Analyzing Lists of the Characteristics of Effective Professional Development to Promote Visionary Leadership

NASSP Bulletin

Volumn 87, Issue 637, 2003, Pages 4-20

  Guskey, Thomas R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992923828     PISSN: 01926365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/019263650308763702     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Achinstein, B. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 421-455.
2. American Federation of Teachers (1996). Principles for professional development (Item No. 176). Washington, DC: Author.
3. Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20.
4. Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28-33.
5. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (1998). State policy and classroom performance: Mathematics reform in California. CPRE Policy Briefs (RB-23-May). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE), Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania.
6. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294-343.
7. Consortium for Policy Research in Education (1996). Public policy and school reform: A research summary. (Rep. No. 36). Philadelphia: Author.
8. Corcoran, T. B. (1995a, June). Helping teachers teach well: Transforming professional development. CPRE Policy Briefs. New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Rutgers University.
9. Corcoran, T. B. (1995b). Transforming professional development for teachers: A guide for state policymakers. Washington, DC: National Governors' Association.
10. Corcoran, T. B., Fuhrman, S. H., & Belcher, C. L. (2001). The district role in instructional improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(1), 78-84.
11. Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3-13.
12. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597-604.
13. Educational Research Service (1998). Professional development for teachers: Challenges and trends. Arlington, VA: Author.
14. Frechtling,J. A., Sharp, L., Carey, N., & Baden-Kierman, N. (1995). Teacher enhancement programs: A perspective on the last four decades. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources.
15. Fuhrman. S. H. (1999). The new accountability. (CPRE Policy Briefs No. RB27). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
16. Fullan, M. G. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
17. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
18. Garet, M. S., Birman, B. F., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Herman, B., & Yoon, K. S. (1999). Designing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
19. Guskey, T. R. (1996). Jointly planning staff training. The School Administrator, 53(11), 33-34.
20. Guskey, T. R. (1998). The age of our accountability. Journal of Staff Development, 19(4), 36-44.
21. Guskey, T. R. (1999). Apply time with wisdom. Journal of Staff Development, 20(2), 10-15.
22. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
23. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45-51.
24. Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1996, Fall). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. Professional Development Newsletter-ASCD Human Resource Development Program, 1-2.
25. Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning professon: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Holloway, J. H. (2000). The promise and pitfalls of site based management. Educational Leadership, 57(7), 81-82.
27. Jones, L. L., & Hayes, A. E. (1980). How valid are surveys of teacher needs? Educational Leadership, 37(5), 390-392.
28. Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Form and substance in inservice teachers education. (Research Monograph No. 13). Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin.
29. Kennedy, M. M. (1999). Form and substance in mathematics and science professional development. NISE Brief; 3(2), 1-7.
30. Kent, K., & Lingman, C. (2000). California's course. Journal of Staff Development, 21(3), 31-36.
31. Kifer, E. (2001). Large scale assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
32. Killion, J. (2002). Assessing impact: Evaluating staff development. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
33. Latham, A. S. (1998). Site based management: Is it working? Educational Leadership, 55(7), 85-86.
34. Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509-536.
35. Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-16.
36. Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K., & Hewson, P. (1996). Principles of effective professional development for mathematics and science education: A synthesis of standards. NISE Brief; 1(1), 1-6.
37. McCutchen, D., & Berninger, V. W. (1999). Those who know, teach well: Helping teachers mastery literacy-related subject-matter knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14(4), 215-226.
38. Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundations in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81-102.
39. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America 's future. New York: Author.
40. National Foundation for the Improvement of Education. (1996). Teachers take charge of their learning: Transforming professional development for student success. Washington, DC: Author.
41. National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching. (2000). Improving professional development. Retrieved February15, 2001, from www.npeat.org/strand2/pdprinpdf
42. National Staff Development Council. (1994). National Staff Development Council's standards for staff development: Middle level edition. Oxford, OH: Author.
43. National Staff Development Council (2001). Standards for staff development. Retrieved March 26, 2001, from www.nsdc.org/educatorindex.htm
44. Newmann, F., King, M. B., & Youngs, P. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108(4), 259-299.
45. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (H.R. 1), 107 Cong., 110 (2002) (enacted).
46. Phelps, L. A., & Bredeson, P. V. (2002, March). Enhancing high school teacher leadership through collaborative action research: An analysis of the Education and Work Leadership Program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
47. Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of failed school reforms. New York: Simon & Schuster.
48. Sparks, D. (1997). Professional development: Are you getting the results you want? California Professional Development Consortia, Restructuring Brief 14. Retrieved February 15, 2001, from www.cpdc.kl2.ca.us
49. Sparks, D., & Hirsh, S. (1997). A new vision for professional development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
50. Sparks, D., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1989). Five models of staff development for teachers. Journal of Staff Development, 10(4), 40-57.
51. Supovitz, J. A. (2002). Developing communities of instructional practice. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1591-1626.
52. Terzian, M. (2000). Design principles for effective professional development: A research synthesis. Newton, MA: Education Development Center.
53. U.S. Department of Education (1996). Building bridges: The mission and principles of professional development (pamphlet). Washington, DC: Author.
54. U.S. Department of Education (1997). Achieving the goals: Goal 4. Teacher education and professional development. Washington, DC: Author.
55. U.S. Department of Education (2002). Scientifically based research and the Comprehensive School Reform (CSR) Program. Washington, DC: Author.
56. Wang, Y. L., Frechtling,J. A., & Sanders, W. L. (1999, April). Exploring linkages between professional development and student learning: A pilot study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
57. Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service.
58. Wenglinsky, H. (2002). How schools matter: The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2). Retrieved May 13, 2002, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/vlOn12/