A model based on ARAS-G and AHP methods for multiple criteria prioritizing of heritage value

International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 45-73

  Turskis, Zenonas ^a   Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ^a   Kutut, Vladislavas ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

AHP; ARAS G; assessment; decision making; Heritage; MCDM; multiple criteria

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874815488     PISSN: 02196220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S021962201350003X     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Y.-H. Perng, Y.-K. Juan and H.-S. Hsu, Genetic algorithm-based decision support for the restoration budget allocation of historical buildings, Building and Environment 42 (2007) 770-778, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.009.
2. K. Nerngchamnong, S. Kaviya, Y. Fujii and P. P. Yupapin, World heritage city surveillance system by a smart CCTV system, Procedia Engineering 8 (2011) 321-327, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.060.
3. Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (World Heritage Center, 2008).
4. A. D. Styliadis, I. I. Akbaylar, D. A. Papadopoulou, N. D. Hasanagas, S. A. Roussa and L. A. Sexidis, Metadata-based heritage sites modeling with e-learning functionality, Journal of Cultural Heritage 10 (2009) 296-312, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2008.08.014.
5. S. McDonald, N. Malys and V. Maliene, Urban regeneration for sustainable communities: A case study, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(1) (2009) 49-59, doi: 10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.49-59.
6. UNESCO, Convention concerning the protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (1972), Available at http://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf.
7. CoE (Council of Europe), Council of Europe framework convention on the value of cultural heritage for society (2005), Available at http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/199.htm.
8. J. Pendlebury, M. Short and A. While, Urban World Heritage Sites and the problem of authenticity, Cities 26 (2009) 349-358, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2009.09.003.
9. UNESCO, Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention (World Heritage Centre, Paris, 2008), p. 173, Availble at http://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide08-en.pdf.
10. Communities and Local Government, PPS5 planning for the historic environment: Historic environment planning practice guide (2010).
11. H.-J. Wang and Z.-T. Zeng, A multi-objective decision-making process for reuse selection of historic buildings, Expert Systems with Applications 37 (2010) 1241-1249, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.034.
12. Y.-P. O. Yang, H.-M. Shieh, J.-D. Leu and G.-H. Tzeng, A Vikor-based multiple criteria decision method for improving information security risk, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 8(2) (2009) 267-287.
13. Z. Xu, Approaches of multi-stage multi-Attribute group decision-making, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 10(1) (2011) 121-146, doi: 10.1142/S0219622011004257.
14. A. S. Choi, B. W. Ritchie, F. Papandrea and J. Bennett, Economic valuation of cultural heritage sites: A choice modeling approach, Tourism Management 31 (2010) 213-220, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.014.
15. S. Giannakopoulou, D. Damigos and D. Kaliampakos, Assessing the economic value of vernacular architecture of mountain regions using contingent valuation, Journal of Mountain Science 8(2011) 629-640, doi: 10.1007/s11629-011-2005-y.
16. T. Kolar and V. Zabkar, A consumer-based model of authenticity: An oxymoron or the foundation of cultural heritage marketing? Tourism Management 31 (2010) 652-664, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.010.
17. C.-J. Kim, W. S. Yoo, U.-K. Lee, K.-J. Song, K.-I. Kang and H. Cho, An experience curve-based decision support model for prioritizing restoration needs of cultural heritage, Journal of Cultural Heritage 11 (2010) 430-437, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2010.03.004.
18. U. Iyer-Raniga and J. P. C. Wong, Evaluation of whole life cycle assessment for heritage buildings in Australia, Building and Environment 47 (2012) 138-149, doi: 10.1016/j. buildenv.2011.08.001.
19. P. Nijkamp and P. Riganti, Assessing cultural heritage benets for urban sustainable development, International Journal of Services Technology and Management 10(1) (2008) 29-38, doi: 10.1504/IJSTM.2008.020344.
