Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: a critical review

School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2021, Pages 47-63

  Sims, Sam ^a   Fletcher Wood, Harry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Ambition Institute   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Professional development; reviews; teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 85086456738     PISSN: 09243453     EISSN: 17445124     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2020.1772841     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Adey, P., (1999). The science of thinking, and science for thinking: A description of Cognitive Acceleration through Science Education (CASE). International Bureau of Education.
2. Albornoz, F., Anauati, M. V., Furman, M., Luzuriaga, M., Podestá, M. E., & Tayor, I., (2017). Training to teach science: Experimental evidence from Argentina (CREDIT Research Paper No. 17/08). https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/credit/documents/papers/2017/17-08.pdf
3. Allen, J. P., Hafen, C. A., Gregory, A. C., Mikami, A. Y., & Pianta, R., (2015). Enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement: Replication and extension of the My Teaching Partner-Secondary intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8 (4), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1017680
4. Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J., (2011, August 19). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333 (6045) 1034–1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207998
5. Anderson, V., (1992). A teacher development project in transactional strategy instruction for teachers of severely reading-disabled adolescents. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8 (4), 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(92)90064-A
6. Basma, B., & Savage, R., (2017). Teacher professional development and student literacy growth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30 (2), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9416-4
7. Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Powell, A., & Teddy, L., (2005). Te Kotahitanga: Improving the educational achievement of Maori students in mainstream education. Ministry of Education.
8. Blank, R. K., & de las Alas, N., (2009). Effects of teacher professional development on gains in student achievement: How meta analysis provides scientific evidence useful to education leaders. The Council of Chief State School Officers.
9. Bradford Hill, A., (1965). The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58 (5), 295–300. doi: 10.1177/003591576505800503
10. Caena, F., (2011). Literature review: teachers’ core competences: requirements and development. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/education/experts-groups/2011-2013/teacher/teacher-competences_en.pdf
11. Caird, J., Sutcliffe, K., Kwan, I., Dickson, K., & Thomas, J., (2015). Mediating policy-relevant evidence at speed: Are systematic reviews of systematic reviews a useful approach? Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 11 (1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426514X13988609036850
12. Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E., (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104 (9), 2593–2632. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.9.2593
13. Clarke, B., Gillies, D., Illari, P., Russo, F., & Williamson, J., (2014). Mechanisms and the evidence hierarchy. Topoi, 33 (2), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9220-9
14. Cohen, J., Wong, V., Krishnamachari, A., & Berlin, R., (2020). Teacher coaching in a simulated environment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42 (2), 208–231. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720906217
15. Combs, E., & Silverman, S., (2016). Bridging the gap: Paving the pathway from current practice to exemplary professional learning. Frontline Research & Learning Institute. https://www.frontlineeducation.com/uploads/2018/01/ESSA_Bridging_the_Gap.pdf
16. Confrey, J., Castro-Filho, J., & Wilhelm, J., (2000). Implementation research as a means of linking systemic reform and applied psychology in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 35 (3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3503_4
17. Conn, V. S., Isaramalai, S., Rath, S., Jantarakupt, P., Wadhawan, R., & Dash, Y., (2003). Beyond MEDLINE for literature searches. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 35 (2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00177.x
18. Cooper, H., (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4 th ed.). SAGE.
19. Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Papakonstantinou, A., (2016). Sustainable changes in teacher practices: A longitudinal analysis of the classroom practices of high school mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19 (6), 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9310-2
20. Corcoran, T. C., (1995). Transforming professional development for teachers: A guide for state policymakers. National Governors’ Association.
21. Cordingley, P., Higgins, S., Greany, T., Buckler, N., Coles-Jordan, D., Crisp, B., Saunders, L., & Coe, R., (2015). Developing great teaching: Lessons from the international reviews into effective professional development. Teacher Development Trust. https://tdtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/DGT-Full-report.pdf
22. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M., (with Espinoza, D.,). (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
23. Department for Education. (2016). Standard for teachers’ professional development: Implementation guidance for school leaders, teachers, and organisations that offer professional development for teachers. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/537031/160712_-_PD_Expert_Group_Guidance.pdf
24. Desimone, L. M., (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38 (3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
25. D’Oria, T., (2004). How I improved my teaching practice in Grade 9 boys’ physical education to increase students’ participation and enjoyment [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Nipissing University, Canada.
