A framework for geographically sensitive and efficient recycling networks

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 147-165

  Leigh, Nancey Green ^a   Realff, Matthew J ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY; METROPOLITAN AREA; PLANNING METHOD; RECYCLING; WASTE DISPOSAL;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038018170     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0964056032000071007     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Berger, I.E. (1997) The demographics of recycling and the structure of environmental behavior, Environment and Behavior, 29(4), pp. 515-531.
2. California Department of Toxics Substances Control (2001) Laws and Regulations - Final and Emergency Regulations (http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/laws_regs/finalemergregs.html) (accessed 6 September 2001).
3. California Integrated Waste Management Board (1993) Final Report: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Six Market Devleopment Policy Options (Sacramento, CA, California Integrated Waste Management Board).
4. Californians against Waste (2001) E-waste Charts and Graphics (www.cawrecycles.org/Electronics/ whats%20recycleable.htm) (accessed 19 July 2001).
5. Clarke, R. (1999) Florida's strategy for the management of end-of-life cathode ray tubes (CRTs), computers and other electronic equipment, Florida DEP, paper presented at DEER2 Conference, 26 October.
6. Daskalopoulos, E., Badr, O. & Probert, S.D. (1998) Municipal solid waste: a prediction methodology for the generation rate and composition in the European Union countries and the United States of America, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 24, pp. 155-166.
7. Duchin, F. (1998) Structural Economics: Measuring Change in Technology, Lifestyles, and the Environment (Washington, DC, Island Press).
8. Ebreo, A. & Vining, J. (2001) How similar are recycling and waste reduction? Future orientation and reasons for reducing waste as predictors of self-reported behavior, Environment and Behavior, 33(3), pp. 424-448.
9. Federal Communications Commission (1999) Digital Television (11/2/99) (http://www.fcc.gov/mmb/ vsd/files/descrip.html) (accessed 5 December 2000).
10. Felder, R.M. & Rousseau, R.W. (1999) Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, 3rd edition (New York, Wiley).
11. Gay, A.E., Beam, T.G. & Mar, B.W. (1993) Cost-effective solid-waste characterization methodology, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 119, pp. 631-644.
12. Georgia Environmental Protection Division (2000) Guidelines for Calculating Hazardous Waste Management Fees and Hazardous Substance Reporting Fees (www.dnr.state.ga.us/dnr/environ/) (accessed 19 July 2001).
13. Hainault, T., Smith, D.S., Cauchi, D.J., Thompson, D.A., Fisher, M.M. & Hetzel, C. (2001) Recycling Used Electronics: Report on Minnesota's Demonstration Project (www.moea.state.mn.us) (accessed 25 July 2001).
14. Hockett, D., Lober, D.J. & Pilgrim, K. (1995) Determination of per capita municipal solid waste generation in the southeastern United States, Journal of Environmental Management, 45, pp. 205-217.
15. Kleijn, R., Huele, R. & Voet, E. van der (2000) Dynamic substance flow analysis: the delaying mechanism of stocks, with the case of PVC in Sweden, Ecological Economics, 32, pp. 241-254.
16. Macauley, M., Palmer, K., Shih, J.S., Cline, S. & Holsinger, H. (2001) Modeling the Costs and Environmental Benefits of Disposal Options for End-of-life Electronic Equipment: The Case of Used Computer Monitors, Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 01-27 (www.rff.org) (accessed 10 August).
17. Mann, R.D. (1996) The economics of equipment recycling, Engineering Science and Education Journal, 5(4), pp. 170-177.
18. Marx-Gomez, J. & Rautenstrauch, C. (1999) Predicting the return of scrapped products through simulation - a case study, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Reuse (Eindhoven).
19. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (2000) A New Strategy for Discarded Computer Monitors and Televisions (http://www.state.ma.us/dep/recycle/crt/aboutcrt.htm) (accessed 15 February 2001).
20. McLaren, J., Wright, L., Parkinson, S. & Jackson, T. (1999) A dynamic life-cycle energy model of mobile phone take-back and recycling, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3, pp. 77-91.
21. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (1999) Managing Electronic Equipment, July 1999 (www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/pubs/4_15.pdf) (accessed 25 July 2001).
22. National Recycling Coalition (2001) Domestic Policy Initiatives and Voluntary Programs (http:// www.nrc-recycle.org/Programs/electronics/policy.htm) (accessed 13 February).
23. Northeast Recycling Council (2000) Recycling Economic Information Study (R. W. Beck, Inc.).
24. Northeast Recycling Council (2001) Amended NERC Used Electronics Recycling Market Development Policy Statement, Adopted May 23, 2001 (http://www.nerc.org/documents/amendedpolicystatement5- 23-01.html) (accessed 16 August).
25. Online Sunshine (2001) The 2001 Florida Statutes (www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes) (accessed 6 September).
26. Owens, J., Dickerson, S. & Macintosh, D.L. (2000) Demographic covariates of residential recycling efficiency, Recycling and Behavior, 32(5), pp. 637-650.
27. Ruston, J.F. & Denison, R.A. (1995) Advantage Recycle: Assessing the Full Costs and Benefits of Curbside Recycling (http://www.edf.org/pubs/Reports/advrec.html).
28. Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (1999) Just Say No to E-waste: Background Document on Hazards and Waste from Computers, 1999 (http://www.igc.org/svtc/cleancc/eccc.htm) (accessed 19 October 2000).
29. Slovinski, G. (1998) Demanufacturing: the emergence of an urban industry, Economic Development Quarterly, 12(3), pp. 238-247.
30. Smith, T. (2001) Poison PCs and Toxic TVs (www.svtc.org/cleancc/pubs/poisonpc.htm) (accessed 27 June).
31. Sterner, T. & Bartelings, H. (1999) Household waste management in a Swedish municipality: determinants of waste disposal, recycling and composting, Environmental and Resource Economics, 13, pp. 473-491.
32. Thorpe, B. and Kruszewska, I. (1999) Strategies to Promote Clean Production-Extended Producer Responsibility (www.igc.apc.org/svtc/cleancc/strat.htm) (accessed 13 November 2000).
33. TWICE: This Week in Consumer Electronics (2000) The Top 100 CE Retailers, 15(27), p. 12 (http:// ehostvgw18.epnet.com/delivery.asp) (accessed 22 October 2001).
34. Tucker, P. (1997) Accounting for spatial and temporal variabilities in household recycling schemes: a simulation approach, Journal of Environmental Systems, 26, pp. 365-390.
35. Tucker, P. & Speirs, D. (2001) A profile of recyclers making special trips to recycle, Journal of Environmental Management, 62, pp. 201-220.
36. Tucker, P., Murney, G. & Lamont, J. (1998a) Predicting recycling scheme performance: a process simulation approach, Journal of Environmental Management, 53, pp. 31-48.
37. Tucker, P., Murney, G. & Lamont, J. (1998b) A decision support model for the management of recycling schemes, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41, pp. 445-462.
38. US Bureau of the Census (1993) Computer Use and Ownership Data: October 1993 (http:// www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/computer/computer93.html).
39. US Bureau of the Census (1999) Computer Use in the United States: October 1997, Current Population Reports P20-522.
40. US Bureau of the Census (2001) "Home Computers and Internet Use in the United States: August 2000," by Eric C. Neuberger, Current Population Reports, P23-207, September 2001.
41. US Bureau of the Census & US Department of Labor (2000) Current Population Survey, Annual Demographic Survey: March Supplement 2000, Table HINC-01 Selected Characteristics of Households, by Total Money Income in 1999 (http://ferret.bls.census.gov/macro/032000/hhinc/new01_001.htm).
42. US Department of Housing and Urban Development (1999) The State of the Cities-1998 (http:// www.huduser.org/publications/polleg/tsoc98/tsoc_98.html) (accessed 14 March).
43. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1998) Residential Collection of Household End-of-life Electrical and Electronic Equipment Pilot Collection Program, EPA-901-R-0022.
44. USEPA (1999a) Analysis of Five Community Consumer/Residential Collections End-of-life Electronic and Electrical Equipment, EPA-901-R-98-003.
45. USEPA (1999b) Jobs through Recycling (www.epa.gov/jtr) (accessed February).
46. USEPA (1999c) Municipal Solid Waste Characterization Report, 1999 Update (www.epa.gov/osw).
47. USEPA (2001) Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Facts and Figures [http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/ non-hw/muncpl/hhw.htm#Figures] Accessed February 6, 2001.
48. Weiss, M.J. (1988) The Clustering of America (New York, Harper & Row).
49. Weiss, M.J. (2000) The Clustered World: How We Live, What We Buy, and What It All Means About Who We Are (New York, Little, Brown).