Networks uncover hidden lexical borrowing in Indo-European language evolution

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 278, Issue 1713, 2011, Pages 1794-1803

  Shijulal, Nelson Sathi ^a   List, Johann Mattis ^a   Geisler, Hans ^a   Fangerau, Heiner ^b   Gray, Russell D ^c   Martin, William ^a   Dagan, Tal ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Community structure; Lateral transfer; Phylogenetics

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENE TRANSFER; GENOME; HUMAN EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENETICS;

ARTICLE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CULTURAL EVOLUTION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 79955756838     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1917     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Darwin, C. 1859 On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London, UK: John Murray. See http://www.nla.gov.au/apps/cdview/nla.gen-vn4591931.
2. Schleicher, A. 1863 Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft offenes Sendschreiben an Herrn Dr. Ernst Häckel, 3rd edn (1873). Weimar, Germany: Böhlau.
3. Gray, R. D. & Atkinson, Q. D. 2003 Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426, 435-439. (doi:10.1038/nature02029)
4. Pagel, M. 2009 Human language as a culturally transmitted replicator. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 405-415.
5. Dunn, M., Terrill, A., Reesink, G., Foley, R. A. & Levinson, S. C. 2005 Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history. Science 309, 2072-2075. (doi:10.1126/science.1114615)
6. Lansing, J. S. et al. 2007 Coevolution of languages and genes on the island of Sumba, eastern Indonesia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 16 022-16 026. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0704451104)
7. Pagel, M. & Atkinson, Q. D. 2007 A Meade frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. Nature 449, 717-720. (doi:10.1038/nature06176)
8. Thomason, S. G. 2001 Language contact: an introduction. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
9. Trask, R. L. 2000 The dictionary of historical and comparative linguistics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
10. Thomason, S. & Kaufman, T. 1988 Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11. Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2006 Grammars in contact: a crosslinguistic perspective. In Grammars in contact: a crosslinguistic typology (eds A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. Dixon), pp. 1-66. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Fox, A. 1995 Linguistic reconstruction: an introduction to theory and method. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13. Embleton, S. 2000 Lexicostatistics/glottochronology: from Swadesh to Sankoff to Starostin to future horizons. In Time depth in historical linguistics (eds C. Renfrew, A. McMahon & L. Trask), pp. 143-165. Cambridge, UK: The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
14. Bergsland, K. & Vogt, H. 1962 On the validity of glottochronology. Curr. Anthropol. 3, 115-153. (doi:10.1086/200264)
15. Boyd, R., Borgerhoff, M. M., Durham, W. H. & Richerson, P. J. 1997 Are cultural phylogenies possible? In Human by nature, between biology and the social sciences (eds P. Weingart, P. J. Richerson, S. D. Mitchell & S. Maasen), pp. 355-386. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Atkinson, Q. D. & Gray, R. D. 2006 How old is the Indo- European language family? Illumination or more moths to the flame? In Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages (eds P. Forster & C. Renfrew), pp. 91-109. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
17. Schleicher, A. 1853 Die ersten Spaltungen des indogermanischen Urvolkes. Allgemeine Monatsschrift für Wissenschaft und Literatur, September, 786-787.
18. Schmidt, J. 1872 Die Verwantschaftsverhä ltnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar, Germany: Hermann Böhlau.
19. Schuchardt, H. 1922 Über die Klassifikation der romanischen Mundarten. In Hugo Schuchardt-Brevier. Ein Vademekum der allgemeinen Sprachwissenshaft. Als Festgabe zum 80. Geburtstag des Meisters zusammengestellt und eingeleitet von Leo Spitzer (ed. L. Spitzer), pp. 144-166. Halle, Germany: Max Niemeyer.
20. Hirt, H. 1905 Die Indogermanen. Ihre Verbreitung, ihre Urheimat und ihre Kultur, vol. 1. Strassburg, France: Trübner.
21. Bonfante, G. I. 1931 I dialetti indoeuropei. Annali del R. Istituto Orientale di Napoli 4, 69-185.
22. Dyen, I., James, A. T. & Cole, J. W. L. 1967 Language divergence and estimated word retention rate. Language 43, 150-171. (doi:10.2307/411390)
23. Ringe, D. A. 1992 On calculating the factor of chance in language comparison. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. 82, 1-110. (doi:10.2307/1006563)