20. Y. Peng, G. Kou, Y. Shi and Z. Chen, A descriptive framework for the eld of data mining and knowledge discovery, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 7(4) (2008) 639-682, doi: 10.1142/S0219622008003204.
21. A. Moett and S. Sarkar, Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: A minireview with recommendations, Diversity and Distributions 12(2) (2006) 125-137, doi: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00202.x.
22. E. K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: An overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(2) (2011) 397-427, doi: 10.3846/20294913.2011.593291.
23. Y. Shi, The research trend of information technology and decision making in 2009, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 9(1) (2010) 1-8, doi: 10.1142/S0219622010003762.
24. Y. Peng, G. Kou, G. Wang and Y. Shi, Ensemble of software defect predictors: An AHPbased evaluation method, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 10(1) (2011) 187-206, doi: 10.1142/S0219622011004282.
25. Y. Peng, G. Kou, G. Wang and Y. Shi, FAMCDM: A fusion approach of MCDM methods to rank multiclass classication algorithms, Omega 39 (2011) 677-689, doi: 10.1016/j. omega.2011.01.009.
26. T. Kaya and C. Kahraman, An integrated fuzzy AHP-ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (2011) 8553-8562, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.057.
27. F. Han, Z. Yang, H. Wang and X. Xu, Estimating willingness to pay for environment conservation: A contingent valuation study of Kanas Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 180(1-4) (2011) 451-459, doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1798-4.
28. O. Marinoni, A. Higgins, S. Hajkowicz and K. Collins, The multiple criteria analysis tool (MCAT): A new software tool to support environmental investment decision making, Environmental Modelling & Software 24 (2009) 153-164, doi: 10.1016/j. envsoft.2008.06.015.
29. C. Couch, O. Sykes and W. Borstinghaus, Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency, Progress in Planning 75 (2011) 1-52, doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2010.12.001.
30. L. Petrova, The Economics of Cultural Policy, Book Review, Journal of Cultural Economics 35(3) (2010) 237-240, doi: 10.1007/s10824-011-9138-2.
31. M. Dutta and Z. Husain, An application of multicriteria decision making to built heritage. The case of Calcutta, Journal of Cultural Heritage 10 (2009) 237-243, doi: 10.1016/j. culher.2008.09.007.
32. L. Sakalauskas, Sustainability models and indicators, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(4) (2010) 567-577, doi: 10.3846/tede.2010.35.
33. S. Jakucionis and L. Ustinovicius, Multicriteria analysis of the variants of the old town building renovation in the marketing aspect, Statyba-Civil Engineering 6 (2000) 385-475.
34. K. Livingstone and R. Rogers, Housing for a compact city, Greater London Authority, February 2003, pp. 9-33.
35. Z. Turskis, E. K. Zavadskas and J. Zagorskas, Sustainable city compactness evaluation on the basis of GIS and Bayes rule, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 10(3) (2006) 185-207.
36. A. Mickaityte, E. K. Zavadskas, A. Kaklauskas and L. Tupenaite, The concept model of sustainable buildings refurbishment, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 12(1) (2008) 53-68, doi: 10.3846/1648-715X.2008.12.53-68.
37. Tupenaite, L., E. K. Zavadskas, Kaklauskas, A., Z. Turskis and M. Seniut, Multiple criteria assessment of alternatives for built and human environment renovation, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16(2) (2010) 257-266, doi: 10.3846/jcem.2010.30.
38. M. Medineckien-e and F. Björk, Owner preferences regarding renovation measures-The Demonstration of using multi-criteria decision making, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 17(2) (2011) 284-295, doi: 10.3846/13923730.2011.582380.
39. J. Saparauskas and Z. Turskis, Evaluation of construction sustainability by multiple criteria methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(4) (2006) 321-326.
40. M. S. Sijanec Zavrl, R. Zarnić and J. Selih, Multicriterial sustainability assessment of residential buildings, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(4) (2009) 612-630, doi: 10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.612-630.
