Entrustable Professional Activities in General Surgery: Trends in Resident Self-Assessment

Journal of Surgical Education

Volumn 77, Issue 6, 2020, Pages 1562-1567

  Stahl, Christopher C ^a   Jung, Sarah A ^a   Rosser, Alexandra A ^a   Kraut, Aaron S ^a   Schnapp, Benjamin H ^a   Westergaard, Mary ^a   Hamedani, Azita G ^a   Minter, Rebecca M ^a   Greenberg, Jacob A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

education; entrustable professional activities; Practice Based Learning and Improvement; self assessment; surgery residency

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; GALLBLADDER DISEASE; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INGUINAL HERNIA; MOBILE APPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT; SELF EVALUATION;

EID: 85086563027     PISSN: 19317204     EISSN: 18787452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bjork, RA, Dunlosky, J, Kornell, N, Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Ann Rev Psychol 64 (2013), 417–444, 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823.
2. Taylor, SM., Is maintenance of certification working in surgery. Adv Surg 52 (2018), 73–87, 10.1016/j.yasu.2018.04.002.
3. Duffy, FD, Holmboe, ES., Self-assessment in lifelong learning and improving performance in practice: physician know thyself. JAMA 296 (2006), 1137–1139, 10.1001/jama.296.9.1137.
4. Davis, DA, Mazmanian, PE, Fordis, M, Van Harrison, R, Thorpe, KE, Perrier, L, Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 296 (2006), 1094–1102, 10.1001/jama.296.9.1094.
5. Swing, SR., The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective. Med Teach 29 (2007), 648–654, 10.1080/01421590701392903.
6. Colthart, I, Bagnall, G, Evans, A, et al. The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10. Med Teach 30 (2008), 124–145, 10.1080/01421590701881699.
7. Brasel, KJ, Klingensmith, ME, Englander, R, et al. Entrustable professional activities in general surgery: development and implementation. J Surg Educ 76 (2019), 1174–1186, 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.04.003.
8. Stahl, CC, Collins, E, Jung, SA, et al. Implementation of entrustable professional activities into a general surgery residency. J Surg Educ, 2020, 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.01.012 Online ahead of Print, Feb 8, 2020.
9. Watson, RS, Borgert, AJ, O Heron, CT, et al. A multicenter prospective comparison of the accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones: Clinical Competency Committee vs. Resident Self-Assessment. J Surg Educ 74 (2017), e8–e14, 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.009.
10. Lyle, B, Borgert, AJ, Kallies, KJ, Jarman, BT, Do attending surgeons and residents see eye to eye? An evaluation of the Accreditation Council For Graduate Medical Education Milestones in General Surgery Residency. J Surg Educ 73 (2016), e54–e58, 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.07.004.
11. Lipsett, PA, Harris, I, Downing, S, Resident self-other assessor agreement: influence of assessor, competency, and performance level. Arch Surg 146 (2011), 901–906, 10.1001/archsurg.2011.172.
12. Alameddine, MB, Claflin, J, Scally, CP, et al. Resident surgeons underrate their laparoscopic skills and comfort level when compared with the rating by attending surgeons. J Surg Educ 72 (2015), 1240–1246, 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.07.002.
13. Ganni, S, Chmarra, MK, Goossens, RHM, Jakimowicz, JJ, Self-assessment in laparoscopic surgical skills training: is it reliable. Surg Endosc 31 (2017), 2451–2456, 10.1007/s00464-016-5246-6.
14. Mandel, LS, Goff, BA, Lentz, GM, Self-assessment of resident surgical skills: is it feasible. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193 (2005), 1817–1822, 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.080.
15. Quick, JA, Kudav, V, Doty, J, et al. Surgical resident technical skill self-evaluation: increased precision with training progression. J Surg Res 218 (2017), 144–149, 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.070.
16. Ruxton, GD., The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Behav Ecol 17 (2006), 688–690, 10.1093/beheco/ark016.
17. de Winter, J, Dodou, D, Five-point Likert items: t test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon. Pract Assess Res Evaluat, 15, 2010 Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Five-Point-Likert-Items%3A-t-Test-versus-Winter-Dodou/68f3c1623325aafefd00b4d2a5c1fc841a7ca6e7 Accessed December 26, 2019.
18. McHugh, ML, Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 22 (2012), 276–282.
19. Bangdiwala, SI, Shankar, V., The agreement chart. BMC Med Res Methodol, 13, 2013, 97, 10.1186/1471-2288-13-97.