Interdisciplinarity in closed-loop supply chain management research

Closed-Loop Supply Chains: New Developments to Improve the Sustainability of Business Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 197-214

  Agrawal, Vishal ^a   Toktay, L Beril ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85076657065     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420095265-21     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Agrawal, V., A. Atasu, and K. van Ittersum. 2009a. The Effect of Consumer Perceptions on Competitive Remanufacturing Strategies. Working Paper. College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
2. Agrawal, V., M. Ferguson, L. B. Toktay, and V. Thomas. 2009b. Is Leasing Greener Than Selling? Working Paper. College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
3. Anderson, T and S. Mackenzie. 2006. Applied Sustainability LLC: Making a Business Case for By-Product Synergy. Stanford Graduate School of Business, Case E-118, Stanford, CA.
4. Andrews, C. and D. DeVault. 2009. A model with heterogeneous agents. J. Ind. Ecol. 13(2) 326-345.
5. Atasu, A. and R. Subramanian. 2009. The Effect of Extended Producer Responsibility on Recyclable Product Design. Working Paper. College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
6. Atasu, A., M. Sarvary, and L. N. Van Wassenhove. 2008. Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. Manage. Sci. 54(10) 1731-1747.
7. Baines, T., H. Lightfoot, S. Evans, A. Neely et al. 2007. State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 221(10) 1543-1552.
8. Bellos, I., M. Ferguson, and L. B. Toktay. 2009. To Sell or to Provide? A Comparison of Selling and Membership. Working Paper. College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
9. Chen, C. 2001. Design for the environment: A quality-based model for green product development. Manage. Sci. 47(2) 250-263.
10. CNET. 2007. Apple Sells Refurbished iPhones. http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-9762502-1.html.
11. Corbett, C. and G. DeCroix. 2001. Shared-savings contracts for indirect materials in supply chains: Channel profits and environmental impacts. Manage. Sci. 47 881-893.
12. Debo, L. G., L. B. Toktay, and L. N. Van Wassenhove. 2005. Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Manage. Sci. 51(8) 1193-1205.
13. Debo, L. G., L. B. Toktay, and L. N. Van Wassenhove. 2006. Life-cycle dynamics for portfolios with remanufactured products. Prod. Oper. Manage. 15(4) 498-513.
14. Denizel, M., M. Ferguson, and L. B. Toktay. 2009. Multiple-Criteria Decision Models for Recipient Selection in Donations of Medical Supplies. Working Paper. College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
15. Ehrenfeld, J. and N. Gertler. 1997. Industrial ecology in practice: The evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. J. Ind. Ecol. 1(1) 67-79.
16. Erdem, T. 1998. An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. J. Mark. Res. 35 339-351.
17. Faruk, A., R. Lamming, P. Cousins, and F. Bowen. 2002. Analyzing, mapping and managing environmental impacts along supply chains. J. Ind. Ecol. 5(2) 13-36.
18. Ferguson, M. E. and L. B. Toktay. 2006. Manufacturer strategies in response to remanufacturing competition. Prod. Oper. Manage. 15(3) 351-368.
19. Ferguson, M., E. Plambeck, and L. Denend. 2008. Teaching Note for Interface’s Evergreen Services Agreement. Harvard Business Publishing, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
20. Fishbein, B., L. McGarry, and P Dillon. 2000. Leasing: A Step towards Producer Responsibility. Technical Report, INFORM, Inc., New York.
21. Geyer, R. and T. Jackson. 2004. Supply loops and their constraints: The industrial ecology of recycling and reuse. Calif. Manage. Rev. 46(2) 55-73.
22. Geyer, R., L. Van Wassenhove, and A. Atasu. 2007. The economics of remanufacturing under limited component durability and finite product life cycles. Manage. Sci. 53(1) 88.
23. Ginsberg, J. and P Bloom. 2004. Choosing the Right Green Marketing Strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
24. Goldman, G. and A. Ogishi. 2001. The Economic Impact of Waste Disposal and Diversion in California. Technical Report to the California Integrated Waste Management Board, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
25. Guide, D. and K. Li. 2009. The Potential for Cannibalization of New Product Sales by Remanufactured Products. Working Paper. Smeal College of Business, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
26. Guide, D. and L. N. Van Wassenhove. 2009. OR FORUM-the evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper. Res. 57(1) 10-18.
27. Hawken, P, A. Lovins, and L. Lovins. 1999. Natural Capitalism. Little, Brown & Company, New York.
28. Lawn, P 2001. Goods and services and the dematerialization fallacy: Implications for sustainable development indicators and policy. Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manage. 2(3-4) 363-376.
