Lights, camera, learn: When the set is as important as the actors

Handbook of Design in Educational Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 397-405

  Tabak, Iris ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85087264441     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203075227-46     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and Schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2. Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., & Aber, J. L. (2000). Neighborhood Poverty: Context and Consequences for Children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
3. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
4. Burke, P. (2002). Context in context. Common Knowledge, 8(1), 152–167.
5. Cognition and Technology Group. (1990). The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27, 291–315.
6. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Connolly, S. (2010). Developing authentic achievement for disengaged young people using an electronic portfolio system. Paper presented at the 35th International Association for Educational Assessment (IAEA) Annual Conference: Assessment for a Creative World, Brisbane, Queensland.
9. Design Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–9.
10. Gee, J. P. (2010). Human action and social groups as the natural home of assessment: Thoughts on 21st century learning and assessment. In V. J. Shute & B. J. Becker (Eds.), Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century: Supporting Educational Needs (pp. 13–40). New York: Springer.
11. Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (pp. 1–42). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642.
13. Gutierrez, K. D., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 95(3), 445–471.
14. Linn, M. C., Lee, H. S., Tinker, R., Husic, F., & Chiu, J. L. (2006). Teaching and assessing knowledge integration in science. Science, 313(5790), 1049–1050.
15. Luckin, R. (2010). Re-designing Learning Contexts: Technology Rich, Learner Centred Ecologies. London and New York: Routledge.
16. Marx, D. M., & Stapel, D. A. (2006). Distinguishing steretotype threat from priming effects: On the role of the social self and threat-based concerns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 243–254.
17. McDermott, R. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding Practice (pp. 269–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Moje, E. B. (2000a). Circles of kinship, friendship, position and power: Examining the community in communitybased literacy research. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(1), 77–112.
19. Moje, E. B. (2000b). “To be part of the story.” The literacy practices of Gangsta adolescents. Teachers College Record, 102(3), 651–690.
20. Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and Consciousness. Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction (pp. 69–102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Orellana, M. F., & Hernandez, A. (1999). Talking the walk: Children reading urban environmental print. The Reading Teacher, 52, 612–619.
22. Philips, S. (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence. In C. Cazden (Ed.), Functions of Language in the Classroom (pp. 370–394). New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009). A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 116(1), 129–156.
24. Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185–217.
25. Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Suad Nasir N. I. (2000). “Points ain’t everything”: Emergent goals and average and percent understandings in the play of basketball among African American students. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 31(3), 283–305.
27. Suad Nasir, N. I., Hand, V., & Taylor, E. V. (2008). Culture and mathematics in school: Boundaries between “cultural” and “domain” knowledge in the mathematics classroom and beyond. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 187–240.
28. Tabak, I. (2004a). Reconstructing context: Negotiating the tension between exogenous and endogenous educational design. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 225–233.
29. Tabak, I. (2004b). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 305–335.
30. Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry and identity work in scaffolding. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 393–429.
31. Tabak, I., & Reiser, B. (2008). Software-realized inquiry support for cultivating a disciplinary stance. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16(2), 307–355.
32. Thadani, V., Stevens, R. H., & Tao, A. (2009). Measuring complex features of science instruction: Developing tools to investigate the link between teaching and learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 285–322.
33. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.
34. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Wertsch, J. V., & Rupert, L. J. (1993). The authority of cultural tools in a sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3 & 4), 227–239.
36. Wilson, E., & Goldfarb, A. (1996). Theater: The Lively Art (2 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
37. Zhou, J., Gotch, C., Zhou, Y., & Liu, Z. (2008). Perceiving an object in its context—is the context cultural or perceptual? Journal of Vision, 8(12), 1–5.