41. A. Kaklauskas, E. K. Zavadskas and J. Saparauskas, Conceptual modelling of sustainable Vilnius development, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(1) (2009) 154-177, doi: 10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.154-177.
42. A. Srdić and J. Selih, Integrated quality and sustainability assessment in construction: A conceptual model, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(4) (2011) 611-626, doi: 10.3846/20294913.2011.603177.
43. J. Saparauskas, E. K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, Selection of facade's alternatives of commercial and public buildings based on multiple criteria, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 15(2) (2011) 189-203, doi: 10.3846/1648715X.2011.586532.
44. A. Kaklauskas, L. Kelpsiene, E. K. Zavadskas, D. Bardauskiene, G. Kaklauskas, M. Urbonas and V. Sorakas, Crisis management in construction and real estate: Conceptual modeling at the micro-, meso-And macro-levels, Land Use Policy 28 (2011) 280-293, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.008.
45. E. K. Zavadskas, A. Kaklauskas, Z. Turskis and J. Tamosaitiene, Selection of the e®ective dwelling house walls by applying attributes values determined at intervals, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 14(2) (2008) 85-93, doi: 10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.3.
46. V. Kersuliene, E. K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), Journal of Business Economics and Management 11(2) (2010) 243-258, doi: 10.3846/jbem.010.12.
47. T. L. Saaty, Scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3) (1977) 234-281, doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5.
48. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1980).
49. T. L. Saaty, How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research 48 (1990) 9-26.
50. T. L. Saaty, Response to holder's comments on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of the Operational Research Society 42(10) (1991) 909-914.
51. T. L. Saaty, Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994).
52. T. L. Saaty, Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996).
53. T. L. Saaty, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory. (RWS Publications, Pittsburg, PA, 2001).
54. T. L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making, in Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (Eds.). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. (Springer, 2005) 345-408.
55. T. L. Saaty and H. J. Zo®er, Negotiating the Israeli-Palestinian controversy from a new perspective, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 10(1) (2011) 5-64, doi: 10.1142/S021962201100421X.
56. T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, The legitimacy of rank reversal, Omega 12(5) (1984) 513-516.
57. T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, The analytic hierarchy process: Wash criteria should not be ignored, International Journal of Management and Decision Making 7(2/3) (2006) 180-188.
58. T. L. Saaty, L. G. Vargas and R. E. Wendell, Assessing attribute weights by ratios. Omega 11(1) (1983) 9-13.
59. T. L. Saaty, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, International Journal of Services Sciences 1(1) (2008) 8-98.
60. J. L. Deng, Control problems of grey systems, Systems and Control Letters 1(5) (1982) 288-294.
61. J. L. Deng, Introduction to grey system theory, Journal of Grey System 1 (1988) 1-24.
62. H.-H. Wu, Applying gray model to prioritise technical measures in quality unction development, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 29 (2006) 1278-1283, doi: 10.1007/s00170-005-0016-y.
63. Z. Turskis and E. K. Zavadskas, A novel method for multiple criteria analysis: Grey additive ratio assessment (ARAS-G) method, Informatica 21(4) (2010) 597-610.
64. E. K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(2) (2010) 159-172, doi: 10.3846/tede.2010.10.
65. E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis and T. Vilutiene, Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 10(3) (2010) 123-141.
66. Z. Turskis and E. K. Zavadskas, A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARASF). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location, Transport 25(4) (2010) 423-432, doi: 10.3846/transport.2010.52.
67. V. Kersulien-e and Z. Turskis, Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(4) (2011) 645-666, doi: 10.3846/20294913.2011.635718.
68. E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, L. Ustinovichius and G. Shevchenko, Attributes weights determining peculiarities in multiple attribute decision making methods, Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics 21(1) (2011) 32-43.
69. A. C. Wight and J. J. Lennon, Selective interpretation and eclectic human heritage in Lithuania, Tourism Management 28(2) (2007) 519-529, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman. 2006.03.006.