Safeguards in a World of Ambient Intelligence

International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology

Volumn 1, Issue , 2008, Pages 1-286

  Wright, David ^a   Gutwirth, Serge ^b   Friedewald, Michael ^c   Vildjiounaite, Elena ^d   Punie, Yves ^e  

^a Trilateral Research and Consulting LLP: Trilateral Research Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^c FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

^d VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^e JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85098159678     PISSN: 18750044     EISSN: 18750036     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6662-7_1     Document Type: Chapter

References (271)

1. Aarts, E.H.L., and J.L. Encarnação (eds.), True Visions: The Emergence of Ambient Intelligence, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2006.
2. Aarts, E., R. Harwig and M. Schuurmans, “Ambient Intelligence”, in P. Denning, The Invisible Future: The Seamless Integration of Technology in Everyday Life, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002.
3. Aarts, E., and S. Marzano (eds.), The New Everyday: Views on Ambient Intelligence, Uitgeverij 010 Publishers, Rotterdam, 2003.
4. Åkesson, K.-P., J. Humble, A. Crabtree and A. Bullock, Usage and Development Scenarios for the Tangible Toolbox, ACCORD Deliverable D1.3, Swedish Institute of Computer Science, Kista, 2001.
5. Alahuhta, P., M. Jurvansuu and H. Pentikäinen, “Roadmap for network technologies and service”, Tekes Technology Review 162/2004, Tekes, Helsinki, 2004.
6. Albrecht, K., “Supermarket Cards: The Tip of the Retail Surveillance Iceberg”, Denver University Law Review, No. 79, 2002, pp. 534–539, 558–565.
7. Alheit, K., “The applicability of the EU Product Liability Directive to Software”, The Comparative and International Law Journal of South Africa, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2001.
8. Andrews, S., Privacy and Human Rights 2002, produced by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), Washington, DC, and Privacy International, London, 2002. http://www. privacyinternational.org/survey/phr2002/
9. ARTEMIS Strategic Research Agenda, First Edition, March 2006. http://www.artemis-office.org/DotNetNuke/PressCorner/tabid/89/Default.aspx
10. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Recommendation 3/97: anonymity on the Internet (WP 6), adopted on 3 December 1997, available through http://ec.europa.eu/justice:home/fsj/privacy/
11. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion on more harmonised information provisions (11987/04/EN – WP 100), adopted on 25 November 2004, available through http://ec.europa. eu/justice:home/fsj/privacy/
12. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Working document on the surveillance of electronic communications in the workplace (5401/01/EN/Final – WP 55), adopted 29 May 2002, available through http://ec.europa.eu/justice:home/fsj/privacy/
13. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Working document on determining the international application of EU data protection law to personal data processing on the Internet by non-EU based web sites (5035/01/EN/Final WP 56), 30 May 2002. http://ec.europa.eu/justice: home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2002/wp56_en.pdf
14. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party in Working document on the processing of personal data by means of video surveillance (11750/02/EN – WP 67), adopted 25 November 2002, available through http://ec.europa.eu/justice:home/fsj/privacy/
15. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Working document on biometrics (12168/02/EN – WP 80), adopted on 1 August 2003, available through http://ec.europa.eu/justice:home/fsj/privacy/
16. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Working document on data protection issues related to intellectual property rights (WP 104), adopted on 18 January 2005. http://ec.europa.eu/justice: home/fsj/privacy/
17. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Working document on data protection issues related to RFID technology (10107/05/EN – WP 105), 19 January 2005. http://ec.europa.eu/justice:home/fsj/privacy/
18. Article 29 Working Party, Opinion 4/2005 on the Proposal for a Directive on the retention of Data processed in connection with the Provision of Public Electronic Communications Services and Amending Directive 2002/58/EC. http://ec.europa.eu/justice:home/fsj/privacy/workinggroup/index_en.htm
19. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 5/2007 on the follow-up agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security concluded in July 2007 (01646/07/EN-WP138). http://ec.europa.eu/justice:home/fsj/privacy/docs/wp138_en.pdf
20. Aschmoneit, P., and M. Höbig, Context-Aware Collaborative Environments for Next Generation Business Networks: Scenario Document, COCONET deliverable D 2.2, Telematica Institute, Enschede, 2002. http://www.mosaic-network.org/library/scenarios.html
21. Bauer, M., M. Meints and M. Hansen (eds.), Structured Overview on Prototypes and Concepts of Identity Management Systems, FIDIS (Future of Identity in the Information Society) Deliverable D3.1, September 2005.
22. Becher, A., Z. Benenson and M. Dornseif, “Tampering with Motes: Real-World Physical Attacks on Wireless Sensor Networks”, Third International Conference on Security in Pervasive Computing, York, UK, April 2006, pp. 104–118.
23. Beslay, L., and H. Hakala, “Digital Territory: Bubbles”, in P.T. Kidd (ed.), European Visions for the Knowledge Age: A Quest for New Horizons in the Information Society, Cheshire Henbury, Macclesfield, UK, 2007. http://cybersecurity.jrc.es/docs/DigitalTerritoryBubbles.pdf
24. Beslay, L., and Y. Punie, “The Virtual Residence: Identity, Privacy and Security”, Security and Privacy for the Citizen in the Post-September 11 Digital Age: a Prospective Overview, IPTS Report to the European Parliament Committee on Citizens’ Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE), July 2003. http://www.jrc.es/pages/iptsreport/vol67/english/IPT3E676.html
25. Bianchi, A., S. Barrios, M. Cabrera et al., Revisiting elnclusion: from Vision to Action, EC Directorate-General Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Seville, 2006.
26. Biever, Celeste, “RFID chips watch Grandma brush teeth”, Newscientist.com news service, 17 March 2004.
27. Björk, S., “Designing Mobile Ad Hoc Collaborative Applications: Scenario Experiences with Smart-Its”, www.smart-its.org
28. Bolle, R.M., J.H. Connell, S. Pankanti, N.K. Ratha and A.W. Senior, Guide to Biometrics, Springer, New York, 2004.
29. Börjeson, L., M. Höjer, K.-H. Dreborg, T. Ekvall and G. Finnveden, “Towards a user’s guide to scenarios – a report on scenario types and scenario techniques”, Version 1.1b, Department of Urban Studies,Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2005. http://www.infra.kth.se/fms/pdf/Scenario RapportVer1_1b.pdf
30. Borking, J., “RFID Security, Data Protection & Privacy, Health and Safety Issues”, presentation made during European Commission Consultation on RFID, Brussels, 17 May 2006.
31. Brey, P., “Freedom and privacy in Ambient Intelligence”, Ethics and Information Technology, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2005.
32. Brownsword, R., “Code, Control, and Choice: Why East is East and West is West”, Legal Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1, March 2005, pp. 1–21.
33. BSI, IT-Sicherheitshandbuch: Handbuch für die sichere Anwendung der Informationstechnik, Version 1.0, BSI 7105, Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik [Federal Office for Information Security], Bonn, März 1992.
34. Burnett, R., and P.D. Marshall, Web Theory: An Introduction, Routledge, London, 2002.
35. Cabrera Giráldez, M., and C. Rodríguez Casal, “The role of Ambient Intelligence in the Social Integration of the Elderly” in G. Riva, F. Vatalaro et al. (eds.), Ambient Intelligence: The Evolution of Technology, Communication and Cognition Towards the Future of Human-Computer Interaction, IOS Press (Studies in New Technologies and Practices in Communication, 6), Amsterdam, 2005, pp. 265–280.
36. Camenisch, J. (ed.), First Annual Research Report, PRIME Deliverable D16.1, 2005. http://www. prime-project.eu.org/public/prime_products/deliverables/rsch/pub_del_D16.1.a_ec_wp16.1_ V1_final.pdf
37. Carr, S., “Wireless Tagging in Hospitals is ‘Inevitable’: Prepare to be chipped …”, silicon.com, 7 December 2004. http://hardware.silicon.com/storage/0,39024649,39126387,00.htm
38. Čas, J., “Privacy in Pervasive Computing Environments – A Contradiction in Terms?”, Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE, Vol. 24, Issue 1, Spring 2005, pp. 24–33.
39. CDT (Centre for democracy and technology) Working Group on RFID: Privacy Best Practices for Deployment of RFID Technology, Interim Draft, 1 May 2006, http://www.cdt.org/privacy/20060501rfid-best-practices.php
40. Claes, E., A. Duff and S. Gutwirth (eds.), Privacy and the Criminal Law, Intersentia, Antwerp/ Oxford, 2006.
41. Clarke, R., “Information Technology and Dataveillance”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 31, No. 5, May 1988, pp. 498–512.
42. Creese, S., M. Goldsmith and I. Zakiuddin, “Authentication in Pervasive Computing”, First International Conference on Security in Pervasive Computing, Boppard, Germany, 12–14 March 2003, pp. 116–129.
43. Custers, B., The Power of Knowledge, Ethical, Legal and Technological Aspects of Data Mining and Group Profiling in Epidemiology, Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, 2004.
44. Da Costa, O., M. Boden, Y. Punie and M. Zappacosta, “Science and Technology Roadmapping from Industry to Public Policy”, in The IPTS Report, 73, 2003.
45. Daugman, J., “Iris Recognition: Anti-spoofing Liveness Testing, Stable Biometric Keys, and Further Research Directions”, BioSecure 1st Residential Workshop, Paris, August 2005.
46. De Hert, P., “European Data Protection and E-Commerce: Trust Enhancing?”, in J.E.J. Prins, P. M.A. Ribbers, H.C.A. Van Tilborg, A.F.L. Veth and J.G.L. Van Der Wees (eds.), Trust in Electronic Commerce, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2002, pp. 190–199.
47. De Hert, P., “De soevereiniteit van de mensenrechten: aantasting door de uitlevering en het bewijsrecht” [Sovereignty of human rights: threats created by the law of extradition and by the law of evidence], Panopticon, Tijdschrift voor strafrecht, criminologie en forensisch welzijnswerk, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2004, pp. 229–238.
48. De Hert, P., Biometrics: Legal Issues and Implications, Background paper for the Institute of Prospective Technological Studies, EC – JRC, Seville, January 2005. http://cybersecurity.jrc. es/docs/LIBE%20Biometrics%20March%2005/LegalImplications_Paul_de_Hert.pdf
49. De Hert, P., “What are the risks and what guarantees need to be put in place in a view of interoperability of the databases?”, Standard Briefing Note “JHA & Data Protection”, No. 1. January 2006, http://www.vub.ac.be/LSTS/pub/Dehert/006.pdf
50. De Hert, P., and S. Gutwirth, “Making sense of privacy and data protection. A prospective overview in the light of the future of identity, location based services and the virtual residence” in Security and Privacy for the Citizen in the Post-September 11 Digital Age: A Prospective Overview, Report to the European Parliament Committee on Citizens’ Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies – Joint Research Centre, Seville, July 2003, pp. 111–162. ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/ EURdoc/eur20823en.pdf
51. De Hert, P., and S. Gutwirth, “Interoperability of police databases: an accountable political choice”, International Review of Law Computers & Technology, Vol. 20/no. 1–2, 2006, pp. 21–35.
52. De Hert, P., and S. Gutwirth, “Privacy, data protection and law enforcement. Opacity of the individual and transparency of power” in E. Claes, A. Duff and S. Gutwirth (eds.), Privacy and the Criminal Law, Intersentia, Antwerp/Oxford, 2006, pp. 61–104.
53. De Hert, P., and M. Loncke, “Camera Surveillance and Workplace Privacy in Belgium”, in S. Nouwt, B.R. de Vries and C. Prins (eds.), Reasonable Expectations of Privacy? Eleven Country Reports on Camera Surveillance and Workplace Privacy, TMC Asser Press, The Netherlands, 2005.
54. De Hert, P., and F.P. Ölcer, “Het onschadelijk gemaakte Europees privacybegrip. Implicaties voor de Nederlandse strafrechtspleging” [The notion of privacy made innocent. Implications for criminal procedure], Strafblad. Het nieuwe tijdschrift voor strafrecht, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2004, pp. 115–134.
55. Desai, M.S., J. Oghen and T.C. Richards, “Information Technology Litigation and Software Failure”, The Journal of Information, Law & Technology, Vol. 2, 2002. http://www2.warwick. ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2002_2/desai/
56. Dey, A., and J. Mankoff, “Designing Mediation for Context-Aware Applications”, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Special issue on Sensing-Based Interactions, Vol. 12, Issue 1, March 2005, pp. 53–80.
57. Drees, C., “Civil liberties debate leaves much of America cold”, Reuters, published in The Washington Post, 18 May 2006.
58. Ducot, C., and G.J. Lubben, “A Typology for Scenarios”, Futures, Vol. 12, February 1980.
59. Edler, J. (ed.), “Politikbenchmarking Nachfrageorientierte Innovationspolitik”, Progress report No. 99, Office for Technology Assessment at the German Parliament, Berlin, 2006.
60. Eggermont, L.D.J., Embedded Systems Roadmap 2002: Vision on technology for the future of PROGRESS, STW Technology Foundation/PROGRESS, Utrecht, 2002. http://www.stw.nl/progress/ESroadmap/index.html
61. Emiliani, P.L., and C. Stephanidis, “Universal access to ambient intelligence environments: opportunities and challenges for people with disabilities”, IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2005, pp. 605–619.
62. Engberg, S., “Empowerment and Context Security as the route to Growth and Security”, SWAMI Final Conference, Brussels, 21–22 March 2006.
63. Eriksen, E.O., J.E. Fossum and A.J. Menéndez (eds.), The Chartering of Europe: The European Charter of Fundamental Rights and its Constitutional Implications, Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, 2003.
64. Espiner, T., “Philips unfurls prototype flexible display”, ZDNet UK. http://news.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/emergingtech/0,39020357,39216111,00.htm
65. Espiner, T., “Viruses cause most security breaches”, ZDNet UK, 28 February 2006. http://news. zdnet.co.uk/0,39020330,39254929,00.htm
66. Espiner, T., “Philips unfurls prototype flexible display”, ZDNet UK, 2 September 2005. http://news.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/emergingtech/0,39020357,39216111,00.htm
67. Estrin, D. (ed.), Embedded, Everywhere: A Research Agenda for Networked Systems of Embedded Computers, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
68. European Commission, eEurope 2002: An Information Society For All, Action Plan prepared by the Council and the European Commission for the Feira European Council, 19–20 June 2000. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/2002/action_plan/pdf/actionplan_en.pdf
69. European Commission, Technology Platforms: from Definition to Implementation of a Common Research Agenda: Report compiled by a Commission Inter-Service Group on Technology Platforms, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2004. http://www.eurogif.org/wimages/Technology_Platforms_21_September_2004.pdf
70. European Commission, Science and Technology, the Key to Europe’s Future – Guidelines for Future European Union Policy to Support Research, COM(2004) 353 final, Brussels, 2004. ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/era/docs/com2004_353_en.pdf
71. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. The Hague Programme – Ten priorities for the next five years. The Partnership for European renewal in the field of Freedom, Security and Justice, COM(2005) 184 final.
72. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, eEurope 2005: An information society for all. http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eEurope/ 2002/news_library/documents/eeurope2005/eeurope2005_en.pdf
73. European Commission, Report on European Technology Platforms and Joint Technology Initiatives: Fostering Public-Private R&D Partnerships to Boost Europe’s Industrial Competitiveness, Commission Staff Working Document, SEC(2005) 800, Brussels, 2005.
74. European Commission, Communication to the Council and the European Parliament on improved effectiveness, enhanced interoperability and synergies among European databases in the area of Justice and Home Affairs, COM (2005) 597 final, Brussels, 24 November 2005.
75. European Commission, Green Paper on Conflicts of Jurisdiction and the Principle of ne bis in idem in Criminal Proceedings, COM(2005) 696, December 2005. http://ec.europa.eu/comm/off/green/index_en.htm
76. European Commission, European Technology Platforms: Moving to Implementation, Second Status Report, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, May 2006. ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/technology-platforms/docs/ki7305429ecd.pdf
77. European Commission, A strategy for a Secure Information Society – “Dialogue, Partnership and Empowerment”, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, COM(2006) 251, Brussels, 31 May 2006. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/doc/com2006251.pdf
78. European Commission, Impact Assessment: Commission Staff Working Document, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Review of the EU Regulatory Framework for electronic communications networks and services, SEC(2006) 817, Brussels, 28 June 2006. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/doc/info_centre/public_ consult/review/impactassessment_final.pdf
79. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on Promoting Data Protection by Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs), COM (2007) 228 final, Brussels, 2 May 2007.
80. European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), Opinion on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Visa Information System (VIS) and the Exchange of Data between Member States on Short Stay-visas, COM (2004) 835 final, Official Journal C 181/27, 23 July 2005.
81. European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), Annual Report 2005. http://www.edps.eu.int/publications/annual_report_en.htm
82. European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), Comments on the Communication of the Commission on Interoperability of European Databases, 10 March 2006. http://www.edps. eu.int/legislation/Comments/06-03-10_Comments_interoperability_EN.pdf
83. European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), Opinion on the Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the Exchange of Information under the Principle of Availability (COM (2005) 490 final), Brussels, 28 February 2006. http://www.edps.eu.int/legislation/Opinions_A/06-02-28_Opinion_availability_EN.pdf
84. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, “Ethical Aspects of ICT Implants in the Human Body”, Opinion to the Commission, 16 March 2005. http://europa.eu/comm/european_group_ethics/docs/avis20en.pdf
85. Friedewald, M., R. Lindner and D. Wright (eds.), Threats, Vulnerabilities and Safeguards in Ambient Intelligence, Deliverable D3, A report of the SWAMI consortium to the European Commission, 3 July 2006.
86. Friedewald, M., E. Vildjiounaite, Y. Punie and D. Wright, “The Brave New World of Ambient Intelligence: An Analysis of Scenarios Regarding Privacy, Identity and Security Issues”, in J. A. Clark et al. (eds.), Security in Pervasive Computing: Proceedings of the Third International Conference, SPC 18–21 April 2006, York, UK, Springer, Berlin, 2006.
87. Friedewald, M., and D. Wright (eds.), Report on the Final Conference, Brussels, 21–22 March 2006, SWAMI Deliverable D5, 2006.
88. Friedewald, M., E. Vildjiounaite and D. Wright, The Brave New World of Ambient Intelligence, Deliverable D1, A report of the SWAMI consortium to the European Commission under contract 006507, June 2005.
89. FTC, “Future Threats and Crimes in an Ambient Intelligent Everyday Environment” supplied by Qinetiq and Transcrime for IPTS/JRC under contract 22152-2004-06-F7SC SEV GB, July 2005.
90. Fujawa, J.M., “Privacy Made Public: Will National Security Be the End of Individualism?” Computers and Society, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2005.
91. Fule, P., and J.F. Roddick, “Detecting Privacy and Ethical Sensitivity in Data Mining Results” in V. Estivill-Castro (ed.), Computer Science 2004, Twenty-Seventh Australasian Computer Science Conference (ACSC2004), Dunedin, New Zealand, January 2004, Australian Computer Society (CRPIT, 26), 2004, pp. 159–166.
92. Garate, A., I. Lucas, N. Herrasti and A. Lopez, “Ambient Intelligence Technologies for Home Automation and Entertainment”, in EUSAI 2004, Workshop “Ambient Intelligence Technologies for Well-Being at Home”, 2004.
93. García, R.A., “The General Provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union”, Jean Monnet Working Paper 4/02. http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org
94. Garlan, D., D. Siewiorek, A. Smailagic and P. Steenkiste, “Project Aura: Toward Distraction-Free Pervasive Computing” in IEEE Pervasive Computing, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2002.
95. Gasson, M., M. Meints and K. Warwick (eds.), A study on PKI and Biometrics, FIDIS (Future of Identity in the Information Society) Deliverable D3.2, July 2005. http://www.fidis.net
96. Gavigan, J.P., F. Scapolo, M. Keenan, I. Miles, F. Farhi, D. Lecoq, M. Capriati, T. Di Bartolomeo (eds.), “A practical guide to Regional Foresight”, EUR 20128 EN, IPTS, Seville, December 2001.
97. Gehring, R.A., “Software Development, Intellectual Property, and IT Security”, The Journal of Information, Law and Technology, 1/2003. http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/03-1/gehring.html
98. Gettelman, A., “The Information Divide in the Climate Sciences”, National Center for Atmospheric Research, May 2003. http://www.isse.ucar.edu/infodivide/
99. Giensen, I., and M.B.M. Loos, “Liability for Defective Products and Services: The Netherlands”, Netherlands Comparative Law Association, 2002, pp. 75–79. http://www.ejcl.org/64/art64-6. html
100. Godet, M., “The art of scenario and strategic planning: tools and pitfalls”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 65, 2000, pp. 3–22.
101. Goldman, J., “Privacy and individual empowerment in the interactive age” in Y. Poullet, C. De Terwangne and P. Turner (eds.), Privacy: New Risk and Opportunities, Story-Scientia, Diegem, 1997.
102. Grabner-Kräuter, S., and E.A. Kaluscha, “Empirical Research in on-Line Trust: A Review and Critical Assessment”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 58, No. 6, 2003, pp. 783–812.
103. Günther, O., and S. Spiekermann, “RFID and the Perception of Control: The Consumer’s View”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 48, No. 9, 2005.
104. Gutwirth, S., “De polyfonie van de democratische rechtsstaat” [The polyphony of the democratic constitutional state] in M. Elchardus (ed.), Wantrouwen en onbehagen [Distrust and uneasiness], Balans 14, VUBPress, Brussels, 1998, pp. 137–193.
105. Gutwirth, S., Privacy and the Information Age, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham/Boulder/ New York/Oxford, 2002, pp. 5–20.
106. Gutwirth, S., and P. de Hert, “Privacy and Data Protection in a Democratic Constitutional State” in M. Hildebrandt and S. Gutwirth (eds.), Profiling: Implications for Democracy and Rule of Law, FIDIS deliverable 7.4, Brussels, 2005. www.fidis.net
107. Gutwirth, S., and P. De Hert, “Regulating profiling in a democratic constitutional state”, to be published in M. Hildebrandt and S. Gutwirth (eds.), Profiling the European Citizen, Springer, Dordrecht, 2008 (forthcoming).
108. Hansell, S., “Increasingly, Internet’s Data Trail Leads to Court”, The New York Times, 4 February 2006.
109. Hansen, M., and H. Krasemann (eds.), Privacy and Identity Management for Europe – PRIME White Paper, Deliverable D 15.1.d, 18 July 2005. http://www.prime-project.eu.org/public/prime_products/deliverables/
110. Harmon, Amy, “Lost? Hiding? Your Cellphone Is Keeping Tabs”, The New York Times, 21 December 2003.
111. Henderson, K., and A. Poulter, “The Distance Selling Directive: Points for Further Revision”, International Review for Law Computers & Technology, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2002, pp. 289–300.
112. Heusel, W. (ed.), Grundrechtecharta und Verfassungsentwicklung in der EU, Bundesanzeiger (Shriftenreihe der Europäischen Rechtsakademie Trier, Vol. 35), Köln, 2002.
113. Hildebrandt, M., “Profiling and the Identity of European Citizens” in M. Hildebrandt and S. Gutwirth (eds.), Profiling: Implications for Democracy and Rule of Law, FIDIS deliverable 7.4, Brussels, 2005. www.fidis.net
114. Hildebrandt, M., and J. Backhouse (eds.), Descriptive Analysis and Inventory of Profiling Practices, FIDIS (Future of Identity in the Information Society) Deliverable D7.2. http://www. fidis.net
115. Hildebrandt, M., and S. Gutwirth (eds.), Implications of Profiling on Democracy and the Rule of Law, FIDIS (Future of Identity in the Information Society), Deliverable D7.4, September 2005. http://www.fidis.net
116. Hilty, L., et al., The Precautionary Principle in the Information Society, Effects of Pervasive Computing on Health and Environment, Report of the Centre for Technology Assessment, February 2005.
117. Hogan, J., “Smart software linked to CCTV can spot dubious behaviour”, New Scientist.com, 11 July 2003. http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3918
118. Hustinx, P., Letter of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) to Dr W. Schauble, 27 June 2007. http://www.epic.org/privacy/pdf/hustinx-letter.pdf
119. Inayatullah, S., “Alternative Futures for the Islamic Ummah”, Metafuture.org (undated). http://www.metafuture.org/Articles/AltFuturesUmmah.htm
120. INDICARE Project, “Content Providers’ Guide to Digital Rights Management: Any side effects in using DRM?”. http://www.indicare.org
121. ISO/IEC 15408, Information Technology – Security Techniques – Evaluation Criteria for IT Security, First edition, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1999.
122. ISO/IEC 17799:2005(E), Information Technology – Security Techniques – Code of Practice for Information Security Management, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2005.
123. IST Advisory Group, Ambient Intelligence: From Vision to Reality. For participation – in society and business, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2003. http://www.cordis.lu/ist/istag-reports.html
124. IST Advisory Group, Trust, Dependability, Security and Privacy for IST in FP6, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2002. http://www.cordis.lu/ist/istag-reports.html
125. IST Advisory Group, K. Ducatel, M. Bogdanowicz et al., Scenarios for Ambient Intelligence in 2010, EUR 19763 EN, EC-JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Seville, 2001. http://www.cordis.lu/ist/istag-reports.html
126. ITEA Technology Roadmap for Software-Intensive Systems, 2nd edition, Information Technology for European Advancement (ITEA) Office Association, Eindhoven, 2004. www.itea-office.org
127. Ito, M., A. Iwaya, M. Saito et al., “Smart Furniture: Improvising Ubiquitous Hot-spot Environment” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW’03), Providence, RI, 19–22 May 2003, IEEE Press, 2003, pp. 48–53.
