: Materialy k diskussijam na konferencii [Materials for the discussion on the conference]. Ed. by S. V. Kullanda, J. D. Longinov, A. J. Militarev, E. J. Nosenko, and V. A. Shnirel’man. Moscow: Institut Vostokovedenija, 3-39; English translation:- (2000). “Comparative-historical linguistics and lexicostatistics”. In: Time depth in historical linguistics. Ed. by C. Renfrew, A. McMahon, and L. Trask. Trans. from the Russian by I. Peiros. Vol. 1. Papers in the prehistory of languages. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 223-265.
191. Statt, D. A., comp. (1981 [1998]). Consise dictionary of psychology. 3rd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
192. Steiner, L., P. F. Stadler, and M. Cysouw (2011). “A pipeline for computational historical linguistics”. Lang. Dyn. Change 1.1, 89-127.
193. Sturtevant, E. H. (1920). The pronunciation of Greek and Latin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
194. Sun, C. (2006). Chinese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
195. Swadesh, M. (1950). “Salish internal relationships”. Int. J. Am. Linguist. 16.4, 157-167.
196. Swadesh, M. (1952). “Lexico-statistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts. With special reference to North American Indians and Eskimos”. Proc. Am. Philol. Soc. 96.4, 452-463.
197. Swadesh, M. (1955). “Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating”. Int. J. Am. Linguist.21.2, 121-137.
198. Szemerényi, O. (1970). Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft. Darmstadt:Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
199. Taylor, W. R. (1987). “Multiple sequence alignment by a pairwise algorithm”. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 3.2, 81-87.
200. Ternes, E. (1987). Einführung in die Phonologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
201. Thompson, J. D. (2009). “Constructing alignment benchmarks”. In: Sequence alignment. Methods, models, concepts, and strategies. Ed. by M. S. Rosenberg. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 151-177.
202. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson (1994). “CLUSTAL W. Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice”. Nucleic Acids Res. 22.22, 4673-4680.
203. Thompson, J. D., F. Plewniak, and O. Poch (1999). “A comprehensive comparison of multiple sequence alignment programs”. Nucleic Acids Res. 27.13, 2682-2690.
204. Torres, A., A. Cabada, and J. J. Nieto (2003). “An exact formula for the number of alignments between two DNA sequences”. DNA Sequence 14.6, 427-430.
205. Trask, R. L. (1996). Historical linguistics. London et al.: Arnold.
206. Trask, R. L. comp. (2000). The dictionary of historical and comparative linguistics. Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.
207. Turchin, P., I. Peiros, and M. Gell-Mann (2010). “Analyzing genetic connections between languages by matching consonant classes”. J. Lang. Relationship 3, 117-126.
208. Wagner, R. A. (1975). “On the complexity of the extended string-to-string correction problem”. In: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM symposium on theory of computing. “STOC 1975" (Albuquerque), 218-223.
209. Wagner, R. A. and M. J. Fischer (1974). “The string-to-string correction problem”. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 21.1, 168-173.
210. Wallace, I. M., O. O’Sullivan, and D. G. Higgins (2005). “Evaluation of iterative alignment algorithms for multiple alignment”. Bioinformatics 21.8, 1408-1414.
211. Wang, F. (2006a). Comparison of languages in contact. The distillation method and the case of Bai. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics Academia Sinica.
212. Wang, L. and T. Jiang (1994). “On the complexity of multiple sequence alignment”. J. Comput. Biol. 1.4, 337-348.
213. Wang, W. S.-Y. (1969). “Competing changes as a cause of residue”. Language 45.1, 9-25.
214. Wang, W. S.-Y. (2006b). Yŭyán, yŭyīn yŭ jìshù [Language, phonology and technology]. Shànghăi: Xiānggăng Chéngshì Dàxué.
215. Weinreich, U. (1954). “Is a structural dialectology possible?" Word 10.2/3, 388-400.
216. Wichmann, S., E. W. Holman, A. Müller, V. Velupillai, J.-M. List, O. Belyaev, M. Urban, and D. Bakker (2010). “Glottochronology as a heuristic for genealogical language relationships”. J. Quant. Linguist. 17.4, 303-316.
217. Wilkins, D. P. (1996). “Natural tendencies of semantic change and the search for cognates”. In: The comparative method reviewed. Regularity and irregularity in language change. Ed. by M. Durie. With an intro. by M. D. Ross and M. Durie. New York: Oxford University Press, 264-304.
218. Witten, I. H. and E. Frank (2005). Data mining. Practical machine learning tools and techniques. 2nd ed. Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier.