Feedback, Correctives, and the Use of Pre-Assessments

The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 432-450

  Guskey, Thomas R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85089522492     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/9781316832134.021     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Ainsworth, L., and Viegut, D. (2006). Common formative assessments: How to connect standards-based instruction and assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
2. Armstrong, T. (2000). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (2nd edn.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3. Black, P., and Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139-144.
4. Bloom, B. S. (1964). Stability and change in human characteristics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
5. Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment (UCLA-CSIEP), 1(2), 1-12.
6. Bloom, B. S. (1971a). Individual differences in school achievement: A vanishing point? Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappan International.
7. Bloom, B. S. (1971b). Mastery learning. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory and practice (pp. 47-63). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
8. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Bloom, B. S. (1977). Favorable learning conditions for all. Teacher, 95(3), 22-28.
10. Bloom, B. S. (1978). New views of the learner for instruction and curriculum. Educational Leadership, 35, 563-576.
11. Bloom, B. S. (1981). All our children learning: A primer for parents, teachers, and other educators. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., and Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook 1: The cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
13. Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., and Madaus, G. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Bloom, B. S., Madaus, G. F., and Hastings, J. T. (1981). Evaluation to improve learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
16. Dollard, J., and Miller, N. E. (1950). Personality and psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Duffy, G. G., and Kear, K. (2007). Compliance or adaptation: What is the real message about research-based practices? Phi Delta Kappan, 88, 579-581.
18. Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. New York: Basic Books.
19. Given, B. K. (2000). Learning styles (rev. edn.). Oceanside, CA: Learning Forum Publications.
20. Guskey, T. R. (1997). Implementing mastery learning (2nd edn.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
21. Guskey, T. R. (1998). Making time to train your staff. School Administrator, 55(7), 35-37.
22. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
23. Guskey, T. R. (2001). Mastery learning. In N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (pp. 9372-9377). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
24. Guskey, T. R. (2003). How classroom assessments improve learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 6-11.
25. Guskey, T. R. (2007a). Formative classroom assessment and Benjamin S. Bloom: Theory, research, and practice. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice (pp. 63-78). New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Guskey, T. R. (2007b). Closing achievement gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom’s “Learning for Mastery.” Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 8-31.
27. Guskey, T. R. (2008). The rest of the story. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 28-35.
28. Guskey, T. R. (Ed.) (2012). Benjamin S. Bloom: Portraits of an Educator (2nd edn.). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Education.
29. Guskey, T. R., and DeWitt, P. (2017, June 1). Why do we recycle and sometimes misuse educational words? Education Week Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek. org/edweek/finding_common_ground/2017/06/educational_words_wh_they_are_recycled_and_sometimes_misused.html.
30. Guskey, T. R., and McTighe J. (2016). Pre-assessment: Promises and cautions. Educational Leadership, 73(7), 38-43.
31. Hattie, J., and Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
32. Hockett, J. A., and Doubet, K. J. (2014). Turning on the lights: What pre-assessments can do. Educational Leadership, 71(4), 50-54.
33. Jenkins, J. K., and Sekayi, D. (2016, Winter). Teacher perceptions of response to intervention implementation in light of IDEA goals. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 66-86.
34. Kastner, J., and Gottlieb, J. (1991). Classification of children in special education: Importance of pre-assessment information. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 19-27.
35. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., and Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook 2: The affective domain. New York: McKay.
36. Lawrence, G. D. (1997). Looking at type and learning styles. Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.
37. Lazarowitz, R., and Lieb, C. (2006). Formative assessment pre-test to identify college students’ prior knowledge, misconceptions and learning difficulties in biology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 741-762.
38. Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., and Wiliam, D. (2005). Minute-by-minute and dayby-day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 18-24.
39. Leyton, F. S. (1983). The extent to which group instruction supplemented by mastery of initial cognitive prerequisites approximates the learning effectiveness of one-toone tutorial methods. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
40. Marzano, R. J. (2017). The new art and science of teaching. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
41. Mattern, K., Sanchez, E., and Ndum, E. (2017). Why do achievement measures underpredict female academic performance? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 36, 47-57.
42. Morrison, H. C. (1926). The practice of teaching in the secondary school. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43. Myles, B. S., Ormsbee, C. K., and Simpson, R. L. (1997). Reflections on “General and special educators’ perceptions of preassessment-related activities and team members.” Exceptionality, 7, 193-197.
44. Pendergrass, E. (2013). Differentiation: It starts with pre-assessment. Educational Leadership, 71(4).
45. Scriven, M. S. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, and M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
46. Silver, H. F., Strong, R. W., and Perini, M. J. (2000). So each may learn: Integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
47. Simpson, E. J. (1966). The classification of educational objectives: Psychomotor domain. Urbana: University of Illinois.
48. Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., and DeLisi, R. (2001). Natural classroom assessment: Designing seamless instruction and assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
49. Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Allowing for thinking styles. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 36-40.
50. Stiggins, R. (2008). An introduction to student-involved assessment for learning (5th edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
51. Tomlinson, C. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
52. Tomlinson, C. A., and Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
53. Wagner, E. P., Sasser, H., and DiBiase, W. J. (2002). Predicting students at risk in general chemistry using pre-semester assessments and demographic information. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 749-755.
54. Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., and Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research in science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210). New York: Macmillan.
55. Washburne, C. W. (1922). Educational measurements as a key to individualizing instruction and promotions. Journal of Educational Research, 5, 195-206.
56. Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd edn.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.