128. Jackson, R., “New fraud threat to chip-and-PIN cards”, The Scotsman, 6 January 2007. http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=26792007
129. Jardin, X., “Your Identity, Open to All”, Wired News, 6 May 2005. http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,67407,00.html
130. Jordan, M., “Electronic Eye Grows Wider in Britain”, The Washington Post, 7 January 2006.
131. Juels, A., D. Molnar and D. Wagner, “Security and Privacy Issues in E-passports”, ePrint Archive Cryptology Report 2005/095. http://eprint.iacr.org/
132. Julia-Barcelo, R., and K.J. Koelman, “Intermediary Liability in the E-commerce Directive: So far so Good, But It’s not Enough”, Computer Law and Security Report, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2000, pp. 231–239.
133. Kaasinen, E., K. Rentto, V. Ikonen and P. Välkkynen, MIMOSA Initial Usage Scenarios, MIMOSA Deliverable D1.1, version 1.0, 2004. http://www.mimosa-fp6.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/MIMOSA.woa/1/wo/g6hDj8CHIFBQDjTQXuNVGM/8.0.5.11.
134. Kardasiadou, Z., and Z. Talidou, Report on Legal Issues of RFID Technology, LEGAL IST (Legal Issues for the Advancement of Information Society Technologies) Deliverable D15, 2006.
135. Kato, U., T. Hayashi, N. Umeda et al. (eds.), Flying Carpet: Towards the 4th Generation Mobile Communications Systems, Ver. 2.00, 4th Generation Mobile Communications Committee, 2004. http://www.mitf.org/public_e/archives/index.html
136. Kawahara, Y., M. Minami, S. Saruwatari et al., “Challenges and Lessons Learned in Building a Practical Smart Space”, in The First Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, Boston, MA, 22–26 August 2004, pp. 213–222.
137. Kelly, L., “Spyware attacks triple in 2005”, Computing, 12 June 2006. http://www.vnunet.com/computing/news/2158112/spyware-attacks-triple-2005
138. Kent, S.T., and L.I. Millett (eds.), Who Goes There? Authentication Through the Lens of Privacy. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
139. Kent, S.T., and L.I. Millett (eds.), IDs – Not That Easy. Questions About Nationwide Identity Systems, Committee on Authentication Technologies and Their Privacy Implications, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
140. Knospe, H., and H. Pohl, “RFID Security”, in Information Security Technical Report, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2004, S. 30–41.
141. Koops, B.J., and M.M. Prinsen, “Glazen woning, transparant lichaam. Een toekomstblik op huisrecht en lichamelijke integriteit” [“Glass house, transparent body. A future view on home law and body integrity”], Nederland Juristenblad, 12 March 2005, pp. 624–630.
142. Koorn, R., H. van Gils, J. ter Hart, P. Overbeek, R. Tellegen and J. Borking, “Privacy-Enhancing Technologies. White Paper for Decision-Makers”, Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, The Hague, 2004. http://www.dutchdpa.nl/downloads_overig/PET_ whitebook.pdf
143. Korhonen, I., P. Aavilainen and A. Särelä, “Application of ubiquitous computing technologies for support of independent living of the elderly in real life settings” in UbiHealth 2003: The 2nd International Workshop on Ubiquitous Computing for Pervasive Healthcare Applications, Seattle, 8 October 2003.
144. Kravitz, D.W., K.-E. Yeoh and N. So, “Secure Open Systems for Protecting Privacy and Digital Services”, in T. Sander (ed.), Security and Privacy in Digital Rights Management, ACM CCS-8 Workshop DRM 2001, Philadelphia, 5 November 2001, Revised Papers, Springer, Berlin, 2002, pp. 106–125.
145. Krebs, B., “Hackers Break Into Computer-Security Firm’s Customer Database”, The Washington Post, 19 December 2005.
146. Krebs, B., “Microsoft Releases Windows Malware Stats”, The Washington Post, 12 June 2006. http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/06/microsoft_releases_malware_sta.html
147. Krebs, B., “Invasion of the Computer Snatchers”, The Washington Post, 19 February 2006.
148. Krebs, B., “Hacked Home PCs Fueling Rapid Growth in Online Fraud”, The Washington Post, 19 September 2005. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/19/AR2005091900026.html
149. Krim, J., “Consumers Not Told Of Security Breaches, Data Brokers Admit”, The Washington Post, 14 April 2005.
150. Krim, J., “Data on 3,000 Consumers Stolen With Computer”, The Washington Post, 9 November 2005.
151. Krikke, J., “T-Engine: Japan’s Ubiquitous Computing Architecture Is Ready for Prime Time”, in Pervasive Computing, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2005, pp. 4–9.
152. Kruger, D., Access Denied? Preventing Information Exclusion, Demos, London, 1998.
153. Lahlou, S., and F. Jegou, “European Disappearing Computer Privacy Design Guidelines V1”, Ambient Agora Deliverable D15.4, Electricité de France, Clamart, 2003. http://www.ambient-agoras.org/downloads/D15[1].4_-_Privacy_Design_Guidelines.pdf
154. Lahlou, S., M. Langheinrich and C. Rocker, “Privacy and Trust Issues with Invisible Computers”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 48, No. 3, March 2005.
155. Langheinrich, M., “Privacy by Design – Principles of Privacy-Aware Ubiquitous Systems”, in G.D. Abowd, B. Brumitt and S.A. Shafer (eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp 2001), Springer, Berlin, 2001, pp. 273–91.
156. Langheinrich, M., “The DC-Privacy Troubadour – Assessing Privacy Implications of DC-Projects”, Paper presented at the Designing for Privacy Workshop, DC Tales Conference, Santorini, Greece, 2003.
157. Leenes, R., and B.J. Koops, “‘Code’: Privacy’s Death or Saviour?” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2005.
158. Lemos, R., “Cybersecurity contests go national”, The Register, 5 June 2006. http://www.theregister. co.uk/2006/06/05/security_contests/. This article originally appeared at SecurityFocus. http://www.securityfocus.com/news/11394
159. Lessig, L., “The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach”, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 133, 1999, pp. 501–546.