29. Lee, D. 2009. Turning Waste into By-Product. Working Paper. Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA
30. Lee, D., M. Toffel, and R. Gordon. 2009. Cook Composites and Polymers Co. Harvard Business School Case 9-608-055, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
31. Leigh, N. and L. Patterson. 2005. Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling for Environmental Protection and Economic Development. Technical Report, Southeast Environmental Finance Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.
32. Leigh, N. and M. Realff. 2003. A framework for geographically sensitive and efficient recycling networks. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 46(2) 147-165.
33. Lifset, R. and T. Lindhqvist. 2000. Does leasing improve end of product life management? J. Ind. Ecol. 3(4) 10-13.
34. Lund, R. 2001. Remanufacturing as a resource. In Fifth International Congress on Environmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing, June 16-17, Rochester, NY.
35. Matthews, H., C. Hendrickson, and L. Lave. 2002. The economic and environmental implications of centralized stock keeping. J. Ind. Ecol. 6(2) 71-81.
36. Mont, O. 2004. Product-Service Systems: A Panacea or Myth? The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
37. Nelson, E. 2008. The business of old carpet: The interface journey to 2020. In The International Closed-Loop Supply Chain Workshop: Interdisciplinarity in Closed-Loop Supply Chain Management Research, October 9-11, 2008, College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
38. Olivia, R. and J. Quinn. 2003. Interface’s Evergreen Services Agreement. Harvard Business School Case 9-603-112, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
39. Ovchinnikov, A. 2009. Revenue and Cost Management for Remanufactured Products. Working Paper. Darden Graduate School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
40. Plambeck, E. and L. Denend. 2007. Wal-Mart’s Sustainability Strategy. Stanford Graduate School of Business, Case OIT-71, Stanford, CA.
41. Plambeck, E. and Q. Wang. 2009. Effects of e-waste regulation on new product introduction. Manage. Sci. 55(3) 333-347.
42. Quariguasi Frota Neto, J. 2008. Eco-efficient supply chains for electrical and electronic products. Dissertation, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
43. Quariguasi Frota Neto, J. and J. Bloemhof. 2008. The Environmental Gains of Remanufacturing: Evidence from the Computer and Mobile Industry. Working Paper. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
44. Rangaswamy, B., R. Burke, and T. Oliva. 1993. Brand equity and extendibility of brand names. Int. J. Res. Mark. 10 61-75.
45. Rayport, J. and J. Vanthiel. 2003. Green Marketing at Rank Xerox. Harvard Business School Case 9-594-047, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
46. Reiskin, E., A. White, J. Johnson, and T. Vorta. 2000. Servicizing the chemical supply chain. J. Ind.. Ecol. 3(2-3) 19-31.
47. Robert, K. H., B. Schmidt-Bleek, J. Aloise de Larderel, G. Basile, J.L. Jansen, R. Kuehr, P. Price Thomas, M. Suzuki, P Hawken, and M Wackernagel. 2002. Strategic sustainable development-selection, design and synergies of applied tools. J. Cleaner Prod. 10(3) 197-214.
48. Rock, M. T., P. L. Lim, and D. P. Angel. 2006. Impact of firm-based environmental standards on subsidiaries and their suppliers: Evidence from Motorola-Penang. J. Ind. Ecol. 10(1-2) 257-278.
49. Rosen, C., J. Bercovitz, and S. Beckman. 2001. Environmental supply-chain management in the computer industry. J. Ind. Ecol. 4(4) 83-103.
50. Smith, V. and G. Keoleian. 2004. The value of remanufactured engines. J. Ind. Ecol. 8(1-2) 193-221.
51. Subramanian, R. and R. Subramanyam. 2009. Key Drivers in the Market for Remanufactured Products: Empirical Evidence from eBay. Working Paper. College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
52. Subramanian, R., B. Talbot, and S. Gupta. 2008. An Approach to Integrating Environmental Considerations within Managerial Decision-Making. Working Paper. College of Management, Georgialnstitute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
53. Subramanian, R., M. Ferguson, and L. B. Toktay. 2009. The Impact of Remanufacturing on the Component Commonality Decision. Working Paper. College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
54. Sullivan, M. 1990. Measuring image spillovers in umbrella-branded products. J. Bus. 63(3) 309-329.
55. Toktay, L. B., L. Selhat, and R. Anderson. 2006. Doing well by doing good: Interface’s vision of being the first industrial company in the world to attain sustainability. In Enterprise Transformation: Understanding and Enabling Fundamental Change, W. Rouse (Ed.), Wiley, New York.
56. Van Wassenhove, L., D. Guide, and N. Kumar. 2002. Managing Product Returns at Hewlett Packard. INSEAD Case 602-039-1.
57. Vietor, R. and F. Murray. 1995. Xerox: Design for the Environment. Harvard Business School Case 9-794-022, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.