26. Dunst, C. J., Bruder, M. B., & Hamby, D. W., (2015). Metasynthesis of in-service professional development research: Features associated with positive educator and student outcomes. Educational Research and Reviews, 10 (12), 1731–1744. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2306
27. Garet, M. S., Heppen, J. B., Walters, K., Parkinson, J., Smith, T. M., Song, M., Garrett, R., Yang, R., & Borman, G. D., (2016). Focusing on mathematical knowledge: The impact of content-intensive teacher professional development (NCEE 2016-4010). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20164010/pdf/20164010.pdf
28. Garet, M. S., Wayne, A. J., Stancavage, F., Taylor, J., Eaton, M., Walters, K., Song, M., Brown, S., Hurlburt, S., Zhu, P., Sepanik, S., & Doolittle, F., (2011). Middle School Mathematics Professional Development Impact Study: Findings after the second year of implementation (NCEE 2011-4024). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20114024/pdf/20114024.pdf
29. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J., (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. SAGE.
30. Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S., (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1 (1), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
31. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A., (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26 (2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
32. Greenleaf, C. L., Litman, C., Hanson, T. L., Rosen, R., Boscardin, C. K., Herman, J., Schneider, S. A., Madden, S., & Jones, B., (2011). Integrating literacy and science in biology: Teaching and learning impacts of Reading Apprenticeship professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 48 (3), 647–717. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210384839
33. Guskey, T. R., (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8 (3) 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
34. Guskey, T. R., (2003a). Analyzing lists of the characteristics of effective professional development to promote visionary leadership. NASSP Bulletin, 87 (637), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650308763702
35. Guskey, T. R., (2003b). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84 (10), 748–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308401007
36. Hanushek, E. A., (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30 (3), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.006
37. Hill, H. C., Beisiegel, M., & Jacob, R., (2013). Professional development research: Consensus, crossroads, and challenges. Educational Researcher, 42 (9), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13512674
38. Huffman, D., Goldberg, F., & Michelin, M., (2003). Using computers to create constructivist learning environments: Impact on pedagogy and achievement. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 22 (2), 151–168.
39. Jacob, R., Hill, H., & Corey, D., (2017). The impact of a professional development program on teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching, instruction, and student achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10 (2), 379–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1273411
40. Kennedy, M. M., (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86 (4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
41. Kitmitto, S., González, R., Mezzanote, J., & Chen, Y., (2018). Thinking, Doing, Talking Science: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Projects/Evaluation_Reports/TDTS.pdf
42. Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D., (2018). The effect of teaching coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88 (4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
43. Lally, P., van Jaarsveld, C. H. M., Potts, H. W. W., & Wardle, J., (2009). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40 (6), 998–1009. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.674
44. Lochner, L., (2011). Nonproduction benefits of education: Crime, health, and good citizenship. In E. A., Hanushek, S., Machin, & L., Woessman (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (pp. 183–282). North-Holland.
45. Lynch, K., Hill, H. C., Gonzalez, K. E., & Pollard, C., (2019). Strengthening the research base that informs STEM instructional improvement efforts: A meta-analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41 (3), 260–293. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719849044
46. Mackie, J. L., (1974). The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford University Press.
47. Main, K., & Pendergast, D., (2015). Core features of effective continuing professional development for the middle years: A tool for reflection. RMLE Online, 38 (10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2015.11658177
48. McDonagh, M., Peterson, K., Raina, P., Chang, S., & Shekelle, P., (2013). Avoiding bias in selecting studies. Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews [Internet]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK47095/
49. Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. P., Cane, J., & Wood, C. E., (2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46 (1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
50. Mill, J. S., (1884). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation (Vol. 1). Longmans, Green, and Co.
51. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma, Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6 (7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
52. Moxon, J., (2003). A study of the impact of the Restorative Thinking Programme within the context of a large multi-cultural New Zealand secondary school [Unpublished MA thesis]. University of Aukland, New Zealand.