160. Lessig, L., Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Basic Books, New York, 1999.
161. Lewis, Paul, “Court victory hailed as spam stopper”, The Guardian, 28 December 2005. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1674316, 00.html
162. Leyden, J., “Hackers cost UK.biz billions”, The Register, 28 April 2004. http://www.theregister. co.uk/2004/04/28/dti_security_survey/
163. Maghiros, I. (ed.), Security and Privacy for the Citizen in the Post-September 11 Digital Age: A Prospective Overview, Report to the European Parliament Committee on Citizens’ Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE), IPTS Technical Report, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, 2003. ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/EURdoc/eur20823en.pdf
164. Maghiros, I., Y. Punie, S. Delaitre et al., Biometrics at the Frontiers: Assessing the Impact on Society, Study commissioned by the LIBE committee of the European Parliament, EC – DG Joint Research Centre, EUR 21585 EN, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Seville, 2005. http://www.jrc.es/home/pages/detail.cfm?prs=1235.
165. Magnus, U., and H.W. Micklitz, Comparative Analysis of National Liability Systems for Remedying Damage Caused by Defective Consumer Services: A study commissioned by the European Commission, Final Report, April 2004. http://europa.eu.int/comm/consumers/cons_safe/serv_ safe/liability/reportabc_en.pdf; http://europa.eu.int/comm/consumers/cons_safe/serv_safe/liability/reportd_en.pdf
166. Markoff, J., “Attack of the Zombie Computers Is Growing Threat”, New York Times, 7 January 2007. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/07/technology/07net.html?hp&ex=1168232400 &en=60c6afb90ec2af68&ei=5094&partner=homepage
167. Masera, M., and R. Bloomfeld, A Dependability Roadmap for the Information Society in Europe, AMSD Delilverable D1.1, 2003. https://rami.jrc.it/roadmaps/amsd
168. Massini, E.H., and J.M. Vasquez, “Scenarios as seen from a human and social perspective”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 65, 2000, pp. 49–66.
169. Meints, M., “AmI – The European Perspective on Data Protection Legislation and Privacy Policies”, presentation at the SWAMI International Conference on Safeguards in a World of Ambient Intelligence, 21 March 2006.
170. Michahelles, F., P. Matter, A. Schmidt, B. Schiele, “Applying Wearable Sensors to Avalanche Rescue: First Experiences with a Novel Avalanche Beacon” in Computers and Graphics, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2003, pp. 839–847.
171. Mietzner, D., and G. Reger, “Scenario Approaches – History, Differences, Advantages, and Disadvantages”, in F. Scapolo and E. Cahill, New Horizons and Challenges for Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: Proceedings of the EU-US Scientific Seminar: New Technology
172. Foresight, Forecasting and Assessment Methods, 13–14 May 2004, European Commission DG JRC-IPTS, Seville, 2004. http://www.jrc.es/projects/fta/
173. Miles, I., M. Keenan and J. Kaivo-Oja, “Handbook of Knowledge Society Foresight”, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin, 2003. This handbook is available in electronic format only: http://www.eurofound.eu.int
174. Mohammed, A., “Record Fine for Data Breach”, The Washington Post, 27 January 2006.
175. Mohammed, A., and S. Kehaulani Goo, “Government Increasingly Turning to Data Mining”, The Washington Post, 15 June 2006. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti-cle/2006/06/14/AR2006061402063.html
176. Molas-Gallart, J., “Government Policies and Complex Product Systems: The Case of Defence Standards and Procurement”, International Journal of Aerospace Management, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2001, pp. 268–280.
177. Moores, T., “Do Consumers Understand the Role of Privacy Seals in E-Commerce?”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2005, pp. 86–91.
178. MPHPT, Information and Communications in Japan: Building a Ubiquitous Network Society that Spreads Throughout the World, White Paper, Ministry of Public Management Home Affairs Posts and Telecommunications of Japan, Economic Research Office, General Policy Division, Tokyo, 2004. http://www.johotsusintokei.soumu.go.jp/whitepaper/eng/WP2004/2004-index. html
179. Müller, B., “Equity in Climate Change – The Great Divide”, Executive summary, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies with the support of Shell Foundation. http://www.oxfordenergy.org/pdfs/great_divide_executive_summary.pdf
180. Müller, G., and S. Wohlgemuth (eds.), Study on Mobile Identity Management, FIDIS Deliverable D3.3, May 2005. http://www.fidis.net
181. Murakami, T., “Establishing the Ubiquitous Network Environment in Japan: From e-Japan to U-Japan”, NRI Paper 66, Nomura Research Institute, Tokyo, 2003. http://www.nri.co.jp/english/opinion/papers/2003/pdf/np200366.pdf
182. Naylor, David, & Cyril Ritter, “B2C in Europe and Avoiding Contractual Liability: Why Businesses with European Operations Should Review their Customer Contracts Now”, 15 September 2004. http://www.droit-technologie.org
183. Nissenbaum, H., “Privacy as Contextual Integrity”, in Washington Law Review, Vol. 79, No. 1, 2004, pp. 101–139.
184. Norris, P., Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
185. O’Brien, T.L., “Identity Theft Is Epidemic. Can It Be Stopped?”, The New York Times, 24 October 2004.
186. OECD Guidelines Governing the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 23 September 1980.
187. OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2001.
188. OECD Guidelines for the Security of Information Systems and Networks: Towards a Culture of Security, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2002.
189. OECD, Emerging Systemic Risks in the 21st Century, Paris, 2003.
190. OECD, Report on Disclosure Issues Related to the Use of Copy Control and Digital Rights Management Technologies, DSTI/CP(2005)15/FINAL, 2006. https://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/31/36546422.pdf
191. Oertel, B., M. Wölk, L.M. Hilty et al., Risiken und Chancen des Einsatzes von RFID-Systemen: Trends und Entwicklungen in Technologien, Anwendungen und Sicherheit, SecuMedia, Ingelheim, 2004.
192. Ofcom, Online protection: A survey of consumer, industry and regulatory mechanisms and systems, 21 June 2006. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research/technology/onlineprotection/report.pdf
193. O’Harrow, R., No Place to Hide, Simon & Schuster, New York, 2005.
194. Olsen, T., T. Mahler et al., “Privacy – Identity Management, Data Protection Issues in Relation to Networked Organisations Utilizing Identity Management Systems”, LEGAL IST: Legal Issues for the Advancement of Information Society Technologies, Deliverable D11, 2005. http://193.72.209.176/default.asp?P=369&obj=P1076
195. Orr, R.J., R. Raymond, J. Berman and F. Seay, “A System for Finding Frequently Lost Objects in the Home”, Technical Report 99–24, Graphics, Visualization, and Usability Center, Georgia Tech, 1999.
196. Paciga, M., and H. Lutfiyya, “Herecast: An open infrastructure for location-based services using WiFi, Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications”, WiMob’2005, IEEE International Conference, 2005, pp. 21–28.