24. Southworth, F. C. 1964 Family-tree diagrams. Language 40, 557-565. (doi:10.2307/411938)
25. Bryant, D., Filimon, F. & Gray, R. D. 2005 Untangling our past: languages, trees, splits and networks. In The evolution of cultural diversity: phylogenetic approaches (eds R. Mace, C. Holden & S. Shennan), pp. 67-84. London, UK: UCL Press.
26. Nakhleh, L., Ringe, D. & Warnow, T. 2005 Perfect phylogenetic networks: a new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81, 382-420. (doi:10.1353/lan.2005.0078)
27. McMahon, A., Heggarty, P., McMahon, R. & Slaska, N. 2005 Swadesh sublists and the benefits of borrowing: an Andean case study. Trans. Phil. Soc. 103, 147-170. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-968X.2005.00148.x)
28. Ben Hamed, M. & Wang, F. 2006 Stuck in the forest: trees, networks and Chinese dialects. Diachronica 23, 29-60.
29. Dyen, I., Kruskal, J. B. & Black, P. 1997 Comparative Indo-European database: file IEdata1. See http://www.wordgumbo.com/ie/cmp/iedata.txt.
30. Starostin, G. 2008 Tower of Babel: an etymological database project. See http://starling.rinet.ru.
31. Newman, M. E. J. 2003 The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45, 167-256. (doi:10.1137/S003614450342480)
32. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2003 MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572-1574. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180)
33. Saitou, N. & Nei, M. 1987 The neighbor-joining method. A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406-425.
34. Huson, D. H. & Bryant, D. 2006 Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 254-267. (doi:10.1093/molbev/msj030)
35. Dagan, T. & Martin, W. 2007 Ancestral genome sizes specify the minimum rate of lateral gene transfer during prokaryote evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 870-875. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0606318104)
36. Zar, J. H. 1999 Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
37. Dagan, T., Artzy-Randrup, Y. & Martin, W. 2008 Modular networks and cumulative impact of lateral transfer in prokaryote genome evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10 039-10 044. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0800679105)
38. Swadesh, M. 1955 Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. Int. J. Am. Linguist. 21, 121-137. (doi:10.1086/464321)
39. Swadesh, M. 1952 Lexicostatistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts: with special reference to North American Indians and Eskimos. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 96, 452-463.
40. Geisler, H. & List, J.-M. 2011 Beautiful trees on unstable ground: notes on the data problem in lexicostatistics. In Die Ausbreitung des Indogermanischen. Thesen aus Sprachwissenschaft, Archä ologie und Genetik, Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft Würzburg, 24-26 September 2009 (ed. H. Hettrich). Wiesbaden, Germany: Reichert.
41. Girvan, M. & Newman, M. E. J. 2002 Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 12, 7821-7826.
42. Dyen, I., Kruskal, J. B. & Black, P. 1992 An Indoeuropean classification: a lexicostatistical experiment. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. 82, 3-132.
43. Mallory, J. P. & Adams, D. Q. 2006 The Oxford introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44. Wells, R. S. 1973 Uniformitarianism in linguistics. In Dictionary of the history of ideas (ed. P. Wiener), pp. 423-431. New York, NJ: Scribner.
45. Christy, C. 1983 Uniformitarianism in linguistics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
46. Greenhill, S. J., Currie, T. E. & Gray, R. D. 2009 Does horizontal transmission invalidate cultural phylogenies? Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 2299-2306. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1944)
47. Lewis, P. M. 2009 Ethnologue: languages of the world, 16th edn. Dallas, TX: SIL International. See http://www.ethnologue.com.
48. Garrett, A. 2006 Convergence in the formation of Indo-European subgroups: phylogeny and chronology. In Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages (eds P. Forster & C. Renfrew), pp. 139-151. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
49. Hock, H. H. & Joseph, B. D. 2009 Language history, language change and language relationship. In An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics, 2nd edn. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
50. Auty, R. 1963 The formation of the Slovene literary language against the background of the Slavonic national revival. SEER 41, 391-402.
51. Mallinson, G. 1988 The Romance languages in. In The Romance languages (eds M. Harris & V. Nigel), pp. 391-419. London, UK: Croom Helm.
52. Orel, V. 2003 A handbook of Germanic etymology. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
53. Soukhanov, A. H. 1992 The American heritage dictionary of the English language. Boston, MA: Mifflin.