53. Nugent, G., Kunz, G., Houston, J., Kalutskaya, I., Wu, C., Pedersen, J., Lee, S., DeChenne, S. E., Luo, L., & Berry, B., (2016). The effectiveness of technology-delivered science instructional coaching in middle and high school. National Center for Research on Rural Education, Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
54. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D., (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81 (3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
55. Penuel, W. R., Gallagher, L. P., & Moorthy, S., (2011). Preparing teachers to design sequences of instruction in earth science: A comparison of three professional development programs. American Educational Research Journal, 48 (4), 996–1025. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211410864
56. Rosenbaum, P. R., (2017). Observation and experiment: An introduction to causal inference. Harvard University Press.
57. Ross, J. A., (1994). The impact of an inservice to promote cooperative learning on the stability of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10 (4), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)90020-5
58. Ross, J. A., Roleiser, C., & Hogaboam-Gray, A., (1999). Effects of collaborative action research on the knowledge of five Canadian teacher-researchers. The Elementary School Journal, 99 (3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1086/461926
59. Russo, F., & Williamson, J., (2007). Interpreting causality in the health sciences. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 21 (2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590701498084
60. Rutkowski, S., Rutkowski, L., Bélanger, J., Knoll, S., Weatherby, K., & Prusinski, E., (2013). Teaching and Learning International Survey TALIS 2013: Conceptual framework. OECD Publishing.
61. Schober, H. M., (1984). The effects of inservice training on participating teachers and students in their economics classes. The Journal of Economic Education, 15 (4), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.1984.10845087
62. Seger, C. A., & Spiering, B. J., (2011). A critical review of habit learning and the basal ganglia. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 5, Article 66. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2011.00066
63. Sellen, P., (2016). Teacher workload and professional development in England’s secondary schools: Insights from TALIS. Education Policy Institute.
64. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T., (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
65. Sims, S., Hobbiss, M., & Allen, B., (in press). Habit formation limits growth in teacher effectiveness: A review of converging evidence from neuroscience and social science. Review of Education.
66. Sztjan, P., Campbell, M. P., & Yoon, K. S., (2011). Conceptualizing professional development in mathematics: Elements of a model. PNA, 5 (3), 83–92.
67. Tasker, G., (2001). Students’ experience in an HIV/AIDS-sexuality education programme: What they learnt and the implications for teaching and learning in health education [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
68. Thomas, J., Newman, M., & Oliver, S., (2013). Rapid evidence assessments of research to inform social policy: Taking stock and moving forward. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 9 (1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426413X662572
69. Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I., (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). New Zealand Ministry of Education.
70. van Driel, J. H., Meirink, J. A., van Veen, K., & Zwart, R. C., (2012). Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: A review of design features and quality of research. Studies in Science Education, 48 (2), 129–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.738020
71. Vontz, T. S., Metcalf, K. K., & Patrick, J. J., (2000). “Project Citizen” and the civic development of adolescent students in Indiana, Latvia, and Lithuania. ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED447047.pdf
72. Walter, C., & Briggs, J., (2012). What professional development makes the most difference to teachers. Oxford University Press. https://clie.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Walter_Briggs_2012.pdf
73. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P., (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132 (2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249.
74. Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S., (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council.
75. Whitlock, E. P., Lin, J. S., Chou, R., Shekelle, P., & Robinson, K. A., (2008). Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148 (10), 776–782. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-10-200805200-00010
76. Wood, W., & Neal, D. T., (2007). A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychological Review, 114 (4), 843–863. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.843.
77. Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. L., (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 033). Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southwest/pdf/REL_2007033.pdf