197. Palmas, G., N. Tsapatsoulis, B. Apolloni et al., Generic Artefacts Specification and Acceptance Criteria, Oresteia Deliverable D01, STMicroelectronics s.r.l., Milan, 2001.
198. Peers, S., and A. Ward (eds.), The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2004.
199. Pennington, R., H.D. Wilcox and V. Grover, “The Role of System Trust in Business-to-Consumer Transactions”, Journal of Management Information System, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2004, pp. 197–226.
200. Perri 6 and Ben Jupp, Divided by Information? The “Digital Divide” and the Implications of the New Meritocracy, Demos, London, 2001.
201. Pfitzmann, A., “Anonymity, unobservability, pseudonymity and identity management requirements for an AmI world”, SWAMI Final Conference, Brussels, 21–22 March 2006.
202. Pfitzmann, A., and M. Hansen, Anonymity, Unlinkability, Unobservability, Pseudonymity, and Identity Management – A Consolidated Proposal for Terminology, Version v0.27, 20 February 2006. http://dud.inf.tu-dresden.de/Anon_Terminology.shtml
203. Pfitzmann, A., and M. Kohntopp, “Striking a Balance between Cyber-Crime and Privacy”, IPTS Report 57, EC-JRC, Seville, September 2001. http://www.jrc.es/home/report/english/articles/vol57/welcome.htm
204. Poulsen, K., “Traffic Hackers Hit Red Light”, Wired News, 12 August 2005. http://www.wired. com/news/technology/0,1282,68507,00.html
205. Prins, J.E.J., “The Propertization of Personal Data and Identities”, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 8.3, October 2004. http://www.ejcl.org
206. Prins, J.E.J., and M.H.M. Schellekens, “Fighting Untrustworthy Internet Content: In Search of Regulatory Scenarios”, Information Polity, Vol. 10, 2005, pp. 129–139.
207. Punie, Y., “The future of Ambient Intelligence in Europe: The need for more Everyday Life”, Communications and Strategies, Vol. 57, 2005, pp. 141–165.
208. Punie, Y., S. Delaitre, I. Maghiros and D. Wright (eds.), Dark Scenarios in Ambient Intelligence: Highlighting Risks and Vulnerabilities, SWAMI Deliverable D2, A report of the SWAMI consortium to the European Commission, November 2005.
209. Rannenberg, K., “Multilateral Security: A Concept and Examples for Balanced Security”, ACM New Security Paradigms Workshop, September 2000, pp. 151–162.
210. Reed, Ch., and A. Welterveden, “Liability”, in Ch. Reed and J. Angel (eds.), ComputerLaw, London, 2000.
211. Resnick, P., and R. Zeckhauser, “Trust Among Strangers in Internet Transactions: Empirical Analysis of eBay’s Reputation System”, in Michael R. Baye (ed.), The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce, Vol. 11 of Advances in Applied Microeconomics, JAI Press, Amsterdam, 2002, pp. 127–157.
212. Resnick, P., R. Zeckhauser, E. Friedman and K. Kuwabara, “Reputation Systems: Facilitating Trust in Internet Interactions”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, No. 12, 2000, pp. 45–48. http://www.si.umich.edu/∼presnick/papers/cacm00/reputations.pdf
213. Richtel, M., “Suddenly, an Industry Is All Ears”, The New York Times, 4 March 2006.
214. Roussos, G., and T. Moussouri, “Consumer Perceptions of Privacy, Security and Trust in Ubiquitous Commerce”, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 8, No. 6, 2004, pp. 416–429.
215. Sachinopoulou, A., S. Mäkelä, S. Järvinen et al., “Personal video retrieval and browsing for mobile users” in 17th International Symposium Electronic Imaging Science and Technology, San José, CA, 16–20 January 2005.
216. Samuelson, P., “Privacy As Intellectual Property?”, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 52, 2000.
217. Savidis, A., S. Lalis, A. Karypidis et al., Report on Key Reference Scenarios, 2WEAR Deliverable D1, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Institute of Computer Science, Heraklion, 2001.
218. Schneider, F.B. (ed.), Trust in Cyberspace, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999.
219. Schneier, B., “Risks of Relying on Cryptography”, Communications of the ACM 42, No. 10, 1999.
220. Schneier, B., “The Future of Surveillance”, Crypto-Gram News letter, 15 October 2003.
221. Schneier, B., “Information security: How liable should vendors be?”, Computerworld, 28 October 2004. http://www.schneier.com/essay-073.html
222. Schneier, B., Secrets & Lies, Wiley Computer Publishing, New York, 2000.
223. Schneier, B., “Customers, Passwords, and Web Sites”, in IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine, Vol. 2, No. 5, 2004.
224. Schneier, B., “Identification and Security”, Crypto-Gram Newsletter, 15 February 2004. http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-back.html
225. Schneier, B., “National ID Cards”, Crypto-Gram Newsletter, 15 April 2004. http://www.schneier. com/crypto-gram-back.html
226. Schneier, B., “Why Data Mining Won’t Stop Terror”, Wired News, 9 March 2005. http://www. schneier.com/essay-108.html
227. Schreurs, W., M. Hildebrandt, M. Gasson and K. Warwick, Report on Actual and Possible Profiling Techniques in the Field of Ambient Intelligence, FIDIS Deliverable D7.3, 2005. http://www.fidis.net
228. Schreurs, W., M. Hildebrandt, E. Kindt and M. Vanfleteren, “Cogitas, ergo sum. The role of data protection law and non-discrimination law in group profiling in the private sector”, to be published in M. Hildebrandt and S. Gutwirth (eds.), Profiling the European Citizen, Springer, Dordrecht, 2008 (forthcoming).
229. Schwarz, J., Statement of John Schwarz, President, Symantec Corporation on Worms, Viruses and Securing Our Nation’s Computers, House Government Reform Subcommittee on Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and the Census, Washington, DC, 2003. http://reform.house.gov/UploadedFiles/Schwarz-v5.pdf
230. Scott, A.O., “A Future More Nasty, Because It’s So Near”, Film review of “Code 46”, The New York Times, 6 August 2004.
231. Sharpe, B., S. Zaba and M. Ince, “Foresight Cyber Trust and Crime Prevention Project: Technology Forward Look: User Guide”, Office of Science and Technology, London, 2004.
232. Singsangob, A., Computer Software and Information Licensing in Emerging Markets, The Need for a Viable Legal Framework, Aspen Publishers, 2003.
233. Solove, D.J., The Digital Person, New York University Press, New York, 2004.
234. Sommer, D., Architecture Version 0, PRIME Deliverable D14.2.a, 13 October 2004, pp. 35–36, 57–58. http://www.prime-project.eu.org
235. Sorkin, D.E., “Technical and Legal Approaches to Unsolicited Electronic Mail”, University of San Francisco Law Review, Vol. 35, 2001.
236. Spiekermann, S., and F. Pallas, “Technology Paternalism – Wider Implications of Ubiquitous Computing”, Poiesis & Praxis, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2006.
237. Spiekermann, S., and M. Rothensee, “Soziale und psychologische Bestimmungsfaktoren des Ubiquitous Computing”, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2005. http://interval.hu-berlin.de/downloads/rfid/neuste%20forschungsergebnisse/SocioPsychofak.pdf
238. Stajano, F., and R. Anderson, “The Resurrecting Duckling: Security Issues for Ubiquitous Computing”, first Security & Privacy Supplement to IEEE Computer, April 2002, pp. 22–26.
239. Stajano, F., and J. Crowcroft, “The Butt of the Iceberg: Hidden Security Problems of Ubiquitous Systems”, in Basten et al. (eds.), Ambient Intelligence: Impact on Embedded System Design, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003.
240. Stout, D., “Data Theft at Nuclear Agency Went Unreported for 9 Months”, The New York Times, 10 June 2006.
241. Streitz, N.A., and P. Nixon, “The Disappearing Computer”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2005, pp. 32–35.
242. Sturcke, J., and agencies, “US access to flight data unlawful”, The Guardian, 30 May 2006.
243. Subirana, B., and M. Bain, Legal Programming: Designing Legally Compliant RFID and Software Agent Architectures for Retail Processes and Beyond, Springer, New York, 2005.
244. Summers, D., “Bureau admits innocents branded criminals”, The Herald [Scotland], 22 May 2006.
245. Sutter, G., “ ‘Don’t Shoot the Messenger?’ The UK and Online Intermediary Liability”, International Review of Law Computers & Technology, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2003, pp. 73–84.
246. SWAMI, “Safeguards in a World of Ambient Intelligence (SWAMI): Policy Options to Counteract Threats and Vulnerabilities – First Results”, Report submitted to the participants of the SWAMI conference, Brussels, 21–22 March 2006.
247. Tuohey, J., “Government Uses Color Laser Printer Technology to Track Documents. Practice embeds hidden, traceable data in every page printed”, PC World, 22 November 2004. http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,118664,00.asp
248. Upton, M., “Casual Rock Concert Events”, June 2005. http://www.crowddynamics.com/Main/Concert risks.htm
249. [US] Committee on Information Systems Trustworthiness, Trust in Cyberspace, National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 1999.
250. [US] Committee on Radio Frequency Identification Technologies, Radio Frequency Identification Technologies: A Workshop Summary, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004. http://books. nap.edu/catalog/11189.html
251. [US] National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), Falling through the Net: Towards Digital Inclusion. A Report on Americans’ Access to Technology Tools, US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Washington, DC, 2000. http://search. ntia.doc.gov/pdf/fttn00.pdf
252. Venkatesh, V., “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2000, pp. 342–365.
253. Vijayan, J., “ID Theft Continues to Increase. More than 13 million Americans have been victimized, new study reveals”, Computerworld, 30 July 2003. http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,111832,00.asp
254. Vishwanath, A., “Manifestations of Interpersonal Trust in Online Interaction”, New Media and Society, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2004, pp. 224 f.
255. Waelbroeck, D., D. Slater and G. Even-Shoshan G [Ashurst], Study on the Conditions of Claims for Damages in Case of Infringement of EC Competition Rules, commissioned by European Commission DG Competition, 2004. http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/antitrust/others/actions_for_damages/study.html
256. Waldo, James, Herbert S. Lin and Lynette I. Millett, Engaging Privacy and Information Technology in a Digital Age, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
257. Weis, S.A., S.E. Sarma, R.L. Rivest and D.W. Engels, “Security and Privacy Aspects of Low-Cost Radio Frequency Identification Systems”, in D. Hutter, G. Müller et al. (eds.), Security in Pervasive Computing, First International Conference, Boppard, Germany, 12–14 March 2003, Springer (Lecture notes in computer science, 2802), Berlin/New York, 2004, pp. 201–212.
258. Weiser, M., “The Computer for the 21st Century”, Scientific American, Vol. 265, No. 3, 1991, pp. 94–104.
259. Weiser, M., “Some Computer Science Issues in Ubiquitous Computing”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 36, No. 7, 1993, pp. 75–85.
260. Weiser, M., and J.S. Brown, “The Coming Age of Calm Technology”, in P.J. Denning and R.M. Metcalfe (eds.), Beyond Calculation: The Next Fifty Years of Computing, Copernicus, New York, 1997.
261. Welen, P., A. Wilson and P. Nixon, Scenario Analysis, Gloss Deliverable D.9, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 2003. http://iihm.imag.fr/projects/Gloss/Deliverables/D9–1.pdf
262. Whitehouse, O., GPRS Wireless Security: Not Ready for Prime Time, Research report, Stake, Boston, MA, 2002. http://www.atstake.com/research/reports/acrobat/atstake_gprs_security. pdf
263. Wilkinson, L., “How to Build Scenarios”, Wired 3, Special Issue. http://www.wired.com/wired/scenarios/build.html
264. Williams, A., “House of Lords to investigate Net security”, PCPro, 28 July 2006. http://www. pcpro.co.uk/news/91105/house-of-lords-to-investigate-net-security.html
265. Wright, D., “The dark side of ambient intelligence”, Info, Vol. 7, No. 6, October 2005, pp. 33–51. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/info
266. Wright, David, “Alternative futures: Aml scenarios and Minority Report”, Futures, Vol. 40:5, June 2008 (forthcoming).
267. Wright, D., et al., “The illusion of security”, Communications of the ACM, 2008 (forthcoming).
268. WWRF, The Book of Visions 2001: Visions of the Wireless World, Version 1.0, Wireless World Research Forum, 2001. http://www.wireless-world-research.org/general_info/BoV2001-final. pdf
269. Xenakis, C., and S. Kontopoulou, “Risk Assessment, Security & Trust: Cross Layer Issues”, Special Interest Group 2, Wireless World Research Forum, 2006.
270. Zeller, T. Jr., “For Victims, Repairing ID Theft Can Be Grueling”, The New York Times, 1 October 2005.
271. Zetter, K., “TSA Data Dump Leads to Lawsuit”, Wired News, 14 July 2005. http://www.wired. com/news/privacy/0,1848,68560,00.html